Literature DB >> 23470108

Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system.

Sherrie Kelly1, Ann Sprague1, Deshayne B Fell1, Phil Murphy2, Nancy Aelicks3, Yanfang Guo4, John Fahey5, Leeanne Lauzon5, Heather Scott6, Lily Lee7, Brooke Kinniburgh7, Monica Prince1, Mark Walker8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the groups within the obstetric population contributing most substantially to the Caesarean section rate in five Canadian provinces.
METHODS: Hospital births from five participating provinces were grouped into Robson's 10 mutually exclusive and totally inclusive classification categories. The relative contribution of each group to the overall CS rate, relative size of group, and CS rate were calculated for British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland and Labrador for the four-year period from 2007-2008 to 2010-2011.
RESULTS: In all five provinces (accounting for approximately 64% of births in Canada), and for all years examined, the group making the largest relative contribution to the CS rate was women with at least one previous CS and a term, singleton, cephalic-presenting pregnancy (Robson Group 5). The CS rate for this group ranged from 76.1% in Alberta to 89.9% in Newfoundland and Labrador in 2010 to 2011, accounting for 11.3% of all deliveries. The rate of CS for Group 5 decreased slightly over the four years, except in Ontario. The next largest contributing group was nulliparous women with a term, singleton, cephalic-presenting pregnancy. Those with induced labour or Caesarean section before labour (Robson Group 2) had CS rates ranging from 34.4% in Nova Scotia to 44.6% in British Columbia (accounting for 13.1% of all deliveries), and those with spontaneous onset of labour (Robson Group 1) had CS rates of 14.5% to 20.3% in 2010 to 2011 (accounting for 23.6% of all deliveries).
CONCLUSION: All hospitals and health authorities can use this standardized classification system as part of a quality improvement initiative to monitor Caesarean section rates. This classification system identifies relevant areas for interventions and resources to reduce rates of Caesarean section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23470108     DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30992-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  18 in total

1.  Feasibility of Implementing a Standardized Clinical Performance Indicator to Evaluate the Quality of Obstetrical Care in British Columbia.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hutcheon; Lily Lee; K S Joseph; Brooke Kinniburgh; Geoffrey W Cundiff
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-12

2.  Audit of Caesarean Section Births in Small Private Maternity Homes: Analysis of 15-Year Data Applying the Modified Robson Criteria, Canada.

Authors:  Kishore B Atnurkar; Arun R Mahale
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-05-09

3.  Cesarean Section Rate and Perinatal Outcome Analyses According to Robson's 10-Group Classification System.

Authors:  Christabel Eftekharian; Peter Wolf Husslein; Rainer Lehner
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-06-28

4.  Proposing a Hybrid Model Based on Robson's Classification for Better Impact on Trends of Cesarean Deliveries.

Authors:  Punit Hans; Renu Rohatgi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-11-21

5.  Segregation of Patients for Intrapartum Monitoring, using Robson's Classification.

Authors:  Khushboo Vikram Kandhari; Rahul Vishwanath Mayekar; Archana Anilkumar Bhosale; Yogeshwar Sadashiv Nandanwar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-04-01

6.  Maternal and newborn outcomes after a prior cesarean birth by planned mode of delivery and history of prior vaginal birth in British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Celeste D Bickford; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

7.  A 10-year appraisal of cesarean delivery and the associated fetal and maternal outcomes at a teaching hospital in southeast Nigeria.

Authors:  Robinson Chukwudi Onoh; Justus Ndulue Eze; Paul Olisaemeka Ezeonu; Lucky Osaheni Lawani; Chukwuemeka Anthony Iyoke; Peter Onubiwe Nkwo
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-05-13

8.  Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth.

Authors:  Marcos Nakamura-Pereira; Maria do Carmo Leal; Ana Paula Esteves-Pereira; Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues; Jacqueline Alves Torres; Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias; Maria Elisabeth Moreira
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 9.  A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Nadia Vindevoghel; Joao Paulo Souza; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Maria Regina Torloni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Caesarean Section in Peru: Analysis of Trends Using the Robson Classification System.

Authors:  Vilma Tapia; Ana Pilar Betran; Gustavo F Gonzales
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.