Literature DB >> 34175093

Recommendations for strengthening the role of embedded researchers to accelerate implementation in health systems: Findings from a state-of-the-art (SOTA) conference workgroup.

Laura J Damschroder1, Andrew J Knighton2, Emily Griese3, Sarah M Greene4, Paula Lozano5, Amy M Kilbourne6, Diana S M Buist7, Karen Crotty8, A Rani Elwy9, Lee A Fleisher10, Ralph Gonzales11, Amy G Huebschmann12, Heather M Limper13, NithyaPriya S Ramalingam14, Katherine Wilemon15, P Michael Ho16, Christian D Helfrichfcr17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional research approaches do not promote timely implementation of evidence-based innovations (EBIs) to benefit patients. Embedding research within health systems can accelerate EBI implementation by blending rigorous methods with practical considerations in real-world settings. A state-of-the-art (SOTA) conference was convened in February 2019 with five workgroups that addressed five facets of embedded research and its potential to impact healthcare. This article reports on results from the workgroup focused on how embedded research programs can be implemented into heath systems for greatest impact.
METHODS: Based on a pre-conference survey, participants indicating interest in accelerating implementation were invited to participate in the SOTA workgroup. Workgroup participants (N = 26) developed recommendations using consensus-building methods. Ideas were grouped by thematic clusters and voted on to identify top recommendations. A summary was presented to the full SOTA membership. Following the conference, the workgroup facilitators (LJD, CDH, NR) summarized workgroup findings, member-checked with workgroup members, and were used to develop recommendations.
RESULTS: The workgroup developed 12 recommendations to optimize impact of embedded researchers within health systems. The group highlighted the tension between "ROI vs. R01" goals-where health systems focus on achieving return on their investments (ROI) while embedded researchers focus on obtaining research funding (R01). Recommendations are targeted to three key stakeholder groups: researchers, funders, and health systems. Consensus for an ideal foundation to support optimal embedded research is one that (1) maximizes learning; (2) aligns goals across all 3 stakeholders; and (3) implements EBIs in a consistent and timely fashion.
CONCLUSIONS: Four cases illustrate a variety of ways that embedded research can be structured and conducted within systems, by demonstrating key embedded research values to enable collaborations with academic affiliates to generate actionable knowledge and meaningfully accelerate implementation of EBIs to benefit patients. IMPLICATIONS: Embedded research approaches have potential for transforming health systems and impacting patient health. Accelerating embedded research should be a focused priority for funding agencies to maximize a collective return on investment. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embedded research; Partnered research; State-of-the-art review

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34175093      PMCID: PMC8243415          DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc (Amst)        ISSN: 2213-0764


  49 in total

1.  Embedded research to improve health: the 20th annual HMO Research Network conference, March 31-April 3, 2014, Phoenix, Arizona.

Authors:  Ella E Thompson; John F Steiner
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-09

2.  Outcomes of Veterans Undergoing TAVR Within Veterans Affairs Medical Centers: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.

Authors:  Philip S Hall; Colin I O'Donnell; Verghese Mathew; Santiago Garcia; Anthony A Bavry; Subhash Banerjee; Hani Jneid; Ali E Denktas; John C Giacomini; Paul M Grossman; Kul Aggarwal; Jeffrey M Zimmet; Elaine E Tseng; Leo Gozdecki; Lucas Burke; Stefan C Bertog; Maurice Buchbinder; Mary E Plomondon; Stephen W Waldo; Kendrick A Shunk
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Harnessing the Synergy Between Improvement Science and Implementation Science in Cancer: A Call to Action.

Authors:  Bogda Koczwara; Angela M Stover; Louise Davies; Melinda M Davis; Linda Fleisher; Shoba Ramanadhan; Florian R Schroeck; Leah L Zullig; David A Chambers; Enola Proctor
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  An evidence integration triangle for aligning science with policy and practice.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Lawrence W Green; Martina V Taylor; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  The business case for health-care quality improvement.

Authors:  Stephen J Swensen; James A Dilling; Patrick M Mc Carty; Jeffrey W Bolton; Charles M Harper
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Temporal Trends in Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.

Authors:  Stephen W Waldo; Madhura Gokhale; Colin I O'Donnell; Mary E Plomondon; Javier A Valle; Ehrin J Armstrong; Richard Schofield; Stephan D Fihn; Thomas M Maddox
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 11.195

7.  Antibiotic Prescribing Variability in a Large Urgent Care Network: A New Target for Outpatient Stewardship.

Authors:  Edward Stenehjem; Anthony Wallin; Katherine E Fleming-Dutra; Whitney R Buckel; Valoree Stanfield; Kimberly D Brunisholz; Jeff Sorensen; Matthew H Samore; Raj Srivastava; Lauri A Hicks; Adam L Hersh
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 20.999

8.  Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: a call for a rapid learning health research enterprise.

Authors:  William T Riley; Russell E Glasgow; Lynn Etheredge; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2013-05-10

9.  The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change.

Authors:  David A Chambers; Russell E Glasgow; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  The effectiveness of continuous quality improvement for developing professional practice and improving health care outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  James E Hill; Anne-Marie Stephani; Paul Sapple; Andrew J Clegg
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  10 in total

1.  How Dissemination and Implementation Science Can Contribute to the Advancement of Learning Health Systems.

Authors:  Katy E Trinkley; P Michael Ho; Russell E Glasgow; Amy G Huebschmann
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 7.840

2.  Applying User-Centered Design to Develop Practical Strategies that Address Overuse in Primary Care.

Authors:  Tanner J Caverly; Sarah E Skurla; Mandi L Klamerus; Jordan B Sparks; Eve A Kerr; Timothy P Hofer; David Reed; Laura J Damschroder
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 6.473

3.  Evaluating clinician-led quality improvement initiatives: A system-wide embedded research partnership at Stanford Medicine.

Authors:  Stacie Vilendrer; Erika A Saliba-Gustafsson; Steven M Asch; Cati G Brown-Johnson; Samantha M R Kling; Jonathan G Shaw; Marcy Winget; David B Larson
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2022-08-23

4.  How the VA is training the Next-Generation workforce for learning health systems.

Authors:  Amy M Kilbourne; Joel Schmidt; Margo Edmunds; Ryan Vega; Nicholas Bowersox; David Atkins
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2022-08-16

5.  Maintaining Implementation through Dynamic Adaptations (MIDAS): protocol for a cluster-randomized trial of implementation strategies to optimize and sustain use of evidence-based practices in Veteran Health Administration (VHA) patients.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; Jeremy B Sussman; Paul N Pfeiffer; Jacob E Kurlander; Michelle B Freitag; Claire H Robinson; Patrick Spoutz; Melissa L D Christopher; Saraswathy Battar; Kimberly Dickerson; Christopher Sedgwick; Ashleigh G Wallace-Lacey; Geoffrey D Barnes; Amy M Linsky; Christi S Ulmer; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-05-14

6.  Translating research into policy and action.

Authors:  Amy M Kilbourne; Melissa M Garrido; Arleen F Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.734

7.  Balancing reality in embedded research and evaluation: Low vs high embeddedness.

Authors:  George L Jackson; Laura J Damschroder; Brandolyn S White; Blake Henderson; Ryan J Vega; Amy M Kilbourne; Sarah L Cutrona
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2021-11-03

8.  Community engagement to improve access to healthcare: a comparative case study to advance implementation science for transgender health equity.

Authors:  Hale M Thompson; Allison M Clement; Reyna Ortiz; Toni Marie Preston; Ava L Wells Quantrell; Michelle Enfield; A J King; Lee Klosinski; Cathy J Reback; Alison Hamilton; Norweeta Milburn
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2022-07-31

9.  Promises and pitfalls in implementation science from the perspective of US-based researchers: learning from a pre-mortem.

Authors:  Rinad S Beidas; Shannon Dorsey; Cara C Lewis; Aaron R Lyon; Byron J Powell; Jonathan Purtle; Lisa Saldana; Rachel C Shelton; Shannon Wiltsey Stirman; Meghan B Lane-Fall
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 7.960

Review 10.  Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR Outcomes Addendum.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; Caitlin M Reardon; Marilla A Opra Widerquist; Julie Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 7.327

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.