Literature DB >> 34191634

Muscle torques and joint accelerations provide more sensitive measures of poststroke movement deficits than joint angles.

Ariel B Thomas1,2, Erienne V Olesh1,2, Amelia Adcock3,4, Valeriya Gritsenko1,2.   

Abstract

The whole repertoire of complex human motion is enabled by forces applied by our muscles and controlled by the nervous system. The impact of stroke on the complex multijoint motor control is difficult to quantify in a meaningful way that informs about the underlying deficit in the active motor control and intersegmental coordination. We tested whether poststroke deficit can be quantified with high sensitivity using motion capture and inverse modeling of a broad range of reaching movements. Our hypothesis is that muscle moments estimated based on active joint torques provide a more sensitive measure of poststroke motor deficits than joint angles. The motion of 22 participants was captured while performing reaching movements in a center-out task, presented in virtual reality. We used inverse dynamic analysis to derive active joint torques that were the result of muscle contractions, termed muscle torques, that caused the recorded multijoint motion. We then applied a novel analysis to separate the component of muscle torque related to gravity compensation from that related to intersegmental dynamics. Our results show that muscle torques characterize individual reaching movements with higher information content than joint angles do. Moreover, muscle torques enable distinguishing the individual motor deficits caused by aging or stroke from the typical differences in reaching between healthy individuals. Similar results were obtained using metrics derived from joint accelerations. This novel quantitative assessment method may be used in conjunction with home-based gaming motion capture technology for remote monitoring of motor deficits and inform the development of evidence-based robotic therapy interventions.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Functional deficits seen in task performance have biomechanical underpinnings, seen only through the analysis of forces. Our study has shown that estimating muscle moments can quantify with high-sensitivity poststroke deficits in intersegmental coordination. An assessment developed based on this method could help quantify less observable deficits in mildly affected stroke patients. It may also bridge the gap between evidence from studies of constrained or robotically manipulated movements and research with functional and unconstrained movements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-D arm movements; motor assessment; motor control; nonlinear dynamics; stroke paresis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34191634      PMCID: PMC8409956          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00149.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.974


  60 in total

1.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Robotic devices for movement therapy after stroke: current status and challenges to clinical acceptance.

Authors:  Peter Lum; David Reinkensmeyer; Richard Mahoney; William Z Rymer; Charles Burgar
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.119

3.  Persistence of inter-joint coupling during single-joint elbow flexions after shoulder fixation.

Authors:  D B Debicki; P L Gribble
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Kinematic and dynamic processes for the control of pointing movements in humans revealed by short-term exposure to microgravity.

Authors:  C Papaxanthis; T Pozzo; J McIntyre
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for providing lateral trunk lean feedback during gait retraining.

Authors:  Ross A Clark; Yong-Hao Pua; Adam L Bryant; Michael A Hunt
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude.

Authors:  Caroline J Ketcham; Rachael D Seidler; Arend W A Van Gemmert; George E Stelmach
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Kinematic variables quantifying upper-extremity performance after stroke during reaching and drinking from a glass.

Authors:  Margit Alt Murphy; Carin Willén; Katharina S Sunnerhagen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 8.  Motor control and aging: links to age-related brain structural, functional, and biochemical effects.

Authors:  Rachael D Seidler; Jessica A Bernard; Taritonye B Burutolu; Brett W Fling; Mark T Gordon; Joseph T Gwin; Youngbin Kwak; David B Lipps
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Robot enhanced stroke therapy optimizes rehabilitation (RESTORE): a pilot study.

Authors:  Alexa B Keeling; Mark Piitz; Jennifer A Semrau; Michael D Hill; Stephen H Scott; Sean P Dukelow
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Automated assessment of upper extremity movement impairment due to stroke.

Authors:  Erienne V Olesh; Sergiy Yakovenko; Valeriya Gritsenko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.