Literature DB >> 34194044

Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science.

Jake M Hofman1, Duncan J Watts2,3,4, Susan Athey5, Filiz Garip6, Thomas L Griffiths7,8, Jon Kleinberg9,10, Helen Margetts11,12, Sendhil Mullainathan13, Matthew J Salganik6, Simine Vazire14, Alessandro Vespignani15, Tal Yarkoni16.   

Abstract

Computational social science is more than just large repositories of digital data and the computational methods needed to construct and analyse them. It also represents a convergence of different fields with different ways of thinking about and doing science. The goal of this Perspective is to provide some clarity around how these approaches differ from one another and to propose how they might be productively integrated. Towards this end we make two contributions. The first is a schema for thinking about research activities along two dimensions-the extent to which work is explanatory, focusing on identifying and estimating causal effects, and the degree of consideration given to testing predictions of outcomes-and how these two priorities can complement, rather than compete with, one another. Our second contribution is to advocate that computational social scientists devote more attention to combining prediction and explanation, which we call integrative modelling, and to outline some practical suggestions for realizing this goal.

Year:  2021        PMID: 34194044     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03659-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  27 in total

1.  False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.

Authors:  Joseph P Simmons; Leif D Nelson; Uri Simonsohn
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-10-17

2.  A twenty-first century science.

Authors:  Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Beyond prediction: Using big data for policy problems.

Authors:  Susan Athey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Big data. The parable of Google Flu: traps in big data analysis.

Authors:  David Lazer; Ryan Kennedy; Gary King; Alessandro Vespignani
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning.

Authors:  Tal Yarkoni; Jacob Westfall
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-08-25

6.  Scaling up psychology via Scientific Regret Minimization.

Authors:  Mayank Agrawal; Joshua C Peterson; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Computational social science: Obstacles and opportunities.

Authors:  David M J Lazer; Alex Pentland; Duncan J Watts; Sinan Aral; Susan Athey; Noshir Contractor; Deen Freelon; Sandra Gonzalez-Bailon; Gary King; Helen Margetts; Alondra Nelson; Matthew J Salganik; Markus Strohmaier; Alessandro Vespignani; Claudia Wagner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Social science. Computational social science.

Authors:  David Lazer; Alex Pentland; Lada Adamic; Sinan Aral; Albert-Laszlo Barabasi; Devon Brewer; Nicholas Christakis; Noshir Contractor; James Fowler; Myron Gutmann; Tony Jebara; Gary King; Michael Macy; Deb Roy; Marshall Van Alstyne
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A manifesto for reproducible science.

Authors:  Marcus R Munafò; Brian A Nosek; Dorothy V M Bishop; Katherine S Button; Christopher D Chambers; Nathalie Percie du Sert; Uri Simonsohn; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Jennifer J Ware; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-01-10

10.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

View more
  9 in total

1.  Predicting How Well Adolescents Get Along with Peers and Teachers: A Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Farhan Ali; Rebecca P Ang
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2022-04-04

2.  Some Recommendations on the Use of Daily Life Methods in Affective Science.

Authors:  Peter Kuppens; Egon Dejonckheere; Elise K Kalokerinos; Peter Koval
Journal:  Affect Sci       Date:  2022-03-19

3.  A model-based opinion dynamics approach to tackle vaccine hesitancy.

Authors:  Camilla Ancona; Francesco Lo Iudice; Franco Garofalo; Pietro De Lellis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Social media and well-being: A methodological perspective.

Authors:  Douglas A Parry; Jacob T Fisher; Hannah Mieczkowski; Craig J R Sewall; Brittany I Davidson
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2021-12-06

5.  Development of a Computational Policy Model for Comparing the Effect of Compensation Scheme Policies on Recovery After Workplace Injury.

Authors:  Jason Thompson; Camilo Cruz-Gambardella
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-10

6.  A deep learning model identifies emphasis on hard work as an important predictor of income inequality.

Authors:  Abhishek Sheetal; Srinwanti H Chaudhury; Krishna Savani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Egocentric network characteristics of people who inject drugs in the Chicago metro area and associations with hepatitis C virus and injection risk behavior.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti; Joshua Falk; Carl Latkin; Maggie Kaufmann; Leslie Williams; Basmattee Boodram
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2022-06-02

8.  Forecasting elections with agent-based modeling: Two live experiments.

Authors:  Ming Gao; Zhongyuan Wang; Kai Wang; Chenhui Liu; Shiping Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 9.  Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility.

Authors:  Tenelle Porter; Abdo Elnakouri; Ethan A Meyers; Takuya Shibayama; Eranda Jayawickreme; Igor Grossmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Psychol       Date:  2022-06-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.