| Literature DB >> 34198905 |
Małgorzata Kałużna1, Bartłomiej Budny1, Michał Rabijewski2, Jarosław Kałużny3, Agnieszka Dubiel4, Małgorzata Trofimiuk-Müldner4, Elżbieta Wrotkowska1, Alicja Hubalewska-Dydejczyk4, Marek Ruchała1, Katarzyna Ziemnicka1.
Abstract
Kallmann syndrome (KS) is a combination of isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) with olfactory dysfunction, representing a heterogeneous disorder with a broad phenotypic spectrum. The genetic background of KS has not yet been fully established. This study was conducted on 46 Polish KS subjects (41 males, 5 females; average age: 29 years old). The studied KS patients were screened for defects in a 38-gene panel with next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. The analysis revealed 27 pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants, and 21 variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The P/LP variants were detected in 20 patients (43.5%). The prevalence of oligogenic P/LP defects in selected genes among KS patients was 26% (12/46), whereas the co-occurrence of other variants was detected in 43% (20 probands). The examined KS patients showed substantial genotypic and phenotypic variability. A marked difference in non-reproductive phenotypes, involving defects in genes responsible for GnRH neuron development/migration and genes contributing to pituitary development and signaling, was observed. A comprehensive gene panel for IHH testing enabled the detection of clinically relevant variants in the majority of KS patients, which makes targeted NGS an effective molecular tool. The significance of oligogenicity and the high incidence of alterations in selected genes should be further elucidated.Entities:
Keywords: GnRH neuron; Kallmann syndrome (KS); anosmia; combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD); hyposmia; isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH); next-generation sequencing (NGS)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34198905 PMCID: PMC8229512 DOI: 10.3390/genes12060868
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
KS patients with genetic defects in primary GnRH neuron development/migration.
| Patient No. | Stage | Variant HGVS | MAF | ACMG Classification | Anosmia/Hyposmia | Cryptorchidism | Associated Defects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Anosmia | Bilateral | Bimanual synkinesis; left kidney agenesis |
|
|
|
|
|
| Anosmia | Right testis | Bimanual synkinesis; right kidney agenesis |
|
|
|
|
|
| Anosmia | Bilateral | Bilateral duplex pelvicalyceal system |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hyposmia | No | NA |
|
|
|
|
|
| Anosmia | Bilateral | Cleft lip and palate |
| Pituitary dev. and signalling | GLI2 p.D1520N (c.4558G>A) | 0.00935 | Benign | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Hyposmia | Bilateral | NA |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hyposmia | Bilateral | Double pyelum in the left kidney; myopia (8 dptr) |
| GnRH neuron migration | CHD7 p.E1478= (c.4434A>G) | NR | Likely benign | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Anosmia | No | Dental agenesis (lateral jaw’s incisors) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Anosmia | No | Sandal gap deformity |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Anosmia | No | NA |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Anosmia | No | Left kidney agenesis; splenomegaly |
| GnRH neuron development | HS6ST1 p.K67* (c.199A>T) | 0.00624 | Benign | ||||
| Pituitary dev. and signalling | LHX4 p.D128= (c.384C>T) | 0.00864 | Benign | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Hyposmia | No | Syndactyly of the toes |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hyposmia | Right testis | Choanal atresia; clinodactyly; spina bifida (L5) |
| Pituitary dev. and signalling | LHX4 p.D128= (c.384C>T) | 0.00864 | Benign | ||||
| 14 | GnRH neuron migration | CHD7 p.R947Q (c.2840G>A) | 0.0000763 | Uncertain significance | Anosmia | Bilateral | Micropenis; pre-auricular fistula; discoloration of the hair on the temple; brachydactyly |
| 15 | GnRH neuron migration | CHD7 p.M340V (c.1018A>G) | 0.00462 | Benign | Hyposmia | No | NA |
| 16 | GnRH neuron development | WDR11 p.M769V (c.2305A>G) | 0.000565 | Uncertain significance | Anosmia | Right testis | NA |
| GnRH neuron migration | PROKR2 p.R268C (c.802C>T) | 0.00391 | Benign | ||||
| 17 | GnRH neuron development | FGF8 intronic (c.445-62G>T) | 0.0000957 | Uncertain significance | Anosmia | Migrating testis | NA |
| 18 | GnRH neuron development | FGF8 intronic (c.445-62G>T) | 0.0000957 | Uncertain significance | Anosmia | No | Intellectual disability |
| 19 | GnRH neuron development | FGF8 p.P26L (c.77C>T) | 0.00115 | Uncertain significance | Hyposmia | No | Bimanual synkinesis |
| 20 | GnRH neuron development | HS6ST1 p.R249S (c.745C>A) | 0.0074 | Uncertain significance | Anosmia | Right testis | NA |
| GnRH neuron development | HS6ST1 p.D87E (c.261C>A) | 0.01’ | Uncertain significance | ||||
| 21 | GnRH neuron development | HS6ST1 p.R249S (c.745C>A) | 0.0074 | Uncertain significance | Anosmia | Right testis | Micropenis; syndactyly of toes |
| GnRH neuron development | HS6ST1 p.D87E (c.261C>A) | 0.01’ | Uncertain significance | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Anosmia | Right testis | Bimanual synkinesis |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Pituitary dev. and signalling | GNRHR p.Ser151 = (c.453C>T) | 0.0755 | Uncertain significance | ||||
| 23 | GnRH neuron development | WDR11 p.M769V (c.2305A>G) | 0.000565 | Uncertain significance | Anosmia | No | NA |
MAF: minor allele frequency; *: STOP codon; NR: not reported; ND: no data (neither results from the past nor information from the patient); NA: no abnormalities; variant frequency unclear because it falls within a segmental duplication region with inbreeding coefficient suspicion according to GnomAD; pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants are in bold.
KS patients with genetic defects in hypothalamic/pituitary development and signaling.
| Patient No. | Stage | Variant HGVS | MAF | ACMG Classification | Anosmia/Hyposmia | Cryptorchidism | Associated Defects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hyposmia | No | NA |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Pituitary dev. and signalling | PCSK1 intronic (c.544-43T>G) | NR | Uncertain significance | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Hyposmia | No | NA |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| GnRH neuron migration | CHD7 p.K683_T684insAK (c.2053_2058dupGCAAAA) | 0.00623 | Uncertain significance | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Anosmia | ND | Incomplete rotation of the right kidney |
|
|
|
|
|
| Anosmia | ND | NA |
| GnRH neuron development | WDR11 p.P475= (c.1425G>A) | 0.00275 | Benign | ||||
| 28 | Hypothalamic signalling | GNRH1 p.E47D (c.141G>C) | 0.00153 | Uncertain significance | Anosmia | No | Micropenis |
| Hypothalamic signalling | GNRH1 p.F65= (c.183C>T) | 0.00524 | Uncertain significance | ||||
| 29 | Hypothalamic signalling | GNRH1 p.F65= (c.183C>T) | 0.00524 | Uncertain significance | Hyposmia | ND | NA |
|
|
|
|
|
| Anosmia | No | Micropenis |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 31 | Pituitary dev. and signalling | GLI2 p.L1488F (c.4464G>T) | 0.0000676 | Uncertain significance | Hyposmia | No | NA |
| Pituitary dev. and signalling | PITX2 p.T38= (c.114G>T) | 0.000032 | Likely benign | ||||
| 32 | Pituitary dev. and signalling | GLI2 p.G1006= (c.3018C>T) | 0.00429 | Benign | Anosmia | ND | Strabismus; oligodontia; ptosis; VSD |
| 33 | Pituitary dev. and signalling | GLI2 p.G1006= (c.3018C>T) | 0.00429 | Benign | Anosmia | ND | Strabismus; oligodontia; ptosis; VSD |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hyposmia | No | NA |
| 35 | Pituitary dev. and signalling | POLR3B p.T682A (c.2044A>G) | NR | Uncertain significance | Anosmia | No | NA |
| 36 | Pituitary dev. and signalling | NR0B1 p.S148N (c.443G>A) | NR | Uncertain significance | Anosmia | No | Abdominal hernia |
| GnRH neuron migration | PROKR2 p.S130= (c.390C>T) | 0.000529 | Uncertain significance | ||||
| 37 | Pituitary dev. and signalling | LRRIQ3 p.R227C (c.679C>T) | 0.000748 | Uncertain significance | Hyposmia | No | NA |
| 38 | Pituitary dev. and signalling | LHX4 p.D128= (c.384C>T) | 0.00864 | Benign | Anosmia | Bilateral | NA |
| 39 | Pituitary dev. and signalling | LHX4 p.D128= (c.384C>T) | 0.00864 | Benign | Anosmia | No | NA |
| GnRH neuron migration | CHD7p.S103T (c.307T>A) | 0.0123 | Benign | ||||
| 40 | Pituitary dev. and signalling | LHX3 p.Q41= (c.123G>A) | 0.0111 | Benign | Anosmia | Bilateral | NA |
MAF: minor allele frequency; *: STOP codon; NR: not reported; ND: no data (neither results from the past nor information from the patient); NA: no abnormalities; variant frequency unclear because it falls within a segmental duplication region with inbreeding coefficient suspicion according to GnomAD; pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants are in bold.
Figure 1Histograms showing the prevalence of mutations among KS patients, which are classified by three metrics: (A) mutation severity (ACMG criteria: pathogenic/likely pathogenic, VUS variant of unknown significance, benign/likely benign); (B) oligogenicity; (C) novelty.
Figure 2Modelling and prediction of conformational changes of selected HS6ST1 and PROKR2 variants. Predicted conformational changes surrounding variant positions are highlighted and indicated with arrows. Ribbon models of reference HS6ST1 and PROKR2 are shown on the left side.