| Literature DB >> 34184980 |
Daniel Garrido-Sanz1,2, Miguel Redondo-Nieto1, Marta Martin1, Rafael Rivilla1.
Abstract
Pseudomonas corrugata constitute one of the phylogenomic subgroups within the Pseudomonas fluorescens species complex and include both plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and plant pathogenic bacteria. Previous studies suggest that the species diversity of this group remains largely unexplored together with frequent misclassification of strains. Using more than 1800 sequenced Pseudomonas genomes we identified 121 genomes belonging to the P. corrugata subgroup. Intergenomic distances obtained using the genome-to-genome blast distance (GBDP) algorithm and the determination of digital DNA-DNA hybridization values were further used for phylogenomic and clustering analyses, which revealed 29 putative species clusters, of which only five correspond to currently named species within the subgroup. Comparative and functional genome-scale analyses also support the species status of these clusters. The search for PGPR and plant pathogenic determinants showed that approximately half of the genomes analysed could have a pathogenic behaviour based on the presence of a pathogenicity genetic island, while all analysed genomes possess PGPR traits. Finally, this information together with the characterization of phenotypic traits, allows the reclassification proposal of Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 as Pseudomonas ogarae sp. nov., nom rev., type strain F113T (=DSM 112162T=CECT 30235T), which is substantiated by genomic, functional genomics and phenotypic differences with their closest type strains.Entities:
Keywords: PGPR; Pseudomonas corrugata; Pseudomonas ogarae; comparative genomics; phylogenomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34184980 PMCID: PMC8461476 DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Genom ISSN: 2057-5858
Fig. 1.GBDP-based phylogeny of 121 genomes belonging to and other major subgroups within the complex of species and other major groups. Colours according to the phylogenomic group (G), subgroup (SG) or species identified by clustering analyses of GBDP intergenomic distances (Fig. 2, File S3). Numbers in nodes leading to species-clusters are used throughout the study. Bold T, and coloured taxa name indicate type strain.
Fig. 2.Clustering analysis of 145 genomes belonging to the subgroup and the other main subgroups and groups within the genus (Fig. 1) using a range of distance thresholds T. Total cluster consistency (i.e. MRI=1) was achieved using an average linkage (i.e. F=0.5) at species-level (a) or complete linkage (i.e. F=1) at phylogenomic group-level (b) compared to the reference partition. Distance matrices (c, d) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) matrix (e), showing these clusters.
Fig. 3.Analysis based on the identification of orthologous groups. (a) Unrooted maximum-likelihood tree of 1891 single-copy amino acid sequences present in the 121 genomes belonging to the subgroup. Bold and T indicate type strain. Species groups are shadowed in colour according to the legend and numbers according to Fig. 1. Dots indicate bootstrap support ≥90 % (not shown in nodes within a species cluster). Core genome (b), pan genome (c), and strain-specific genome (d) fractions over the sampled genomes. Mean values (line) and Q1 and Q3 quantiles (shadow) over 1000 replicates of randomly sampled genomes are represented. Empty circles and the number above indicate the mean genome fraction value achieved at 121 genomes sampled.
Fig. 4.Principal component analysis (PCA) of functional BRITE categories among subgroup genomes. (a) Biplot of the first two principal components (PC) explaining the 43 % of the observed variance. The different groups are coloured according to the legend. Ellipses represent the core area added by the default confidence interval of 68 % to facilitate the separation between observation groups. (b) Proportion of explained variance by each PC. Dashed horizontal line indicates 5 % of explained variance. (c) Principal component variables, zero-centred and scaled to unit variance.
Fig. 5.Comparative analysis of closely related , and P. ogarae type strains genomes based on orthologous sequences. (a) Upset plot showing the intersections of shared orthologous proteins among the three genomes (red), the shared proteins between each two genomes (black) and specific proteins to each genome (blue). (b) Abundance of BRITE categories among the different intersections.
Differential phenotypic characteristics of strain F113T and their closest species type strains
Strains: 1, P. ogarae F113T; 2, P. ogarae RDP1; 3, DSM 13647T; 4, P. brassicacearum DSM 13227T; 5, sp. WCS365, 6, NFM421; 7, Q8r1-96; 8, DSM 13194T.
|
Characteristic |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
|
N-acetyl-glucosamine |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
|
|
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Inosine |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
|
|
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
|
|
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
|
|
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
|
|
− |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
|
Pectin |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
|
|
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
|
|
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
|
|
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
|
Tween 40 |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Acetic acid |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
| ||||||||
|
pH 5 |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
|
1 % Sodium lactate |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Troleandomycin |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
|
Guanidine HCl |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
|
Niaproof 4 |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
|
Potassium tellurite |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Aztreonam |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
|
| ||||||||
|
Glycerol |
+ |
+ |
wa |
+a |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
|
|
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
+ |
|
wa |
wa |
+ |
+ |
|
wa |
|
|
|
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
Inositol |
+ |
+ |
w* |
w* |
+ |
+ |
|
+ |
|
|
+ |
+ |
w* |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
+ |
+ |
w* |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
+ |
+ |
w* |
− |
+ |
+ |
|
+* |
|
|
+ |
+ |
w* |
−* |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
+ |
+ |
+ |
w* |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Gentiobiose |
|
|
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
|
+ |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
+ |
+ |
− |
|
+ |
|
|
+ |
|
| ||||||||
|
Reduction of nitrates |
+ |
+ |
w* |
− |
+ |
|
|
− |
|
Arginine dihydrolase |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Gelatin hydrolysis (protease) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
N-acetyl-glucosamine assimilation |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
For assimilation and oxidation of carbon compounds: positive (+), negative (-), weakly positive (w). For sensitivity: insensitive (+, can grow in its presence), sensitive (-, cannot grow in its presence).
Result differs from the published by Sikorsky et al. [67].
Fig. 6.Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination analysis of the distinctive phenotypic characters. (a) Scattered NMDS plot across NMDS1 and NMDS2 axes. Colours according to the species groups indicated in the legend. Shepard plot (upper left) indicating the statistics for goodness of fit between ordination distances and observed dissimilarity. (b) Intrinsic vectors driving the distribution pattern. Colour according to the test they belong to.