Literature DB >> 34189163

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Streptococcus anginosus Group Infective Endocarditis: A Multicenter Matched Cohort Study.

Francesc Escrihuela-Vidal1, Luis Eduardo López-Cortés2, Laura Escolà-Vergé3,4, Arístides De Alarcón González5, Guillermo Cuervo1, Antonio Sánchez-Porto6, Nuria Fernández-Hidalgo3,4, Rafael Luque5, Miguel Montejo7, José M Miró8, Miguel Ángel Goenaga9, Patricia Muñoz10, Maricela Valerio10, Marco Ripa11, Dolores Sousa-Regueiro12, Mercé Gurguí13, María Carmen Fariñas-Alvarez14, Lourdes Mateu15, Elisa García Vázquez16, Juan Gálvez-Acebal2, Jordi Carratalà1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although Streptococcus anginosus group (SAG) endocarditis is considered a severe disease associated with abscess formation and embolic events, there is limited evidence to support this assumption.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive patients with definite SAG endocarditis in 28 centers in Spain and Italy. A comparison between cases due to SAG endocarditis and viridans group streptococci (VGS) or Streptococcus gallolyticus group (SGG) was performed in a 1:2 matched analysis.
RESULTS: Of 5336 consecutive cases of definite endocarditis, 72 (1.4%) were due to SAG and matched with 144 cases due to VGS/SGG. SAG endocarditis was community acquired in 64 (88.9%) cases and affected aortic native valve in 29 (40.3%). When comparing SAG and VGS/SGG endocarditis, no significant differences were found in septic shock (8.3% vs 3.5%, P = .116); valve disorder, including perforation (22.2% vs 18.1%, P = .584), pseudoaneurysm (16.7% vs 8.3%, P = .108), or prosthesis dehiscence (1.4% vs 6.3%, P = .170); paravalvular complications, including abscess (25% vs 18.8%, P = .264) and intracardiac fistula (5.6% vs 3.5%, P = .485); heart failure (34.7% vs 38.9%, P = .655); or embolic events (41.7% vs 32.6%, P = .248). Indications for surgery (70.8% vs 70.8%; P = 1) and mortality (13.9% vs 16.7%; P = .741) were similar between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: SAG endocarditis is an infrequent but serious condition that presents a prognosis similar to that of VGS/SGG.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Streptococcus anginosus; Streptococcus gallolyticus; infective endocarditis; viridans group streptococci

Year:  2021        PMID: 34189163      PMCID: PMC8231368          DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis        ISSN: 2328-8957            Impact factor:   3.835


Infective endocarditis is one of the most life-threatening infections encountered in clinical practice and still represents a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. About 40%–50% of patients with endocarditis require valve surgery at some point during the clinical course and mortality remains around 20%–25% in the first year after diagnosis [1]. In recent years, epidemiological changes in endocarditis have been documented in high-income countries, with an increasing rate of episodes caused by staphylococci and enterococci [2, 3]. Nevertheless, streptococci are still a major cause of endocarditis, mostly in developing countries [4]. Concerning streptococcal endocarditis, there is a clear predominance of cases due to viridans group streptococci (VGS), whereas β-hemolytic streptococci [5] and Streptococcus anginosus group (SAG) [1] are identified less often as causative agents. The species encompassing SAG (Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus intermedius, and Streptococcus constellatus) are known for their propensity to cause pyogenic infection and abscess formation in the head, neck, or abdomen. SAG can also cause bacteremia and, more rarely, endocarditis [6, 7]. Although endocarditis caused by SAG is thought to be associated with valve destruction, abscess formation, and embolic events [8], little information is available to support the assumption that it is more severe than other causes. We therefore aimed to characterize the main clinical features and outcomes of endocarditis caused by SAG and compared this with endocarditis and cases due to VGS or Streptococcus gallolyticus group (SGG) in a large cohort of patients with infective endocarditis.

METHODS

Patient Population and Data Collection

This was a large multicenter cohort study of consecutive adult patients with a definite diagnosis of endocarditis at 27 different Spanish hospitals (24 of them included within the Grupo de Apoyo al Manejo de la Endocarditis Infecciosa en España [GAMES] prospective cohort) and 1 Italian hospital. GAMES is a prospective registry into which multidisciplinary teams prospectively record all consecutive episodes of endocarditis since 2008 [9]. We therefore performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for the period 2008–2017, using a standardized case report form. Data included demographic and clinical variables, echocardiography findings, treatment, and outcomes, namely septic shock, valvular and paravalvular complications, heart failure, embolic events, indication for surgery, and mortality. We analyzed all cases of definite endocarditis due to SAG and compared these with cases due to VGS or SGG using a 1:2 matched analysis. Matching was performed according to the type of valve (native or prosthetic), patient’s sex, age (±5 years), year of diagnosis, and when feasible, hospital. Episodes of device-related infection (pacemaker and implantable defibrillators) and isolated right-side valve endocarditis were excluded.

Definitions

Definite infective endocarditis was defined according to the modified Duke criteria [10, 11]. Acquisition was categorized as community-acquired or non-community-acquired, with the latter including nosocomial-acquired and health care–associated infections [12]. All patients were followed up for up to 1 year and were considered cured in the absence of relapse or death. Relapse during follow-up was defined as positive blood cultures with the same microorganism. A new episode of endocarditis caused by a different microorganism was classified as a reinfection. Embolic events were defined as radiological findings consistent with ischemia of a major organ, either symptomatic or asymptomatic. Request for imaging tests was made at the discretion of the treating physicians. Acute kidney injury was defined as an abrupt decrease in kidney function with an increase of at least 1.5-fold in serum creatinine levels. Heart conduction disorders were defined as newly identified auriculoventricular blockage or heart bundle blockage. Septic shock was defined as hypotension persisting despite adequate fluid resuscitation [13, 14]. Indication for surgery was considered for heart failure due to valve regurgitation, intracardiac complications, or signs of uncontrolled infection, as listed in both the European and US guidelines [11, 15]. Overall mortality was defined as all-cause death during follow-up. Endocarditis-related mortality was defined as death during active antibiotic treatment at initial hospitalization or when occurring as a complication of valve surgery.

Microbiological Identification

Identification of microorganisms to the species level was performed according to standard methods in each participating center [16]. Before 2011, bacteria isolated from blood culture isolates were identified using conventional biochemical tests or by 16S polymerase chain reaction and sequencing in cases of inconclusive results. Since 2011, isolates have been identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time of flight in the majority of the participant hospitals. Viridans group streptococci included Streptococcus mitis group (S mitis, S oralis, S sanguinis, S parasanguinis, S gordonii), Streptococcus mutans group (S mutans), and Streptococcus salivarius group (S salivarius). Streptococcus gallolyticus group included 4 subspecies: gallolyticus, pasteurianus, infantarius, and lutetiensis. Streptococcus anginosus group included S anginosus, S constellatus, and S intermedius. Antibiotic susceptibility was evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendations.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables are expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD). Qualitative variables were compared using χ 2 or Fisher exact tests, and quantitative variables were compared using the Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Statistical significance was set at P < .05, and all P values were 2-sided. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 20 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York). Ethical Considerations This observational study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the regional ethics committee (Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica Regional de la Comunidad de Madrid, approval code 07/18). To protect personal privacy, identifying information in the electronic database was encrypted for each patient. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients reviewed in the GAMES cohort. Informed consent was waived by the ethics committee in each of the Barcelona Endocarditis Study Team (BEST) participating hospitals because no intervention was involved and no patient-identifying information was included.

RESULTS

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of SAG Endocarditis

During the study period, 5336 episodes of definite endocarditis were recorded in the participating hospitals. Of these, 72 cases (1.4%) were due to SAG, and these cases were matched with 144 controls of patients with VGS or SGG endocarditis. Characteristics by infective agent are detailed in Tables 1 and 2. Most cases of SAG (76%) occurred in men, and the mean age was 67 years (SD, 16 years). Most cases were community-acquired (90%) and affected native valves (80.6%). The aortic valve was involved most often (40.3%), followed by the mitral valve (38.9%) and the aortic and mitral valves combined (19.4%).
Table 1.

Comparative Analysis of General Characteristics and Clinical Manifestations of Infective Endocarditis Caused by Streptococcus anginosus Group and Viridans Group Streptococci/Streptococcus gallolyticus Group

CharacteristicSAG Endocarditis (n = 72)VGS or SGG Endocarditis (n = 144)P Value
Male sex55 (76.4)106 (73.6).846
Mean age, y (SD)67 (16)68 (15).845
Chronic lung disease12 (16.7)23 (16)1.000
Diabetes mellitus16 (22.2)22 (15.3).283
Chronic kidney disease6 (8.3)18 (12.5).491
Age-adjusted Charlson index, y, mean (SD)3.8 (2.6)3.7 (2.5).960
Acquisition.834
 Community-acquired64 (88.9)133 (92.4).552
 Non-community-acquired6 (8.4)9 (6.3).776
Type of endocarditis.951
 Native58 (80.6)118 (81.9).951
 Prosthetic14 (19.4)26 (18.1).951
Affected valve.876
 Aortic29 (40.3)60 (41.7).961
 Mitral28 (38.9)52 (36.1).803
 Mitral and aortic14 (19.4)26 (18.1).950
Embolic phenomena30 (41.7)47 (32.6).248
 Central nervous system emboli18 (25)22 (15.3).122
Echocardiographic findings
 Perforation or valve rupture16 (22.2)26 (18.1).584
 Pseudoaneurysm12 (16.7)12 (8.3).108
 Abscess18 (25)27 (18.8).264
 Intracardiac fistula4 (5.6)5 (3.5).485
 Prosthesis dehiscence1 (1.4)9 (6.3).170

Data are presented as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated.

Abbreviations: SAG, Streptococcus anginosus group; SD, standard deviation; SGG, Streptococcus gallolyticus group; VGS, viridans group streptococci.

Table 2.

Comparative Analysis of Treatment and Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis Caused by Streptococcus anginosus Group and Viridans Group Streptococci/Streptococcus gallolyticus Group

CharacteristicSAG Endocarditis (n = 72)VGS or SGG Endocarditis (n = 144)P Value
Treatment duration, d, mean (SD)34.5 (12.6)33.8 (10.8).854
Combination treatment with gentamicin37 (51)82 (56.9).494
Complications
 Acute heart failure25 (34.7)56 (38.9).655
 Persistent bacteremia4 (5.6)8 (5.6).602
 Heart conduction disorder11 (15.3)18 (12.5).739
 Acute kidney injury15 (20.8)44 (30.6).177
 Septic shock6 (8.3)5 (3.5).116
Surgery
 Surgery indicated51 (70.8)102 (70.8)1
 Elective24 (33.3)47 (32.6)1
 Urgent12 (16.7)19 (13.2).618
 Emergent5 (6.9)7 (4.9).749
Surgery indicated but not performed10 (13.9)29 (20.1).348
Prognosisa
 Definitely cured60 (83.3)114 (79.2).584
 Overall mortality10 (13.9)24 (16.7).741
  Endocarditis-related mortality10 (13.9)16 (11.1).711
 Relapse01 (0.7)
 Reinfection02 (1.4)

Data are presented as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated.

Abbreviations: SAG, Streptococcus anginosus group; SD, standard deviation; SGG, Streptococcus gallolyticus group; VGS, viridans group streptococci.

aThere were 2 and 3 losses to follow-up among SAG and VSG/SGG endocarditis, respectively.

Comparative Analysis of General Characteristics and Clinical Manifestations of Infective Endocarditis Caused by Streptococcus anginosus Group and Viridans Group Streptococci/Streptococcus gallolyticus Group Data are presented as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated. Abbreviations: SAG, Streptococcus anginosus group; SD, standard deviation; SGG, Streptococcus gallolyticus group; VGS, viridans group streptococci. Comparative Analysis of Treatment and Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis Caused by Streptococcus anginosus Group and Viridans Group Streptococci/Streptococcus gallolyticus Group Data are presented as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated. Abbreviations: SAG, Streptococcus anginosus group; SD, standard deviation; SGG, Streptococcus gallolyticus group; VGS, viridans group streptococci. aThere were 2 and 3 losses to follow-up among SAG and VSG/SGG endocarditis, respectively. New valve regurgitation developed in 20 (27.8%) patients, with severe mitral regurgitation being the most frequent. Notably, 15 patients (20.9%) suffered some form of intracranial hemorrhage and 14 (19.4%) suffered splenic emboli. Acute heart failure occurred in 34.7%, with 26.4% of cases having a New York Heart Classification III or IV. Acute kidney injury occurred in 20.8%, heart conduction disorders in 15.3%, and septic shock in 8.3%, but there were no cases of symptomatic osteoarticular involvement. All patients received β-lactams as backbone antibiotic therapy, in 37 cases (51%) in synergic combination with gentamicin. The mean antibiotic treatment length was 34.5 days (SD, 12.6 days). Although more than two-thirds of cases had an indication for surgery, it was eventually not performed in 14% due to a poor prognosis and/or lack of patient consent. There was an elective indication in 33% of surgeries. Ultimately, 83% of cases were deemed to have been cured. Overall mortality occurred in 10 patients (14%), all cases considered endocarditis-related mortality due to peri- or postoperative complications, severe bleeding, multiorgan failure, and septic or cardiogenic shock.

Microbiology

The most frequently isolated microorganism in SAG endocarditis was S anginosus (n = 40 [55%]), followed by S constellatus (n = 15 [20%]) and S intermedius (n = 7 [10%]). In 10 (14%) cases, a SAG microorganism was isolated but not identified to the species level. Among the cases of VGS/SGG endocarditis, S mitis was the most commonly isolated microorganism (n = 40 [28%]), followed by S oralis (n = 22 [15%]), S sanguinis (n = 20 [14%]), and other species (Table 3). In 29 (20%) cases of VGS/SGG endocarditis, identification was not performed to the species level.
Table 3.

Distribution of Viridans Group Streptococci or Streptococcus gallolyticus Group Isolates Causing Endocarditis, by Species

Species of MicroorganismFrequency (%)
Streptococcus mitis40 (27.8)
Nonidentified Streptococcus viridans group29 (20.1)
Streptococcus oralis22 (15.3)
Streptococcus sanguinis20 (13.9)
Streptococcus salivarius12 (8.3)
Streptococcus mutans9 (6.3)
Streptococcus gordonii8 (5.6)
Streptococcus gallolyticus group3 (2.1)
Streptococcus parasanguinis1 (0.7)
Distribution of Viridans Group Streptococci or Streptococcus gallolyticus Group Isolates Causing Endocarditis, by Species

Comparative Analysis of SAG and VGS/SGG Endocarditis

Tables 1 and 2 show the comparison between SAG and VGS/SGG endocarditis. There were no statistically significant differences in either valve involvement (perforation: 22.2% vs 18.1%, P = .584; pseudoaneurysm: 16.7% vs 8.3%, P = .108; prosthesis dehiscence: 1.4% vs 6.3%, P = .170) or paravalvular complications (abscess: 25% vs 18.8%, P = .264; intracardiac fistula: 5.6% vs 3.5%, P = .485). Equally, no significant differences were detected between SAG and VGS/SGG endocarditis when comparing the rate of acute heart failure (34.7% vs 38.9%, P = .655), heart conduction disorders (15.3% vs 12.5%, P = .739), septic shock (8.3% vs 3.5%, P = .116), indication for surgery (70.8% vs 70.8%, P = 1), or overall mortality (13.9% vs 16.7%, P = .741). There was 1 case of relapse due to S oralis. No molecular typing was performed.

DISCUSSION

In this largest study of SAG endocarditis to date, we found that SAG accounted for 1.4% of all definite cases of endocarditis in our cohort. This figure concurs with that reported in a previous study of 18 patients [17]. Also in accordance with previous observations, we found that S. anginosus was the most commonly identified causative species in SAG endocarditis [8, 18]. Controversy remains about the true virulence of SAG in infective endocarditis. Some sporadic case reports depict SAG endocarditis as an aggressive infection with frequent intracardiac complications, embolic events, and abscess formation [19-21]. In a retrospective study of 56 cases of endocarditis caused by β-hemolytic streptococci, 29 cases of SAG endocarditis had a less aggressive presentation and fewer extracardiac complications [1]. However, the conclusions in previous studies are limited by the limited by the small number of cases of endocarditis caused by SAG. We observed no statistically significant differences when comparing SAG with VGS/SGG endocarditis regarding either local complications (valve perforation or abscess, pseudoaneurysm, prosthesis dehiscence, or intracardiac fistula) or systemic complications (heart failure and septic shock). Similarly, we found no differences in the proportion of patients with surgical indications nor in mortality. These results are consistent with those of a previous study in which SAG endocarditis had a comparable prognosis to VGS/SGG endocarditis [17]. It could be hypothesized that prior observations reporting a higher virulence of SAG endocarditis may have been biased toward describing the most severe cases. It should be noted, however, that higher rates of pseudoaneurysms, intracardiac abscess, and central nervous system emboli were actually identified, although without achieving statistical significance. Anatomic damage and prognostic differences may ultimately be subtle and difficult to detect; thus, the non–statistically significant differences observed could reflect a type II statistical error due to the limited number of SAG endocarditis cases in our cohort. Our study has some limitations that should be acknowledged. Due to its retrospective design, some information such as the formation of extracardiac abscesses was not available for comparison between groups. Moreover, the small number of cases with certain complications, such as prosthesis dehiscence or intracardiac fistula, diminishes the power of these analyses. On the other hand, the well-known difficulties for the accurate identification of streptococcal species and some changes in the microbiological tools used for this task throughout the study period should be recognized as another potential limitation. We believe, however, that the multicenter nature of this study and the contemporary period of data collection strengthen our results. In conclusion, SAG endocarditis is an infrequent but serious condition that follows a similar clinical course to VGS/SGG endocarditis, regarding valvular complications and prognostic variables such as indication for surgery or endocarditis-related mortality.
  19 in total

1.  Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.

Authors:  J S Li; D J Sexton; N Mick; R Nettles; V G Fowler; T Ryan; T Bashore; G R Corey
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-04-03       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  [2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis].

Authors:  Gilbert Habib; Patrizio Lancellotti; Manuel J Antunes; Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Jean-Paul Casalta; Francesco Del Zotti; Raluca Dulgheru; Gebrine El Khoury; Paola Anna Erba; Bernard Iung; Jose M Miro; Barbara J Mulder; Edyta Płońska-Gościniak; Sussana Price; Jolien Roos-Hesselink; Ulrika Snygg-Martin; Franck Thuny; Pilar Tornos Mas; Isidre Vilacosta; Jose Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Kardiol Pol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.108

3.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Secular trends in the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis at a referral center (2007-2018).

Authors:  Laura Escolà-Vergé; Nuria Fernández-Hidalgo; María Nieves Larrosa; Ruben Fernandez-Galera; Benito Almirante
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Serious infections caused by Streptococcus milleri.

Authors:  H W Murray; K C Gross; H Masur; R B Roberts
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Health care--associated bloodstream infections in adults: a reason to change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections.

Authors:  N Deborah Friedman; Keith S Kaye; Jason E Stout; Sarah A McGarry; Sharon L Trivette; Jane P Briggs; Wanda Lamm; Connie Clark; Jennifer MacFarquhar; Aaron L Walton; L Barth Reller; Daniel J Sexton
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-11-19       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Clinical presentation of infective endocarditis caused by different groups of non-beta haemolytic streptococci.

Authors:  B Nilson; L Olaison; M Rasmussen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.

Authors:  R Phillip Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven A Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Clinical presentation, aetiology and outcome of infective endocarditis. Results of the ESC-EORP EURO-ENDO (European infective endocarditis) registry: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gilbert Habib; Paola Anna Erba; Bernard Iung; Erwan Donal; Bernard Cosyns; Cécile Laroche; Bogdan A Popescu; Bernard Prendergast; Pilar Tornos; Anita Sadeghpour; Leopold Oliver; Jolanta-Justina Vaskelyte; Rouguiatou Sow; Olivier Axler; Aldo P Maggioni; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Current Epidemiology and Outcome of Infective Endocarditis: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study.

Authors:  Patricia Muñoz; Martha Kestler; Arístides De Alarcon; José María Miro; Javier Bermejo; Hugo Rodríguez-Abella; Maria Carmen Fariñas; Manuel Cobo Belaustegui; Carlos Mestres; Pedro Llinares; Miguel Goenaga; Enrique Navas; José Antonio Oteo; Paola Tarabini; Emilio Bouza
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more
  1 in total

1.  Etiology, Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes in Infective Endocarditis Patients Requiring Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Kristians Meidrops; Franziska Johanna Burkhardt; Janis Davis Osipovs; Eva Petrosina; Valerija Groma; Peteris Stradins
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.