Literature DB >> 34192006

Prevalence and correlates of physical activity in a sample of UK adults observing social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Lee Smith1, Louis Jacob2, Laurie Butler3, Felipe Schuch4, Yvonne Barnett5, Igor Grabovac6, Nicola Veronese7, Cristina Caperchione8, Guillermo F Lopez-Sanchez9, Jacob Meyer10, Mohammad Abufaraj11, Anita Yakkundi12, Nicola Armstrong13, Mark A Tully14.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the levels and correlates of physical activity during COVID-19 social distancing in a sample of the UK public.
METHODS: This paper presents analyses of data from a cross-sectional study. Levels of physical activity during COVID-19 social distancing were self-reported. Participants also reported on sociodemographic and clinical data. The association between several factors and physical activity was studied using regression models.
RESULTS: Nine hundred and eleven adults were included (64.0% were women and 50.4% of the participants were aged 35-64 years). 75.0% of the participants met the physical activity guidelines during social distancing. Meeting these guidelines during social distancing was significantly associated with sex (reference: male; female: OR=1.60, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.33), age (reference: 18-34 years; ≥65 years: OR=4.11, 95% CI 2.01 to 8.92), annual household income (reference: <£15 000; £15 000-<£25 000: OR=2.03, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.76; £25 000-<£40 000: OR=3.16, 95% CI 1.68 to 6.04; £40 000-<£60 000: OR=2.27, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.34; ≥£60 000: OR=2.11, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.09), level of physical activity per day when not observing social distancing (OR=1.00 (per 1 min increase), 95% CI 1.00 to 1.01), and any physical symptom experienced during social distancing (reference: no; yes: OR=0.31, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.46).
CONCLUSION: During COVID-19, social distancing interventions should focus on increasing physical activity levels among younger adults, men and those with low annual household income. It should be noted in the present sample that women and younger adults are over-represented. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; physical activity; public health

Year:  2020        PMID: 34192006      PMCID: PMC7358093          DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med        ISSN: 2055-7647


In the present sample of UK adults following UK COVID-19 social distancing guidance, a high level of physical activity was observed. Meeting physical activity guidelines was observed in women and older adults. Interventions should now be developed to support women and older adults in sustaining this level of physical activity post pandemic.

Introduction

Physical activity is defined as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscle that results in energy expenditure.1 Regular and sustained participation in physical activity is associated with almost every facet of health across the lifespan2–4 and importantly the prevention of all-cause early mortality.5 Moreover, acute exercise is an immune system adjuvant that improves defence activity and metabolic health.6 Global governments have produced recommendations for adequate levels of physical activity. One key message from the WHO guidance is that adults should achieve at least 150 min of moderate physical activity and/or 75 min of vigorous physical activity per week.7 However, despite this the proportion of UK adults meeting the physical activity guidelines is low8 and declines with age.9 Among key determinants of changes in physical activity levels are significant life events.10 In March 2020, the WHO declared the COVID-19 outbreak a global pandemic. As of 17 April 2020 (10:00 Central European Time), more than 2 160 170 cases have been diagnosed globally, with over 68 976 fatalities.11 On 23 March 2020 the UK government released social distancing guidance to reduce the risk of transmission. This guidance was implemented for an initial 3-week period, with the guidance extended for a further 3 weeks on 16 April 2020. It should also be noted here that prior to the mass guidance, the UK public who were at high risk for serious complications if they contracted COVID-19, lived with someone who was at high risk for serious complications if they contracted COVID-19, and the elderly were encouraged to engage in social distancing. This scenario is certainly a key life event that may have had an impact on population levels of physical activity. Moreover, social distancing guidance may influence physical activity in different ways dependent on age, sex, chronic conditions, socioeconomic status and marital status—all of which have been shown to be associated with physical activity during non-pandemic times.9 12–15 Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the levels of physical activity during the UK COVID-19 social distancing guidance and investigate how such levels vary by sociodemographic, behavioural, clinical and contextual factors.

Methods

This paper presents preplanned interim analysis of data from a cross-sectional epidemiological study, administered through an online survey. The study was launched on 17 March 2020, 17 days after the first case of COVID-19 was diagnosed in the UK. Participants were recruited through social media and through national media outlets. Adults aged 18 years and over, currently residing in the UK and observing social distancing due to COVID-19 were eligible to participate. Participants were directed to a data-encrypted website where they indicated their consent to participate after reading an information sheet. Before completing the survey participants were asked if they were currently observing social distancing and were over 18 years of age. If the participant’s response was affirmative to both questions, the participant was asked to complete the survey.

Dependent variable

Participants were asked the following: (1) ‘How much time on an average day have you spent in vigorous activity since social distancing?’ and (2) ‘How much time on an average day have you spent in moderate activity since social distancing?’ Responses were reported in hours and minutes. Physical activity when social distancing was included in the analyses as a dichotomous (sufficient physical activity per day: yes or no) and a continuous (number of minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day) variable. Following the WHO recommendations on physical activity levels per week,7 sufficient physical activity per day was defined as approximately 21 min of moderate physical activity and/or 11 min of vigorous physical activity per day.

Independent variables

Demographic data were collected, including sex (male or female), age (in 10-year age bands), marital status (single/separated/divorced/widowed or married/in a domestic partnership), employment (yes or no) and annual household income (ie, <£15 000, £15 000–<£25 000, £25 000–<£40 000, £40 000–<£60 000, ≥£60 000). Participants were also asked to indicate which of the four main UK countries they lived in. Behavioural factors included current smoking status (yes or no), current alcohol consumption (yes or no) and usual levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day during non-pandemic times (when not self-isolating). Participants were also asked to report chronic physical conditions. Finally, participants were asked if they had experienced any physical symptoms of COVID-19 during social distancing and the number of days they had been social distancing.

Statistical analyses

Sample characteristics were compared between participants who met and did not meet the physical activity guidelines using χ2 tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. The mean number of minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day when social distancing was further compared between male and female participants using t-test, while it was compared between adults aged 18–34 years, those aged 35–64 years and those aged ≥65 years using analysis of variance. Effect sizes were estimated using phi coefficients for categorical variables with two categories, Cramer’s V for categorical variables with more than two categories, and Cohen’s d for continuous variables. The relationship between defined factors and physical activity during social distancing was studied in logistic (dichotomous physical activity variable; sufficient physical activity per day: yes or no) and linear regression models (continuous physical activity variable; number of minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day). Results from the logistic regression analysis are presented as ORs and 95% CIs, while beta coefficients with associated 95% CIs are displayed for the linear regression analysis. The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05. The statistical analysis was performed with R V.3.6.2 (The R Foundation).

Results

Nine hundred and eleven adults were included in this cross-sectional study (64.0% were women and 50.4% of the participants were aged 35–64 years; table 1). Overall, 75.0% of participants had sufficient physical activity during social distancing. The mean (SD) number of minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day when social distancing was 94.0 (119.1), and significantly increased from 65.8 (77.7) in the age group 18–34 years to 152.9 (146.3) in the age group ≥65 years (figure 1). The logistic regression analysis showed that sufficient physical activity during social distancing was significantly associated with sex (reference: male; female: OR=1.60, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.33), age (reference: 18–34 years; ≥65 years: OR=4.11, 95% CI 2.01 to 8.92), annual household income (reference: <£15 000; £15 000–<£25 000: OR=2.03, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.76; £25 000–<£40 000: OR=3.16, 95% CI 1.68 to 6.04; £40 000–<£60 000: OR=2.27, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.34; ≥£60 000: OR=2.11, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.09), level of physical activity per day when not social distancing (OR=1.00 (per 1 min increase), 95% CI 1.00 to 1.01), and any physical symptom experienced during social distancing (reference: no; yes: OR=0.31, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.46; table 2). Similar findings were found in linear regression analyses.
Table 1

Sample characteristics (overall and by physical activity status)

CharacteristicsCategoryOverall (n=911)Sufficient physical activity per dayEffect size*P value†
No (n=228)Yes (n=683)
SexMale36.037.335.60.020.688
Female64.062.764.4
Age (years)18–3431.340.828.10.19<0.001
35–6450.453.149.5
≥6518.36.122.4
Marital statusSingle/separated/divorced/widowed44.855.741.20.13<0.001
Married/in a domestic partnership55.244.358.8
EmploymentNo41.335.543.20.070.050
Yes58.764.556.8
Annual household income<£15 00014.822.712.10.140.002
£15 000–<£25 00018.416.918.9
£25 000–<£40 00022.817.324.6
£40 000–<£60 00020.921.820.6
≥£60 00023.221.323.8
RegionEngland77.381.176.10.070.259
Northern Ireland19.317.219.9
Scotland2.30.92.8
Wales1.10.91.2
Current smokingNo88.286.388.80.030.377
Yes11.813.711.2
Current alcohol consumptionNo32.737.231.20.060.114
Yes67.362.868.8
Level of physical activity per day when not social distancing (in minutes)Mean (SD)166.2 (167.7)107.8 (145.0)185.7 (170.3)0.47<0.001
Number of chronic physical conditionsMean (SD)1.8 (2.1)1.7 (2.1)1.8 (2.1)0.040.559
Number of chronic psychiatric conditionsMean (SD)0.6 (0.9)0.9 (1.0)0.6 (0.8)0.33<0.001
Any physical symptom experienced during social distancingNo73.957.479.50.22<0.001
Yes26.142.620.5
Number of days of social distancingMean (SD)9.1 (6.9)8.3 (4.2)9.4 (7.6)0.160.007

Participants were asked how much time in minutes they spend on an average day in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity when self-isolating. The WHO recommendations on physical activity levels per week (ie, at least 150 min of moderate physical activity and/or 75 min of vigorous physical activity in adults aged ≥18 years) were further used to distinguish participants with and those without sufficient physical activity per day (ie, approximately 21 min of moderate physical activity and/or 11 min of vigorous physical activity).

Values are percentages unless otherwise stated.

*Effect size was calculated using phi coefficient for categorical variables with two categories, Cramer’s V for categorical variables with more than two categories, and Cohen’s d for continuous variables.

†P values were based on χ2 tests for categorical variables and on t-tests for continuous variables.

Figure 1

Number of minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day during social distancing in the overall sample and in sex and age groups. Participants were asked how much time in minutes they spend on an average day in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity when social distancing. The number of minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day was compared between male and female participants using t-test, while it was compared between the three age groups using analysis of variance.

Table 2

Factors associated with physical activity in social distancing adults during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in 2020 in the UK

CharacteristicsCategorySufficient physical activity per day (dichotomous variable; logistic regression)Level of physical activity per day (continuous variable; linear regression)
OR95% CIP valueβ95% CIP value
SexMaleReference
Female1.601.10 to 2.330.01516.450.50 to 32.000.041
Age (years)18–34Reference
35–641.440.94 to 2.200.09128.099.54 to 47.030.003
≥654.112.01 to 8.92<0.00171.7046.23 to 98.13<0.001
Marital statusSingle/separated/divorced/widowedReference
Married/in a domestic partnership1.380.92 to 2.060.1194.48−12.28 to 21.370.601
EmploymentNoReference
Yes0.850.55 to 1.330.48521.67−40.27 to 3.370.021
Annual household income<£15 000Reference
£15 000–<£25 0002.031.11 to 3.760.02335.889.04 to 62.660.009
£25 000–<£40 0003.161.68 to 6.04<0.00123.26−3.20 to 50.010.087
£40 000–<£60 0002.271.19 to 4.340.01327.40−0.74 to 55.290.055
≥£60 0002.111.09 to 4.090.02631.242.71 to 59.590.031
RegionEnglandReference
Northern Ireland1.220.77 to 1.970.41110.95−8.04 to 30.070.260
Scotland3.420.84 to 23.350.128−1.37−52.46 to 50.020.958
Wales1.640.33 to 12.320.57635.10−31.49 to 102.060.302
Current smokingNoReference
Yes1.160.68 to 2.020.5997.92−15.29 to 31.470.506
Current alcohol consumptionNoReference
Yes1.230.85 to 1.790.273−11.99−28.22 to 4.120.146
Level of physical activity per day when not social distancingPer 1 min increase1.001.00 to 1.01<0.0010.260.22 to 0.30<0.001
Number of chronic physical conditionsPer one-condition increase0.960.87 to 1.060.427−4.02−8.66 to 0.050.053
Number of chronic psychiatric conditionsPer one-condition increase0.820.67 to 1.000.052−3.70−12.69 to 5.030.414
Any physical symptom experienced during social distancingNoReference
Yes0.310.21 to 0.46<0.00125.53−42.46 to −7.990.004
Number of days of social distancingPer 1-day increase1.030.99 to 1.070.162−0.18−1.28 to 0.930.756

Participants were asked how much time in minutes they spend on an average day in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity when self-isolating. The WHO recommendations on physical activity levels per week (ie, at least 150 min of moderate physical activity and/or 75 min of vigorous physical activity in adults aged ≥18 years) were further used to distinguish participants with and those without sufficient physical activity per day (ie, approximately 21 min of moderate physical activity and/or 11 min of vigorous physical activity). Physical activity was also included in the analyses as a continuous variable and corresponded to the number of minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day.

The association between defined factors (ie, sex, age, marital status, employment, annual household income, region, current smoking, current alcohol consumption, level of physical activity per day when not self-isolating, number of chronic physical conditions, number of chronic psychiatric conditions, any physical symptom experienced during social distancing and number of days of social distancing) and physical activity was studied using logistic (dichotomous physical activity variable) and linear regression (continuous physical activity variable) models.

All significant associations are reported in bold text.

SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Number of minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day during social distancing in the overall sample and in sex and age groups. Participants were asked how much time in minutes they spend on an average day in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity when social distancing. The number of minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day was compared between male and female participants using t-test, while it was compared between the three age groups using analysis of variance. Sample characteristics (overall and by physical activity status) Participants were asked how much time in minutes they spend on an average day in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity when self-isolating. The WHO recommendations on physical activity levels per week (ie, at least 150 min of moderate physical activity and/or 75 min of vigorous physical activity in adults aged ≥18 years) were further used to distinguish participants with and those without sufficient physical activity per day (ie, approximately 21 min of moderate physical activity and/or 11 min of vigorous physical activity). Values are percentages unless otherwise stated. *Effect size was calculated using phi coefficient for categorical variables with two categories, Cramer’s V for categorical variables with more than two categories, and Cohen’s d for continuous variables. †P values were based on χ2 tests for categorical variables and on t-tests for continuous variables. Factors associated with physical activity in social distancing adults during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in 2020 in the UK Participants were asked how much time in minutes they spend on an average day in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity when self-isolating. The WHO recommendations on physical activity levels per week (ie, at least 150 min of moderate physical activity and/or 75 min of vigorous physical activity in adults aged ≥18 years) were further used to distinguish participants with and those without sufficient physical activity per day (ie, approximately 21 min of moderate physical activity and/or 11 min of vigorous physical activity). Physical activity was also included in the analyses as a continuous variable and corresponded to the number of minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day. The association between defined factors (ie, sex, age, marital status, employment, annual household income, region, current smoking, current alcohol consumption, level of physical activity per day when not self-isolating, number of chronic physical conditions, number of chronic psychiatric conditions, any physical symptom experienced during social distancing and number of days of social distancing) and physical activity was studied using logistic (dichotomous physical activity variable) and linear regression (continuous physical activity variable) models. All significant associations are reported in bold text. SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Discussion

The present study found that a total of 75% of the participants met the physical activity guidelines during UK COVID-19 social distancing. Moreover, women, older adults, those with higher annual household income and those not experiencing physical COVID-19 symptoms were significantly likely to be more physically active. Previous studies have identified that approximately 58%–66% of the UK adult population meet physical activity guidelines,8 whereas the present study found that this level was at 75% during social distancing. During COVID-19 social distancing the UK public may have experienced an increase in discretionary time and thus may be using this additional discretionary time to be physically active. Second, one of the key reasons that one may leave their home grounds during COVID-19 social distancing is to partake in one form of exercise daily for 60 min. Interestingly higher levels of physical activity were observed in older adults and in women. These findings contradict the literature during non-pandemic times where the younger and men are observed to have higher levels of physical activity.8 9 Findings must be interpreted in light of the study limitations. First, participants were asked to self-report their physical activity level and thus potentially introducing self-reporting bias into the findings. The present survey did not report the domain of physical activity, only overall levels. However, social distancing legislation in the UK meant that individuals were not permitted to go to their place of work and the behaviour recorded would most likely be leisure time physical activity for which physical activity guidelines are based on. Finally, when comparing the present sample with recent UK population estimates, women (64.0% vs 50.6%) and adults aged 18–34 years (31.3% vs 19.7% (20–34 years in the comparison database, strictly speaking)) are over-represented.16 Moreover, it is indeed known that online surveys may not yield generalisable, epidemiological samples, but given the nature of restrictions in place on personal contacts there are few options to collect this type of data. The present findings suggest that during COVID-19, social distancing interventions should focus on increasing physical activity levels among younger adults, men and those with low annual household income. It should be noted in the present sample that women and younger adults are over-represented.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Life-change events and participation in physical activity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Steven Allender; Lauren Hutchinson; Charles Foster
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 2.483

2.  Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research.

Authors:  C J Caspersen; K E Powell; G M Christenson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews.

Authors:  Darren E R Warburton; Shannon S D Bredin
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: A systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Conor Cunningham; Roger O' Sullivan; Paolo Caserotti; Mark A Tully
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Influence of marital status on physical activity levels among older adults.

Authors:  Kelley K Pettee; Jennifer S Brach; Andrea M Kriska; Robert Boudreau; Caroline R Richardson; Lisa H Colbert; Suzanne Satterfield; Marjolein Visser; Tamara B Harris; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Anne B Newman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Patterns and correlates of physical activity behaviour over 10 years in older adults: prospective analyses from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

Authors:  Lee Smith; Benjamin Gardner; Abigail Fisher; Mark Hamer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Socio-economic determinants of physical activity across the life course: A "DEterminants of DIet and Physical ACtivity" (DEDIPAC) umbrella literature review.

Authors:  Grainne O'Donoghue; Aileen Kennedy; Anna Puggina; Katina Aleksovska; Christoph Buck; Con Burns; Greet Cardon; Angela Carlin; Donatella Ciarapica; Marco Colotto; Giancarlo Condello; Tara Coppinger; Cristina Cortis; Sara D'Haese; Marieke De Craemer; Andrea Di Blasio; Sylvia Hansen; Licia Iacoviello; Johann Issartel; Pascal Izzicupo; Lina Jaeschke; Martina Kanning; Fiona Ling; Agnes Luzak; Giorgio Napolitano; Julie-Anne Nazare; Camille Perchoux; Caterina Pesce; Tobias Pischon; Angela Polito; Alessandra Sannella; Holger Schulz; Chantal Simon; Rhoda Sohun; Astrid Steinbrecher; Wolfgang Schlicht; Ciaran MacDonncha; Laura Capranica; Stefania Boccia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The compelling link between physical activity and the body's defense system.

Authors:  David C Nieman; Laurel M Wentz
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 7.179

9.  Physical activity trajectories and mortality: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Alexander Mok; Kay-Tee Khaw; Robert Luben; Nick Wareham; Soren Brage
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-06-26

10.  Gender differences in leisure-time physical activity.

Authors:  Mario Renato Azevedo; Cora Luiza Pavin Araújo; Felipe Fossati Reichert; Fernando Vinholes Siqueira; Marcelo Cozzensa da Silva; Pedro Curi Hallal
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.380

View more
  25 in total

1.  UK Adults' Exercise Locations, Use of Digital Programs, and Associations with Physical Activity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From the Health Behaviours During the COVID-19 Pandemic Study.

Authors:  Verena Schneider; Dimitra Kale; Aleksandra Herbec; Emma Beard; Abigail Fisher; Lion Shahab
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-06-21

2.  Correlates of and changes in aerobic physical activity and strength training before and after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: findings from the HEBECO study.

Authors:  Aleksandra Herbec; Verena Schneider; Abigail Fisher; Dimitra Kale; Lion Shahab; Phillippa Lally
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Daily Life Patterns, Psychophysical Conditions, and Immunity of Adolescents in the COVID-19 Era: A Mixed Research with Qualitative Interviews by a Quasi-Experimental Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Ji-Eun Yu; Denny Eun; Yong-Seok Jee
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

4.  Moderate to vigorous physical activity and sedentary behavior changes in self-isolating adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: a cross-sectional survey exploring correlates.

Authors:  Mark Tully; Lee Smith; Felipe Barreto Schuch; Rugero A Bulzing; Jacob Meyer; Guillermo F López-Sánchez; Igor Grabovac; Peter Willeit; Davy Vancampfort; Cristina M Caperchione; Kabir P Sadarangani; André O Werneck; Philip B Ward
Journal:  Sport Sci Health       Date:  2021-06-05

5.  The Impact of Coronavirus (COVID-19) Related Public-Health Measures on Training Behaviours of Individuals Previously Participating in Resistance Training: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Authors:  James Steele; Patroklos Androulakis-Korakakis; Luke Carlson; David Williams; Stuart Phillips; Dave Smith; Brad J Schoenfeld; Jeremy P Loenneke; Richard Winett; Takashi Abe; Stéphane Dufour; Martino V Franchi; Fabio Sarto; Tommy R Lundberg; Paulo Gentil; Thue Kvorning; Jürgen Giessing; Milan Sedliak; Antonio Paoli; Fiona Spotswood; Alex Lucas; James P Fisher
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Weight Status of University Students during the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Cross-National Comparative Study.

Authors:  Seok Tyug Tan; Chin Xuan Tan; Seok Shin Tan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Creativity and Leisure During COVID-19: Examining the Relationship Between Leisure Activities, Motivations, and Psychological Well-Being.

Authors:  K F Morse; Philip A Fine; Kathryn J Friedlander
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-05

8.  Physical Activity among Adults Residing in 11 Countries during the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown.

Authors:  Kele Ding; Jingzhen Yang; Ming-Kai Chin; Lindsay Sullivan; J Larry Durstine; Verónica Violant-Holz; Giyasettin Demirhan; Nara R C Oliveira; Biljana Popeska; Garry Kuan; Waheeda Khan; Jianhui Dai; Xia Xu; Zornitza Mladenova; Govindasamy Balasekaran; Gary A Smith
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Associations between sociodemographic factors and physical activity and sedentary behaviors in adults with chronic diseases during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jean Marinho da Silva; Rozangela Verlengia; José Jonas de Oliveira; Anna Gabriela Silva Vilela Ribeiro; Carolina Gabriela Reis Barbosa; Uliana Sbeguen Stotzer; Alex Harley Crisp
Journal:  Sports Med Health Sci       Date:  2020-11-19

10.  Population level physical activity before and during the first national COVID-19 lockdown: A nationally representative repeat cross-sectional study of 5 years of Active Lives data in England.

Authors:  Tessa Strain; Stephen J Sharp; Andrew Spiers; Helen Price; Ciara Williams; Carol Fraser; Søren Brage; Katrien Wijndaele; Paul Kelly
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2021-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.