Catherine Stewart1, Anna Konstantellou1, Fatema Kassamali1, Natalie McLaughlin1, Darren Cutinha1, Rachel Bryant-Waugh1, Mima Simic1, Ivan Eisler1,2, Julian Baudinet3,4. 1. Maudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders, Maudsley Hospital, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE8 5AZ, UK. 2. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK. 3. Maudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders, Maudsley Hospital, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE8 5AZ, UK. Julian.Baudinet@slam.nhs.uk. 4. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK. Julian.Baudinet@slam.nhs.uk.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, research in virtual care for young people with eating disorders was preliminary and implementation rare. This study explored the experience of young people, parents and clinicians when therapy was transitioned to virtual provision as a result of the UK lockdown in March 2020. METHODS: A mixed-method approach was used in this study. Online questionnaires that included a mixture of rating (Likert scale) and free-text response questions were completed by 53 young people with any eating disorder, 75 parents and 23 clinicians. Questions focused on the experience of online treatment as well as the impact on engagement, perceived treatment efficacy and preferences around treatment mode in the future. Likert scale questions were analysed using a summary approach. Free-text responses were analysed qualitatively using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Responses to rating scale questions indicate satisfaction with treatment, good engagement and ability to manage technology. Young people who had transitioned care, rather than started care virtually in lockdown, rated therapy as less effective. However, individual accounts of experience were more varied. Reflexive thematic analysis of free-text responses identified key themes of 1) Making it work, 2) Home as a therapeutic space, and 3) Disrupted connection and 4) Into the future. CONCLUSIONS: These results have implications for ongoing care during the pandemic and for future implementation of virtual care in the treatment of young people with eating disorders. Particular issues arising are the trade-off between accessibility and therapeutic engagement and depth and need for consideration of equal access to treatment in socially unequal societies.
INTRODUCTION: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, research in virtual care for young people with eating disorders was preliminary and implementation rare. This study explored the experience of young people, parents and clinicians when therapy was transitioned to virtual provision as a result of the UK lockdown in March 2020. METHODS: A mixed-method approach was used in this study. Online questionnaires that included a mixture of rating (Likert scale) and free-text response questions were completed by 53 young people with any eating disorder, 75 parents and 23 clinicians. Questions focused on the experience of online treatment as well as the impact on engagement, perceived treatment efficacy and preferences around treatment mode in the future. Likert scale questions were analysed using a summary approach. Free-text responses were analysed qualitatively using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Responses to rating scale questions indicate satisfaction with treatment, good engagement and ability to manage technology. Young people who had transitioned care, rather than started care virtually in lockdown, rated therapy as less effective. However, individual accounts of experience were more varied. Reflexive thematic analysis of free-text responses identified key themes of 1) Making it work, 2) Home as a therapeutic space, and 3) Disrupted connection and 4) Into the future. CONCLUSIONS: These results have implications for ongoing care during the pandemic and for future implementation of virtual care in the treatment of young people with eating disorders. Particular issues arising are the trade-off between accessibility and therapeutic engagement and depth and need for consideration of equal access to treatment in socially unequal societies.
Authors: Glenn Waller; Matthew Pugh; Sandra Mulkens; Elana Moore; Victoria A Mountford; Jacqueline Carter; Amy Wicksteed; Aryel Maharaj; Tracey D Wade; Lucene Wisniewski; Nicholas R Farrell; Bronwyn Raykos; Susanne Jorgensen; Jane Evans; Jennifer J Thomas; Ivana Osenk; Carolyn Paddock; Brittany Bohrer; Kristen Anderson; Hannah Turner; Tom Hildebrandt; Nikos Xanidis; Vera Smit Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Paulo P P Machado; Ana Pinto-Bastos; Rita Ramos; Tânia F Rodrigues; Elsa Louro; Sónia Gonçalves; Isabel Brandão; Ana Vaz Journal: J Eat Disord Date: 2020-11-02
Authors: Jörg M Fegert; Benedetto Vitiello; Paul L Plener; Vera Clemens Journal: Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Przemysław Seweryn Kasiak; Natalia Adamczyk; Alicja Monika Jodczyk; Aleksandra Kaproń; Anna Lisowska; Artur Mamcarz; Daniel Śliż Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 4.614