| Literature DB >> 34198942 |
Shih-Jie Jhuo1,2, I-Hsin Liu1, Wei-Chung Tasi1,2,3, Te-Wu Chou1, Yi-Hsiung Lin1,4, Bin-Nan Wu2, Kun-Tai Lee1,2, Wen-Ter Lai1.
Abstract
Empagliflozin (EMPA) is a sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor that functions as a new-generation glucose-lowering agent and has been proven to be beneficial for patients with cardiovascular diseases. However, the possible benefits and mechanisms of its antiarrhythmic effects in cardiac tissue have not yet been reported. In this study, we elucidated the possible antiarrhythmic effects and mechanisms of EMPA treatment in cardiac tissues of metabolic syndrome (MS) mice. A total of 20 C57BL/6J mice (age: 8 weeks) were divided into four groups: (1) control group, mice fed a standard chow for 16 weeks; (2) MS group, mice fed a high-fat diet for 16 weeks; (3) EMPA group, mice fed a high-fat diet for 12 weeks and administered EMPA at 10 mg/kg daily for the following 4 weeks; and (4) glibenclamide (GLI) group, mice fed a high-fat diet for 12 weeks and administered GLI at 0.6 mg/kg daily for the following 4 weeks. All mice were sacrificed after 16 weeks of feeding. The parameters of electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography, and the effective refractory period (ERP) of the left ventricle were recorded. The histological characteristics of cardiac tissue, including connexin (Cx) expression and fibrotic areas, were also evaluated. Compared with the MS group, the ECG QT interval in the EMPA group was significantly shorter (57.06 ± 3.43 ms vs. 50.00 ± 2.62 ms, p = 0.011). The ERP of the left ventricle was also significantly shorter in the EMPA group than that in the GLI group (20.00 ± 10.00 ms vs. 60.00 ± 10.00 ms, p = 0.001). The expression of Cx40 and Cx43 in ventricular tissue was significantly lower in the MS group than in the control group. However, the downregulation of Cx40 and Cx43 was significantly attenuated in the EMPA group compared with the MS and GLI groups. The fibrotic areas of ventricular tissue were also fewer in the EMPA group than that in the MS group. In this study, the ECG QT interval in the EMPA group was shorter than that in the MS group. Compared with the MS group, the EMPA group exhibited significant attenuation of downregulated connexin expression and significantly fewer fibrotic areas in ventricles. These results may provide evidence of possible antiarrhythmic effects of EMPA.Entities:
Keywords: SGLT2; antiarrhythmic; cardiac remodeling; connexin; empagliflozin; fibrosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34198942 PMCID: PMC8200966 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22116105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Characteristics of the study groups after 16 weeks of feeding.
| Control | MS | EMPA | GLI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (g) | 29.58 ± 0.46 | 44.62 ± 3.13 * | 37.08 ± 3.30 *,# | 44.46 ± 3.05 *,† |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dL) | 164.10 ± 34.35 | 232.72 ± 48.4 * | 200.23 ± 13.74 | 211.62 ± 28.66 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 47.5 ± 2.65 | 115.60 ± 13.09 * | 99.75 ± 15.69 * | 133.00 ± 4.24 *,#,† |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 2.55 ± 0.17 | 5.35 ± 0.29 * | 5.12 ± 0.95 * | 7.15 ± 1.84 * |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 20.45 ± 2.37 | 45.12 ± 3.59 * | 33.63 ± 9.52 *,# | 51.53 ± 2.01 *,#,† |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 11.50 ± 1.73 | 20.80 ± 2.95 * | 17.25 ± 8.02 | 19.00 ± 2.31 * |
MS: metabolic syndrome group; EMPA: metabolic syndrome with empagliflozin therapy group; GLI: metabolic syndrome with glibenclamide therapy group; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; *: p value < 0.05 compared with the control group; #: p value < 0.05 compared with the MS group; †: p value < 0.05 compared with the EMPA group.
Characteristics of echocardiography in the study groups.
| Control | MS | EMPA | GLI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RVDd (mm) | 1.08 ± 0.26 | 1.03 ± 0.08 | 0.94 ± 0.14 | 0.96 ± 0.16 |
| IVSd (mm) | 0.67 ± 0.06 | 0.72 ± 0.06 | 0.74 ± 0.08 | 0.66 ± 0.03 |
| LVIDd (mm) | 2.81 ± 0.28 | 2.85 ± 0.09 | 2.73 ± 0.21 | 2.76 ± 0.12 |
| LVPWd (mm) | 0.79 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.16 | 0.81 ± 0.06 | 0.79 ± 0.09 |
| IVSs (mm) | 0.84 ± 0.09 | 0.96 ± 0.09 | 0.90 ± 0.06 | 0.98 ± 0.11 |
| LVIDs (mm) | 1.81 ± 0.22 | 1.67 ± 0.30 | 1.63 ± 0.17 | 1.75 ± 0.34 |
| LVPWs (mm) | 0.84 ± 0.13 | 1.00 ± 0.17 | 0.98 ± 0.07 | 0.90 ± 0.14 |
| Ejection fraction (%) | 58.39 ± 6.93 | 64.71 ± 12.94 | 64.31 ± 2.97 | 59.23 ± 13.06 |
RVDd: right ventricular diameter at end-diastole; IVSd: interventricular septal thickness at end-diastole; LVIDd: left ventricular internal diameter at end-diastole; LVPWd: left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end-diastole; IVSs: interventricular septal thickness at end-systole; LVIDs: left ventricular internal diameter at end-systole; LVPWs: left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end-systole.
Figure 1B-mode and M-mode images for the measurement of the dimensions of interventricular septal thickness at end-diastole (IVSd), left ventricular internal diameter at end-diastole (LVIDd), left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end-diastole (LVPWd), interventricular septal thickness at end-systole (IVSs), left ventricular diameter at end-systole (LVIDs), and left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end-systole (LVPWs) among the study groups (n = 5 for each group).
ECG parameters and effective refractory periods (ERPs) of the study groups.
| Control | MS | EMPA | GLI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QRS wave duration (ms) | 24.27 ± 2.04 | 23.73 ± 2.55 | 22.13 ± 2.24 | 23.33 ± 3.83 |
| RR interval (ms) | 144.06 ± 14.87 | 146.67 ± 21.05 | 140.40 ± 23.18 | 142.73 ± 17.91 |
| QT interval (ms) | 53.66 ± 2.32 | 57.06 ± 3.43 | 50.00 ± 2.62 # | 56.87 ± 4.04 |
| QTc interval (ms) | 142.29 ± 9.58 | 149.47 ± 8.25 | 134.15 ± 6.72 | 150.86 ± 9.47 |
| ERP of right ventricle (ms) | 35.00 ± 10.00 | 40.00 ± 14.14 | 47.50 ± 5.00 | 48.00 ± 13.04 |
| ERP of left ventricle (ms) | 35.00 ± 10.00 | 38.00 ± 4.47 | 20.00 ± 10.00 | 60.00 ± 10.00 † |
| Induced VT/VF mice | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
QTc: corrected QT interval; ERP: effective refractory period; VT: ventricular tachycardia; VF: ventricular fibrillation; #: p < 0.05 compared with the MS group; †: p < 0.05 compared with the EMPA group.
Figure 2An example of measuring characteristics of electrocardiography (ECG) in the ventricles among the study groups (n = 5 for each group). The dashed lines indicate measurements of the QRS wave duration, RR interval, and QT interval.
Figure 3Histological analysis of Cx40 in mouse ventricular tissue. (A) Confocal image of ventricles Cx40 immunofluorescence stain in the left ventricle (LV) (left panel) and the right ventricle (RV) (right panel) among the study groups (n = 5 for each group). Blue for DAPI (cell nucleus) staining, red for WGA (cell membrane) staining, and green for Cx40-positive staining. The scale bars indicate 10 μm. (Magnification: 1000×.) (B) The quantification of Cx40 expression integrated from a series of confocal image sections in the ventricles among the study groups. (C) IHC staining of Cx40 in mouse ventricles of each group. Blue for cell nucleus stain and brown for Cx40-positive stain. (Magnification: 100× and 400×.) *: p < 0.05 compared with the control group; #: p < 0.05 compared with the MS group; $: p < 0.05 compared with the EMPA group.
Figure 4Histological analysis of Cx43 expression in mouse ventricles. (A) Immunofluorescence of Cx43 confocal image in the LV (left panel) and the RV (right panel) among the study groups (n = 5 for each group). Nuclei with DAPI staining appear blue. The plasma membrane with WGA staining appears red, and green for Cx43-positive staining. The scale bars indicate 10 μm. (B)The quantification of Cx43 signaling integrated from a series of confocal image sections in ventricles among the study groups. (C) IHC staining of Cx43 in mouse ventricles of each group. Blue is used for cell nucleus staining and brown for Cx43-positive staining. *: p < 0.05 compared with the control group; #: p < 0.05 compared with the MS group; $: p < 0.05 compared with the EMPA group.
Figure 5(A) Histological fibrotic images of ventricles among the study groups (n = 5 for each group) as determined by Mason’s trichrome staining. Bar graphs of fibrotic areas in ventricles. (B) In the LV, the fibrotic areas in the MS were significantly increased compared with that in the control group. The fibrotic areas of the EMPA and GLI groups were significantly fewer than those in the MS group. (C) In the RV, the fibrotic areas in the MS, EMPA, and GLI groups were increased compared with those in the control group. The fibrotic areas in the EMPA group were still significantly fewer than those in the MS group. *: p < 0.05 compared with the control group; #: p < 0.05 compared with the MS group.