Literature DB >> 36046007

Some Recommendations on the Use of Daily Life Methods in Affective Science.

Peter Kuppens1, Egon Dejonckheere1,2, Elise K Kalokerinos3, Peter Koval1,3.   

Abstract

Real-world emotions are often more vivid, personally meaningful, and consequential than those evoked in the lab. Therefore, studying emotions in daily life is essential to test theories, discover new phenomena, and understand healthy emotional functioning; in short, to move affective science forward. The past decades have seen a surge of research using daily diary, experience sampling, or ecological momentary assessment methods to study emotional phenomena in daily life. In this paper, we will share some of the insights we have gained from our collective experience applying such daily life methods to study everyday affective processes. We highlight what we see as important considerations and caveats involved in using these methods and formulate recommendations to improve their use in future research. These insights focus on the importance of (i) theory and hypothesis-testing; (ii) measurement; (iii) timescale; and (iv) context, when studying emotions in their natural habitat. © The Society for Affective Science 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affect; Daily life methods; Emotions; Experience sampling; ecological momentary assessment

Year:  2022        PMID: 36046007      PMCID: PMC9382967          DOI: 10.1007/s42761-022-00101-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Affect Sci        ISSN: 2662-2041


  59 in total

1.  Differentiate to Regulate: Low Negative Emotion Differentiation Is Associated With Ineffective Use but Not Selection of Emotion-Regulation Strategies.

Authors:  Elise K Kalokerinos; Yasemin Erbas; Eva Ceulemans; Peter Kuppens
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-04-16

Review 2.  What Constitutes Strong Psychological Science? The (Neglected) Role of Diagnosticity and A Priori Theorizing.

Authors:  Klaus Fiedler
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-01

3.  The temporal deployment of emotion regulation strategies during negative emotional episodes.

Authors:  Elise K Kalokerinos; Maxime Résibois; Philippe Verduyn; Peter Kuppens
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2016-11-07

4.  The jingle and jangle of emotion assessment: Imprecise measurement, casual scale usage, and conceptual fuzziness in emotion research.

Authors:  Aaron C Weidman; Conor M Steckler; Jessica L Tracy
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2016-09-19

5.  Better methods can't make up for mediocre theory.

Authors:  Paul Smaldino
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The Questionable Ecological Validity of Ecological Momentary Assessment: Considerations for Design and Analysis.

Authors:  Nilam Ram; Miriam Brinberg; Aaron L Pincus; David E Conroy
Journal:  Res Hum Dev       Date:  2017-08-10

7.  Measures of emotion: A review.

Authors:  Iris B Mauss; Michael D Robinson
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2009-02-01

8.  The impact of social interactions and pain on daily positive and negative affect in adults with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Nicole V Rivera; Patricia A Parmelee; Dylan M Smith
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.658

9.  Theory Construction Methodology: A Practical Framework for Building Theories in Psychology.

Authors:  Denny Borsboom; Han L J van der Maas; Jonas Dalege; Rogier A Kievit; Brian D Haig
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-02-16

10.  The dynamical signature of anhedonia in major depressive disorder: positive emotion dynamics, reactivity, and recovery.

Authors:  Vera E Heininga; Egon Dejonckheere; Marlies Houben; Jasmien Obbels; Pascal Sienaert; Bart Leroy; Joris van Roy; Peter Kuppens
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.