Literature DB >> 34197362

Symptoms of Depression, Anxiety, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, and Suicidal Ideation Among State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Public Health Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, March-April 2021.

Jonathan Bryant-Genevier, Carol Y Rao, Barbara Lopes-Cardozo, Ahoua Kone, Charles Rose, Isabel Thomas, Diana Orquiola, Ruth Lynfield, Dhara Shah, Lori Freeman, Scott Becker, Amber Williams, Deborah W Gould, Hope Tiesman, Geremy Lloyd, Laura Hill, Ramona Byrkit.   

Abstract

Increases in mental health conditions have been documented among the general population and health care workers since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic (1-3). Public health workers might be at similar risk for negative mental health consequences because of the prolonged demand for responding to the pandemic and for implementing an unprecedented vaccination campaign. The extent of mental health conditions among public health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, however, is uncertain. A 2014 survey estimated that there were nearly 250,000 state and local public health workers in the United States (4). To evaluate mental health conditions among these workers, a nonprobability-based online survey was conducted during March 29-April 16, 2021, to assess symptoms of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and suicidal ideation among public health workers in state, tribal, local, and territorial public health departments. Among 26,174 respondents, 53.0% reported symptoms of at least one mental health condition in the preceding 2 weeks, including depression (32.0%), anxiety (30.3%), PTSD (36.8%), or suicidal ideation (8.4%). The highest prevalence of symptoms of a mental health condition was among respondents aged ≤29 years (range = 13.6%-47.4%) and transgender or nonbinary persons (i.e., those who identified as neither male nor female) of all ages (range = 30.4%-65.5%). Public health workers who reported being unable to take time off from work were more likely to report adverse mental health symptoms. Severity of symptoms increased with increasing weekly work hours and percentage of work time dedicated to COVID-19 response activities. Implementing prevention and control practices that eliminate, reduce, and manage factors that cause or contribute to public health workers' poor mental health might improve mental health outcomes during emergencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34197362      PMCID: PMC8248597          DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7026e1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


Increases in mental health conditions have been documented among the general population and health care workers since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic (–). Public health workers might be at similar risk for negative mental health consequences because of the prolonged demand for responding to the pandemic and for implementing an unprecedented vaccination campaign. The extent of mental health conditions among public health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, however, is uncertain. A 2014 survey estimated that there were nearly 250,000 state and local public health workers in the United States (). To evaluate mental health conditions among these workers, a nonprobability–based online survey was conducted during March 29–April 16, 2021, to assess symptoms of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and suicidal ideation among public health workers in state, tribal, local, and territorial public health departments. Among 26,174 respondents, 53.0% reported symptoms of at least one mental health condition in the preceding 2 weeks, including depression (32.0%), anxiety (30.3%), PTSD (36.8%), or suicidal ideation (8.4%). The highest prevalence of symptoms of a mental health condition was among respondents aged ≤29 years (range = 13.6%–47.4%) and transgender or nonbinary persons (i.e., those who identified as neither male nor female) of all ages (range = 30.4%–65.5%). Public health workers who reported being unable to take time off from work were more likely to report adverse mental health symptoms. Severity of symptoms increased with increasing weekly work hours and percentage of work time dedicated to COVID-19 response activities. Implementing prevention and control practices that eliminate, reduce, and manage factors that cause or contribute to public health workers’ poor mental health might improve mental health outcomes during emergencies. A nonprobability–based convenience sample of public health workers was invited to complete a self-administered, online, anonymous survey during March 29–April 16, 2021. All persons who worked at a state, tribal, local, or territorial health department for any length of time in 2020 were eligible to participate.* National public health membership associations emailed a link to the survey to all members (approximately 24,000), and supervisors were asked to cascade the survey to all workers within their organization; 26,174 public health workers responded to the survey. The survey included questions on traumatic events or stressors experienced since March 2020, demographics, workplace factors, and self-reported mental health symptoms, including depression, anxiety, PTSD, or suicidal ideation, in the past 2 weeks. Mental health symptoms were evaluated using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for depression (), the 2-item General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) for anxiety (), the 6-item Impact of Event Scale (IES-6) for PTSD (), and one item of the PHQ-9 for suicidal ideation.** Prevalence of symptoms of mental health conditions and suicidal ideation were assessed by demographic characteristics and workplace factors. Univariate prevalence ratios were calculated using Poisson regression with 95% confidence intervals estimated using a robust standard error. Analyses were completed using RStudio software (version 1.2.1335; RStudio). This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy. Overall, 53.0% of respondents reported symptoms of at least one adverse mental health condition in the preceding 2 weeks. Prevalences of symptoms of depression, anxiety, PTSD, and suicidal ideation were 32.0%, 30.3%, 36.8%, and 8.4%, respectively (Table 1). The highest prevalences of symptoms of a mental health condition or suicidal ideation were among respondents aged ≤29 years (range = 13.6%–47.4%), transgender or nonbinary persons of all ages (range = 30.4%–65.5%), and those who identified as multiple races (range = 12.1%–43.4%); prevalence of symptoms of PTSD was higher among respondents who had a postbaccalaureate graduate education (40.7%).
TABLE 1

Mental health symptoms among 26,174 state, tribal, local, and territorial public health workers during the past 2 weeks, by demographic characteristics and work factors — United States, March–April 2021

Characteristic
No.
Depression* (n = 23,112)
Anxiety* (n = 23,610)
PTSD* (n = 22,248)
Suicidal ideation (n = 23,317)
Prevalence, %
PR (95% CI)
Prevalence, %
PR (95% CI)
Prevalence, %
PR (95% CI)
Prevalence, %
PR (95% CI)
Overall26,174*32.0––30.3––36.8––8.4––
Age group, yrs
≤29
3,525
41.4
2.09 (1.92–2.28)
44.7
2.81 (2.56–3.09)
47.4
2.03 (1.88–2.19)
13.6
2.98 (2.46–3.60)
30–39
5,461
35.2
1.78 (1.63–1.93)
37.1
2.33 (2.12–2.56)
42.3
1.81 (1.68–1.95)
10.3
2.26 (1.87–2.73)
40–49
5,102
32.3
1.63 (1.50–1.78)
29.1
1.83 (1.66–2.01)
37.3
1.60 (1.48–1.73)
7.5
1.65 (1.36–2.01)
50–59
4,925
28.8
1.45 (1.33–1.59)
23.5
1.47 (1.33–1.63)
32.0
1.37 (1.26–1.48)
6.0
1.32 (1.08–1.62)
≥60
2,830
19.8
Ref
15.9
Ref
23.4
Ref
4.6
Ref
Sex
Male
3,904
28.2
Ref
24.4
Ref
33.2
Ref
9.9
Ref
Female
19,873
32.3
1.15 (1.09–1.21)
31.2
1.28 (1.20–1.36)
37.2
1.12 (1.07–1.18)
7.9
0.81 (0.72–0.90)
Transgender or nonbinary
147
62.4
2.21 (1.93–2.54)
61.1
2.21 (1.88–2.59)
65.5
1.97 (1.74–2.24)
30.4
3.10 (2.37–4.06)
Race/Ethnicity
Hispanic
1,974
31.4
0.97 (0.90–1.04)
29.9
0.95 (0.89–1.02)
37.5
1.01 (0.95–1.07)
9.9
1.20 (1.03–1.39)
AI/AN, NH
156
36.8
1.14 (0.92–1.40)
32.7
1.04 (0.83–1.31)
41.6
1.12 (0.92–1.35)
7.3
0.89 (0.50–1.57)
Asian, NH
1,009
29.8
0.92 (0.83–1.02)
27.6
0.88 (0.79–0.98)
38.3
1.03 (0.94–1.12)
10.1
1.22 (1.00–1.49)
Black, NH
2,177
25.5
0.79 (0.73–0.85)
21.7
0.69 (0.64–0.75)
29.8
0.80 (0.75–0.86)
6.5
0.79 (0.67–0.94)
NH/PI, NH
96
28.2
0.87 (0.62–1.22)
22.2
0.71 (0.48–1.04)
25.3
0.68 (0.47–0.98)
11.1
1.34 (0.75–2.42)
White, NH
17,218
32.4
Ref
31.4
Ref
37.2
Ref
8.3
Ref
Multiple races, NH
614
40.7
1.26 (1.14–1.39)
37.2
1.19 (1.07–1.32)
43.4
1.17 (1.06–1.28)
12.1
1.46 (1.17–1.83)
Highest educational degree attained
Less than bachelor’s
5,386
32.3
Ref
27.1
Ref
30.1
Ref
6.5
Ref
Bachelor’s
9,180
32.6
1.01 (0.96–1.06)
30.6
1.13 (1.07–1.20)
36.8
1.22 (1.16–1.29)
9.1
1.40 (1.24–1.59)
Graduate
9,375
31.2
0.97 (0.92–1.02)
32.0
1.18 (1.12–1.25)
40.7
1.35 (1.29–1.42)
8.9
1.37 (1.22–1.56)
Hrs worked per wk
≤40
9,993
24.8
Ref
24.4
Ref
27.3
Ref
7.6
Ref
41–60
11,466
34.3
1.38 (1.33–1.45)
32.3
1.32 (1.26–1.38)
40.4
1.48 (1.42–1.54)
8.4
1.10 (1.00–1.21)
>60
3,018
46.6
1.88 (1.79–1.98)
41.6
1.70 (1.61–1.80)
54.2
1.99 (1.89–2.08)
11.0
1.44 (1.27–1.63)
% of time spent on COVID–19 response activities
None
1,787
23.6
Ref
23.0
Ref
22.3
Ref
7.6
Ref
1–25
5,151
24.9
1.06 (0.96–1.17)
23.5
1.02 (0.92–1.13)
24.3
1.09 (0.98–1.21)
7.5
0.99 (0.82–1.21)
26–50
3,432
28.9
1.23 (1.11–1.36)
26.7
1.16 (1.05–1.29)
31.6
1.42 (1.28–1.57)
8.4
1.12 (0.91–1.37)
51–75
3,283
31.6
1.34 (1.21–1.48)
30.6
1.33 (1.20–1.47)
37.0
1.66 (1.50–1.84)
8.6
1.14 (0.93–1.40)
≥76
10,620
37.9
1.61 (1.47–1.76)
35.9
1.56 (1.42–1.71)
47.0
2.11 (1.92–2.32)
8.9
1.18 (0.99–1.41)
Can take time off from work
Yes
13,507
23.5
Ref
23.0
Ref
27.9
Ref
6.2
Ref
No8,58645.31.93 (1.85–2.00)42.41.85 (1.77–1.92)51.51.84 (1.78–1.91)12.01.92 (1.76–2.10)

Abbreviations: AI/AN = American Indian or Alaska Native; CI = confidence interval; IES-6 = 6-item Impact of Event Scale; GAD-2 = General Anxiety Disorder; NH = non-Hispanic; NH/PI = Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander; PHQ-9 = 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire; PR = prevalence ratio; PTSD = post-traumatic stress disorder; Ref = referent group.

* Symptoms of mental health conditions were scored and categorized by severity. Respondents who scored ≥10.0 out of 27 on the PHQ-9 for depression, ≥3.0 out of 6 on the GAD-2 for anxiety, or ≥1.75 out of 4 on the IES-6 for PTSD were considered symptomatic for the respective conditions. Respondents who indicated that they would be better off dead or thought of hurting themselves at any time in the past 2 weeks were categorized as experiencing suicidal ideation.

† Some categories might not sum to 26,174 because of missing data. Denominators for categories are respondents who answered the questions to be scored.

Abbreviations: AI/AN = American Indian or Alaska Native; CI = confidence interval; IES-6 = 6-item Impact of Event Scale; GAD-2 = General Anxiety Disorder; NH = non-Hispanic; NH/PI = Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander; PHQ-9 = 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire; PR = prevalence ratio; PTSD = post-traumatic stress disorder; Ref = referent group. * Symptoms of mental health conditions were scored and categorized by severity. Respondents who scored ≥10.0 out of 27 on the PHQ-9 for depression, ≥3.0 out of 6 on the GAD-2 for anxiety, or ≥1.75 out of 4 on the IES-6 for PTSD were considered symptomatic for the respective conditions. Respondents who indicated that they would be better off dead or thought of hurting themselves at any time in the past 2 weeks were categorized as experiencing suicidal ideation. † Some categories might not sum to 26,174 because of missing data. Denominators for categories are respondents who answered the questions to be scored. Most (92.6%) respondents reported working directly on COVID-19 response activities; the majority (59.2%) worked ≥41 hours in a typical week since March 2020. The prevalences of all four mental health outcomes and the severity of symptoms of depression or PTSD increased as the percentage of work time spent directly on COVID-19 response activities and number of work hours in a typical week increased (Table 1) (Figure). Public health workers who were unable to take time off from work when they needed were nearly twice as likely to report symptoms of an adverse mental health condition (prevalence ratio range = 1.84–1.93) as were those who could take time off. Among those not able to take time off from work (8,586), the most common reasons were concern about falling behind on work (64.4%), no work coverage (60.6%), and feeling guilty (59.0%); 18.2% reported that their employer did not allow time off from work. Needing mental health counseling/services in the last 4 weeks, but not receiving these services, was reported by nearly one in five (19.6%) respondents. Employee assistance programs were available to nearly two thirds (66.1%) of respondents but were accessed by only 11.7% of those respondents; 27.3% of all respondents did not know whether their employer offered an employee assistance program.
FIGURE

Distribution* of 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire scores for depression and 6-item Impact of Event Scale scores for post-traumatic stress disorder among state, tribal, local, and territorial public health worker respondents, by percentage of work time spent directly on COVID-19 response activities for the majority of 2020 (panels A, C), and hours worked in a typical week since March 2020 (panels B, D) — United States, March–April 2021

Abbreviations: IES-6 = 6-item Impact of Event Scale; PHQ-9 = 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire; PTSD = post-traumatic stress disorder.

* Upper and lower levels of boxes indicate 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively; horizontal line indicates median; whiskers indicate observation nearest to 1.5 × interquartile range.

† Self-reported symptoms of depression or PTSD were evaluated; respondents who scored ≥10.0 out of 27 on the PHQ-9 for depression or ≥1.75 out of 4 on the IES-6 for PTSD were considered symptomatic for the respective conditions.

§ Only public health worker respondents who completed all PHQ-9 items (n = 23,112) or all IES-6 items (n = 22,248) are included.

Distribution* of 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire scores for depression and 6-item Impact of Event Scale scores for post-traumatic stress disorder among state, tribal, local, and territorial public health worker respondents, by percentage of work time spent directly on COVID-19 response activities for the majority of 2020 (panels A, C), and hours worked in a typical week since March 2020 (panels B, D) — United States, March–April 2021 Abbreviations: IES-6 = 6-item Impact of Event Scale; PHQ-9 = 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire; PTSD = post-traumatic stress disorder. * Upper and lower levels of boxes indicate 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively; horizontal line indicates median; whiskers indicate observation nearest to 1.5 × interquartile range. † Self-reported symptoms of depression or PTSD were evaluated; respondents who scored ≥10.0 out of 27 on the PHQ-9 for depression or ≥1.75 out of 4 on the IES-6 for PTSD were considered symptomatic for the respective conditions. § Only public health worker respondents who completed all PHQ-9 items (n = 23,112) or all IES-6 items (n = 22,248) are included. Respondents reported experiencing traumatic events or stressors since March 2020, including feeling overwhelmed by workload or family/work balance (72.0%), receiving job-related threats because of work (11.8%), and feeling bullied, threatened or harassed because of work (23.4%); 12.6% of respondents reported having received a diagnosis of COVID-19 (Table 2). Respondents who reported traumatic events or stressors, either personal or work-related, were more likely to report symptoms of PTSD than respondents who did not experience these events or stressors.
TABLE 2

Traumatic events or stressors reported by 26,174 state, tribal, local, and territorial public health workers and comparisons* of symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder — United States, March–April 2021

Traumatic event or stressor/ResponseNo.§ PTSD prevalence, %PTSD PR (95% CI)
Personal-related
Had COVID-19
Yes
2,834
36.7
1.03 (0.98–1.09)
Maybe**
3,310
42.4
1.19 (1.14–1.25)
No
16,266
35.6
Ref
Got divorced or separated
Yes
747
49.6
1.36 (1.27–1.47)
No
22,084
36.3
Ref
Experienced death of a loved one
Yes
7,580
42.3
1.24 (1.20–1.29)
No
15,403
34.0
Ref
Worried about the health of family and loved ones
Yes
20,857
39.4
3.11 (2.77–3.48)
No
2,203
12.7
Ref
Felt isolated and alone
Yes
12,944
49.8
2.49 (2.38–2.60)
No
10,080
20.0
Ref
Work-related
Felt overwhelmed by workload or family/work balance
Yes
16,563
45.4
3.10 (2.91–3.30)
No
6,451
14.7
Ref
Felt disconnected from family and friends because of workload
Yes
14,051
49.0
2.77 (2.64–2.91)
No
8,964
17.7
Ref
Felt inadequately compensated for work
Yes
13,703
45.2
1.85 (1.78–1.93)
No
9,101
24.4
Ref
Felt unappreciated at work
Yes
12,362
46.5
1.82 (1.76–1.90)
No
10,551
25.5
Ref
Experienced stigma or discrimination because of work
Yes
5,962
56.2
1.88 (1.82–1.94)
No
16,944
29.9
Ref
Received job-related threats because of work
Yes
2,699
61.8
1.85 (1.78–1.92)
No
20,262
33.4
Ref
Felt bullied, threatened, or harassed because of work
Yes
5,376
59.0
1.97 (1.91–2.03)
No
17,594
30.0
Ref
Interacted often with the public
Yes
11,143
41.1
1.23 (1.19–1.28)
No
13,318
33.3
Ref
Worried about workplace exposure to COVID-19
Yes
11,197
42.6
1.36 (1.31–1.41)
No11,805 31.3Ref

Abbreviations: IES-6 = 6-item Impact of Event Scale; PR = prevalence ratio; PTSD = post-traumatic stress disorder; Ref = referent group.

* Referent group for all prevalence ratio calculations was not experiencing the traumatic event/stressor (i.e., “No” category).

† Experienced symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder in the 2 weeks preceding survey, defined as having an IES-6 score ≥1.75 out of 4.

§ Some categories might not sum to 26,174; only those respondents who completed IES-6 questions (N = 22,248) are included in analysis.

¶ Positive COVID-19 test or diagnosis by medical professional.

** Had symptoms compatible with COVID-19 but not tested or test inconclusive.

Abbreviations: IES-6 = 6-item Impact of Event Scale; PR = prevalence ratio; PTSD = post-traumatic stress disorder; Ref = referent group. * Referent group for all prevalence ratio calculations was not experiencing the traumatic event/stressor (i.e., “No” category). † Experienced symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder in the 2 weeks preceding survey, defined as having an IES-6 score ≥1.75 out of 4. § Some categories might not sum to 26,174; only those respondents who completed IES-6 questions (N = 22,248) are included in analysis. ¶ Positive COVID-19 test or diagnosis by medical professional. ** Had symptoms compatible with COVID-19 but not tested or test inconclusive.

Discussion

Among a convenience sample of 26,174 state, tribal, local, and territorial public health workers, approximately one half experienced symptoms of a mental health condition in the 2 weeks preceding the survey, with highest prevalences reported among younger respondents, and transgender or nonbinary respondents. Public health workers who reported certain workplace practices, such as long work hours and the inability to take time off, were more likely to have experienced symptoms of a mental health condition. Implementing prevention and control practices that eliminate, reduce, and manage workplace factors that cause or contribute to public health workers’ adverse mental health status*** might improve mental health outcomes during this and other public health emergencies. The overall prevalence of symptoms of mental health conditions among public health workers was higher than previously reported in the general population (approximately 40.9%) (). Prevalences of symptoms of depression and anxiety among public health workers were similar to those in previous reports among health care workers (); however, prevalence of PTSD symptoms among public health workers was 10%–20% higher than that previously reported among health care workers (), frontline personnel (), and the general public (). Symptoms of PTSD disproportionately affected public health workers who experienced work-related traumatic stressors (e.g., felt inadequately compensated or felt unappreciated at work), particularly those factors that affect workers’ personal lives (e.g., felt disconnected from family and friends because of workload). Traumatic and stressful work experiences related to the COVID-19 pandemic might have played a role in elevating the risk for experiencing symptoms of PTSD among public health workers. Increases in adverse mental health symptoms among workers have been linked to increased absenteeism, high turnover, lower productivity, and lower morale, which could influence the effectiveness of public health organizations during emergencies (,). Among public health worker respondents, nearly 20% reported that their employer did not allow them to take time off; the inability to take time off had the largest impact on reporting symptoms of mental health. Approximately one quarter of public health workers did not know whether their workplace offered an employee assistance program. Even where available, employee assistance programs were not commonly accessed. Several strategies could reduce adverse mental health symptoms among public health workers during public health emergencies. For example, expanding staffing size (e.g., recruiting surge personnel to backfill positions) and implementing flexible schedules might reduce the need for long work hours; encouraging workers to take regular breaks and time off could help avoid overwork and reduce the risk for adverse mental health outcomes. In addition, implementing, evaluating, and promoting use of employee assistance programs could improve employee resiliency and coping. The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, the study used a nonprobability–based convenience sample of public health worker respondents, and a completion rate could not be determined. Although the participating national public health membership associations reach many public health workers, the findings might not be representative of all state, tribal, local, and territorial public health workers in the United States. Second, self-reported mental health symptoms were assessed using screening instruments, which does not constitute clinical diagnosis of a mental health disorder; however, the screening instruments have been clinically validated (–). Third, participants were surveyed about symptoms experienced in the 2 weeks preceding the survey, which might not reflect all symptoms experienced during the pandemic. Finally, not all traumatic stressors or events experienced by public health workers were assessed by the survey, such as non–COVID-19 illnesses or financial insecurity. During the COVID-19 pandemic, public health workers have experienced symptoms of depression, anxiety, PTSD, and suicidal ideation. Addressing work practices that contribute to stress and trauma is critical to managing workers’ adverse mental health status during emergency responses. Furthermore, strengthening work systems to encourage behavior changes that promote mental health, such as building awareness of symptoms of mental health conditions and developing sustainable coping strategies, might improve mental health conditions, particularly for public health workers who are at increased risk, including those who are younger () or transgender or nonbinary persons. In addition, employee assistance programs could be evaluated and adjusted to be more accessible and acceptable to workers and focus more on building workplace cultures that promote wellness and destigmatize requests for mental health assistance.

What is already known about this topic?

Increases in mental health conditions have been documented among the general population and health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, data on public health workers are limited.

What is added by this report?

Among 26,174 surveyed state, tribal, local, and territorial public health workers, 53.0% reported symptoms of at least one mental health condition in the past 2 weeks. Symptoms were more prevalent among those who were unable to take time off or worked ≥41 hours per week.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Implementing prevention and control practices that eliminate, reduce, and manage factors that cause or contribute to public health workers’ poor mental health might improve mental health outcomes during emergencies.
  10 in total

1.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A systematic review on the effect of work-related stressors on mental health of young workers.

Authors:  P C F Law; L S Too; P Butterworth; K Witt; N Reavley; A J Milner
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Pandemic-related mental health risk among front line personnel.

Authors:  Hannah M Wright; Brandon J Griffin; Kotaro Shoji; Tiffany M Love; Scott A Langenecker; Charles C Benight; Andrew J Smith
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams; Patrick O Monahan; Bernd Löwe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Brief measure of posttraumatic stress reactions: impact of Event Scale-6.

Authors:  Siri Thoresen; Kristian Tambs; Ajmal Hussain; Trond Heir; Venke A Johansen; Jonathan I Bisson
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Psychosocial Stressors at Work and the Risk of Sickness Absence Due to a Diagnosed Mental Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caroline S Duchaine; Karine Aubé; Mahée Gilbert-Ouimet; Michel Vézina; Ruth Ndjaboué; Victoria Massamba; Denis Talbot; Mathilde Lavigne-Robichaud; Xavier Trudel; Ana-Paula Bruno Pena-Gralle; Alain Lesage; Lynne Moore; Alain Milot; Danielle Laurin; Chantal Brisson
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 21.596

7.  Job performance deficits due to depression.

Authors:  David A Adler; Thomas J McLaughlin; William H Rogers; Hong Chang; Leueen Lapitsky; Debra Lerner
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Enumeration of the governmental public health workforce, 2014.

Authors:  Angela J Beck; Matthew L Boulton; Fátima Coronado
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Mental Health, Substance Use, and Suicidal Ideation During the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, June 24-30, 2020.

Authors:  Mark É Czeisler; Rashon I Lane; Emiko Petrosky; Joshua F Wiley; Aleta Christensen; Rashid Njai; Matthew D Weaver; Rebecca Robbins; Elise R Facer-Childs; Laura K Barger; Charles A Czeisler; Mark E Howard; Shantha M W Rajaratnam
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 17.586

10.  Association Between Proportion of Workday Treating COVID-19 and Depression, Anxiety, and PTSD Outcomes in US Physicians.

Authors:  Danielle M Gainer; Ramzi W Nahhas; Nita V Bhatt; Autumnn Merrill; Julie McCormack
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.306

  10 in total
  17 in total

1.  COVID-19 in Missouri 2020-2021: A Perspective on Origins, Spread & Controversies Part II.

Authors:  David S McKinsey; Joel P McKinsey; Neil B Hampson; Maithe Enriquez
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2022 May-Jun

2.  Pandemic-Related Workplace Violence and Its Impact on Public Health Officials, March 2020‒January 2021.

Authors:  Julie A Ward; Elizabeth M Stone; Paulani Mui; Beth Resnick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 11.561

3.  The role of social support, detachment, and depressive and anxiety symptoms in suicidal thoughts and behaviours during the Covid-19 lockdown: Potential pathways.

Authors:  Aina Gabarrell-Pascuet; Mireia Félez-Nóbrega; Paula Cristóbal-Narváez; Philippe Mortier; Gemma Vilagut; Beatriz Olaya; Jordi Alonso; Josep Maria Haro; Joan Domènech-Abella
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2021-08-19

4.  South Korean validation of the COVID-related-PTSD scale in a non-clinical sample exposed to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Hwa Jung Lee; Ye Jin Kim; Dong Hun Lee
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-05-25

5.  Building the MCH Public Health Workforce of the Future: A Call to Action from the MCHB Strategic Plan.

Authors:  Lauren Raskin Ramos; Michelle Menser Tissue; Ayanna Johnson; Laura Kavanagh; Michael Warren
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2022-02-16

6.  Assessment of Epidemiology Capacity in State Health Departments - United States, 2021.

Authors:  Jessica Arrazola; Sarah Auer
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Understanding the Emotional Labor of Public Health Equity Work: a Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Chad Abresch; Carol Gilbert; Marilyn Johnson; Bibhusha Karki; Kiara Lyons; Karly Meyer; Melissa Tibbits; Drissa Toure
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2022-03-31

8.  Correction and Republication: Symptoms of Depression, Anxiety, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, and Suicidal Ideation Among State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Public Health Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, March-April 2021.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  Exploring Trauma and Resilience among NYS COVID-19 Pandemic Survivors.

Authors:  Kip V Thompson; Elizabeth Eder-Moreau; Sara Cunningham; Yuki Yamazaki; Hang-Yi Chen
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-23

10.  Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and the Sense of Gains and Losses during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Study.

Authors:  Ewa Małgorzata Szepietowska; Ewa Zawadzka; Sara Filipiak
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.