Daniel J Corwin1,2,3, Catherine C McDonald1,3,4, Kristy B Arbogast1,2,3, Fairuz N Mohammed1, Matthew F Grady3,5, Christina L Master1,3,5. 1. Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and. 5. Sports Medicine and Performance Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between patient characteristics and performance on the visio-vestibular examination (VVE) in a cohort of healthy youth athletes and explore the potential association between the VVE and other standardized concussion batteries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Suburban middle and high school. PATIENTS: One hundred ninety subjects age 11 to 18 enrolled before their respective scholastic sport season between August 2017 and March 2020. ASSESSMENT OF INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Patient age, sex, concussion history, comorbidities, hours of weekly exercise, Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, 5th edition (SCAT-5), King-Devick (K-D), Postconcussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visio-vestibular examination abnormalities (smooth pursuit, horizontal and vertical saccades, horizontal and vertical gaze stability, convergence, right and left monocular accommodation, complex tandem gait). RESULTS: Overall, 29.5% of subjects had at least one of 9 VVE elements abnormal, 7.9% at least 2, and 3.2% at least 3. None of 72 comparisons of the VVE elements, when stratified by age, sex, concussion history, history of headaches, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, learning issues, psychiatric problems, motion sickness, or weekly hours of exercise, reached significance using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure at a false discovery rate of 5%. There were no significant associations between VVE elements and the SCAT-5, K-D, or PCSI. CONCLUSIONS: The VVE is robust across multiple patient characteristics. Although healthy subjects may have one abnormal element, multiple abnormal elements are a less common feature, making multiple abnormal elements more indicative of concussion, highlighting the use of this assessment in the setting of injury. The VVE tests unique domains when compared with the PCSI, SCAT-5, and K-D.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between patient characteristics and performance on the visio-vestibular examination (VVE) in a cohort of healthy youth athletes and explore the potential association between the VVE and other standardized concussion batteries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Suburban middle and high school. PATIENTS: One hundred ninety subjects age 11 to 18 enrolled before their respective scholastic sport season between August 2017 and March 2020. ASSESSMENT OF INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Patient age, sex, concussion history, comorbidities, hours of weekly exercise, Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, 5th edition (SCAT-5), King-Devick (K-D), Postconcussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visio-vestibular examination abnormalities (smooth pursuit, horizontal and vertical saccades, horizontal and vertical gaze stability, convergence, right and left monocular accommodation, complex tandem gait). RESULTS: Overall, 29.5% of subjects had at least one of 9 VVE elements abnormal, 7.9% at least 2, and 3.2% at least 3. None of 72 comparisons of the VVE elements, when stratified by age, sex, concussion history, history of headaches, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, learning issues, psychiatric problems, motion sickness, or weekly hours of exercise, reached significance using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure at a false discovery rate of 5%. There were no significant associations between VVE elements and the SCAT-5, K-D, or PCSI. CONCLUSIONS: The VVE is robust across multiple patient characteristics. Although healthy subjects may have one abnormal element, multiple abnormal elements are a less common feature, making multiple abnormal elements more indicative of concussion, highlighting the use of this assessment in the setting of injury. The VVE tests unique domains when compared with the PCSI, SCAT-5, and K-D.
Authors: Angela Lumba-Brown; Keith Owen Yeates; Kelly Sarmiento; Matthew J Breiding; Tamara M Haegerich; Gerard A Gioia; Michael Turner; Edward C Benzel; Stacy J Suskauer; Christopher C Giza; Madeline Joseph; Catherine Broomand; Barbara Weissman; Wayne Gordon; David W Wright; Rosemarie Scolaro Moser; Karen McAvoy; Linda Ewing-Cobbs; Ann-Christine Duhaime; Margot Putukian; Barbara Holshouser; David Paulk; Shari L Wade; Stanley A Herring; Mark Halstead; Heather T Keenan; Meeryo Choe; Cindy W Christian; Kevin Guskiewicz; P B Raksin; Andrew Gregory; Anne Mucha; H Gerry Taylor; James M Callahan; John DeWitt; Michael W Collins; Michael W Kirkwood; John Ragheb; Richard G Ellenbogen; Theodore J Spinks; Theodore G Ganiats; Linda J Sabelhaus; Katrina Altenhofen; Rosanne Hoffman; Tom Getchius; Gary Gronseth; Zoe Donnell; Robert E O'Connor; Shelly D Timmons Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Daniel J Corwin; Kathleen J Propert; Joseph J Zorc; Mark R Zonfrillo; Douglas J Wiebe Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Clinton D Morgan; Scott L Zuckerman; Young M Lee; Lauren King; Susan Beaird; Allen K Sills; Gary S Solomon Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Kristin M Galetta; Jennifer Morganroth; Nicholas Moehringer; Bridget Mueller; Lisena Hasanaj; Nikki Webb; Courtney Civitano; Dennis A Cardone; Arlene Silverio; Steven L Galetta; Laura J Balcer Journal: J Neuroophthalmol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Christina L Master; Allison E Curry; Melissa R Pfeiffer; Kristina B Metzger; Ronni S Kessler; Juliet Haarbauer-Krupa; Lara DePadilla; Arlene Greenspan; Matthew J Breiding; Kristy B Arbogast Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Daniel J Corwin; Kristy B Arbogast; Casey Swann; Rebecca Haber; Matthew F Grady; Christina L Master Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Anne Mucha; Michael W Collins; R J Elbin; Joseph M Furman; Cara Troutman-Enseki; Ryan M DeWolf; Greg Marchetti; Anthony P Kontos Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: James R Clugston; Zachary M Houck; Breton M Asken; Jonathan K Boone; Anthony P Kontos; Thomas A Buckley; Julianne D Schmidt; Sara P D Chrisman; Nicole L Hoffman; Kimberly G Harmon; Thomas W Kaminski; Michael W Collins; Thomas W McAllister; Michael A McCrea; Steven P Broglio; Justus D Ortega Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Patricia R Roby; Kristina B Metzger; Eileen P Storey; Christina L Master; Kristy B Arbogast Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 4.597