| Literature DB >> 34189350 |
Adel Alhazzani1, Amit Kumar2, Mubarak Algahtany3, Dimple Rawat2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: After acute ischemic stroke, a higher level of troponin has been considered as an important biomarker for predicting mortality. AIM ANDEntities:
Keywords: Biomarker; meta-analysis; outcome prediction; stroke; troponin
Year: 2021 PMID: 34189350 PMCID: PMC8191528 DOI: 10.4103/bc.bc_51_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Circ ISSN: 2394-8108
Figure 1Study flow diagram
Baseline characteristics of the included studies in the meta-analysis
| Authors | Country | Study design | Mean age±SD | Patients | Cutoff value | Type of assay | Abnormal cTn (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trooyen | Norway | PCS | - | 40 | >0.4 µg/L | cTnI | - |
| James | New Zealand | PCS | 82 | 181 | >0.1 | cTnT | - |
| Guerrero-peral | Spain | RCS | - | 42 | 0.1 | cTnT | - |
| Maliszewska | Poland | PCS | - | 196 | >0.1 | cTnI | - |
| Di Angelantonio | Italy | PCS | 56.6±12.9 | 330 | 0.1 ng/ml | cTnI | 16.3 |
| Jensen | Denmark | PCS | 68.7±13.1 | 244 | 0.03 µg/L | cTnT | 10 |
| Barber | UK | PCS | 73 | 222 | >0.2 µg/L | cTn1 | |
| Scheitz | Germany | RCS | 66 to 84 | 715 | 0.03 µg/L | cTnT | 14 |
| Hajdinjak | Slovenia | PCS | 70±12.1 | 106 | 0.04 µg/L | cTnT | 15.1 |
| Jensen | Denmark | PCS | 69.4±12.1 | 193 | 14 ng/mL | HS-cTnT | 33.7 |
| Scheitz | Germany | PCS | 61–88 | 1016 | 14 ng/ml | Hs-cTnT | 60 |
| Faiz | Norway | RCS | 65-83 | 287 | 14 ng/ml | HS-cTnT | 54.4 |
| Lasek-Bal | Poland | PCS | 72±11 | 1068 | 0.014 ng/ml | HS-cTnI | 9.7 |
| Maoz | Israel | RCS | 73.9±12.9 | 212 | 0.03 µg/L | HS-cTnT | 16.5 |
| Peddada | USA | RCS | 65±15 | 1145 | 0.12 ng/ml | HS-cTnI | 17.0 |
| Su | Taiwan | RCS | 72.3±13.6 | 871 | 0.01 µg/L | cTnI | 16.8 |
| Batal | USA | PCS | 67±15 | 1718 | 0.10 µg/L | cTnI | 18 |
| Sung | Korea | RCS | 66±12.4 | 1692 | >0.004 ng/ml | cTnI | - |
| Sui | China | PCS | 76 | 241 | 14 ng/L | HS-cTnT | - |
SD: Standard deviation, cTnI: Cardiac troponin I, cTnT: Cardiac troponin, HS: High-sensitivity, PCS: Prospective cohort study, RCS: Retrospective cohort study
Figure 2(a) Association of acute-phase troponin level with inhospital mortality. (b) Association of acute-phase troponin level with last follow up mortality
Figure 3(a) Meta-regression analysis (effect of age on the effect size associated with inhospital mortality). (b) Meta-regression analysis (effect of age on the effect size associated with last follow up mortality)associated with last follow up mortality)
Figure 4(a) Sensitivity analysis for association of high troponin level with inhospital mortality. (b) Sensitivity analysis for association of high troponin level with follow-up mortality
Figure 5(a) Funnel plot showing no significant publication bias for outcome inhospital mortality. (b) Funnel plot showing no significant publication bias at the end of follow-up mortalitymortality
Figure 6(a) Association of acute-phase troponin level with inhospital mortality after adjustment of confounding effect of the presence of cardiac disease. (b) Association of acute-phase troponin level with follow-up mortality after adjustment of confounding effect of the presence of cardiac diseaseacute-phase troponin level with follow-up mortality after adjustment of confounding effect of the presence of cardiac disease
Methodological quality of studies included in the meta-analysis using Newcastle–Ottawa Methodological Quality Scale
| Studies | Respersentativive of the exposed cohort | Selection of the non-exposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration that outcome was not present at study start | Comparability of cohorts based on design or analysis | Assessment of outcome | Enough follow up period (>1 year | Adequacy of follow up | Overall NOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trooyen | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| James | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |
| Guerrero-peral | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Maliszewska | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |
| Di Angelantonio | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Jensen | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |
| Barber | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |
| Scheitz | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |
| Hajdinjak | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Jensen | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |
| Scheitz | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Faiz | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Lasek -Bal | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Maoz | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Peddada | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Su | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Batal | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |
| Sung | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Sui | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
NOS: Newcastle–Ottawa Scale
Figure 7(a) Quality-effects model associated with follow-up mortality. (b) Quality-effects model associated with the last follow-up mortality