Literature DB >> 34181155

Cesarean Section Rate and Perinatal Outcome Analyses According to Robson's 10-Group Classification System.

Christabel Eftekharian1, Peter Wolf Husslein2, Rainer Lehner2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The cesarean delivery (CD) rate is increasing worldwide. An internationally recognized classification system had been required to analyse the trend and its possible consequences in a standardized manner. The goal of this study was to identify the main contributors to the CD rate at the Medical University of Vienna in an 11-year time period (2003-2013) and to analyse neonatal outcome parameters within the ten Robson categories.
METHODS: This is a retrospective data-analysis of singleton and twin pregnancies in cephalic, breech and transverse presentation with a gestational age between 23 and 42 weeks. The cases were divided into ten classes based on the Robson criteria. CD rates and perinatal outcome parameters were analysed within each Robson class. The outcome parameters included: NICU-admission rate and 5 min Apgar score values < 7.
RESULTS: The overall CD rate was at 44.2%. Within Robson class 5 the CD rate was the highest at 99.1%. Main contributors were Robson class 5 at 20.6%, followed by class 2 at 17.1% and class 8 at 15.0%. Neonatal outcome analyses revealed significant differences between the Robson classes.
CONCLUSIONS: The main contributors to the CD rate were determined. We suggest reconsidering the frequently applied birth mode especially for Robson class 2, 4, 5 and 8. Lowering the CD rate could be achievable, if a careful delivery management and an individual risk evaluation is provided. It is important to reduce the CD rate in the individual Robson classes under consideration of perinatal outcome parameters, since a reduction should only take place where it is clinically useful and relevant.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords:  10 Group classification system; Cesarean delivery; Cesarean section rate; Robson classes; Robson classification

Year:  2021        PMID: 34181155     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03183-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  5 in total

1.  Classification of caesarean sections in Canada: the Modified Robson criteria.

Authors:  Dan Farine; Debra Shepherd
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2012-10

2.  Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system.

Authors:  Sherrie Kelly; Ann Sprague; Deshayne B Fell; Phil Murphy; Nancy Aelicks; Yanfang Guo; John Fahey; Leeanne Lauzon; Heather Scott; Lily Lee; Brooke Kinniburgh; Monica Prince; Mark Walker
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2013-03

3.  Labour and Childbirth After Previous Caesarean Section: Recommendations of the Austrian Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (OEGGG).

Authors:  P Reif; C Brezinka; T Fischer; P Husslein; U Lang; A Ramoni; H Zeisler; P Klaritsch
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy.

Authors:  Jon F R Barrett; Mary E Hannah; Eileen K Hutton; Andrew R Willan; Alexander C Allen; B Anthony Armson; Amiram Gafni; K S Joseph; Dalah Mason; Arne Ohlsson; Susan Ross; J Johanna Sanchez; Elizabeth V Asztalos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Nadia Vindevoghel; Joao Paulo Souza; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Maria Regina Torloni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.