| Literature DB >> 34184080 |
Minsun Kim1, Jae-Hyun Kim1, Sooyeon Hong1, Boguen Kwon1, Eun-Young Kim1, Hyuk-Sang Jung1, Youngjoo Sohn1.
Abstract
<span class="Disease">Osteoporosis is a <span class="Disease">systemic skeletal disease characterized by reduced bone mineral density (BMD), which results in an increased risk of fracture. Melandrium firmum (Siebold & Zucc.) Rohrbach (MFR), 'Wangbulryuhaeng' in Korean, is the dried aerial portion of Melandrii Herba Rohrbach, which is a member of the Caryophyllaceae family and has been used to treat several gynecological conditions as a traditional medicine. However, to the best of our knowledge, the effect of MFR on osteoclast differentiation and osteoporosis has not been assessed. To evaluate the effects of MFR on osteoclast differentiation, tartrate‑resistant acid phosphatase staining, actin ring formation and bone resorption assays were used. Additionally, receptor activator of nuclear factor‑κB ligand‑induced expression of nuclear factor of activated T cell, cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1) and c‑Fos were measured using western blotting and reverse transcription‑PCR. The expression levels of osteoclast‑related genes were also examined. To further investigate the anti‑osteoporotic effects of MFR in vivo, an ovariectomized (OVX) rat model of menopausal osteoporosis was established. Subsequently, the femoral head was scanned using micro‑computed tomography. The results revealed that MFR suppressed osteoclast differentiation, formation and function. Specifically, MFR reduced the expression levels of osteoclast‑related genes by downregulating transcription factors, such as NFATc1 and c‑Fos. Consistent with the in vitro results, administration of MFR water extract to OVX rats reduced BMD loss, and reduced the expression levels of NFATc1 and cathepsin K in the femoral head. In conclusion, MFR may contribute to alleviate osteoporosis‑like symptoms. These results suggested that MFR may exhibit potential for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.Entities:
Keywords: Melandrium firmum Rohrbach; cytoplasmic 1; c‑Fos; nuclear factor of activated T cell; osteoclasts; ovariectomized rats; receptor activator of nuclear factor‑κB ligand
Year: 2021 PMID: 34184080 PMCID: PMC8258467 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2021.12248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Med Rep ISSN: 1791-2997 Impact factor: 2.952
Primer sequences for reverse transcription-PCR analysis.
| Gene name | Sequence (5′-3′) | Temperature (°C) | Cycle | Accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F: TGCTCCTCCTCCTGCTGCTC | 58 | 32 | NM_198429.2m | |
| R: CGTCTTCCACCTCCACGTCG | ||||
| F: ATGGGCTCTCCTGTCAACAC | 58 | 40 | NM_010234.3 | |
| R: GGCTGCCAAAATAAACTCCA | ||||
| F: AGGCGGCTATATGACCACTG | 58 | 26 | NM_007802.4 | |
| R: CCGAGCCAAGAGAGCATATC | ||||
| F: CGACTTTTGTGGTCTTCCCC | 58 | 30 | NM_013599.4 | |
| R: TGAAGGTTTGGAATCGACCC | ||||
| F: CTCTCAGGACAATGCAGTGCTGA | 58 | 32 | NM_001357334.1 | |
| R: ATCCAGGTCACACATTCCAGCA | ||||
| F: ACTTCCCCAGCCCTTACTACCG | 58 | 30 | NM_007388.3 | |
| R: TCAGCACATAGCCCACACCG | ||||
| F: ATGGGGCCTTGCAAAAGAAATCTG | 58 | 30 | NM_175406.3 | |
| R: CGACAGCGTCAAACAAAGGCTTGTA | ||||
| F: TGGAAGTTCACTTGAAACTACGTG | 63 | 30 | NM_001289506.1 | |
| R: CTCGGTTTCCCGTCAGCCTCTCTC | ||||
| F: CTGCTGGTAACGGATCAGCTCCCCAGA | 53 | 35 | NM_001290377.1 | |
| R: CCAAGGAGCCAGAACCTTCGAAACT | ||||
| F: TCCAGGCTGAGGAGTGGTACTTTGG | 64 | 40 | NM_001025395.2 | |
| R: ATACGGTAGTGAGGCGGTGACACAG | ||||
| F: TTCTTGTGTGGTATTG | 50 | 40 | NM_007548.4 | |
| R: TTGGGGACACTCTTTG | ||||
| F: TTCTACAATGAGCTGCGTGT | 58 | 30 | NM_007393 | |
| R: CTCATAGCTCTTCTCCAGGG |
Ctsk, cathepsin k; Mmp9, matrix metalloproteinase-9; Ca2, carbonic anhydrase 2; Acp5, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; Atp6v0d2, ATPase H+ transporting V0 subunit D2; Dcstamp, dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein; Oscar, osteoclast-associated receptor; Pdrm1, b lymphocyte-induced maturation protein-1; F, forward; R, reverse.
Figure 1.High-performance liquid chromatography analysis of the MFR extracts. Vitexin was confirmed in (A) the standard and (B) MFR water extract at a wavelength of 335 nm. MFR, Melandrium firmum Rohrbach.
Figure 2.Effect of MFR on RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation, F-actin ring formation and pit formation. (A) RANKL-induced osteoclasts were stained using a TRAP kit. Magnification, ×100; scale bar, 200 µm. (B) Number of TRAP-positive cells with >3 nuclei were counted. (C) TRAP levels was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reader. (D) F-actin rings were stained using fluorescent phalloidin and (E) a bone resorption assay was performed using osteo-coated plates. Magnification, ×100; scale bar, 200 µm. (F) Number of F-actin rings was counted and (G) pit area was measured using ImageJ. (H) RAW 264.7 cell viability was determined using the MTS assay. (I) Cell viability of mature osteoclasts was examined using the MTS assay. All data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean of three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. aP<0.05 vs. normal group (untreated cells); bP<0.05 vs. RANKL treatment group; cP<0.05 vs. MFR 12.5 µg/ml treatment group; dP<0.05 vs. MFR 25 µg/ml treatment group; eP<0.05 vs. MFR 50 µg/ml treatment group. MFR, Melandrium firmum Rohrbach; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand; F-actin, filamentous actin; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase.
Figure 3.Effect of MFR on the protein and mRNA expression levels of NFATc1, c-Fos and TRAF6. (A) NFATc1 expression was determined by western blotting and reverse transcription-PCR, and (B) normalized to β-actin. (C) Protein and mRNA expression levels of c-Fos were determined and (D) normalized to β-actin. (E) Protein expression levels of TRAF6 were measured and (F) normalized to β-actin. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean of three independent experiments. All data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. aP<0.05 vs. normal group (untreated cells); bP<0.05 vs. RANKL treatment group; cP<0.05 vs. MFR 12.5 µg/ml treatment group; dP<0.05 vs. MFR 25 µg/ml treatment group; eP<0.05 vs. MFR 50 µg/ml treatment group. MFR, Melandrium firmum Rohrbach; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand; NFATc1, nuclear factor of activated T-cells; TRAF6, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6.
Figure 4.Effect of MFR on the expression levels of osteoclast-related genes. (A) Western blot analysis of CTK and MMP-9. (B) Protein expression levels were normalized to β-actin. (C) mRNA expression levels of Mmp9, Ctsk and Ca2 were analyzed using RT-PCR. (D) mRNA expression levels were normalized to Actb. (E) RT-PCR analysis was used to determine the mRNA expression levels of Acp5, Atp6v0d2 and Dcstamp, and (F) expression was normalized to Actb. (G) RT-PCR analysis was performed to determine the mRNA expression levels of Oscar, Src and Prdm1, and (H) expression was normalized to Actb. All data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean of three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. aP<0.05 vs. normal group (untreated cells); bP<0.05 vs. RANKL treatment group; cP<0.05 vs. MFR 12.5 µg/ml treatment group; dP<0.05 vs. MFR 25 µg/ml treatment group; eP<0.05 vs. MFR 50 µg/ml treatment group. MFR; Melandrium firmum Rohrbach; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand; CTK/Ctsk, cathepsin k; MMP-9/Mmp9, matrix metalloproteinase-9; CA2/Ca2, carbonic anhydrase 2; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; Acp5, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; Atp6v0d2, ATPase H+ transporting V0 subunit D2; Dcstamp, dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein; Oscar, osteoclast-associated receptor; Pdrm1, B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein-1.
Figure 5.Effect of MFR on body, uterus and femur weights, and serum levels of ALP, AST and ALT. (A) Body weight was measured weekly for 8 weeks. (B) Uterus and (C) femur weights were measured after sacrificing the rats. The serum levels of (D) AST, (E) ALT, (F) ALP, (G) CTX-1 and (H) TRAP were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. All data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n=8 per group). (A) Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. (B-H) Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test. aP<0.05 vs. sham group; bP<0.05 vs. OVX group; cP<0.05 vs. MFR-L group; dP<0.05 vs. MFR-H group; eP<0.05 vs. E2 group. MFR, Melandrium firmum Rohrbach; OVX, ovariectomized; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CTX-1, C-telopeptide of type I collagen; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; MFR-L, low dose of MFR; MFR-H, high dose of MFR; E2, β-estradiol; ALN, alendronate.
Figure 6.Effects of MFR on bone microarchitecture of OVX-induced osteoporosis rats. (A) Femurs were analyzed using micro-CT imaging. (B) BMD, (C) Tb.Th and (D) Tb.sp were analyzed using micro-CT image analysis. All data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n=8/group). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test. aP<0.05 vs. sham group; bP<0.05 vs. OVX group; cP<0.05 vs. MFR-L group; dP<0.05 vs. MFR-H group; eP<0.05 vs. E2 group. MFR, Melandrium firmum Rohrbach; OVX, ovariectomized; BMD, bone mineral density; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.sp, trabecular spacing; micro-CT, micro computed tomography; MFR-L, low dose of MFR; MFR-H, high dose of MFR; E2, β-estradiol; ALN, alendronate.
Figure 7.Effect of MFR on trabecular area in OVX-induced rats. (A) Bone tissues were stained with H&E. Magnifications, ×40 and ×100; scale bar, 500 and 200 µm, respectively. (B) Trabecular area was analyzed in the H&E-stained sections. All data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n=8/group). Statistical analyses are performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test. aP<0.05 vs. sham group; bP<0.05 vs. OVX group; cP<0.05 vs. MFR-L group; dP<0.05 vs. MFR-H group. MFR, Melandrium firmum Rohrbach; OVX, ovariectomized; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; MFR-L, low dose of MFR; MFR-H, high dose of MFR; E2, β-estradiol; ALN, alendronate.
Figure 8.Effects of MFR on the expression levels of CTK and NFATc1 in OVX-induced rats. (A) NFATc1 and (B) CTK-positive expression in bone tissue was assessed using IHC. NFATc1 and CTK-positive expression is highlighted by the red arrowheads. Mean number of (C) NFATc1 and (D) CTK-positive cells in femur tissues was counted. Magnifications, ×100 and ×200; scale bar, 200 and 100 µm, respectively. All data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n=8/group). Statistical analyses are performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test. aP<0.05 vs. sham group; bP<0.05 vs. OVX group; cP<0.05 vs. MFR-L group. MFR, Melandrium firmum Rohrbach; CTK, cathepsin k; NFATc1, nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1; OVX, ovariectomized; IHC, immunohistochemistry; MFR-L, low dose of MFR; MFR-H, high dose of MFR; E2, β-estradiol; ALN, alendronate.
Figure 9.Effects of MFR on the production of mineralization in MC3T3-E1 cells. (A) MFR treatment suppressed mineralization in MC3T3-E1 cells. (B) Cell viability was determined using the MTS assay. (C) Quantitative analysis of mineralization was performed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reader. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. aP<0.05 vs. normal group (untreated cells); bP<0.05 vs. osteogenic medium treatment group; cP<0.05 vs. MFR 12.5 µg/ml treatment group; dP<0.05 vs. MFR 25 µg/ml treatment group; MFR, Melandrium firmum Rohrbach.
Figure 10.Inhibitory mechanisms of MFR on osteoclast differentiation. MFR, Melandrium firmum Rohrbach; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand; RANK, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB; TRAF6, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; NFATc1, nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic 1; MMP-9, matrix metalloproteinase-9; ATP6v0d2, ATPase H+ transporting V0 subunit D2; DC-STAMP, dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase.