| Literature DB >> 34198623 |
Yu-Chia Chang1,2, Te-Feng Yeh3, I-Ju Lai4, Cheng-Chia Yang1.
Abstract
This study investigated the influences of nursing assistants' job competency on their intrinsic and extrinsic satisfaction and intention to stay in the profession of long-term care institutions. Understanding the relationship between job competency and job satisfaction, both intrinsic and extrinsic, would enable institutions to strengthen service workers' intention to stay and to retain essential personnel. This study was a cross-sectional study in which nursing assistants from 26 nursing homes and 15 elderly welfare institutions in Taiwan. The relationship between job competency and intention to stay was discovered to be significantly mediated by intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction. Given the staff shortages and difficulty retaining staff in long-term care environments, organizations must be able to strengthen employees' intention to stay; one suggestion is to improve the employees' competency, because higher competency results in higher quality of care and greater extrinsic job satisfaction. Furthermore, greater job competency is more likely to result in affirmation and accomplishment, both of which increase intrinsic job satisfaction and thus positively influence intention to stay.Entities:
Keywords: extrinsic job satisfaction; intention to stay; intrinsic job satisfaction; job competency; nursing assistants
Year: 2021 PMID: 34198623 PMCID: PMC8296268 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126436
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Reliability and convergent validity of the reflective metrics.
| Dimension | Variable | Loading | T-Value | CR | AVE | α Value | VIF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-term care support and services | Self1 | 0.864 | 53.928 | 0.898 | 0.688 | 0.849 | 2.489 |
| Self2 | 0.828 | 36.829 | 2.262 | ||||
| Self3 | 0.806 | 36.015 | 1.897 | ||||
| Self4 | 0.819 | 33.477 | 1.912 | ||||
| Support daily living | Sub1 | 0.723 | 23.764 | 0.880 | 0.595 | 0.829 | 1.449 |
| Sub2 | 0.801 | 32.910 | 1.834 | ||||
| Sub3 | 0.790 | 31.236 | 1.750 | ||||
| Sub4 | 0.752 | 23.639 | 1.659 | ||||
| Sub5 | 0.787 | 30.305 | 1.712 | ||||
| Crisis prevention and | BE1 | 0.833 | 35.182 | 0.888 | 0.664 | 0.849 | 1.944 |
| BE2 | 0.865 | 53.66 | 2.123 | ||||
| BE3 | 0.793 | 30.116 | 1.684 | ||||
| BE4 | 0.766 | 22.796 | 1.568 | ||||
| Ethics | Eth1 | 0.872 | 52.974 | 0.924 | 0.710 | 0.898 | 3.197 |
| Eth2 | 0.849 | 44.485 | 2.823 | ||||
| Eth3 | 0.858 | 46.891 | 2.614 | ||||
| Eth4 | 0.815 | 37.159 | 2.080 | ||||
| Eth5 | 0.817 | 29.521 | 2.278 | ||||
| Patient health and safety | Heal1 | 0.849 | 43.785 | 0.876 | 0.702 | 0.787 | 1.835 |
| Heal2 | 0.861 | 44.928 | 1.893 | ||||
| Heal3 | 0.801 | 35.664 | 1.443 | ||||
| Intrinsic satisfaction | IS1 | 0.750 | 28.564 | 0.945 | 0.588 | 0.936 | 2.442 |
| IS1 | 0.760 | 29.214 | 2.467 | ||||
| IS2 | 0.750 | 25.273 | 2.302 | ||||
| IS3 | 0.810 | 41.448 | 2.627 | ||||
| IS4 | 0.733 | 23.300 | 2.164 | ||||
| IS5 | 0.794 | 36.666 | 2.526 | ||||
| IS6 | 0.641 | 17.457 | 1.679 | ||||
| IS7 | 0.722 | 25.480 | 1.968 | ||||
| IS8 | 0.810 | 41.314 | 2.817 | ||||
| IS9 | 0.824 | 43.910 | 3.036 | ||||
| IS10 | 0.835 | 47.396 | 3.858 | ||||
| IS11 | 0.751 | 25.156 | 2.484 | ||||
| IS12 | 0.750 | 28.564 | 2.442 | ||||
| Extrinsic satisfaction | ES1 | 0.794 | 23.752 | 0.922 | 0.6 | 0.902 | 3.872 |
| ES2 | 0.853 | 44.066 | 4.613 | ||||
| ES3 | 0.844 | 44.579 | 3.738 | ||||
| ES4 | 0.825 | 35.895 | 2.775 | ||||
| ES5 | 0.804 | 32.266 | 2.572 | ||||
| ES6 | 0.594 | 10.733 | 1.553 | ||||
| ES7 | 0.661 | 13.385 | 1.892 | ||||
| ES8 | 0.785 | 31.653 | 2.209 | ||||
| Intention to stay | Stay1 | 0.972 | 192.901 | 0.972 | 0.946 | 0.943 | 4.931 |
| Stay2 | 0.974 | 213.064 | 4.931 |
Matrix of latent constructs in the measurement model.
| Constructs | Mean | SE | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.96 | 2.30 |
| ||||||||
| 2 | 21.66 | 2.43 | 0.659 |
| |||||||
| 3 | 17.22 | 2.14 | 0.531 | 0.674 |
| ||||||
| 4 | 22.57 | 2.52 | 0.519 | 0.66 | 0.651 |
| |||||
| 5 | 12.93 | 1.61 | 0.603 | 0.735 | 0.672 | 0.596 |
| ||||
| 6 | 48.53 | 6.58 | 0.546 | 0.579 | 0.546 | 0.471 | 0.553 |
| |||
| 7 | 31.34 | 4.91 | 0.403 | 0.414 | 0.403 | 0.35 | 0.419 | 0.753 |
| ||
| 8 | 91.36 | 9.26 | 0.817 | 0.769 | 0.817 | 0.751 | 0.831 | 0.663 | 0.499 | NA | |
| 9 | 8.20 | 1.77 | 0.332 | 0.314 | 0.332 | 0.378 | 0.327 | 0.549 | 0.553 | 0.404 |
|
Note 1: 1. Long-term care, supports, and services; 2. Supporting daily living; 3. Crisis prevention and conflict resolution; 4. Ethics; 5. Patient health and safety; 6. Intrinsic satisfaction; 7. Extrinsic satisfaction; 8. Job competency; 9. Intention to stay. Note 2: NA indicates that formative metrics do not require measurement of the square root of the AVE. Note 3: The square root of the AVE values shown in bold represent.
Figure 1Theoretical model. Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Hypothesis constructs.
| Effect | Relations | Estimate | SE | 95% CI | 95% CI | Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | ||||||
| H1: ES–IS | 0.625 *** | 0.036 | Yes | |||
| H2: JC–IS | 0.345 *** | 0.038 | 0.584 | 0.715 | Yes | |
| H3: JC–ES | 0.488 *** | 0.045 | 0.410 | 0.584 | Yes | |
| H4: IS–ITS | 0.237 * | 0.113 | 0.016 | 0.434 | Yes | |
| H5: ES–ITS | 0.321 ** | 0.097 | 0.135 | 0.497 | Yes | |
| Mediating | ||||||
| H6: JC–IS–ITS | 0.082 * | 0.074 | 0.009 | 0.158 | Yes | |
| H7: JC–ES–ITS | 0.157 *** | 0.048 | 0.065 | 0.256 | Yes | |
| H8: JC–ES–IS–ITS | 0.072 * | 0.037 | 0.006 | 0.150 | Yes |
Note 1: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. Note 2: IS: intrinsic satisfaction, ES: extrinsic satisfaction; JC: job competency; ITS: intention to stay.