Literature DB >> 34177001

Consequences of Ignoring Guessing Effects on Measurement Invariance Analysis.

Ismail Cuhadar1, Yanyun Yang2, Insu Paek2.   

Abstract

Pseudo-guessing parameters are present in item response theory applications for many educational assessments. When sample size is not sufficiently large, the guessing parameters may be ignored from the analysis. This study examines the impact of ignoring pseudo-guessing parameters on measurement invariance analysis, specifically, on item difficulty, item discrimination, and mean and variance of ability distribution. Results show that when non-zero guessing parameters are ignored from the measurement invariance analysis, item discrimination estimates tend to decrease particularly for more difficult items, and item difficulty estimates decrease unless the items are highly discriminating and difficult. As the guessing parameter increases, the size of the decrease in item discrimination and difficulty tends to increase, and the estimated mean and variance of ability distribution tend to be inaccurate. When two groups have heterogeneous ability distributions, ignoring the guessing parameter affects the reference group and the focal group differently. Implications of result findings are discussed.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  differential item functioning; item response theory; measurement invariance analysis; multiple-group factor analysis; pseudo-guessing parameter

Year:  2021        PMID: 34177001      PMCID: PMC8202978          DOI: 10.1177/01466216211013915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  6 in total

1.  Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach.

Authors:  J H Steiger
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1990-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  How Item Residual Heterogeneity Affects Tests for Differential Item Functioning.

Authors:  Carol M Woods; Jared Harpole
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-12-11

3.  The Interaction of Ability Differences and Guessing When Modeling Differential Item Functioning With the Rasch Model: Conventional and Tailored Calibration.

Authors:  Christine E DeMars; Daniel P Jurich
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Detection Rates of the M2 Test for Nonzero Lower Asymptotes Under Normal and Nonnormal Ability Distributions in the Applications of IRT.

Authors:  Insu Paek; Jie Xu; Zhongtian Lin
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-04-18

5.  Estimation of an IRT Model by Mplus for Dichotomously Scored Responses Under Different Estimation Methods.

Authors:  Insu Paek; Mengyao Cui; Neşe Öztürk Gübeş; Yanyun Yang
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.