Literature DB >> 29881006

How Item Residual Heterogeneity Affects Tests for Differential Item Functioning.

Carol M Woods1, Jared Harpole1.   

Abstract

Differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when people with the same proficiency have different probabilities of giving a certain response to an item. The present study focused on an assumption implicit in popular methods for DIF testing that has received little attention in published literature (item residual homogeneity). The assumption is explained, a strategy for detecting violations of it (i.e., item residual heterogeneity) is illustrated with empirical data, and simulations are carried out to evaluate the performance of binary logistic regression, two-group item response theory (IRT), and the Mantel-Haenszel (MH) test in the presence of item residual heterogeneity. Results indicated that heterogeneity inflated Type I error and attenuated power for logistic regression, and attenuated power and produced biased estimates of the latent focal group mean and standard deviation for two-group IRT. The MH test was robust to item residual heterogeneity, probably because it does not use the logistic function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DIF; differential item functioning; heterogeneity; logistic regression

Year:  2014        PMID: 29881006      PMCID: PMC5978544          DOI: 10.1177/0146621614561313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  2 in total

1.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.

Authors:  N MANTEL; W HAENSZEL
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Illustration of MIMIC-Model DIF Testing with the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality.

Authors:  Carol M Woods; Thomas F Oltmanns; Eric Turkheimer
Journal:  J Psychopathol Behav Assess       Date:  2009
  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Chun Wang; Marjorie Kleinman; Richard N Jones; David J Weiss
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Consequences of Ignoring Guessing Effects on Measurement Invariance Analysis.

Authors:  Ismail Cuhadar; Yanyun Yang; Insu Paek
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-05-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.