Literature DB >> 36092763

Welfare of pigs during transport.

Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Elisabetta Canali, Julian Ashley Drewe, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas, Christian Gortázar Schmidt, Virginie Michel, Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca, Barbara Padalino, Paolo Pasquali, Helen Clare Roberts, Hans Spoolder, Karl Stahl, Antonio Velarde, Arvo Viltrop, Christoph Winckler, Bernadette Earley, Sandra Edwards, Luigi Faucitano, Sonia Marti, Genaro C Miranda de La Lama, Leonardo Nanni Costa, Peter T Thomsen, Sean Ashe, Lina Mur, Yves Van der Stede, Mette Herskin.   

Abstract

In the framework of its Farm to Fork Strategy, the Commission is undertaking a comprehensive evaluation of the animal welfare legislation. The present Opinion deals with protection of pigs during transport. The welfare of pigs during transport by road is the main focus, but other means of transport are also covered. Current practices related to transport of pigs during the different stages (preparation, loading/unloading, transit and journey breaks) are described. Overall, 10 welfare consequences were identified as highly relevant for the welfare of pigs during transport based on the severity, duration and frequency of occurrence: group stress, handling stress, heat stress, injuries, motion stress, prolonged hunger, prolonged thirst, restriction of movement, resting problems and sensory overstimulation. These welfare consequences and their animal-based measures are described. A variety of hazards were identified, mainly relating to factors such as mixing of unfamiliar pigs, inappropriate handling methods and devices, the use of pick-up pens, inexperienced/untrained handlers, structural deficiencies of vehicles and facilities, poor driving conditions, unfavourable microclimatic and environmental conditions and poor husbandry practices leading to these welfare consequences. The Opinion contains general and specific conclusions relating to the different stages of transport of pigs. Recommendations to prevent hazards and to correct or mitigate welfare consequences are made. Recommendations were also developed to define quantitative thresholds for microclimatic conditions and minimum space allowance within means of transport. The development of the welfare consequences over time was assessed in relation to maximum journey duration. The Opinion covers specific animal transport scenarios identified by the European Commission relating to transport of cull sows and 'special health status animals', and lists welfare concerns associated with these.
© 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Farm to Fork Strategy; animal welfare assessment; animal‐based measures; hazards; pig; quantitative thresholds; sow; welfare consequences

Year:  2022        PMID: 36092763      PMCID: PMC9449989          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


  157 in total

1.  Hand-held lactate analyzer as a tool for the real-time measurement of physical fatigue before slaughter and pork quality prediction.

Authors:  L M Rocha; A Dionne; L Saucier; E Nannoni; L Faucitano
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Effects of high temperature on body temperature and hormonal adjustments in piglets.

Authors:  Anne Collin; Maria-Joao Vaz; Jean Le Dividich
Journal:  Reprod Nutr Dev       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

Review 3.  The physiological regulation of thirst and fluid intake.

Authors:  Michael J McKinley; Alan Kim Johnson
Journal:  News Physiol Sci       Date:  2004-02

4.  Decubital shoulder ulcers in sows: a review of classification, pain and welfare consequences.

Authors:  M S Herskin; M K Bonde; E Jørgensen; K H Jensen
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Muscle fatigue experienced during maximal eccentric exercise is predictive of the plasma creatine kinase (CK) response.

Authors:  S Hody; B Rogister; P Leprince; F Wang; J-L Croisier
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Generalized additive mixed model on the analysis of total transport losses of market-weight pigs1.

Authors:  Tiago L Passafaro; Denise Van de Stroet; Nora M Bello; Noel H Williams; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Virginie Michel; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Sandra Edwards; Sean Ashe; Denise Candiani; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Cristina Rojo Gimeno; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Christoph Winckler
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-07-12

8.  Can the monitoring of animal welfare parameters predict pork meat quality variation through the supply chain (from farm to slaughter)?

Authors:  L M Rocha; A Velarde; A Dalmau; L Saucier; L Faucitano
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Heat stress: physiology of acclimation and adaptation.

Authors:  Robert J Collier; Lance H Baumgard; Rosemarie B Zimbelman; Yao Xiao
Journal:  Anim Front       Date:  2018-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.