| Literature DB >> 34194730 |
Herbert Situmorang1, Andon Hestiantoro1, Sigit Purbadi1, Darin Flamandita2, Muhamad Sahlan2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Endometriosis is a disease that impacts around 10% of all women in reproductive age, with pelvic pain and infertility as its main clinical features. Current medical treatment targeting lowering estrogen activity has not shown sufficient result due its side effects and reproductive function suppression. Propolis has been widely studied, showing anti inflammation and pro-apoptosis property, that could potentially be used in the treatment of endometriosis. This study investigates the interaction between Sulawesi Propolis' active components and receptors and protein related to endometriosis pathogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: Docking; Endometriosis; Estrogen receptor; In silico; NF-kB; Progesterone receptor; Propolis; Prostaglandin receptor; TNF alpha Receptor
Year: 2021 PMID: 34194730 PMCID: PMC8237281 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102459
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) ISSN: 2049-0801
Docking results (ΔG) of propolis active compounds affinity to receptors associated endometriosis pathogenesis.
| No | Active Compounds | TNF | NF-kB | Estrogen | Estrogen | Proges-terone B | PGE2 EP3 Subtype | PGE2 EP2 Subtype |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2-methoxykurarinone | −7,9 | −6,5 | −6,0 | −5,1 | −4,9 | −8,5 | −5,6 |
| 2 | Kurarinone | −8,- | −6,9 | −5,7 | −6,8 | −5,1 | −9,0 | −6,0 |
| 3 | Chrysin-7-O-β- | −8,8 | −8,7 | −7,7 | −9,1 | −6,6 | −10,3 | −7,2 |
| 4 | Flavenochromane B | −9,5 | −8,4 | −8,3 | −7,5 | −5,3 | −5,9 | −7,3 |
| 5 | Ginkgol | −5,8 | −5,8 | −7,7 | −7,4 | −7,5 | −7,4 | −6,3 |
| 6 | Irilone | −8,2 | −8,6 | −8,3 | −7,3 | −10,0 | −9,3 | −7,3 |
| 7 | Leachianone A | −8,6 | −7,1 | −6,7 | −6,1 | −8,1 | −9,3 | −6,1 |
| 8 | Icaritin | −7,8 | −7,5 | −8,1 | −6,1 | −7,2 | −8,2 | −5,6 |
| 9 | Scutellarein | −6,8 | −8,1 | −8,2 | −7,3 | −8,6 | −8,4 | −6,2 |
| 10 | Cimicifugic acid | −7,9 | −7,9 | −6,6 | −7,5 | −8,2 | −9,2 | −6,5 |
| 11 | Demethoxycurcumin | −7,4 | −7,9 | −8,0 | −7,4 | −7,7 | −10,3 | −6,3 |
| 12 | Dendrocandin B | −8,1 | −7,5 | −6,9 | −6,6 | −6,3 | −7,2 | −6,5 |
| 13 | Ricinoleic acid | −5,6 | −5,4 | −7,1 | −6,9 | −6,8 | −6,9 | −5,4 |
| 14 | Polydatin | −7,7 | −7,6 | −6,1 | −6,8 | −6,2 | −10,7 | −6,1 |
| 15 | Sanggenon H | −8,8 | −9,8 | −8,3 | −6,9 | −8,3 | −9,2 | −7,3 |
| 16 | Sanggenon C | −10,2 | −8,7 | +5,6 | −4,9 | −6,5 | −5,4 | −7,2 |
| 17 | Epicryptoacetalide | −8,2 | −8,5 | −8,9 | −7,7 | −7,9 | −9,7 | −7,8 |
| 18 | Shogaol | −5,8 | −5,6 | −7,0 | −6,9 | −6,9 | −6,5 | −5,5 |
| 19 | Caesalpins J | −7,8 | −6,8 | −8,2 | −7,0 | −7,0 | −6,6 | −6,3 |
| 20 | Ginkgetin | −9,9 | −8,4 | −6,5 | −7,4 | −6,0 | −7,0 | −7,0 |
| 21 | Lupinifolin | −8,8 | −8,3 | −0,8 | −6,3 | −6,7 | −9,0 | −6,4 |
| 22 | Rhamnetin | −7,7 | −8,7 | −8,1 | −6,9 | −8,4 | −9,1 | −6,8 |
| Native ligand | −8.23 | −9,8 | −7.9 | −7.9 | −7.96 |
Summary of docking results, 3D visualization and hydrogen binding site.
| Protein Target | Substance with Strongest Binding Affinity | ΔG in Kcal/Mol (Ki in μM) | H Bound | 3D Visualization |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNF-alpha | Sanggenon C | −10,2 (0,03) | 5 (Tyr151(A), Tyr119(B), Ser60(B), Ser60(B), Leu120(B)) | |
| NF-kB p50/p65 | Sanggenon H | −9,8 (0,07) | 2 (Arg246(A), da18(D)) | |
| ER-A | Epicryptoacetalide | −8,9 (0,30) | – | |
| ER-B | Chrysin-7-O-β- | −9,1 (0,21) | 4 (Asn234(A), Glu260(A), Val293(A), Tyr352(A)) | |
| Progesterone Receptor B | Irilone | −10 (0,05) | 1 (Tyr151(B)) | |
| PGE2 EP3 | Polydatin | −10,7 (0,01) | 8 (Thr206(A), Tyr114(A), Ser336(A), Ser336(A), Gln339(A), Gln339(A), Gly102(A), Thr136(A)) | |
| PGE2 EP2 | Epicryptoacetalide | −7,8 (1.92) | – |