Literature DB >> 34177240

Screening High-Risk Women Veterans for Breast Cancer.

Yeun-Hee Anna Park1, Alison Keller1, Ta-Chueh Melody Hsu1, Balmatee Bidassie1, Vickie Venne1, Douglas Hawley1, Lori Hoffman-Högg1, Bernadette Heron1, Sarah Colonna1, Anita Aggarwal1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Within the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), breast cancer prevalence has more than tripled from 1995 to 2012. Women veterans may be at an increased breast cancer risk based on service-related exposures and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
METHODS: Women veterans aged ≥ 35 years with no personal history of breast cancer were enrolled at 2 urban VA medical centers. We surveyed women veterans for 5-year and lifetime risks of invasive breast cancer using the Gail Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT). Data regarding demographics, PTSD status, eligibility for chemoprevention, and genetic counseling were also collected. Descriptive statistics were used to determine results.
RESULTS: A total of 99 women veterans participated, of which 60% were Black. In total, 35% were high risk with a 5-year BCRAT > 1.66%. Breast biopsies had been performed in 22% of our entire population; 57% had a family history positive for breast cancer. Comparatively, in our high-risk Black population, 33% had breast biopsies and 94% had a family history. High-risk patients were referred for chemoprevention; 5 accepted and 13 were referred for genetic counseling. PTSD was present in 31% of the high-risk subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of Black patients participated in this pilot study, which also showed an above average rate of PTSD among women veterans who are at high risk for developing breast cancer. Historically, breast cancer rates among Black women are lower than those found in the general population. High participation among Black women veterans in this pilot study uncovered the potential for further study of this population, which is otherwise underrepresented in research. Limitations included a small sample size, exclusively urban population, and self-selection for screening. Future directions include the evaluation of genetic and molecular mutations in high risk Black women veterans, possibly even a role for PTSD epigenetic changes.
Copyright © 2021 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34177240      PMCID: PMC8223736          DOI: 10.12788/fp.0122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fed Pract        ISSN: 1078-4497


  42 in total

1.  Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial.

Authors:  Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Walter M Cronin; Reena S Cecchini; James N Atkins; Therese B Bevers; Louis Fehrenbacher; Eduardo R Pajon; James L Wade; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; Joan James; Scott M Lippman; Carolyn D Runowicz; Patricia A Ganz; Steven E Reis; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; V Craig Jordan; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Breast cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Emmanuel M Gabriel; Ismail Jatoi
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.512

3.  Regulatory approval of cancer risk-reducing (chemopreventive) drugs: moving what we have learned into the clinic.

Authors:  Frank L Meyskens; Gregory A Curt; Dean E Brenner; Gary Gordon; Ronald B Herberman; Olivera Finn; Gary J Kelloff; Samir N Khleif; Caroline C Sigman; Eva Szabo
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-03

4.  Chemical exposures in the workplace and breast cancer risk: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Christine C Ekenga; Christine G Parks; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Patterns and Trends in Age-Specific Black-White Differences in Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality - United States, 1999-2014.

Authors:  Lisa C Richardson; S Jane Henley; Jacqueline W Miller; Greta Massetti; Cheryll C Thomas
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  Postmenopausal breast cancer and occupational exposures.

Authors:  France Labrèche; Mark S Goldberg; Marie-France Valois; Louise Nadon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 7.  Use of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Kala Visvanathan; Patricia Hurley; Elissa Bantug; Powel Brown; Nananda F Col; Jack Cuzick; Nancy E Davidson; Andrea Decensi; Carol Fabian; Leslie Ford; Judy Garber; Maria Katapodi; Barnett Kramer; Monica Morrow; Barbara Parker; Carolyn Runowicz; Victor G Vogel; James L Wade; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Benefit/risk assessment for breast cancer chemoprevention with raloxifene or tamoxifen for women age 50 years or older.

Authors:  Andrew N Freedman; Binbing Yu; Mitchell H Gail; Joseph P Costantino; Barry I Graubard; Victor G Vogel; Garnet L Anderson; Worta McCaskill-Stevens
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Race, medical researcher distrust, perceived harm, and willingness to participate in cardiovascular prevention trials.

Authors:  Joel B Braunstein; Noëlle S Sherber; Steven P Schulman; Eric L Ding; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Gaps in Receipt of Clinically Indicated Genetic Counseling After Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Steven J Katz; Kevin C Ward; Ann S Hamilton; M Chandler Mcleod; Lauren P Wallner; Monica Morrow; Reshma Jagsi; Sarah T Hawley; Allison W Kurian
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 50.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.