| Literature DB >> 24784036 |
Hamid Farahani1, Rahman Wagiran2, Mohd Nizar Hamidon3.
Abstract
Humidity measurement is one of the most significant issues in various areas of applications such as instrumentation, automated systems, agriculture, climatology and GIS. Numerous sorts of humidity sensors fabricated and developed for industrial and laboratory applications are reviewed and presented in this article. The survey frequently concentrates on the RH sensors based upon their organic and inorganic functional materials, e.g., porous ceramics (semiconductors), polymers, ceramic/polymer and electrolytes, as well as conduction mechanism and fabrication technologies. A significant aim of this review is to provide a distinct categorization pursuant to state of the art humidity sensor types, principles of work, sensing substances, transduction mechanisms, and production technologies. Furthermore, performance characteristics of the different humidity sensors such as electrical and statistical data will be detailed and gives an added value to the report. By comparison of overall prospects of the sensors it was revealed that there are still drawbacks as to efficiency of sensing elements and conduction values. The flexibility offered by thick film and thin film processes either in the preparation of materials or in the choice of shape and size of the sensor structure provides advantages over other technologies. These ceramic sensors show faster response than other types.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24784036 PMCID: PMC4063076 DOI: 10.3390/s140507881
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
The state-of-the-art of humidity sensors based on fabrication technologies and sensing materials.
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional Ceramic/Semiconductor Processing | Available | Not Available | Available | Low | Simple, and Bulk Application | |
| Thick Film, LTCC | Not Available | Available | Available | Medium | Signal Drift | |
| Thin Film | Not Available | Available | Available | Medium | Hysteresis | |
| p-n Heterojunction | Not Available | Not Available | Available | Medium- High | In Progress | |
|
| ||||||
| Solid Moisture (Al2O3) | Not Available | Not Available | Available | Medium- Low | Versatile | |
| Chilled Mirror Dew/Frost Point | Not Available | Not Available | Not Available | High | Complex | |
Examples of the different relative humidity sensors based upon the technologies and specifications.
|
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||||
| Not Available | Not Available | Available | Available | Available | Available | Ceramic | Ceramic | 29,31,33*,34,40*,44,51,58,59, 60*,61*,62,64,69*,86,182–192, 203,206,208-211,214,215,218, 221,224,225,259–262,267–278, 297,298,301,305,307. | 44,69*, 211, 224,344. | ||
|
| |||||||||||
| Hybrid | 308,317,318. | - | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| Available | Not Available | Not Available | Not Available | Available | Not Available | - | Electrolyte | 47,52. | - | ||
|
| |||||||||||
| Not Available | Available | Available | Available | Available | Available | Ceramic | Polymer | 49,54,98,166. | 321,330,340. | ||
|
| |||||||||||
| Ceramic | 30,32,36,48,49,95,178,207,216, 220,222,226,228,237–258, 263–266,279,280,299,300, 302–304, 306. | 368. | |||||||||
| Hybrid |
| ||||||||||
| - | - | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| Not Available | Available | Available | Available | Available | Available | Ceramic | Polymer | 28,46,47,49,53,99, 105–108,113–137, 141–146,147–165,175. | 46,47,49,55, 105,111,323, 325–329, 331–359. | ||
|
| |||||||||||
| Ceramic | 26,34,42,47,48,49,56,57, 69,91,96,100–104,179, 180,193,194,196,204,205, 212,219,227–231,245,281–296. | 47,49,57,212,323,325–327, 360–367, 369–372. | |||||||||
| Hybrid |
| ||||||||||
| 27,37,41,138–140,167–174, 309,310,312–316,319. | 27,37,322. | ||||||||||
Figure 1.Proton conduction of the H-bonded networks between water molecules [74]. The express substitution of hydrogen (H+) between hydronium cation (H3O+) and water molecule (H2O) without diffusive action of an individual hydrogen or oxygen atom.
Figure 2.Proton transfer mechanism of hydroxide ions [75].
Figure 3.Adsorption sites on the silica surfaces, and formation of hydroxyl pairs to hold water molecules [87].
Figure 4.Illustration of water vapour chemisorption and hydroxyl layers on the surface of SnO2.
Figure 5.Multilayer structure of adsorbed water vapour molecules on the surface of iron oxide [83].
Figure 6.Layout of nanocrystalline ceramic with the different superficial components.
Figure 7.Sketch of a planar thick/thin film-based humidity sensor based on the interdigitated structure with the porous sensing element.
Figure 8.Schematic view of the ‘Hument HPR’ type humidity sensor [47].
Figure 9.Construction sketch of MgCr2O4-TiO2 ceramic humidity sensor [86].
Figure 10.Configuration of ‘Humicape’ humidity sensor.