Literature DB >> 34181206

Imaging biomarkers in the diagnosis of salivary gland tumors: the value of lesion/parenchyma ratio of perfusion-MR pharmacokinetic parameters.

Francesco Mungai1, Giovanni Battista Verrone2, Luigi Bonasera2, Eleonora Bicci2, Michele Pietragalla3, Cosimo Nardi3, Valentina Berti3, Lorenzo Nicola Mazzoni4, Vittorio Miele2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Morphologic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for characterization of salivary gland tumors has limited utility, and the use of perfusion MRI data in the clinical setting is controversial. We examined the potential of tissue-normalized dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI pharmacokinetic parameters of salivary gland tumors as imaging biomarkers for characterization and differentiation between benign and malignant lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: DCE-MR images acquired from 60 patients with parotid and submandibular gland tumors were retrospectively reviewed. Pharmacokinetic parameters as transfer constant (Ktrans), rate constant (Kep), extracellular space volume (Ve), fractional plasma volume (Vp), and AEC (area of all times enhancement curve) were measured on both the lesion and the normal contralateral salivary gland parenchyma. Lesion/parenchyma ratio (L/P) for each parameter was calculated.
RESULTS: Five groups of lesions were identified (reference: histopathology): pleomorphic adenomas(n = 20), Warthin tumors(n = 16), other benign entities(n = 4), non-Hodgkin lymphomas(n = 4), and malignancies(n = 16). Significant differences were seen for mean values of L/PKtrans (higher in malignancies), L/PKep (lower in adenomas than Warthin tumors), L/PVe (lower in Warthin tumors and lymphomas), L/PVp (higher in Warthin tumors and malignancies than adenomas), and L/PAEC (higher in malignancies). Significant differences were found between benign and malignant (non-lymphoproliferative) lesions in mean value of L/PKtrans (0.485 and 1.581), L/PVp (1.288 and 2.834), and L/PAEC (0.682 and 1.910). ROC analysis demonstrated the highest AUC (0.96) for L/PAEC, with sensitivity and specificity for malignancy of 93.8% and 97.5% (cutoff value = 1.038).
CONCLUSION: Lesion/parenchyma ratio of DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic data could be helpful for recognizing the principal types of salivary gland tumors; L/PAEC seems a valuable biomarker for differentiating benign from malignant tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; Imaging biomarkers; Lesion/parenchyma ratio; Pharmacokinetic analysis; Salivary gland tumors

Year:  2021        PMID: 34181206     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-021-01376-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  20 in total

1.  Head and neck tumours: combined MRI assessment based on IVIM and TIC analyses for the differentiation of tumors of different histological types.

Authors:  Misa Sumi; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Imaging of Minor Salivary Glands.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Suresh K Mukherji
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 3.  State-of-the-Art Imaging of Salivary Gland Tumors.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Suresh K Mukherji
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland lesions: A 6-year retrospective review.

Authors:  Erin N Consamus; Deborah Smith; Sergio Pina Oviedo; Dina R Mody; Hidehiro Takei
Journal:  J Am Soc Cytopathol       Date:  2014-11-14

Review 5.  Biopsy of parotid masses: Review of current techniques.

Authors:  Sananda Haldar; Joseph D Sinnott; Kemal M Tekeli; Samuel S Turner; David C Howlett
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

Review 6.  Parotid Gland Imaging.

Authors:  Ravi S Prasad
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Assessment of salivary gland tumors using MRI and CT: impact of experience on diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Thomas J Vogl; Moritz H Albrecht; Nour-El-Din A Nour-Eldin; Hanns Ackermann; Adel Maataoui; Timo Stöver; Matthew W Bickford; Tatjana Stark-Paulsen
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 8.  Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy in salivary glands: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hee Joon Kim; Jong Seung Kim
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 9.  State of the art MRI in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Y L Dai; A D King
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  Management of Salivary Gland Tumours: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines.

Authors:  S Sood; M McGurk; F Vaz
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.469

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Role of Texture Analysis in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Eleonora Bicci; Cosimo Nardi; Leonardo Calamandrei; Michele Pietragalla; Edoardo Cavigli; Francesco Mungai; Luigi Bonasera; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Lymph Nodes Evaluation in Rectal Cancer: Where Do We Stand and Future Perspective.

Authors:  Alessandra Borgheresi; Federica De Muzio; Andrea Agostini; Letizia Ottaviani; Alessandra Bruno; Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Ginevra Danti; Federica Flammia; Roberta Grassi; Francesca Grassi; Federico Bruno; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Antonio Barile; Vittorio Miele; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Conventional, functional and radiomics assessment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Andrea Belli; Valentina Borzillo; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Federico Bruno; Roberta Grassi; Alessandro Ottaiano; Guglielmo Nasti; Vincenzo Pilone; Antonella Petrillo; Francesco Izzo
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.965

Review 4.  Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Techniques: Technical Principles and Applications in Nanomedicine.

Authors:  Federico Bruno; Vincenza Granata; Flavia Cobianchi Bellisari; Ferruccio Sgalambro; Emanuele Tommasino; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Francesco Arrigoni; Diletta Cozzi; Francesca Grassi; Maria Chiara Brunese; Silvia Pradella; Maria Luisa Mangoni di S Stefano; Carmen Cutolo; Ernesto Di Cesare; Alessandra Splendiani; Andrea Giovagnoni; Vittorio Miele; Roberto Grassi; Carlo Masciocchi; Antonio Barile
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  Imaging Features of Post Main Hepatectomy Complications: The Radiologist Challenging.

Authors:  Carmen Cutolo; Federica De Muzio; Roberta Fusco; Igino Simonetti; Andrea Belli; Renato Patrone; Francesca Grassi; Federica Dell'Aversana; Vincenzo Pilone; Antonella Petrillo; Francesco Izzo; Vincenza Granata
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-26

Review 6.  Multimodality Imaging Assessment of Desmoid Tumors: The Great Mime in the Era of Multidisciplinary Teams.

Authors:  Igino Simonetti; Federico Bruno; Roberta Fusco; Carmen Cutolo; Sergio Venanzio Setola; Renato Patrone; Carlo Masciocchi; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Francesco Arrigoni; Carmine Picone; Andrea Belli; Roberta Grassi; Francesca Grassi; Antonio Barile; Francesco Izzo; Antonella Petrillo; Vincenza Granata
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.