Lauri Laru1,2, Hanna Ronkainen3, Pasi Ohtonen4, Markku H Vaarala3. 1. Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. lauri.t.laru@gmail.com. 2. Department of Urology, Oulu University Hospital, PO Box 21, FI-90029 OYS, Oulu, Finland. lauri.t.laru@gmail.com. 3. Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. 4. Division of Operative Care, Oulu University Hospital and Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and metastasectomies on the survival of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) using real-life, population-based national dataset. METHODS: Nationwide data, including all cases of synchronous mRCC in Finland diagnosed on a 6-year timeframe, based on the Finnish Cancer Registry and complemented with patient records from the treating hospitals, were analyzed. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 3-4 were excluded. Univariate and adjusted multivariable survival analysis were performed, including subgroup analysis for patients with different medical therapies. Nephrectomy complications were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 732 patients were included in the analysis. CN was performed for 389 (53.1%) patients, whereas 68 (9.3%) patients underwent nephrectomy and metastasectomies of all lesions (surgery with curative intent). Median overall survival (OS) for patients who did not undergo nephrectomy was 5.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.6-7.2) months. Patients who had a CN had a median OS of 16.6 (95% CI = 14.2-19.1, p < 0.001) months, whereas patients who had surgery with curative intent had a median OS of 51.3 (95% CI = 36.0-66.6, p < 0.001) months. The survival benefit of CN and metastasectomies remained significant in all medical therapy subgroups and in both of the applied multivariable statistical models. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer is associated with a significant survival benefit in patients with good and moderate performance status, regardless of the chosen medical therapy.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and metastasectomies on the survival of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) using real-life, population-based national dataset. METHODS: Nationwide data, including all cases of synchronous mRCC in Finland diagnosed on a 6-year timeframe, based on the Finnish Cancer Registry and complemented with patient records from the treating hospitals, were analyzed. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 3-4 were excluded. Univariate and adjusted multivariable survival analysis were performed, including subgroup analysis for patients with different medical therapies. Nephrectomy complications were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 732 patients were included in the analysis. CN was performed for 389 (53.1%) patients, whereas 68 (9.3%) patients underwent nephrectomy and metastasectomies of all lesions (surgery with curative intent). Median overall survival (OS) for patients who did not undergo nephrectomy was 5.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.6-7.2) months. Patients who had a CN had a median OS of 16.6 (95% CI = 14.2-19.1, p < 0.001) months, whereas patients who had surgery with curative intent had a median OS of 51.3 (95% CI = 36.0-66.6, p < 0.001) months. The survival benefit of CN and metastasectomies remained significant in all medical therapy subgroups and in both of the applied multivariable statistical models. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer is associated with a significant survival benefit in patients with good and moderate performance status, regardless of the chosen medical therapy.
Authors: R C Flanigan; S E Salmon; B A Blumenstein; S I Bearman; V Roy; P C McGrath; J R Caton; N Munshi; E D Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-12-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; Piotr Tomczak; M Dror Michaelson; Ronald M Bukowski; Olivier Rixe; Stéphane Oudard; Sylvie Negrier; Cezary Szczylik; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; Paul W Bycott; Charles M Baum; Robert A Figlin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bimal Bhindi; Elizabeth B Habermann; Ross J Mason; Brian A Costello; Lance C Pagliaro; R Houston Thompson; Bradley C Leibovich; Stephen A Boorjian Journal: J Urol Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: C N Robertson; W M Linehan; H I Pass; L G Gomella; G P Haas; A Berman; M Merino; S A Rosenberg Journal: J Urol Date: 1990-09 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Daniel Y C Heng; J Connor Wells; Brian I Rini; Benoit Beuselinck; Jae-Lyun Lee; Jennifer J Knox; Georg A Bjarnason; Sumanta Kumar Pal; Christian K Kollmannsberger; Takeshi Yuasa; Sandy Srinivas; Frede Donskov; Aristotelis Bamias; Lori A Wood; D Scott Ernst; Neeraj Agarwal; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Sun Young Rha; Jenny J Kim; Toni K Choueiri Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; Piotr Tomczak; M Dror Michaelson; Ronald M Bukowski; Stéphane Oudard; Sylvie Negrier; Cezary Szczylik; Roberto Pili; Georg A Bjarnason; Xavier Garcia-del-Muro; Jeffrey A Sosman; Ewa Solska; George Wilding; John A Thompson; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; Xin Huang; Robert A Figlin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gary Hudes; Michael Carducci; Piotr Tomczak; Janice Dutcher; Robert Figlin; Anil Kapoor; Elzbieta Staroslawska; Jeffrey Sosman; David McDermott; István Bodrogi; Zoran Kovacevic; Vladimir Lesovoy; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf; Olga Barbarash; Erhan Gokmen; Timothy O'Toole; Stephanie Lustgarten; Laurence Moore; Robert J Motzer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245