Literature DB >> 34183872

A paired-agent fluorescent molecular imaging strategy for quantifying antibody drug target engagement in in vivo window chamber xenograft models.

Elif Kayaalp Nalbant1,2, Cody Rounds1,2, Negar Sadeghipour3, Boyu Meng4, Margaret R Folaron4, Chandrika Haldar4, Rendall R Strawbridge4, Kimberley S Samkoe4, Scott C Davis4, Kenneth M Tichauer1.   

Abstract

A paired-agent fluorescent molecular imaging strategy is presented as a method to measure drug target engagement in whole tumor imaging. The protocol involves dynamic imaging of a pair of targeted and control imaging agents prior to and following antibody therapy. Simulations demonstrated that antibody "drug target engagement" can be estimated within a 15%-error over a wide range of tumor physiology (blood flow, vascular permeability, target density) and antibody characteristics (affinity, binding rates). Experimental results demonstrated the first in vivo detection of binding site barrier, highlighting the potential for this methodology to provide novel insights in drug distribution/binding imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binding potential; fluorescent imaging; paired-agent; window chamber

Year:  2020        PMID: 34183872      PMCID: PMC8236091          DOI: 10.1117/12.2545182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  11 in total

1.  Theoretical analysis of antibody targeting of tumor spheroids: importance of dosage for penetration, and affinity for retention.

Authors:  Christilyn P Graff; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Andrew M Scott; James P Allison; Jedd D Wolchok
Journal:  Cancer Immun       Date:  2012-05-01

Review 3.  Delivery of molecular and cellular medicine to solid tumors.

Authors:  R K Jain
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Effect of small-molecule-binding affinity on tumor uptake in vivo: a systematic study using a pretargeted bispecific antibody.

Authors:  Kelly Davis Orcutt; John J Rhoden; Benjamin Ruiz-Yi; John V Frangioni; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.261

5.  A modeling analysis of monoclonal antibody percolation through tumors: a binding-site barrier.

Authors:  K Fujimori; D G Covell; J E Fletcher; J N Weinstein
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Dynamic dual-tracer MRI-guided fluorescence tomography to quantify receptor density in vivo.

Authors:  Scott C Davis; Kimberley S Samkoe; Kenneth M Tichauer; Kristian J Sexton; Jason R Gunn; Sophie J Deharvengt; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Factors determining antibody distribution in tumors.

Authors:  Greg M Thurber; Michael M Schmidt; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 8.  Antibody tumor penetration: transport opposed by systemic and antigen-mediated clearance.

Authors:  Greg M Thurber; Michael M Schmidt; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  Affibody molecules for epidermal growth factor receptor targeting in vivo: aspects of dimerization and labeling chemistry.

Authors:  Vladimir Tolmachev; Mikaela Friedman; Mattias Sandström; Tove L J Eriksson; Daniel Rosik; Monika Hodik; Stefan Ståhl; Fredrik Y Frejd; Anna Orlova
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  The HER2 Receptor in Breast Cancer: Pathophysiology, Clinical Use, and New Advances in Therapy.

Authors:  Zahi Mitri; Tina Constantine; Ruth O'Regan
Journal:  Chemother Res Pract       Date:  2012-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.