Literature DB >> 34197578

Evaluation of sow thermal preference across three stages of reproduction.

Lindsey A Robbins1, Angela R Green-Miller2, Donald C Lay3, Allan P Schinckel1, Jay S Johnson3, Brianna N Gaskill1.   

Abstract

The metabolic heat production of modern pigs has increased by an average of 16%, compared with sows of 30 years ago. Therefore, it is likely that temperature recommendations require updating to meet the needs of modern pigs. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether different reproductive stages of sows altered thermal preference and if current recommendations required updating. Twenty multiparous sows (3.4 ± 1.2 parity) in different reproductive stages (nonpregnant: n = 7; mid-gestation: 58.5 ± 5.68 d, n = 6; and late-gestation: 104.7 ± 2.8 d, n = 7) were tested. Thermal preference was individually tested, and sows could freely choose a temperature, using a thermal gradient between 10.4 and 30.5 °C. Sows were given 24 h to acclimate to the thermal apparatus. Before testing began, sows were given daily feed allotment and returned to the apparatus. Video from the 24-h test period was used to record sow behavior (time spent inactive), posture (upright and sternal and lateral lying), and location using instantaneous scan samples every 15 min. Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED procedure in SAS 9.4. A cubic regression model was used to calculate the sow's most preferred temperature based on the location, or temperature, in which they spent the most time. The preference range was calculated using peak temperature preference ±SE for each sow. The reproductive stage altered where sows spent their time within the thermal gradient (P < 0.01). Late-gestation sows preferred cooler temperatures (14.0 °C) than mid-gestation (14.8 °C; P < 0.01) and nonpregnant sows (14.8 °C; P < 0.01). In summary, sow thermal preferences were within the lower half of the current recommended range (10 to 25 °C). This indicates that temperatures at the higher end of the recommended range could be uncomfortable to sows and that the thermal comfort zone of sows may be narrower than recommendations indicate.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  reproductive stage; sows; thermal comfort zone; thermal preference; thermal recommendations

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34197578      PMCID: PMC8355610          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  23 in total

Review 1.  Seasonal variation in the ovarian function of sows.

Authors:  M J Bertoldo; P K Holyoake; G Evans; C G Grupen
Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  High environmental temperature around farrowing induced heat stress in crated sows.

Authors:  R Muns; J Malmkvist; M L V Larsen; D Sørensen; L J Pedersen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Seasonality of reproduction in gilts and sows.

Authors:  O A T Peltoniemi; J V Virolainen
Journal:  Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl       Date:  2006

Review 4.  Toward a better understanding of pig behavior and pig welfare.

Authors:  Apisit Kittawornrat; Jeffrey J Zimmerman
Journal:  Anim Health Res Rev       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.615

5.  Studies on the energy metabolism of the pregnant sow. 2. The partition and utilization of metabolizable energy intake in pregnant and non-pregnant animals.

Authors:  W H Close; J Noblet; R P Heavens
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.718

6.  Impact of sow energy status during farrowing on farrowing kinetics, frequency of stillborn piglets, and farrowing assistance.

Authors:  Takele Feyera; Trine Friis Pedersen; Uffe Krogh; Leslie Foldager; Peter Kappel Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Evaluation of data loggers, sampling intervals, and editing techniques for measuring the lying behavior of dairy cattle.

Authors:  D N Ledgerwood; C Winckler; C B Tucker
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Behavioral thermoregulatory responses of single- and group-housed mice.

Authors:  C J Gordon; P Becker; J S Ali
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1998-11-15

9.  Effects of a controlled heat stress during late gestation, lactation, and after weaning on thermoregulation, metabolism, and reproduction of primiparous sows.

Authors:  A M Williams; T J Safranski; D E Spiers; P A Eichen; E A Coate; M C Lucy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Beyond the classic thermoneutral zone: Including thermal comfort.

Authors:  Boris Rm Kingma; Arjan Jh Frijns; Lisje Schellen; Wouter D van Marken Lichtenbelt
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2014-07-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Characterizing the effect of incrementally increasing dry bulb temperature on linear and nonlinear measures of heart rate variability in nonpregnant, mid-gestation, and late-gestation sows.

Authors:  Christopher J Byrd; Betty R McConn; Brianna N Gaskill; Allan P Schinckel; Angela R Green-Miller; Donald C Lay; Jay S Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Welfare of pigs during transport.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Bernadette Earley; Sandra Edwards; Luigi Faucitano; Sonia Marti; Genaro C Miranda de La Lama; Leonardo Nanni Costa; Peter T Thomsen; Sean Ashe; Lina Mur; Yves Van der Stede; Mette Herskin
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-09-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.