Literature DB >> 3417408

Dynamic visual acuity with telescopic spectacles: improvement with adaptation.

J L Demer1, F I Porter, J Goldberg, H A Jenkins, K Schmidt.   

Abstract

Telescopic spectacles are used as aids for the visually impaired in order to increase effective visual acuity. Because ocular stabilization reflexes are not fully compensatory when telescopic spectacles are worn, head motion would be expected to produce retinal image motion which could decrease visual acuity. Using 1.0 Hz sinusoids of vertical axis head rotation, we investigated the effect of head velocity and telescopic spectacle magnification on binocular dynamic visual acuity (DVA), the acuity during head motion, in 34 normally sighted subjects. The visual field peripheral to the telescopes was masked. Up to a head velocity amplitude of 30 degrees/sec, DVA was insensitive to head velocity for X2 telescopic spectacles. For X4 and, to a greater degree, X6 telescopic spectacles, DVA decreased progressively as head velocity increased. DVA measurements were repeated after a 15 min adaptation period, during which a distant video monitor was viewed using telescopic spectacles. For X4 telescopic spectacles, DVA increased significantly after adaptation. With an unobstructed peripheral visual field, initial DVA with X4 telescopic spectacles was equal to adapted DVA with peripheral vision occluded, but adaptation produced no further improvement in DVA with the peripheral field unobstructed. These data indicate that the visual acuity obtained with telescopic spectacles is substantially reduced under conditions where head motion occurs, potentially reducing the functional value of these devices in low vision rehabilitation. The adverse effect of head motion on DVA may be reduced by adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3417408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  4 in total

1.  Head mounted video magnification devices for low vision rehabilitation: a comparison with existing technology.

Authors:  R Harper; L Culham; C Dickinson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Low Vision Enhancement with Head-mounted Video Display Systems: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Ashley D Deemer; Christopher K Bradley; Nicole C Ross; Danielle M Natale; Rath Itthipanichpong; Frank S Werblin; Robert W Massof
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Perceptual Adaptation to Continuous Versus Intermittent Exposure to Spatial Distortions.

Authors:  Iona R McLean; Tyler S Manning; Emily A Cooper
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.925

4.  Preliminary Evaluation of Two Digital Image Processing Strategies for Head-Mounted Magnification for Low Vision Patients.

Authors:  Ashley D Deemer; Bonnielin K Swenor; Kyoko Fujiwara; James T Deremeik; Nicole C Ross; Danielle M Natale; Chris K Bradley; Frank S Werblin; Robert W Massof
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.283

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.