| Literature DB >> 34193889 |
Maysam Oladazimi1,2, Thibaut Putelat3,4, Alan Champneys3, Cornelius Schwarz5,6, Robert Szalai3, Kentaro Noda7,8, Isao Shimoyama7,9.
Abstract
Neuronal activities underlying a percept are constrained by the physics of sensory signals. In the tactile sense such constraints are frictional stick-slip events, occurring, amongst other vibrotactile features, when tactile sensors are in contact with objects. We reveal new biomechanical phenomena about the transmission of these microNewton forces at the tip of a rat's whisker, where they occur, to the base where they engage primary afferents. Using high resolution videography and accurate measurement of axial and normal forces at the follicle, we show that the conical and curved rat whisker acts as a sign-converting amplification filter for moment to robustly engage primary afferents. Furthermore, we present a model based on geometrically nonlinear Cosserat rod theory and a friction model that recreates the observed whole-beam whisker dynamics. The model quantifies the relation between kinematics (positions and velocities) and dynamic variables (forces and moments). Thus, only videographic assessment of acceleration is required to estimate forces and moments measured by the primary afferents. Our study highlights how sensory systems deal with complex physical constraints of perceptual targets and sensors.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34193889 PMCID: PMC8245408 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92770-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Whisker and biomechanical measurement. (A) Rat whisker C4. The rat ‘s head and location of whisker field is shown. The position of C4 is the green dot in the magnified whisker field. Conical shape, length and distance (cf. panel C) are shown. (Note that we repeated core measurements using also a C3 and a D3 whisker, the locations of which are indicated by grey dots) (B) Microscopic images of whisker tip (left) and base (right). (C) Experimental set up (view from the recording camera). The rotating rod is seen on top. At the bottom, the half-cylinder holding the sandpaper is shown. Experimental variables position on whisker (length) , driving speed , and distance are indicated. (D) Stick–slip events in a whisker moving across a texture. Videographic analysis of whisker shape and location in and during one protraction (all frames of the video are shown, the sandpaper was located at distance 1 mm less than whisker length: i.e. at mm). Red: all frames below the driving velocity—pointing to sticking periods. Green: instances with local maximum of acceleration—pointing to slips. The first frame captured when the whisker was moving free in air (no texture) is shown for comparison (violet). Inset: Cross-correlogram of accelerations at the tip ( mm, top white line) vs. that at the base ( mm, bottom white line). The grey lines indicate time lag (abscissa) and correlation coefficient (ordinate). (E) Method to identify stick and slip events. Sticks (red) were found by thresholding the velocity trace (at driving speed 420°/s) and minimizing the trace below that limit. Slips (green) were found by maximizing the acceleration strips above threshold (2 standard deviations found with movement in air/no contact). On top all events are shown again aligned on the time axis. Further, a short sequence of 4 slips and 7 sticks is shown in the blow-up.
Figure 2Curvature of the whisker in moving contact. (A) Movement in air. Curvature of each point along the beam and across time is colour coded. Inset: Calculation of curvature . The angle at each point of the beam is measured and the curvature calculated as We plot , in which the intrinsic curvature of the whisker (at rest in air) is subtracted. (B) Curvature as in A when in contact with a smooth sandpaper (P1200) and (C) a rough sandpaper (P80). For both the distance was (distance mm; speed °/s). Arrows point to curvature changes evoked by stick–slip events being transmitted rapidly along the beam and therefore appearing as vertical stripes. (D) Spectra of base movements shown in ABC. Inset shows the same data rescaled to dB. Note the prominent peak in the spectrum at ~ 200 Hz in the ‘free in air’ condition, indicating the 2nd bending mode.
Figure 3Moment amplification during transmission from whisker tip to base. (A) Curvature of whisker in contact with P80 (speed 420°/s). Each line represents one time bin (0.25 ms). Two frames toward the extremes of the curvature are coloured to demonstrate a node of vibration at around 10 mm from the tip (2nd bending mode). (B) Moment as calculated from Eq. (2). Left Inset: Schematic of normal and axial forces (Fa) and moment () acting in the plane of whisker movement. Moments are negligible at the tip and small negative moment builds up a short distance from the tip. (cf. right inset). The left bundle of lines indicate moment calculated using (instead , cf. Equation 2). Two arbitrary frames are highlighted in green to demonstrate the node of vibration. (C) Moment at tip (s = 24 mm) and base (s = 3 mm) of the whisker (note the three orders of magnitude difference in scale). The red areas indicate periods of sticking (°/s). (D, E) Average moment with respect to stick (red) and slip (green) events (as identified using the method in Fig. 1B). Nine correlograms taken from traces measured with three different sandpapers and using three driving speeds are shown.
Figure 4Micro-force measurement at the whisker base. (A) Left inset: Photograph of the measurement set-up. The sensor was mounted on an immobile ledge directly above the rotation axis of a rotating drum. The drum was perforated to save weight and contained a wall to fix the sandpaper. Centre: Schematic of measurement set-up. The whisker (green) was mounted on the sensor (dark grey and pink), and brought in contact with the sandpaper (violet), which in turn was rotated by the drum (grey arrow). Two measurements were performed. First, the forces in the plane of whisker movement (Fa) were directly measured by the piezoresistive sensor (right inset). Second, the lateral acceleration at the base (s = 3 mm) () was assessed by videography (cf. Fig. S1). (B) The top graph plots (red) on top of , the bottom one plots and . Acceleration is in excellent correspondence to the forces acting on the base. (C) Average normal force triggered on stick events. builds up during sticks (as well as , not shown). Compare with the parallel increment of moment as calculated from curvature measurements (Fig. 3D).
List of all input parameters of the Cosserat and the friction model.
| Parameter (measured) | Symbol | Units | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whisker length | mm | 28.36 | |
| Base radius | μm | 69 | |
| Tip radius | μm | 2.5 | |
| Intrinsic curvature | rad/m | 0 | |
| Whisker mass | mg | 0.19 | |
| 2nd mode natural frequency | Hz | 230 | |
| Truncation length | mm | 1.066 | |
| Density | kg m-3 | 1295.1 | |
| Young modulus | GPa | 3.3 | |
| Sound speed | m s-1 | 1596.3 | |
| Driving plate location | 0.98 | ||
| Damping constant | kg m s-1 | ||
| Dimensionless damping constant | 0.1–1 | ||
| Friction velocity variation strength | 0.035 | ||
| Interfacial state variation strength | 0.049 | ||
| Friction velocity reference | μm s-1 | 1 | |
| Memory length | μm | 5–500 | |
Figure 5Kinematic and dynamical output variables of the model (see full set of output variables in Table 2). Stick and slip events were identified as in the videographic measurements (cf. Fig. 1E, dots in base kinematic traces in which the identification was done, and lines throughout, red: sticks; green: slips) (A–C) Kinematic variables (D–F) Dynamical variables. (G) The average normal force to the whisker base builds up to a maximum around a stick event. (H) Spectra of moments for model runs using different values of [5,50,500]. Top and bottom are the same data plotted as dB or PSD. Medium values of match the experimental data (cf. Fig. 2D) best, as this model best recreates the dominance of the 2nd bending mode (2nd harmonic is marked by an asterisk). (I) Curvature output () of the model using μm. (experimental data cf. Fig. 2B). (J) Moments (each line represents moments at one time point along ). A few lines have been coloured green to demonstrate the node of vibration at 2nd bending mode. Comparable experimental data are in Fig. 3B.
List of all output parameters of the Cosserat and the friction model.
| Kinematics | Symbol | Arguments |
|---|---|---|
| Angular position, velocity, acceleration | ||
| Curvature | ||
| Normal, axial force | ||
| Moment | ||
| Friction | ||
| Pressure | ||