Literature DB >> 3417461

Effects of bell versus diaphragm on indirect blood pressure measurement.

A M Mauro1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of using the bell versus the diaphragm of the stethoscope on indirect blood pressure (BP) measurement. The design was experimental. Data were collected from 56 subjects randomly selected from 255 young women. Systolic (S1), fourth phase diastolic (D4), and fifth phase diastolic (D5) values were the dependent variables. Three research hypotheses were tested. Data were analyzed by using a one-tailed t test for dependent means. Hypotheses 1 and 2 predicted that use of the bell would result in higher S1 and D4 readings, respectively, than use of the diaphragm. Hypothesis 1 was supported whereas hypothesis 2 was not. Hypothesis 3, which stated that using the bell would produce a lower D5 reading than using the diaphragm, was supported. Implications of these findings as well as suggestions for future research are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3417461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung        ISSN: 0147-9563            Impact factor:   2.210


  4 in total

1.  Confounders of auscultatory blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  R H Baker; J Ende
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level.

Authors:  Hanna Tolonen; Päivikki Koponen; Androniki Naska; Satu Männistö; Grazyna Broda; Tarja Palosaari; Kari Kuulasmaa
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 3.  Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Helen E Ward; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  Comparison of stethoscope bell and diaphragm, and of stethoscope tube length, for clinical blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Chengyu Liu; Clive Griffiths; Alan Murray; Dingchang Zheng
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.444

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.