| Literature DB >> 30710997 |
Chenguang Li1, Jie Zhang1, Mei Xue1, Xiaoyu Li1, Fei Han1, Xiangyang Liu1, Linxin Xu1, Yunhong Lu1, Ying Cheng1, Ting Li1, Xiaochen Yu1, Bei Sun2, Liming Chen3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperglycaemia associated with myocardial oxidative stress and fibrosis is the main cause of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor has recently been reported to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes in an insulin-independent manner. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of empagliflozin on myocardium injury and the potential mechanism in type 2 diabetic KK-Ay mice.Entities:
Keywords: Empagliflozin; Myocardial fibrosis; Oxidative stress; SGLT2; Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30710997 PMCID: PMC6359811 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-019-0816-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Weight gain, and blood and serum parameters after 8 weeks of treatment in control and diabetic mice
| Con (n = 15) | DM (n = 15) | DM + EM (n = 15) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 25.46 ± 0.70 | 33.61 ± 1.40* | 32.17 ± 1.23* | < 0.001 |
| Body weight gain (g) | 5.32 ± 0.64 | 8.05 ± 0.64* | 6.61 ± 0.42*# | < 0.001 |
| Heart weight (mg) | 130.45 ± 5.81 | 152.37 ± 6.26* | 149.13 ± 7.87* | < 0.001 |
| Heart weight/Tibial length (mg/mm) | 7.73 ± 0.25 | 8.72 ± 0.32* | 8.42 ± 0.27* | < 0.001 |
| Blood glucose (mmol/L, fasting) | 6.38 ± 0.27 | 18.83 ± 1.17* | 9.27 ± 0.76*# | < 0.001 |
| Blood glucose (mmol/L, non-fasting) | 8.26 ± 0.38 | 26.39 ± 1.38* | 12.51 ± 1.08*# | < 0.001 |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 22.93 ± 2.82 | 94.71 ± 6.52* | 39.57 ± 4.95*# | < 0.001 |
| Insulin (μg/L) | 1.71 ± 0.22 | 4.92 ± 0.43* | 2.69 ± 0.51*# | < 0.001 |
| TC (mg/dL) | 87.59 ± 3.66 | 215.89 ± 14.08* | 216.35 ± 15.67* | < 0.001 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 32.76 ± 2.29 | 73.16 ± 6.51* | 75.71 ± 4.71* | < 0.001 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 40.59 ± 4.92 | 63.54 ± 6.35* | 62.12 ± 5.96* | < 0.001 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 94.24 ± 6.25 | 314.87 ± 24.10* | 310.47 ± 25.67* | < 0.001 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD
TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein
*P < 0.05 vs. Con; #P < 0.05 vs. DM
Fig. 1Left ventricular echocardiographic representative images
Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricle structural and functional data in mice
| Con (n = 15) | DM (n = 15) | DM + EM (n = 15) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart rate (bpm) | 473.13 ± 24.31 | 421.22 ± 20.35* | 465.60 ± 22.82# | < 0.001 |
| LVIDd (mm) | 3.43 ± 0.31 | 2.94 ± 0.23* | 3.33 ± 0.28# | < 0.001 |
| LVIDs (mm) | 2.33 ± 0.17 | 2.22 ± 0.15 | 2.05 ± 0.17 | 0.059 |
| IVSd (mm) | 1.05 ± 0.08 | 1.06 ± 0.06 | 0.94 ± 0.08*# | 0.005 |
| IVSs (mm) | 1.35 ± 0.07 | 1.36 ± 0.08 | 1.31 ± 0.09 | 0.815 |
| LV mass (mg) | 92.60 ± 9.75 | 74.23 ± 8.53* | 86.49 ± 9.12*# | < 0.001 |
| LV mass/BW (mg/g) | 3.65 ± 0.44 | 2.21 ± 0.25* | 2.69 ± 0.30*# | < 0.001 |
| EF (%) | 70.26 ± 5.46 | 60.22 ± 6.62* | 73.73 ± 5.79# | < 0.001 |
| FS (%) | 33.08 ± 3.12 | 23.14 ± 2.37* | 37.22 ± 3.25*# | < 0.001 |
| FAC (%) | 70.42 ± 7.72 | 54.27 ± 7.49* | 71.38 ± 7.69# | < 0.001 |
| E/A | 1.73 ± 0.24 | 1.22 ± 0.15* | 1.70 ± 0.24# | < 0.001 |
Data are presented as the mean ± SD. P values were calculated using a one-way analysis of variance test and LSD test was used for multiple comparisons. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD
LVIDd LV internal diastolic diameter, LVIDs LV internal systolic diameter, IVSd interventricular septal width during end-diastole, IVSs systolic interventricular septal thickness, LV left ventricle, BW body weight, EF ejection fraction, FS fractional shortening, FAC fractional area change, E/A ratio between early (E)-to-late (A) diastolic mitral inflow
*P < 0.05 vs. Con; #P < 0.05 vs. DM
Fig. 2Effect of empagliflozin on oxidative stress in the cardiac tissue homogenate. Lipid hydroperoxide (a), glutathione peroxidase (b), superoxide dismutase (c), malondialdehyde (d), Western blotting analysis of NOX4 in the mice myocardium (e, f). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 vs. Con; #P < 0.05 vs. DM
Fig. 3Empagliflozin suppresses matrix accumulation and myocardial fibrosis in DM mice. Immunostaining of TGF-β1, collagen I and collagen III protein expression and Masson’s trichrome staining of the myocardium (a). The percentages of positive areas of TGF-β1 (b), collagen I (c), collagen III (d) and connective tissue fraction (e). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 vs. Con; #P < 0.05 vs. DM
Fig. 4Effect of empagliflozin on Nrf2/ARE and TGF-β/SMAD pathway in vivo. a Western blot analysis for the expression of TGF-β/SMAD pathway was performed on protein isolated from the hearts of the three groups. b Western blot analysis for the expression of Nrf2/ARE pathway of heart tissue in mice. c The relative protein levels were calculated and Lamin B was used as an internal control. d The relative protein levels were calculated and β-actin was used as an internal control. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 vs. Con; #P < 0.05 vs. DM