Daniel J Corwin1, Kathleen J Propert2, Joseph J Zorc3, Mark R Zonfrillo4, Douglas J Wiebe5. 1. Division of Emergency Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Center for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America. Electronic address: corwind@email.chop.edu. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America. 3. Division of Emergency Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America. 4. Center for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Hasbro Children's Hospital, Providence, RI, United States of America. 5. Center for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Concussion guidelines recommend a vestibular and oculomotor (VOM) examination be performed for all patients with concern for concussion, however the feasibility of performing testing is unknown. We aimed to measure rates of exam performance after implementation of training and support tools in a pediatric emergency department. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients age 6 to 18 years old presenting over a 12-month period. Charts were obtained via natural language processing, where concussion was suggested as a diagnosis in the electronic health record, and then manually reviewed to record patient and provider factors. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with exam performance, and a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was performed to determine if a specific patient type was at risk for not having testing performed. RESULTS: Four hundred patients were included in the analysis. Sixty-four percent received a VOM examination (including 73% of those diagnosed with concussion). Provider type, concussion history, symptom burden, injury mechanism, and final diagnosis were all significantly associated with exam performance. CART analysis determined patients with a non-concussion diagnosis, a non-sports injury mechanism, no prior history of concussion, and two or fewer symptoms had the lowest likelihood (46%) of receiving the exam. CONCLUSION: Performing a VOM examination for concussion is feasible in the acute setting following provider education and using clinical support tools. The exam is more likely to be performed on those children with history or exam findings associated with perceived risk for ongoing symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Concussion guidelines recommend a vestibular and oculomotor (VOM) examination be performed for all patients with concern for concussion, however the feasibility of performing testing is unknown. We aimed to measure rates of exam performance after implementation of training and support tools in a pediatric emergency department. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients age 6 to 18 years old presenting over a 12-month period. Charts were obtained via natural language processing, where concussion was suggested as a diagnosis in the electronic health record, and then manually reviewed to record patient and provider factors. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with exam performance, and a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was performed to determine if a specific patient type was at risk for not having testing performed. RESULTS: Four hundred patients were included in the analysis. Sixty-four percent received a VOM examination (including 73% of those diagnosed with concussion). Provider type, concussion history, symptom burden, injury mechanism, and final diagnosis were all significantly associated with exam performance. CART analysis determined patients with a non-concussion diagnosis, a non-sports injury mechanism, no prior history of concussion, and two or fewer symptoms had the lowest likelihood (46%) of receiving the exam. CONCLUSION: Performing a VOM examination for concussion is feasible in the acute setting following provider education and using clinical support tools. The exam is more likely to be performed on those children with history or exam findings associated with perceived risk for ongoing symptoms.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Michael J Ellis; Dean Cordingley; Sara Vis; Karen Reimer; Jeff Leiter; Kelly Russell Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Kristy B Arbogast; Allison E Curry; Melissa R Pfeiffer; Mark R Zonfrillo; Juliet Haarbauer-Krupa; Matthew J Breiding; Victor G Coronado; Christina L Master Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Daniel J Corwin; Douglas J Wiebe; Mark R Zonfrillo; Matthew F Grady; Roni L Robinson; Arlene M Goodman; Christina L Master Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Christina L Master; Stephen R Master; Douglas J Wiebe; Eileen P Storey; Julia E Lockyer; Olivia E Podolak; Matthew F Grady Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Anne Mucha; Michael W Collins; R J Elbin; Joseph M Furman; Cara Troutman-Enseki; Ryan M DeWolf; Greg Marchetti; Anthony P Kontos Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Daniel J Corwin; Kristy B Arbogast; Rebecca A Haber; Kevin W Pettijohn; Mark R Zonfrillo; Matthew F Grady; Christina L Master Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Divya Jain; Kristy B Arbogast; Catherine C McDonald; Olivia E Podolak; Susan S Margulies; Kristina B Metzger; David R Howell; Mitchell M Scheiman; Christina L Master Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 2.106
Authors: Kristy B Arbogast; Riddhi P Ghosh; Daniel J Corwin; Catherine C McDonald; Fairuz N Mohammed; Susan S Margulies; Ian Barnett; Christina L Master Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2022-10 Impact factor: 4.869
Authors: Daniel J Corwin; Kristy B Arbogast; Casey Swann; Rebecca Haber; Matthew F Grady; Christina L Master Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Graham D Cochrane; Jennifer B Christy; Anwar Almutairi; Claudio Busettini; Hendrik K Kits van Heyningen; Katherine K Weise; Mark W Swanson; Sara J Gould Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2021 Jul-Aug 01 Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Patricia R Roby; Kristina B Metzger; Catherine C McDonald; Daniel J Corwin; Colin M Huber; Declan A Patton; Susan S Margulies; Matthew F Grady; Christina L Master; Kristy B Arbogast Journal: Phys Sportsmed Date: 2021-09-21 Impact factor: 2.241
Authors: Olivia E Podolak; Sofia Chaudhary; Juliet Haarbauer-Krupa; Kristina B Metzger; Allison E Curry; Ronni S Kessler; Melissa R Pfeiffer; Matthew J Breiding; Christina L Master; Kristy B Arbogast Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 1.602
Authors: Daniel J Corwin; Catherine C McDonald; Kristy B Arbogast; Fairuz N Mohammed; Kristina B Metzger; Melissa R Pfeiffer; Declan A Patton; Colin M Huber; Susan S Margulies; Matthew F Grady; Christina L Master Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2020-03
Authors: Daniel J Corwin; Catherine C McDonald; Kristy B Arbogast; Fairuz N Mohammed; Matthew F Grady; Christina L Master Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 3.454