| Literature DB >> 34178602 |
Xiuhua Wu1, Xiaolin Xu2, Qi Liu1, Jianyang Ding1, Junhao Liu1, Zhiping Huang1, Zucheng Huang1, Xiaoliang Wu1, Rong Li1, Zhou Yang1, Hui Jiang1, Jie Liu3, Qingan Zhu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Keywords: Bone microarchitecture; Non-human primates (NHP); Osteoporosis; Spinal cord injury
Year: 2021 PMID: 34178602 PMCID: PMC8193057 DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2021.03.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Translat ISSN: 2214-031X Impact factor: 5.191
Fig. 1Successful established the hemi-contusion SCI Model in NHP. A The HE staining of spinal cord tissue in the transverse section after 6 months injury. The spinal cord at the epicenter of ipsilateral was severe damage after SCI, with loss of the ventral horns of gray matter and lateral funiculus of white matter. B The electrophysiological monitoring after 6 months injury. The ipsilateral MEPs and SEPs were showed latency prolongation and amplitude reduction after SCI.
The bone length of humerus, radius and ulna after SCI.
| Humerus | Radius | Ulna | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ipsilateral | Contralateral | Ipsilateral | Contralateral | Ipsilateral | Contralateral | |
| Sham | 141.0 ± 11.1 | 140.9 ± 11.5 | 141.8 ± 11.4 | 141.5 ± 11.4 | 160.7 ± 12.4 | 159.7 ± 11.5 |
| SCI | 135.5 ± 6.3 | 137.4 ± 5.8 | 136.2 ± 4.0 | 135.7 ± 4.3 | 152.6 ± 3.7 | 152.7 ± 4.8 |
Note: Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 4 in the sham group and n = 8 in the SCI group)
Fig. 2Atrophy of muscles in forelimb after SCI. A-D The musculi palmaris longus (MPL), flexor carpi radialis (FCR), pronator teres (PT) and brachioradialis (BR) were marked atrophy between ipsilateral and contralateral sides after SCI. E-F The dry weight of MPL, FCR, PT and BR between ipsilateral and contralateral sides or control and SCI groups after injury. ∗P < 0.05 between the ipsilateral side and contralateral side, #P < 0.05 between the control group and SCI group (control, n = 4; SCI, n = 8)
Fig. 3The bone microstructure change of cancellous bone in the proximal humerus. A The 3D images of transverse section and the 2D images of transverse and sagittal sections. B The trabecula parameters of cancellous bone. ∗P < 0.05 between the ipsilateral side and contralateral side (control, n = 4; SCI, n = 8)
Fig. 4The bone microstructure change of cancellous bone in the distal radius. A The 3D images of transverse section and the 2D images of transverse and sagittal sections. B The trabecula parameters of cancellous bone. ∗P < 0.05 between the ipsilateral side and contralateral side, #P < 0.05 between the control group and SCI group (control, n = 4; SCI, n = 8)
Fig. 5The bone microstructure change of cancellous bone in L4.
Fig. 6The bone microstructure change of cortical bone in the mid-shaft humerus. A The 3D images of transverse section and the 2D images of sagittal section. B The parameters of cortical bone. ∗P < 0.05 between the ipsilateral side and contralateral side (control, n = 4; SCI, n = 8)
Fig. 7The bone microstructure change of cortical bone in the distal radius.
The biomechanical properties of humerus, radius and vertebrae measured by micro-FE.
| Stiffness ( × 103 N/mm) | Failure load ( × 102 N) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | SCI | Sham | SCI | ||
| Humerus | Ipsilateral | 210.6 ± 45.8 | 134.3 ± 26.9∗# | 34.5 ± 5.9 | 24.0 ± 4.1∗# |
| contralateral | 214.3 ± 43.2 | 188.5 ± 20.4 | 35.4 ± 5.7 | 31.7 ± 3.0 | |
| Radius | Ipsilateral | 116.8 ± 21.9 | 86.9 ± 32.4∗ | 19.6 ± 3.5 | 10.1 ± 3.5∗# |
| contralateral | 126.6 ± 26.2 | 133.0 ± 30.4 | 21.3 ± 4.2 | 16.7 ± 3.8 | |
| Vertebrae | 41.2 ± 9.2 | 32.7 ± 1.5 | 2.2 ± 0.7 | 2.0 ± 0.2 | |
Note: Data are expressed as means ± SD. ∗P < 0.05 between ipsilateral and contralateral sides in the SCI group; #P < 0.05 between the sham and SCI groups in the ipsilateral side (n = 4 and n = 8 in the humerus and radius in the sham and SCI groups; n = 4 in the vertebrae in the sham and SCI groups)
The Calcium, Phosphorus and Vitamin D, and the biomarkers of bone metabolic in serum between sham and SCI groups.
| Calcium (mmol/L) | Phosphorus (mmol/L) | Vitamin D (ng/ml) | ALP (mmol/L) | OCN (U/L) | t-P1NP (U/L) | β-CTX (U/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 122.3 ± 16.1 | 140.7 ± 40.3 | 11.5 ± 0.7 | 821.7 ± 380.6 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | |
| SCI | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 118.0 ± 18.5 | 163.0 ± 56.7 | 7.6 ± 2.0 | 422.1 ± 151.1 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | |
Note: Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 4 in the sham and SCI groups)