Literature DB >> 12649189

Theoretical analysis of antibody targeting of tumor spheroids: importance of dosage for penetration, and affinity for retention.

Christilyn P Graff1, K Dane Wittrup.   

Abstract

The interplay among antibody/antigen binding kinetics, antibody diffusion, and antigen metabolic turnover together determines the depth of penetration of antitumor antibodies into prevascular tumor spheroid cell clumps. A sharp boundary between an outer shell of bound high-affinity antibody and an inner antibody-free core has been previously observed and mathematically modeled and was termed the "binding site barrier." We show here that this process is well described by a simplified shrinking core model wherein binding equilibration is much more rapid than diffusion. This analysis provides the following experimentally testable predictions: (a) the binding site barrier is a moving boundary whose velocity is proportional to the time integral of antibody concentration at the spheroid surface (i.e. plasma antibody AUC); (b) the velocity of this moving boundary is independent of binding affinity, if the affinity is sufficiently high to strongly favor antibody/antigen complex formation at prevailing antibody concentrations; and (c) maximum tumor retention is achieved when the antibody/antigen dissociation rate approaches the rate of antigen metabolic turnover. The consistency of these predictions with published experimental results is demonstrated. The shrinking core model provides a simple analytic relationship predicting the effects of altered antibody pharmacokinetics, antibody molecular weight, antigen turnover rate, antigen expression level, and micrometastasis size on antibody penetration and retention. For example, a formula is provided for predicting the bolus dose necessary to accomplish tumor saturation as a function of antibody and tumor properties. Furthermore, this analysis indicates certain attributes necessary for an optimal tumor targeting agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12649189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  75 in total

Review 1.  Molecular engineering of antibodies for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes.

Authors:  Frédéric Ducancel; Bruno H Muller
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 2.  Antibody vectors for imaging.

Authors:  Tove Olafsen; Anna M Wu
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 3.  Continuing pursuit for ideal systemic anticancer radiotherapeutics.

Authors:  Marlein Miranda Cona; Huaijun Wang; Junjie Li; Yuanbo Feng; Feng Chen; Peter de Witte; Alfons Verbruggen; Yicheng Ni
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  Issues related to targeted delivery of proteins and peptides.

Authors:  Yingjuan Lu; Jun Yang; Emanuela Sega
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Binding and transport of PAMAM-RGD in a tumor spheroid model: the effect of RGD targeting ligand density.

Authors:  Carolyn L Waite; Charles M Roth
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Glycosylation profiles determine extravasation and disease-targeting properties of armed antibodies.

Authors:  Dario Venetz; Christian Hess; Chia-wei Lin; Markus Aebi; Dario Neri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Monitoring therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in brain tumor.

Authors:  Rima Ait-Belkacem; Caroline Berenguer; Claude Villard; L'Houcine Ouafik; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Alain Beck; Olivier Chinot; Daniel Lafitte
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.857

8.  Quantitative spatiotemporal analysis of antibody fragment diffusion and endocytic consumption in tumor spheroids.

Authors:  Greg M Thurber; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Camouflaging Nanoparticles for Ratiometric Delivery of Therapeutic Combinations.

Authors:  Fanfei Meng; Jianping Wang; Qineng Ping; Yoon Yeo
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 10.  Nanovehicular intracellular delivery systems.

Authors:  Ales Prokop; Jeffrey M Davidson
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.