Body composition of extremely preterm infants fed protein-enriched, fortified milk: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill extremely preterm infants fed human milk are often underrepresented in neonatal nutrition trials aimed to determine the effects of enteral protein supplementation on body composition outcomes.
METHODS: Masked randomized trial in which 56 extremely preterm infants 25-28 weeks of gestation were randomized to receive either fortified milk enriched with a fixed amount of extensively hydrolyzed protein (high protein group) or fortified milk without additional protein (standard protein group).
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. In a longitudinal analysis, the mean percent body fat (%BF) at 30-32 weeks of postmenstrual age (PMA), 36 weeks PMA, and 3 months of corrected age (CA) did not differ between groups (17 ± 3 vs. 15 ± 4; p = 0.09). The high protein group had higher weight (-0.1 ± 1.2 vs. -0.8 ± 1.3; p = 0.03) and length (-0.8 ± 1.3 vs. -1.5 ± 1.3; p = 0.02) z scores from birth to 3 months CA. The high protein group also had higher fat-free mass (FFM) z scores at 36 weeks PMA (-0.9 ± 1.1 vs. -1.5 ± 1.1; p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Increased enteral intake of protein increased FFM accretion, weight, and length in extremely preterm infants receiving protein-enriched, fortified human milk. IMPACT: Extremely preterm infants are at high risk of developing postnatal growth failure, particularly when they have low fat-free mass gains. Protein supplementation increases fat-free mass accretion in infants, but several neonatal nutrition trials aimed to determine the effects of enteral protein supplementation on body composition outcomes have systematically excluded critically ill extremely preterm infants fed human milk exclusively. In extremely preterm infants fed fortified human milk, higher enteral protein intake increases fat-free mass accretion and promotes growth without causing excessive body fat accretion.

Introduction

With the steady decrease in mortality rates among extremely preterm infants (28 weeks of gestation or less),[1] the risk of several morbidities, including postnatal growth faltering attributed to slow weight gain, has increased in this vulnerable population.[2] While numerous randomized trials have determined the quantitative effects of hospital-based nutritional interventions on weight gain,[3,4] only a limited number of randomized trials have determined the qualitative effects of these interventions on body composition, specifically fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) accretion in extremely preterm infants.[5,6]

Weight gain resulting from FFM gains increases brain size[7] and reduces the risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes among preterm infants.[8] Conversely, weight gain resulting from excessive FM gains could increase the susceptibility to metabolic reprogramming[9] and the risk of adverse metabolic outcomes.[10,11] This evidence suggests that any nutritional intervention that reduces the risk of postnatal growth faltering should ideally improve the quantitative (i.e., weight, length, and head circumference) and qualitative (i.e., body composition) outcomes of growth.[12,13] Body composition measurements are not part of routine clinical care, but reference values for preterm infants have been recently defined.[14]

Because muscle, bone, brain, and other structures that account for FFM are built on a protein matrix,[15] higher protein intake could increase weight gain, minimize FM gains, and maximize FFM gains.[16] These potential benefits are critical for extremely preterm infants fed human milk. They often receive fortified human milk that contains low and variable amounts of protein.[17] More evidence is needed to support current protein supplementation practices in these high-risk infants. We hypothesized that adding a fixed amount of protein to fortified human milk reduces percent body fat (%BF) and increases FFM accretion in extremely preterm infants.

Methods

Trial design

This study was a parallel-group, masked, randomized clinical trial in which extremely preterm infants were randomly assigned to receive either high or standard protein supplementation with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The study protocol was approved by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Review Board. Written parental consent was obtained within the first two weeks after birth. Patient recruitment began in July 2018 and continued until December 2019. Follow-up visits for body composition measurements at 3 months of corrected age (CA) began in February 2019 and ended abruptly in March 2020 due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Because it was impossible to complete follow-up visits in a considerable proportion of infants, the trial registration was updated and the original primary outcome of mean %BF at 3 months CA was replaced by the outcome of mean %BF between 30 and 32 weeks of postmenstrual age (PMA) and 3 months CA before data analysis.

Participants

Extremely preterm infants with gestational ages between 25 and 28 weeks of gestation were included. Infants with gastrointestinal malformations, central nervous system malformations, or terminal illness were excluded.

Randomization, allocation concealment, and masking

A computer-generated, random-block sequence was used to randomize study participants. Numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes were opened in sequential order to allocate the study intervention. Twin infants were randomized individually. The study intervention was masked.

Interventions

Infants fed maternal or donor milk fortified with a commercially available human milk fortifier containing casein hydrolysate (Similac Human Milk Fortifier Hydrolyzed Protein Concentrated Liquid, Abbott, Columbus, OH) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 allocation ratio to receive either fortified human milk enriched with a fixed amount of a commercially available protein supplement containing casein hydrolysate (high protein group) or fortified human milk without the additional protein supplement (standard protein group). In the high protein group, extensively hydrolyzed liquid protein (Liquid Protein Fortifier, Abbott, Columbus, OH) was added to fortified human milk to increase the protein content of human milk by ~0.75 g per 100 ml.

Primary and secondary outcomes

The revised primary outcome was %BF estimated between 30 and 32 weeks PMA and 3 months CA. Other pre-specified, secondary efficacy outcomes were anthropometric measurements (weight, head circumference, and length) from birth to 3 months CA; FM, FFM, %BF at 36 weeks PMA or hospital discharge (whichever occurred first); postnatal growth failure (below 10th percentile) at 36 weeks PMA or discharge, and growth rate in g/kg/day from birth to 36 weeks PMA estimated by using the exponential method.[18] Safety outcomes included death, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) stage 2 or greater, metabolic acidosis, and uremia.

Study procedures

The study intervention began the day after standard bovine fortification was initiated and continued until 32 weeks PMA or postnatal day 50, whichever occurred first. Body composition was measured with air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) at ~30–32 weeks PMA, at 36 weeks PMA or discharge, and at 3 months CA. For inpatient body composition measurements, infants were transported from the neonatal unit to an exam room if they were no longer requiring respiratory support with mechanical ventilation, CPAP or HFNC. For outpatient body composition measurements at 3 months CA, a follow-up visit was scheduled. All these body composition measurements were converted into z score values using updated, sex-specific, reference curves of body composition in preterm infants.[14] Anthropometric measurements at birth, postnatal day 7, postnatal day 14, postnatal day 28, 32 weeks PMA, and 36 weeks PMA or discharge were converted into z score values using the INTERGROWTH-21st growth curves.[19] Individual protein and energy intakes were calculated after study completion assuming that the energy content of human milk was 20 kcal/oz (0.67 kcal/ml).

Control or monitoring of co-interventions

During the trial, enteral nutrition was initiated at 20–25 ml/kg/day for 1–5 days and then advanced by 20–25 ml/kg/day until full enteral nutrition was established (>150 ml/kg/day). Bovine-based fortifiers were added to human milk when enteral nutrition reached volumes greater than 120 ml/kg/day. If the supply of human milk was insufficient to advance and continue enteral nutrition, donor milk was offered until 32 weeks PMA. If the supply of human milk was insufficient after 32 weeks PMA, the preterm formula was prescribed until discharge.

Sample size

A sample size of 56 infants was considered sufficient to detect a 3 percentage points difference in a t-test comparing means of %BF from two independent groups (level of significance: 0.05, power: 80%, and anticipated lost-to-follow-up rate: 10%).

Statistical methods

This trial recorded core data on nutrition, as recommended by consensus groups.[18] Descriptive data were expressed as means (SD) or numbers (percentages) of observations. For analysis of the primary outcome, an unadjusted t-test comparison of the mean %BF between groups was planned. However, due to unexpected missing data for the primary outcome, a repeated-measures mixed model was performed using longitudinal %BF data from 30 to 32 weeks PMA to 3 months CA. For this analysis that accounted for subject-to-subject variability (random effects) and a fixed interaction term between the study groups and time (fixed effects), randomness in missing data and unstructured correlations were assumed.[20] A similar approach was used for analyses of secondary outcomes. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro, version 14 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

Results

Of the 143 extremely preterm infants 25–28 weeks of gestation born during the study period, 56 were randomized (Fig. 1). The median gestational age of these infants was 27 weeks (IQR: 26–28 weeks) and the mean birthweight was 957 g (SD: 260 g). Of the 56 infants included, 50 had at least one body composition measurement after randomization (88%). Body composition was measured in 17 infants at 30–32 weeks PMA, in 46 infants at 36 weeks PMA, and in 23 infants at 3 months CA. Due to respiratory support requirement, many infants did not have inpatient body composition measurements at 30–32 weeks PMA. Of the 6 infants on respiratory support at 36 weeks PMA, 3 remained on respiratory support at 3 months CA.

Fig. 1

Participant flow diagram.

Enrollment, randomization, and outcomes.

The baseline characteristics of the study participants did not differ between groups (Table 1). Randomization and treatment allocation occurred at ~2 weeks after birth. The average duration of the study intervention was 23 days. The average enteral protein intake after randomization was 3.9 ± 1.5 g/kg/day in the high protein group and 3.3 ± 1.2 g/kg/day in the standard protein group (p = 0.004). The protein/energy ratios were also higher in the high protein group (Fig. 2). Significant differences in enteral energy intake between groups were not found (117 ± 34 vs. 113 ± 33 kcal/kg/day; p = 0.35) (Fig. 2).

Table 1

Baseline characteristics.

	Intervention group (n = 28)	Control group (n = 28)
Demographic characteristics
Birthweight in grams, median (IQR)	940 ± 307	982 ± 272
Gestational age in weeks, median (IQR)	26 (25–28)	27 (26–28)
Weight-for-age z score at birth, mean ± SDa	0 ± 1.7	−0.1 ± 1.3
Weight <10th percentile at birth, (%)	5/28 (18)	5/28 (18)
Male, n (%)	10/28 (36)	14/28 (50)
Black race, n (%)	17/28 (61)	17/28 (61)
Exposure to a full course (2 doses) of antenatal steroids, n (%)	21/28 (75)	21/28 (75)
Vaginal delivery, n (%)	22/28 (79)	24/28 (86)
Multiple gestations, n (%)	11/28 (39)	8/28 (29)
Postnatal age when consent was obtained in days, median (IQR)	9 (3–13)	8 (4–13)
Postnatal age when enteral feeding was initiated in days, median (IQR)	3 (2–4)	3 (3–4)
Postnatal age when >120 ml/kg of enteral feeding was achieved in days, median (IQR)	10 (8–12)	10 (8–12)
Postnatal age at the time of fortification in days, median (IQR)	14 (12–19)	14 (12–18)
Enteral protein intake in g/kg at postnatal day 7, mean ± SD	1.1 ± 1.1	1.0 ± 0.5
Parenteral protein intake in g/kg at postnatal day 7, mean ± SD	3.3 ± 1.0	3.4 ± 1.4
Duration of parenteral nutrition in days, median (IQR)	5 (3–7)	5 (2–9)

az scores were estimated with the INTEGROWTH-21st growth curves.

Fig. 2

Energy and protein intake according to intervention group.

Longituinal changes in energy intake (a), protein intake (b), and protein/energy ratios (c). Mean values and 95% CIs were adjusted with repeated measures analyses that assumed an unstructured variance and accounted for subject-to-subject variability (random effects) and a fixed interaction term between the study groups and time (fixed effects).

Fifty infants were included in the primary outcome analysis. The repeated-measures mixed model included 86 body composition measurements. It revealed that the mean %BF values did not differ over time between groups (17 ± 3 vs. 15 ± 4; p = 0.09) (Fig. 3a). The longitudinal analysis of FFM data from 30 to 32 weeks PMA to 3 months CA showed that FFM z score values were higher in the high protein group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (mean difference favoring the high protein group: +0.6 points; 95% CI − 0.1 to 1.4; p = 0.07) (Fig. 3c). The longitudinal analyses of anthropometric data from birth to 3 months CA demonstrated that weight and length z score values were higher in the high protein group (Fig. 3d, e).

Fig. 3

Growth and body composition outcomes from birth to 3 months of corrected age according to intervention group.

Longituinal changes in body fat percentage (a), fat mass (b), fat-free mass (c), weight (d), length (e), and head circumference (f). Mean values and 95% CIs were adjusted with repeated measures analyses that assumed an unstructured variance and accounted for subject-to-subject variability (random effects) and a fixed interaction term between the study groups and time (fixed effects).

Growth and body composition outcomes at 36 weeks PMA are shown in Table 2. FFM and FM z scores at 36 weeks PMA were higher in the intervention group. Growth rates and declines in z scores from birth to 36 weeks PMA and from postnatal days 7–36 weeks PMA did not differ significantly between groups. The median length of hospital stay was 75 days (IQR: 64–104). During the first 28 days after birth, five infants had BUN values >40 mg/dl (3 in the high protein group and 2 in the standard protein group) and seven infants had total serum CO2 values of 16 mmol/l or less (4 in the high protein group and 3 in the standard protein group). The median BUN values did not differ between the high and the standard protein group (26 ± 9 vs. 23 ± 10 mg/dl, respectively). Serum concentrations of albumin and ammonia were not routinely measured.

Table 2

Study outcomes in extremely preterm infants with body composition measurements at 36 weeks PMA or hospital discharge.

Outcomes	Intervention group (n = 21)	Control group (n = 25)	p
Nutritional outcomes
Proportion of intake as mother’s milk (>80%) at 36 weeks, n (%)	7/21 (33)	9/25 (36)	0.85
Feeding volume at 36 weeks in ml/kg/d, mean ± SD	156 (143–169)	153 (143–160)	0.30
Energy intake at 36 weeks in kcal/kg/d, median (IQR)	126 (113–142)	124 (100–140)	0.39
Protein intake at 36 weeks in g/kg/d, median (IQR)	4.5 (3.5–5.0)	4.0 (2.7–4.7)	0.13
Growth rate from birth to 36 weeks in g/kg/d, mean ± SD	13 (12–15)	14 (12–15)	0.96
Anthropometric outcomesa
Weight in grams at 36 weeks, mean ± SD	2698 ± 598	2387 ± 526	0.06
Weight-for-age z score at 36 weeks, mean ± SD	0 ± 1.2	−0.9 ± 1.3	0.02
Length-for-age z score at 36 weeks, mean ± SD	−1.4 ± 1.3	−2.0 ± 1.6	0.19
Head circumference (HC)-for-age z score at 36 weeks, mean ± SD	−1.2 ± 1.0	−1.8 ± 1.8	0.27
Postnatal growth restriction at 36 weeks (weight < 10th percentile), n (%)	4 (19)	8 (32)	0.50
Difference between weight z score at birth and weight z score at 36 weeks, mean ± SD	−0.6 ± 0.7	−0.8 ± 0.8	0.28
Difference between HC-for-age z score at birth and HC-for-age z score at 36 weeks, mean ± SD	−1.3 ± 1.2	−1.5 ± 1.4	0.59
Body composition outcomes
Postnatal age at assessment in days, median (IQR)	61 (56–85)	64 (51–85)	0.64
Fat mass z score, mean ± SD	3.1 ± 1.6	2.1 ± 1.9	0.05
Fat mass in grams, mean ± SD	506 ± 183	400 ± 160	0.04
Fat-free mass z score, mean ± SD	−0.9 ± 1.1	−1.5 ± 1.1	0.04
Fat-free mass in grams, mean ± SD	2191 ± 434	1986 ± 390	0.10
% Body fat z score, mean ± SD	2.7 ± 0.8	2.3 ± 1.3	0.21

az scores were estimated with the INTEGROWTH-21st growth curves.

Pearson correlation coefficients of a post hoc correlation analysis between energy/protein intake and anthropometric/body composition measurements at 36 weeks PMA are shown in Table 3. P/E ratio at postnatal day 21 had the strongest correlation with weight and FFM z scores at 36 weeks PMA.

Table 3

Pearson coefficients of correlation analyses between enteral intake at postnatal days 21–28 and growth outcomes at 36 weeks PMA.

	z score outcomes at 36 weeks PMAa
	Weight	Length	Head circumference	Fat-free mass
Enteral intake
Energy intake at day 21	0.27	0.13	0.11	0.09
Protein intake at day 21	0.45	0.30	0.25	0.29
Protein/energy ratio at day 21	0.50	0.34	0.28	0.42
Caloric intake at day 28	0.23	0.02	0.12	0.04
Protein intake at day 28	0.48	0.18	0.30	0.25
Protein/energy ratio at day 28	0.54	0.34	0.37	0.35

aWeight, length, and head circumference z scores were estimated with the INTEGROWTH-21st growth curves.

From birth to 120 days, none of the infants included in the trial died or developed NEC stage 2 or greater. Three infants received postnatal steroids (2 in the high protein group and 1 in the standard protein group). Between high and standard protein groups, there were no differences in the duration of mechanical ventilation (5 ± 8 vs. 3 ± 4), the duration of respiratory support with continuous positive airway pressure (13 ± 8 vs. 13 ± 8), or the number of days on supplemental oxygen during the first 28 days after birth (20 ± 10 vs. 18 ± 10). There were no serious events related to body composition measurements.

Discussion

This single-center, masked, randomized trial examined the effects of high protein supplementation on body composition outcomes of extremely preterm infants fed fortified human milk. This supplementation method did not result in lower %BF at any of the three time points analyzed (30–32 weeks PMA, 36 weeks PMA, or 3 months CA). However, FM and FFM z scores at 36 weeks PMA, ~4 weeks after the intervention was discontinued per study protocol, increased more in the supplemented group. A repeated-measures analysis of longitudinal FFM z score data revealed that the effect of higher enteral protein intake on higher FFM found at 36 weeks PMA was also evident at 30–32 weeks PMA and 3 months CA, but these early and long-lasting effects did not reach statistical significance. In contrast, a similar analysis of longitudinal FM z score data showed that the effect of higher enteral protein intake on higher FM found at 36 weeks PMA was transient. After increasing the enteral intake of protein for ~3 weeks, we did not observe an increased risk of metabolic acidosis and uremia.

Adding a fixed amount of protein to fortified human milk resulted in higher P/E ratios and higher FFM gains at 36 weeks PMA, but it did not significantly affect growth rates or changes in weight z scores over time. Because the total energy intake did not differ between groups, we did not anticipate differences in growth rates or weight z score changes from birth to 36 weeks PMA. When infants receive human milk, actual enteral protein intake is often lower than assumed enteral protein intake. We proposed this pragmatic supplementation approach to correct the 0.5–0.8 g/kg/day deficit of protein reported in extremely preterm infants fed powdered human milk fortifiers.[21] Another pragmatic approach that could correct this deficit is increasing the current industry standard of protein content in commercially available liquid human milk fortifiers.

Our results support the claims that higher protein/energy ratios increase FFM accretion in preterm infants[22] and that FFM gains resulting from higher enteral protein intake are associated with improved growth in preterm infants fed human milk.[23,24] This effect on FFM has potential long-term benefits because several observational studies have shown that higher FFM gains are associated with a lower risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.[8,25-27]

By selecting %BF as the primary outcome of this trial, we expected that increased enteral protein intake would result in lower %BF and higher FFM accretion. However, recent studies suggest that early changes in %BF from birth to 36 weeks are an adaptive response to the extrauterine environment independent of nutrient intake[28] and that lower %BF z scores do not correlate with higher FFM z scores.[29]

One of the main limitations of this trial was the decreased power for several of the comparisons reported. Due to an unexpected pause in research activities that included the cancellation of outpatient visits, we had to replace our original aim. With a repeated-measures analysis that allows comparisons of overall mean values between groups, we maximized the value of the 86 body composition measurements obtained during the trial and addressed the problem of randomness in missing data.

Another important limitation was the reduced number of inpatient body composition measurements at 30–32 weeks PMA. We systematically excluded extremely preterm infants 22–24 weeks of gestation to minimize this limitation. However, this approach was insufficient to have a baseline measurement of infant body composition. By the time extremely preterm infants were stable enough to have their body composition measurement with ADP at 30–32 weeks PMA, most of them were already receiving the study intervention. We have demonstrated the feasibility of obtaining baseline measurements soon after birth in infants born at 28–32 weeks.[29] However, the results of this trial suggest that this might not be possible in more immature extremely preterm infants. Other limitations were the single-center study design, the calculations used to assume enteral protein intake without a human milk analyzer, and the lack of serum measurements of amino acid concentrations after protein supplementation.

The main strengths of this study are randomization, masking, and ADP measurements of body composition in extremely preterm infants. Other trials of protein supplementation did not include body composition as an outcome.[4] ADP is a non-invasive and accurate method to measure body composition.[30] Other strengths include the reporting on early infancy outcomes in a neonatal trial, the report of growth outcomes as recommended by consensus groups, and the use of the intention-to-treat principle to preserve the effect of randomization.

Providing information on body composition outcomes during early infancy is a high-priority field of nutrition research. Ideally, future multicenter trials should include only high-risk, immature, extremely preterm infants (mainly 22–24 weeks of gestation) and more extended periods of protein supplementation. FFM z scores should be the primary outcome of future trials. Because body composition measurements at 3 months of age in term infants may not be the ideal reference for preterm infants, these trials should consider using or developing new reference values generated with longitudinal data of body composition measurements in preterm infants. Future multicenter studies with larger sample sizes should also investigate alternative methods to assess FFM accretion. ADP is not always feasible in extremely preterm infants.

In conclusion, supplementation with extensively hydrolyzed protein in extremely preterm infants fed multi-nutrient fortified human milk did not decrease %BF. However, this supplementation method increased weight, length, and FFM z scores from 30 to 32 weeks PMA to 3 months CA in extremely preterm infants. Larger trials are needed before implementing high protein supplementation in extremely preterm infants.