| Literature DB >> 34178767 |
Yuefang Zhou1, Chunping Yang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to explore the influence of midwifery care on the mode of delivery (MOD), duration of labor and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) of elderly parturients.Entities:
Keywords: Duration of labor; Elderly parturients; Midwifery care; Mode of delivery; Postpartum hemorrhage
Year: 2021 PMID: 34178767 PMCID: PMC8213635 DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v50i1.5075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Public Health ISSN: 2251-6085 Impact factor: 1.429
Comparison of general data [n(%)] (x±sd)
| Age (yr) | 0.267 | 0.790 | ||
| 40.05±2.18 | 40.14±2.15 | |||
| Gestational age (weeks) | 0.894 | 0.373 | ||
| 40.25±1.25 | 40.08±1.19 | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.291 | 0.771 | ||
| 25.08±2.06 | 24.98±2.35 | |||
| Residence | 0.010 | 0.919 | ||
| Urban | 56 (65.88) | 55 (68.75) | ||
| Rural | 29 (34.12) | 25 (31.25) | ||
| Nationality | 0.049 | 0.826 | ||
| Han nationality | 69 (81.18) | 66 (82.50) | ||
| Minority nationalities | 16 (18.82) | 14 (17.50) | ||
| Educational level | 0.010 | 0.919 | ||
| ≥ High school | 58 (68.24) | 54 (67.50) | ||
| < High school | 27 (31.76) | 26 (32.50) | ||
| Occupation | 0.361 | 0.996 | ||
| Civil servants | 29 (34.12) | 27 (33.75) | ||
| Company employees | 23 (27.06) | 23 (28.75) | ||
| Self-employed | 14 (16.47) | 12 (15.00) | ||
| Workers | 10 (11.76) | 9 (11.25) | ||
| Farmers | 6 (7.06) | 5 (6.25) | ||
| Unemployed | 3 (3.53) | 4 (5.00) | ||
| Smoking history | 0.057 | 0.811 | ||
| Yes | 15 (17.65) | 13 (16.25) | ||
| No | 70 (82.35) | 67 (83.75) | ||
| Drinking history | 0.067 | 0.796 | ||
| Yes | 26 (30.59) | 23 (28.75) | ||
| No | 59 (69.41) | 57 (71.25) |
Comparison of MOD [n(%)]
| Study group | 85 | 78 (91.76) | 5 (5.88) | 2 (2.35) | 78 (91.76) |
| Control group | 80 | 50 (62.50) | 21 (26.25) | 9 (11.25) | 50 (62.50) |
| - | 20.290 | ||||
| - | <0.001 |
SVD: Spontaneous vaginal delivery; CS: Cesarean section; AVD: Assisted vaginal delivery
Comparison of duration of labor stages (x̄±sd, min)
| Study group | 85 | 381.50±101.52 | 30.21±10.31 | 424.21±102.47 |
| Control group | 80 | 458.36±127.69 | 39.85±14.67 | 508.85±137.64 |
| - | 4.292 | 4.907 | 4.498 | |
| - | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Comparison of incidence of PPH [n(%)]
| Study group | 85 | 2 (2.35) |
| Control group | 80 | 15 (18.75) |
| χ2 | - | 11.990 |
| - | <0.001 |
Comparison of incidence of neonatal asphyxia [n(%)]
| Study group | 85 | 1 (1.18) |
| Control group | 80 | 10 (12.50) |
| χ2 | - | 8.493 |
| - | 0.003 |
Comparison of pain score (x̄±sd)
| Study group | 85 | 3.11±1.24 |
| Control group | 80 | 6.84±1.58 |
| - | 16.920 | |
| - | <0.001 |
Fig. 1:Comparison of SAS scores
SAS scores showed no significant difference between the two groups before midwifery care intervention (P > 0.05), and decreased significantly after intervention (P < 0.05), and the study group was significantly lower than the control group (P < 0.05). Note: ***P < 0.001
Fig. 2:Comparison of SDS scores
SDS scores showed no significant difference between the two groups before midwifery care intervention (P > 0.05), and decreased significantly after intervention (P < 0.05), and the study group was significantly lower than the control group (P < 0.05). Note: ***P < 0.001
Comparison of satisfaction of patients on nursing care [n(%)]
| Highly satisfied | 63 (74.12) | 33 (41.25) | - | - |
| Satisfied | 20 (23.53) | 29 (36.25) | - | - |
| Dissatisfied | 2 (2.35) | 18 (22.50) | - | - |
| Nursing satisfaction | 83 (97.65) | 62 (77.50) | 23.702 | <0.001 |