| Literature DB >> 34181290 |
Xiangbin Kong1, Zhen Ye2, Yaoping Chen3, Huan Zhao4, Jian Tu5, Tianqing Meng6, Chengliang Xiong2, Honggang Li7, Yijun Gong8, Liang Zheng8, Bangning Cheng8, Zhijun Zhang9, Peng Xu4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study, we investigated the clinical value of serum Inhibin B alone or in combination with other hormone indicators in subfertile men.Entities:
Keywords: Inhibin B; biomarker; spermatogenesis; subfertile men
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34181290 PMCID: PMC8373365 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23882
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Lab Anal ISSN: 0887-8013 Impact factor: 2.352
Comparison of hormone levels among all groups
| Group | E2 (pg/ml) | Testosterone (ng/ml) | AMH (ng/ml) | Inhibin B (pg/ml) | LH (mIU/ml) | FSH (mIU/ml) | PRL (ng/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOR ( | |||||||
| Mean | 71.31 | 5.57 | 8.13 | 132.67 | 4.60 | 5.01 | 12.78 |
| SD | 18.49 | 1.80 | 4.49 | 49.55 | 3.36 | 2.98 | 11.83 |
| OA ( | |||||||
| Mean | 71.28 | 5.19 | 8.41 | 124.25 | 4.82 | 4.93 | 12.12 |
| SD | 20.48 | 1.81 | 4.20 | 51.22 | 2.72 | 3.00 | 5.48 |
| IMO ( | |||||||
| Mean | 72.18 | 5.39 | 8.30 | 96.38 | 5.10 | 8.05 | 10.60 |
| SD | 22.18 | 1.50 | 4.61 | 49.45 | 2.13 | 6.43 | 3.22 |
| ISO ( | |||||||
| Mean | 68.19 | 4.98 | 5.72 | 66.55 | 6.04 | 13.26 | 10.50 |
| SD | 18.96 | 1.82 | 3.55 | 40.08 | 2.41 | 9.80 | 4.89 |
| NOA ( | |||||||
| Mean | 59.95 | 4.22 | 5.41 | 25.22 | 9.71 | 19.71 | 11.25 |
| SD | 25.16 | 1.77 | 4.43 | 14.91 | 5.93 | 11.14 | 4.20 |
| Total ( | |||||||
| Mean | 67.76 | 5.04 | 6.99 | 85.09 | 6.35 | 11.00 | 11.57 |
| SD | 21.73 | 1.83 | 4.50 | 59.84 | 4.46 | 9.89 | 7.65 |
| Group comparison | |||||||
|
| 4.02 | 7.10 | 7.09 | 82.68 | 21.30 | 44.73 | 1.10 |
|
| 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.355 |
Abbreviations: IMO, idiopathic moderate oligozoospermia; ISO, idiopathic severe oligozoospermia; NOA, nonobstructive azoospermia; NOR, normospermia; OA, obstructive azoospermia.
F‐test for comparison of multiple groups’ means, p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.
FIGURE 1Differences in hormone distribution among groups. *Group 1: NOR (n = 96), Group 2: IMO (n = 46), Group 3: ISO (n = 53), Group 4: OA (n = 38), and Group 5: NOA (n = 91)
Comparison between normal control group and obstructive azoospermia group
| Inhibin B | AMH | FSH | E2 | Testosterone | LH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.673 | 0.250 | 0.104 | 0.006 | 0.835 | 0.270 | |
| 0.502 | 0.803 | 0.918 | 0.995 | 0.405 | 0.788 |
Correlation analysis of hormone levels and semen concentration
| E2 | Testosterone | AMH | LH | Inhibin B | FSH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 ( | ||||||
| Spearman_ | 0.197 | 0.252 | 0.267 | −0.502 | 0.755 | −0.692 |
|
| 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Group 2 ( | ||||||
| Spearman_ | 0.048 | 0.090 | 0.172 | −0.319 | 0.530 | −0.543 |
|
| 0.504 | 0.212 | 0.016 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Group 3 ( | ||||||
| Spearman_ | −0.032 | 0.129 | 0.183 | −0.078 | 0.216 | −0.231 |
|
| 0.751 | 0.205 | 0.070 | 0.445 | 0.032 | 0.022 |
| Group 4 ( | ||||||
| Spearman_ | −0.227 | 0.011 | −0.360 | 0.274 | −0.218 | 0.188 |
|
| 0.130 | 0.940 | 0.014 | 0.066 | 0.146 | 0.211 |
| Group 5 ( | ||||||
| Spearman_ | −0.067 | 0.088 | 0.055 | −0.115 | 0.061 | −0.137 |
|
| 0.632 | 0.531 | 0.694 | 0.412 | 0.666 | 0.328 |
Group 1: NOR (n = 96), IMO (n = 46), ISO (n = 53) and NOA (n = 91), Group 2: NOR (n = 96), IMO (n = 46) and ISO (n = 53), Group 3: IMO (n = 46), ISO (n = 53), Group 4: IMO (n = 46), Group 5: ISO (n = 53).
Distribution characteristics of total testicular volume under different spermatogenesis status
| Group | Subgroup |
| Mean | Standard deviation | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOR | 96 | 37.03 | 9.56 | 13.63 | 60.00 | |
| Oligozoospermia | IMO | 46 | 26.27 | 7.40 | 14.99 | 44.42 |
| ISO | 53 | 22.97 | 7.97 | 6.00 | 40.00 | |
| NOA | SCOS (Sertoli‐cell‐only syndrome) | 8 | 22.78 | 2.25 | 18.00 | 25.38 |
| Spermatogenic arrest | 32 | 16.88 | 5.68 | 7.75 | 30.00 | |
| No biopsy | 51 | 10.90 | 4.40 | 1.27 | 18.15 |
FIGURE 2Correlation analysis of semen average concentration and total testicular volume. *Spearman correlation analysis (r = 0.750, p < 0.001) of samples under different spermatogenesis status (normal, mild and medium, severe oligospermia, nonobstructive azoospermia)
AUC of different hormone parameters in the diagnosis of idiopathic oligozoospermia
| Parameter | AUC | Standard errora | 95% Confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | |||
| E2 | 0.519 | 0.042 | 0.437 | 0.600 |
| T | 0.566 | 9.041 | 0.486 | 0.647 |
| AMH | 0.588 | 0.041 | 0.508 | 0.668 |
| Inhibin B | 0.802 | 0.032 | 0.739 | 0.865 |
| FSH | 0.781 | 0.033 | 0.763 | 0.881 |
| LH | 0.681 | 0.039 | 0.605 | 0.756 |
| Inhibin B + AMH + FSH | 0.822 | 0.030 | 0.763 | 0.881 |
| ALL 6 | 0.824 | 0.030 | 0.765 | 0.882 |
Under the nonparametric assumption.
FIGURE 3AUC of different hormone parameters in the diagnosis of idiopathic oligozoospermia
Comparison between NOR and idiopathic oligozoospermia (including IMO and ISO) with Inhibin B, AMH, FSH, and other parameters
| Inhibin B | AMH | FSH | E2 | T | LH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.57 | 1.93 | 6.185 | 0.453 | 1.587 | 2.442 | |
| <0.001 | 0.055 | <0.001 | 0.651 | 0.114 | 0.016 | |
| Cutoff | 97.1 | — | 6.245 | — | — | 4.565 |
| Sensitivity | 0.792 | — | 0.667 | — | — | 0.646 |
| Specificity | 0.727 | — | 0.802 | — | — | 0.677 |
| Youden index | 0.519 | — | 0.469 | — | — | 0.324 |
FIGURE 4AUC of different parameters in the diagnosis of idiopathic severe oligozoospermia
AUC of different hormone parameters in the diagnosis of idiopathic severe oligozoospermia (ISO)
| Parameter | AUC | Standard errora | 95% Confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | |||
| Inhibin B | 0.685 | 0.053 | 0.581 | 0.790 |
| FSH | 0.692 | 0.053 | 0.588 | 0.795 |
| AMH | 0.673 | 0.054 | 0.568 | 0.778 |
| Inhibin B + AMH + FSH | 0.714 | 0.051 | 0.613 | 0.814 |
Under the nonparametric assumption.
Comparison between idiopathic moderate oligozoospermia (IMO) and idiopathic severe oligozoospermia (ISO) with Inhibin B, AMH, FSH, and other parameters
| Inhibin B | AMH | FSH | E2 | Testosterone | LH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.313 | 3.143 | 3.167 | 0.963 | 1.217 | 2.029 | |
| 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.338 | 0.226 | 0.045 | |
| Cutoff | 58.25 | 3.935 | 10.80 | — | — | — |
| Sensitivity | 0.870 | 0.935 | 0.869 | — | — | — |
| Specificity | 0.472 | 0.377 | 0.491 | — | — | — |
| Youden index | 0.341 | 0.312 | 0.360 | — | — | — |
FIGURE 5AUC of different parameters in the diagnosis of nonobstructive azoospermia
AUC of different parameters in the diagnosis of nonobstructive azoospermia
| Parameter | AUC | Standard errora | 95% Confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | |||
| Inhibin B | 0.941 | 0.013 | 0.916 | 0.966 |
| AMH | 0.652 | 0.038 | 0.577 | 0.727 |
| FSH | 0.867 | 0.023 | 0.822 | 0.912 |
| Inhibin B + AMH + FSH | 0.943 | 0.012 | 0.919 | 0.967 |
Under the nonparametric assumption.
Cutoff and other index comparison between OA (obstructive azoospermia) and NOA (non‐obstructive azoospermia) for Inhibin B, AMH, and FSH
| Inhibin B | AMH | FSH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| <0.000 | 0.009 | <0.000 | |
| Cutoff | 45.90 | 4.17 | 8.83 |
| Sensitivity | 0.926 | 0.822 | 0.864 |
| Specificity | 0.883 | 0.481 | 0.752 |
| Youden index | 0.809 | 0.304 | 0.617 |
FIGURE 6AUC of AMH/T in the diagnosis of nonobstructive azoospermia
AUC of Inhibin B and AMH/T in the diagnosis of nonobstructive azoospermia
| Parameter | AUC | Standard errora | 95% Confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | |||
| Inhibin B | 0.941 | 0.013 | 0.916 | 0.966 |
| AMH/T | 0.728 | 0.055 | 0.621 | 0.819 |
Under the nonparametric assumption.
Cutoff and other index comparison between OA (obstructive azoospermia) and NOA (non‐obstructive azoospermia) for Inhibin B and AMH/T
| Inhibin B | AMH/T | |
|---|---|---|
| <0.000 | <0.000 | |
| Cutoff | 45.90 | 1.14 |
| Sensitivity | 0.926 | 0.895 |
| Specificity | 0.883 | 0.636 |
| Youden index | 0.809 | 0.531 |