| Literature DB >> 34176483 |
Haiyun Zhang1, Xiaoyan Si1, Feifan Xu2,1, Junlin Chen3, Yuhao Chen4, Xiaopeng Cui5, Yongwei Qin6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a global focus on illness diagnosis in smear-negative and latent tuberculosis infectious populations (SN-TB and LTBI). CD27 has been suggested to play a direct role in active TB. Little is known about smear-negative individuals. Here, we tried to investigate whether it has a role in smear-negative populations. The expression of CD27 and MTB-specific CD27 in CD4+ T cells ("CD27-CD4+" and "CD27-IFN-γ+CD4+") was evaluated in MTB-unexposed controls (HC), TB contacts (TB-C) and SN-TB individuals by flow cytometry. The sensitivity, specificity and AUC (area under curve) of "CD27-IFN-γ+CD4+" cells to distinguish SN-TBs from HCs and TB-Cs were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The clinical index was selected from the clinical laboratory and evaluated for correlation with "CD27-IFN-γ+CD4+" cells by Spearman statistical analysis.Entities:
Keywords: CD27; Diagnosis; Smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis; Therapy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34176483 PMCID: PMC8237462 DOI: 10.1186/s12865-021-00430-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Immunol ISSN: 1471-2172 Impact factor: 3.615
Characterization of groups included in the study
| Characteristic | HC | TB-C | SN-TB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 46 | ||||
| Sex (male/female) | 20/14 | 27/19 | 27/29 | 0.4844 |
| Age (years) | 44.24 ± 15.15 | 38.34 ± 9.42 | 45.14 ± 13.52 | 0.0215* |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.89 ± 2.28 | 21.54 ± 2.43 | 20.26 ± 2.31 | 0.0268* |
| TSPOT.TB (+) | 0 (0%) | 46 (100%) | 56 (100%) | < 0.0001*** |
| With BCG injected | 33 (97.06%) | 46 (100%) | 52 (92.86%) | 0.1591 |
| WBC (×109/L) | 6.62 ± 2.08 | 6.87 ± 2.15 | 5.34 ± 2.12 | 0.0008** |
| RBC (×1012/L) | 4.31 ± 0.60 | 4.37 ± 0.52 | 3.73 ± 0.84 | < 0.0001*** |
| HGB (g/L) | 128.35 ± 16.96 | 129.39 ± 11.63 | 121.55 ± 23.37 | 0.0738 |
| PLT (×109/L) | 307.24 ± 89.91 | 334.54 ± 55.67 | 240.89 ± 85.52 | < 0.0001*** |
| IgA (g/L) | 2.41 ± 0.98 | 2.78 ± 0.98 | 2.56 ± 1.43 | 0.3754 |
| IgG (g/L) | 11.95 ± 3.11 | 10.91 ± 3.00 | 10.26 ± 4.97 | 0.1508 |
| IgM (g/L) | 2.33 ± 0.89 | 2.12 ± 1.17 | 2.16 ± 1.95 | 0.8188 |
| IgE (IU/mL) | 35.53 ± 88.72 | 59.42 ± 165.22 | 84.05 ± 176.32 | 0.3491 |
| ESR (mm/h) | 32.35 ± 47.66 | 27.50 ± 42.56 | 41.75 ± 35.03 | 0.2079 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 21.92 ± 40.34 | 21.88 ± 38.90 | 31.44 ± 43.61 | 0.4171 |
Significant value: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; *** P < 0.00001
Fig. 1Smear-negative TB patients have higher percentage of CD27−IFN-γ+ cells in their peripheral blood. a-d The percentage of CD27 in CD4 T cells population. e-h The percentage of “CD27−IFN-γ+CD4+” cells population by a flow cytometry. i ROC-curve of “CD27−IFN-γ+CD4+” percentages for discriminating SN-TB patients from HC or (and) TB-C. j The percentage of “CD27−IFN-γ+CD4+” cells population in recent and chronic SN-TB patients. ***P < 0.0001
Distinction smear-negative TB from all health participants by detecting “CD27−IFN-γ+CD4+” cells expression
| Sensitivity% | Specificity% | AUC | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SN TB vs HC and TB C | 82.14 | 88.24 | 0.88 | 0.8214 to 0.9371 | < 0.0001*** |
| SN TB vs HC | 82.14 | 80.00 | 0.91 | 0.8491 to 0.9681 | < 0.0001*** |
| SN TB vs TB C | 80.36 | 76.09 | 0.86 | 0.7839 to 0.9312 | < 0.0001*** |
***Significant value (P < 0.0001)
Fig. 2Relationship between the percentage of “CD27−IFN-γ+CD4+” expression and clinical laboratory index. a Relationship between the percentage of “CD27−IFN-γ+CD4+” expression and WBC counts. b Relationship between the percentage of “CD27−IFN-γ+CD4+” expression and IgE
Fig. 3Distribution and outcome of “CD27−IFN-γ+CD4+” in peripheral blood after normal anti-TB therapy. a Total percentage of “CD27−IFN-γ+CD4+” cells after treatment. b The percentage of “CD27−IFN-γ+CD4+” in < 30 years group. c The percentage of “CD27−IFN-γ+CD4+” in 30–50 years group. d The percentage of “CD27−IFN-γ+CD4+” in > 50 years group. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments. *P < 0.05 vs. no therapy at 0 month. **P < 0.01 vs. no therapy at 0 month. ***P < 0.0001 vs. no therapy at 0 month