| Literature DB >> 34180143 |
Dawei Lian1,2, Jiaying Liu3, Ruifang Han3, Jiaqi Jin2, Li Zhu2, Yanhong Zhang4, Yi Huang5, Xiao Wang3, Shaoxiang Xian1, Yang Chen2.
Abstract
In diabetes-induced complications, inflammatory-mediated endothelial dysfunction is the core of disease progression. Evidence shows that kakonein, an isoflavone common in Pueraria, can effectively treat diabetes and its complications. Therefore, we explored whether kakonein protects cardiovascular endothelial function by inhibiting inflammatory responses. In this study, C57BL/6J mice were injected with streptozocin to establish a diabetes model and treated with kakonein or metformin for 7 days. The protective effect of kakonein on cardiovascular endothelial junctions and NLRP3 inflammasome activation was verified through immunofluorescence and ELISA assay. In addition, the regulation of autophagy on the NLRP3 inflammasome was investigated through Western blot, immunofluorescence and RT-qPCR. Results showed that kakonein restored the function of endothelial junctions and inhibited the assembly and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Interestingly, kakonein decreased the expression of NLRP3 inflammasome protein by not reducing the transcriptional levels of NLRP3 and caspase-1. Kakonein activated autophagy in an AMPK-dependent manner, which reduced the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. In addition, kakonein inhibited both hyperglycaemia-induced cardiovascular endothelial junction dysfunction and NLRP3 inflammasome activation, similar to autophagy agonist. Our findings indicated that kakonein exerts a protective effect on hyperglycaemia-induced chronic vascular disease by regulating the NLRP3 inflammasome through autophagy.Entities:
Keywords: NLRP3 inflammasome; autophagy; diabetes; endothelial dysfunction; kakonein
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34180143 PMCID: PMC8335672 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.16747
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
FIGURE 1Therapeutic effects of kakonein on cardiac inter‐endothelial junction disruption in hyperglycaemic mice. (A) Molecular structural formula of puerarin. (B) Effect of kakonein on fasting blood glucose in hyperglycaemic mice (n = 8). (C) Fluorescence indicating the effect of kakonein or metformin hydrochloride on ZO‐1 (green) with VWF (red) co‐localization. (D) Quantitative analysis of the co‐localization of ZO‐1 with vWF (n = 8). (E) Fluorescence indicating the effect of kakonein or metformin hydrochloride on ZO‐2 (green) with VWF (red) co‐localization. (F) Quantitative analysis of the co‐localization of ZO‐2 with vWF (n = 8). ## P < .01 compared with the control. **P < .01 compared with hyperglycaemia
FIGURE 2Kakonein inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome activation of cardiac vascular endothelium in hyperglycaemic mice. (A) Fluorescence indicating the effect of kakonein or metformin hydrochloride on NLRP3 (green) with caspase‐1 (red) co‐localization in cardiac endothelial cells. (B) Quantitative analysis of the co‐localization of NLRP3 with caspase‐1 (n = 8). (C) Fluorescence indicating the effect of kakonein or metformin hydrochloride on HMGB1 (green) with VWF (red) co‐localization. (D) Quantitative analysis of the co‐localization of HMGB1 with vWF (n = 8). (E) IL‐1β content in serum was detected by ELISA kit (n = 8). ## P < .01 compared with the control. **P < .01 compared with hyperglycaemia
FIGURE 3Therapeutic effect of kakonein on the recovery of the integrity of the endothelium under high glucose by inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome. (A) Representative fluorescence images of ZO‐1 (n = 4). (B) ZO‐1 expression was represented by a histogram of fluorescence intensity (RFI). (C) Representative images of immunofluorescence indicating the effects of MCC950 and kakonein on ZO‐1 under high‐glucose stimulation (n = 4). (D) ZO‐1 expression was represented by a histogram of fluorescence intensity (RFI)
FIGURE 4Effect of kakonein on high glucose‐induced NLRP3 inflammasome assembly and activation in endothelial cells. (A) Fluorescence indicating the effect of kakonein and metformin hydrochloride on NLRP3 (green) with caspase‐1 (first line, red) or ASC (second line, red) co‐localization. (B) and (C) Quantitative analysis of the co‐localization of NLRP3 with caspase‐1 or ASC (n = 4). (D) IL‐1β content in supernatant was detected by ELISA kit (n = 4). (E) and (F) Analysis and summary of the effect of kakonein and metformin hydrochloride on caspase‐1 expression through Western blot (n = 4). (G) Analysis of Caspase‐1 transcriptional level (n = 4). (H) and (I) Analysis and summary of the effect of kakonein and metformin hydrochloride on NLRP3 expression through Western blot (n = 4). (J) Analysis of Nlrp3 transcriptional level (n = 4). ## P < .01 compared with the control. **P < .01 compared with HG. *P < .05 compared with HG
FIGURE 5Recovery of high glucose‐induced decrease of autophagy in endothelial cells by kakonein (A) and (B) Analysis and summary of high glucose‐induced AMPK expression through Western blot (n = 4). (C) and (D) Analysis and summary of high glucose‐induced LC3 expression through Western blot (n = 4). (E) and (F) Analysis and summary of high glucose‐induced P62 expression through Western blot (n = 4). (G) Fluorescence indicating the effect of kakonein on NLRP3 (green) and P62 (red) co‐localization in endothelial cells. (H) Quantitative analysis of the co‐localization of NLRP3 with P62 (n = 4). # P < .05 and ## P < .01 compared with the control. *P < .05 and **P < .01 kakonein or metformin hydrochloride compared with HG
FIGURE 6Validation of the therapeutic effect of kakonein in HG‐induced endothelial cell dysfunction through the upregulation of autophagy. (A) and (B) Analysis and summary of NLRP3 expression after rapamycin intervention through Western blot (n = 4). (C) IL‐1β content in supernatant was detected by ELISA kit (n = 4). (D) HMBG1 content in supernatant was detected by ELISA kit (n = 4). (E) Immunofluorescence representative images indicating the effects of rapamycin and kakonein on ZO‐1 under high‐glucose stimulation (n = 4). (F) The expression of ZO‐1 was represented by RFI. # P < .05 compared with the control. **P < .01 and *P < .05 compared with HG