| Literature DB >> 34194524 |
Ziwei Xu1, Yixuan Sheng2, Guowei Zeng2, Zhijun Zeng2,3, Bingtao Li2,3, Li Jiang2,3, Guoliang Xu2,3, Qiyun Zhang2,3.
Abstract
Gegen Qinlian decoction (GGQLD) has a definite effect on T2DM in clinic, and it has the effect of lowering blood sugar, improving insulin resistance, and improving the blood lipid level of rats with dyslipidemia, but the intervention mechanism of GGQLD on dyslipidemia has not been clarified. The changes in endogenous metabolites in the plasma of high-fat diet-induced dyslipidemia rats treated with Ge Gen Qin Lian Decoction (GGQLD) were studied to elucidate the therapeutic effects and mechanism of action of GGQLD in dyslipidemia. Based on ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole-time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS), the metabolic profiles of rat serum samples were collected. The rat model of dyslipidemia was induced by a 60% fat-fed high-fat diet. After feeding the rats with a high-fat diet for 4 weeks, dyslipidemia appeared. After 5 weeks of GGQLD (14.85 g kg-1) administration, the metabonomics of rats' plasma samples in the normal group, model group, and administration group were analyzed. Mass profiler professional (MPP), SIMCA-P 14.1, and Graphpad prism 6.0 software were used combined with METLIN biological database and human metabolite database HMDB to screen and identify endogenous biomarkers. Metaboanalyst 4.0 software was used by combining with HMDB and KEGG databases; the enrichment and metabolic pathway of biomarkers were analyzed to explore the metabolic mechanism of dyslipidemia rats induced by high-fat diet and the intervention mechanism of Gegen Qinlian decoction. After 5 weeks of administration of GGQLD, the levels of serum TC and TG were significantly decreased (P < 0.05, P < 0.01), while HDL-C and LDL-C were not significantly affected. After administration, the food intake of rats in the administration group decreased gradually, and the change trend of body weight gradually slowed down. The metabonomics of rat plasma samples results showed that 23 potential biomarkers including α-linolenic acid, arachidonic acid, and lysophosphatidylcholine were significantly changed in positive ion mode. Studies have shown that GGQLD has a significant lipid-lowering effect on dyslipidemia rats induced by a high-fat diet, and its preventive mechanism is related to tryptophan metabolism, fatty acid biosynthesis, α-linolenic acid metabolism, arachidonic acid, and glycerophosphatidyl metabolism pathway.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34194524 PMCID: PMC8203394 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6692456
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Blood lipid levels of rats in each group after grouping ().
| Group |
| Blood lipid levels of rats (mmol/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC | TG | HDL-C | LDL-C | ||
| Control | 8 | 1.53 ± 0.22 | 1.26 ± 0.23 | 0.67 ± 0.11 | 0.29 ± 0.10 |
| Model | 8 | 1.91 ± 0.44 | 1.77 ± 1.14 | 0.50 ± 0.05 | 0.60 ± 0.31 |
| Administered | 8 | 1.96 ± 0.14 | 1.21 ± 0.53 | 0.56 ± 0.06 | 0.86 ± 0.24 |
Note. Versus normal group, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01.
FPG, Fins, and IR index levels of rats in each group after grouping ().
| Group |
| FPG (mmol/L) | Fins (mU/L) | IR index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 8 | 5.04 ± 0.91 | 21.79 ± 4.78 | 4.83 ± 1.18 |
| Model | 8 | 5.36 ± 1.73 | 23.85 ± 4.69 | 5.58 ± 1.92 |
| Administered | 8 | 5.34 ± 0.95 | 23.42 ± 2.65 | 5.60 ± 1.43 |
Changes in blood lipid levels of rats in each group after 5 weeks of administration ().
| Group |
| Blood lipid (mmol/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC | TG | HDL-C | LDL-C | ||
| Control | 8 | 1.85 ± 0.25 | 1.02 ± 0.31 | 0.73 ± 0.11 | 0.66 ± 0.09 |
| Model | 8 | 2.16 ± 0.29# | 1.67 ± 0.64## | 0.58 ± 0.09## | 0.78 ± 0.29 |
| Administered | 8 | 1.68 ± 0.22 | 0.80 ± 0.19 | 0.52 ± 0.08 | 0.80 ± 0.21 |
Note. Compared with the control group, #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01, compared with the model group, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01.
Changes in blood sugar of rats in each group after 5 weeks of administration ().
| Group |
| Blood sugar (mmol/L) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 8 | 3.79 ± 1.04 |
| Model | 8 | 5.57 ± 0.91## |
| Administered | 8 | 4.09 ± 0.76 |
Note. Compared with the normal group, ##P < 0.01; compared with the model group, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01.
Figure 1TIC of plasma sample in positive scan mode.
Figure 2PCA chart of normal group (C), model group (M), and administered group (M).
Figure 3PLS-DA scores of normal group (C), model group (M), and administered group (A).
Figure 4Model verification diagram of three groups.
Figure 5OPLS-DA score map of normal group (C) and model group (M).
Figure 6Model verification diagram of normal group (C) and model group (M).
Figure 7Variable screening chart.
Potential biomarkers in positive ion mode.
| Biomarker | Formula | m/z | RT (min) | VIP | Model group | Administered group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indole acetaldehyde | C10 H9 N O | 160.0743 | 1.71 | 1.34 | ↓## | ↑ |
| Acylglycine | C9 H9 N O3 | 180.0646 | 4.17 | 1.65 | ↓## | ↑ |
| Iso-L-carnitine | C11 H21 N O4 | 232.1534 | 2.39 | 1.28 | ↓## | ↓ |
|
| C18 H30 O2 | 279.2301 | 14.55 | 1.62 | ↓## | ↑ |
| (Z)-13-octadecenoic acid | C18 H34 O2 | 283.2628 | 17.16 | 1.64 | ↑## | ↓ |
| Androstenone 3 | C15 H28 N6 | 293.2458 | 13.51 | 1.47 | ↓## | ↑ |
| Arachidonic acid | C20 H32 O2 | 305.2472 | 15.51 | 1.24 | ↑## | ↓ |
| Octadecanoic acid | C18 H36 O2 | 307.2604 | 16.39 | 1.06 | ↑## | ↓ |
| L-Octyl carnitine | C16 H25 N5 | 310.1997 | 5.74 | 1.74 | ↑## | ↓ |
| Docosapentaenoic acid | C22 H34 O2 | 331.2622 | 12.41 | 1.41 | ↑# | ↑ |
| Arachidonic acid ethanolamine | C22 H37 N O2 | 348.2889 | 16.32 | 1.30 | ↑# | ↓ |
| Ethyl acetate arachidonic acid | C22 H36 O2 | 355.2614 | 6.85 | 1.08 | ↓## | ↑ |
| Tetracosahexaenoic acid | C24 H36 O2 | 357.2768 | 7.98 | 1.28 | ↓## | ↓ |
| N-Acetylethanolamine | C24 H36 O3 | 373.2722 | 6.81 | 1.45 | ↓## | ↑ |
| 7-Ketodeoxycholic acid | C24 H38 O5 | 407.2781 | 6.47 | 1.32 | ↓# | ↑ |
| Stearyl carnitine | C21 H45 N7 O2 | 428.3719 | 9.32 | 1.60 | ↑## | ↓ |
| LysoPC (14 : 0/0 : 0) | C24 H41 N3 O6 | 468.307 | 7.67 | 1.32 | ↓# | ↓ |
| LysoPE (20 : 4 (5Z, 8Z, 11Z, 14Z)/0 : 0) | C25 H44 NO7P | 502.2919 | 8.49 | 1.60 | ↑# | ↓ |
| LysoPE (20 : 1(11Z)/0 : 0) | C27 H45 N3 O6 | 508.3371 | 8.72 | 1.59 | ↓## | ↓ |
| LysoPC (20 : 5 (5Z, 8Z, 11Z, 14Z, 17Z)) | C30 H43 N3 O6 | 542.3227 | 7.82 | 1.65 | ↓## | ↑ |
| LysoPC (22 : 4 (7Z, 10Z, 13Z, 16Z)) | C32 H49 N3 O6 | 572.3698 | 9.89 | 1.59 | ↑## | ↑ |
| LysoPC (24 : 1(15Z)) | C35 H55 N7 O2 | 628.4311 | 17.04 | 1.51 | ↓## | ↓ |
| SM (D18 : 1/14 : 0) | C39 H70 N4 O5 | 697.5252 | 19.17 | 1.67 | ↑## | ↓ |
Note. “↓” means decreased, “↑” means increased; compared with the normal group, #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01; compared with model group, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01.
Figure 8The contents of 19 endogenous compounds in plasma of rats in the control group, model group, and administration group. Note: versus normal group, #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01; versus model group, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01.
Figure 9Biomarkers enrichment analysis.
Potential biomarker enrichment analysis table.
| Metabolite set | Total | Hits | Expected |
| Holm P | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha-linolenic acid linoleic acid metabolism | 19 | 5 | 0.38 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Mitochondrial beta-oxidation of long-chain saturated fatty acids | 28 | 2 | 0.55 | 0.10 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Plasmalogen synthesis | 26 | 1 | 0.51 | 0.41 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Mitochondrial beta-oxidation of short-chain saturated fatty acids | 27 | 1 | 0.53 | 0.42 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Tryptophan metabolism | 60 | 1 | 1.17 | 0.71 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Arachidonic acid metabolism | 69 | 1 | 1.32 | 0.76 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Figure 10Biomarkers metabolic pathway map.
Analysis table of potential biomarker metabolic pathways.
| Pathway name | MatchStatus |
| Holm P | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids | 5/42 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.0 |
| Alpha-linolenic acid metabolism | 1/9 | 0.07 | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Glycerophospholipid metabolism | 1/30 | 0.21 | 1.0 | 0.05 |
| Arachidonic acid metabolism | 1/36 | 0.25 | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Tryptophan metabolism | 1/41 | 0.28 | 1.0 | 0.03 |
| Fatty acid biosynthesis | 1/43 | 0.30 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
Figure 11The metabolic pathway network by KEGG.