Literature DB >> 34194640

Three Dimensional Anthropometric Analysis of Glenoid Anatomy in Normal Indian Population.

Chandrasekhar Bodanki1,2, Hari Krishna Yadoji1,2, Venkateshwar Reddy Maryada2, Gurava Reddy Annapareddy Venkata2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shoulder unlike any other joint has a wide range of mobility and is important in day to day activities. Different ethnic groups vary in skeletal anatomy and anthropometry. Most of our knowledge on the shoulder-anatomy, surgical technique and prosthesis designs is based on western literature. There are few studies on the Indian population. Our aim is to study the anthropometry of glenoid based on 3D CT scan of the shoulder. Our objectives are to calculate glenoid height, width, version, inclination, analyse the data for differences between male and female, compare data with similar studies in India and other countries and study the impact on shoulder arthroplasty implant size.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 100 CT scans (male/female-50/50) of the Indian population are studied from our database. Glenoid measurements are calculated and analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean value of glenoid height is 32.9 ± 3.2 mm (27.6-41.7 mm), width 23.4 ± 2.62 mm (19.1-30.9 mm), version 0.07 ± 5.38° (- 11° to + 10.85°) and inclination 6.68 ± 5.49° (- 9.91° to + 20.75°). In our study glenoid is retroverted, superiorly inclined and height is more than width. The height and width are less than French and Americans but slightly more than the Japanese population.
CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in Indian glenoid measurements compared to other countries. Even the smallest size of shoulder arthroplasty glenoid component currently available in India is larger than the mean glenoid size of our study. As shoulder replacement surgeries are rising in India, we may have to bring changes in the implant design and surgical technique to suit our population. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT scan shoulder; Glenoid inclination; Glenoid measurements; Glenoid version; Indian population; Shoulder arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 34194640      PMCID: PMC8192620          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00321-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  28 in total

1.  A finite element model of the shoulder: application to the comparison of normal and osteoarthritic joints.

Authors:  P Büchler; N A Ramaniraka; L R Rakotomanana; J P Iannotti; A Farron
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Decreasing glenoid inclination improves function in shoulders with simulated massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Gerhard G Konrad; Max Markmiller; John T Jolly; Axel E Ruter; Norbert P Sudkamp; Patrick J McMahon; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Effects of glenoid component version on humeral head displacement and joint reaction forces: an experimental study.

Authors:  Richard W Nyffeler; Ralph Sheikh; Todd S Atkinson; Hilaire A C Jacob; Philippe Favre; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Risks of loosening of a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion.

Authors:  Alain Farron; Alexandre Terrier; Philippe Büchler
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G Walch; R Badet; A Boulahia; A Khoury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Three-dimensional measurement method of arthritic glenoid cavity morphology: feasibility and reproducibility.

Authors:  G Moineau; C Levigne; P Boileau; A Young; G Walch
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.256

7.  Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders.

Authors:  F Sirveaux; L Favard; D Oudet; D Huquet; G Walch; D Molé
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

8.  Computed tomography measurement of glenoid vault version as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version.

Authors:  Noboru Matsumura; Kiyohisa Ogawa; Hiroyasu Ikegami; Philippe Collin; Gilles Walch; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Study of the variability of scapular inclination and the glenoid version - considerations for preoperative planning: clinical-radiological study.

Authors:  Petr Fulin; Martin Kysilko; David Pokorny; Radek Padr; Nikola Kasprikova; Ivan Landor; Antonin Sosna
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Ethnic differences in bone geometry between White, Black and South Asian men in the UK.

Authors:  A Zengin; S R Pye; M J Cook; J E Adams; F C W Wu; T W O'Neill; K A Ward
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.