| Literature DB >> 34199310 |
Thomas Dippong1, Erika Andrea Levei2, Oana Cadar2.
Abstract
In the last decade, research on the synthesis and characterization of nanosized ferrites has highly increased and a wide range of new applications for these materials have been identified. The ability to tailor the structure, chemical, optical, magnetic, and electrical properties of ferrites by selecting the synthesis parameters further enhanced their widespread use. The paper reviews the synthesis methods and applications of MFe2O4 (M = Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, Zn) nanoparticles, with emphasis on the advantages and disadvantages of each synthesis route and main applications. Along with the conventional methods like sol-gel, thermal decomposition, combustion, co-precipitation, hydrothermal, and solid-state synthesis, several unconventional methods, like sonochemical, microwave assisted combustion, spray pyrolysis, spray drying, laser pyrolysis, microemulsion, reverse micelle, and biosynthesis, are also presented. MFe2O4 (M = Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, Zn) nanosized ferrites present good magnetic (high coercivity, high anisotropy, high Curie temperature, moderate saturation magnetization), electrical (high electrical resistance, low eddy current losses), mechanical (significant mechanical hardness), and chemical (chemical stability, rich redox chemistry) properties that make them suitable for potential applications in the field of magnetic and dielectric materials, photoluminescence, catalysis, photocatalysis, water decontamination, pigments, corrosion protection, sensors, antimicrobial agents, and biomedicine.Entities:
Keywords: applications; ferrites; magnetic nanoparticles; synthesis; transition metal
Year: 2021 PMID: 34199310 PMCID: PMC8231784 DOI: 10.3390/nano11061560
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Papers having M-ferrite (M = Co, Cu, Ni, Mn, Zn) in the topic published in Web of Science Core Collection between 1975–June 2021.
Figure 2Classification of nanoferrite synthesis methods.
Figure 3Application of nanosized ferrites.
Average crystallites size (D), saturation magnetization (MS), remanent magnetisation (MR), coercivity (HC) and anisotropy constant (K) of CoFe2O4, CuFe2O4, MnFe2O4, NiFe2O4, ZnFe2O4, produced by different synthesis methods; RT-room temperature.
| Ferrite | Synthesis Method | Temp. | Ref. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoFe2O4 | sol-gel | RT | 28.0 | 26.3 | 11.9 | 1.440 | 2.378 | [ |
| sol-gel auto-combustion | RT | 36.0 | 89.0 | 20.0 | 0.650 | - | [ | |
| sol-gel auto-combustion | RT | 52.0 | 65.6 | 71.9 | 1.117 | - | [ | |
| solid-state | RT | 80.0 | 77.2 | - | 0.525 | - | [ | |
| co-precipitation | RT | 17.3 | 78.6 | 15.8 | 0.778 | - | [ | |
| co-precipitation | RT | 37.0 | 72.6 | 34.5 | 1.060 | - | [ | |
| co-precipitation | RT | 11.70 | 58.4 | 12.45 | 0.286 | - | [ | |
| combustion | RT | 52.0 | 52.6 | 20.8 | 1.274 | - | [ | |
| hydrothermal | RT | 17.3 | 63.4 | 23.1 | 0.831 | 0.450 | [ | |
| hydrothermal | RT | 8.5 | 55.3 | - | 0.074 | - | [ | |
| hydrothermal | RT | 16.3 | 58.3 | - | 1.029 | - | [ | |
| normal micelles | RT | 5.58 | 12.6 | 0.17 | 0.0237 | - | [ | |
| reverse micelles | RT | 7.62 | 29.4 | 0.84 | 0.0252 | - | [ | |
| reverse micelle | RT | 6.00 | 34.4 | 8.50 | 0.500 | - | [ | |
| polyol | RT | 14.0 | 57.0 | 21.6 | 1.123 | - | [ | |
| thermal decomposition | RT | 13.0 | 68.0 | - | 0.560 | - | [ | |
| thermal decomposition | RT | 82.8 | 48.38 | 11.72 | 0.64 | - | [ | |
| CuFe2O4 | sol-gel | RT | 60.0 | 14.5 | 3.03 | 0.018 | 0.163 | [ |
| sol-gel | RT | 8.00 | 16.5 | 4.00 | 0.450 | - | [ | |
| sol-gel auto-combustion | RT | 18.6 | 78.9 | 35.9 | 0.705 | 0.569 | [ | |
| solid-state | RT | 38.0 | 27.1 | 1.41 | 0.112 | - | [ | |
| co-precipitation | RT | 31.0 | 22.9 | 1.12 | 0.114 | - | [ | |
| co-precipitation | RT | 52.0 | 28.1 | 8.52 | 0.189 | - | [ | |
| combustion | RT | 22.3 | 14.0 | 0.17 | 0.006 | - | [ | |
| auto-combustion | RT | 22.0 | 18.9 | 1.51 | 0.140 | - | [ | |
| thermal decomposition | RT | 53.0 | 29.0 | 0.91 | 0.102 | - | [ | |
| thermal decomposition | RT | 10–250 | 0.90 | - | 0.600 | - | [ | |
| sonochemical | RT | 40.0 | 21.5 | 12.6 | 0.235 | - | [ | |
| MnFe2O4 | sol-gel | RT | 49.0 | 28.5 | 14.8 | 0.119 | 3.392 | [ |
| co-precipitation | RT | 6.10 | 13.5 | 1.24 | 0.046 | - | [ | |
| hydrothermal | RT | 22.0 | 65.5 | 3.86 | 0.054 | 0.018 | [ | |
| hydrothermal | RT | 15.9 | 52.4 | - | 43.9 | - | [ | |
| hydrothermal | RT | 25.4 | 67.3 | - | 0.173 | - | [ | |
| polyol | RT | 7.10 | 51.9 | - | - | - | [ | |
| sonochemical | RT | 25.5 | 59.4 | 3.41 | 0.024 | 1.53 | [ | |
| microwave combustion | RT | 27.9 | 61.0 | 11.4 | 0.064 | - | [ | |
| thermal decomposition | RT | 61.0 | 56.0 | 10.0 | 0.08 | - | [ | |
| NiFe2O4 | sol-gel | RT | 23.0 | 20.1 | 6.82 | 0.061 | 0.770 | [ |
| sol-gel | RT | 70.0 | 37.3 | - | 0.321 | - | [ | |
| sol-gel auto-combustion | RT | 58.0 | 50.0 | 7.00 | 0.050 | - | [ | |
| co-precipitation | RT | 17.3 | 43.9 | 16.6 | 0.051 | - | [ | |
| combustion | RT | 25.0 | 30.2 | 4.00 | 0.159 | - | [ | |
| microwave combustion | RT | 18.5 | 37.9 | 2.57 | 0.016 | - | [ | |
| hydrothermal | RT | 8.20 | 31.9 | - | 0.007 | - | [ | |
| thermal decomposition | RT | 25.0 | 36.5 | 10.6 | 0.263 | - | [ | |
| thermal decomposition | RT | 79.0 | 43.60 | 17.63 | 0.645 | - | [ | |
| thermal decomposition | RT | 10.7 | 36.8 | - | - | - | [ | |
| ZnFe2O4 | sol-gel | RT | 49.0 | 10.8 | 1.67 | 0.015 | 0.102 | [ |
| sol-gel auto-combustion | RT | 54.0 | 5.31 | 0.08 | 0.113 | - | [ | |
| solid-state | RT | 80.0 | 77.27 | - | 0.525 | - | [ | |
| co-precipitation | RT | 4.80 | 11.9 | 0.01 | 0.004 | - | [ | |
| microwave combustion | RT | 37.5 | 2.60 | 0.01 | 0.007 | - | [ | |
| microwave combustion | RT | 21.1 | 3.85 | 0.51 | 0.010 | - | [ | |
| hydrothermal | RT | 15.9 | 52.4 | - | 0.044 | - | [ | |
| solvothermal | RT | 80.0 | 77.0 | - | 0.090 | - | [ | |
| reverse micelle | RT | 8.30 | 4.90 | 0.01 | 0.010 | - | [ | |
| thermal decomposition | RT | 30.0 | 12.8 | - | - | - | [ |