Literature DB >> 34173348

Impact of bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) and intestine-specific homeobox (ISX) expression on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma' for better clarity.

Kai-Ting Chuang1,2, Shen-Nien Wang1,3,4,2, Shih-Hsien Hsu1,5, Li-Ting Wang6,7.   

Abstract

Epigenetic regulation is important for cancer tumor metastasis and progression, including lung and liver cancer. However, the mechanism of epigenetic regulation in liver cancer leaves much to be discussed. According to a previous study, p300/CBP-associated factor (PCAF) mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and promotes cancer metastasis by recruiting intestine-specific homeobox (ISX) and bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) in lung cancer. To figure out whether the three genes are also expressed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or not, and their correlation with patients' outcome, BRD4, PCAF, and ISX messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels in 377 patients with HCC were investigated using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and confocal fluorescence imaging. The correlation of the gene expression (PCAF, ISX, and BRD4) in liver cancer is also being investigated. Here, we show that the mRNA expression of PCAF, BRD4, and ISX in 377 paired specimens from patients with HCC, and the adjacent normal tissues exhibited a tumor-specific expression pattern, highly correlated with disease pathogenesis, patient survival time, progression stage, and poor prognosis. The results show that ISX and BRD4 can potentially be a target for improving the survival rate.
© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRD4; HCC; ISX

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34173348      PMCID: PMC8366091          DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Med        ISSN: 2045-7634            Impact factor:   4.452


INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the fifth most commonly occurring cancer and the third leading cause of cancer‐related deaths every year worldwide., In Taiwan, it is the second leading cause of preventable deaths after lung cancer. From the clinical medicine perspective, reduction in the mortality rate of liver cancer and improvement of the quality of life of liver cancer patients, the detection and treatment of liver cancer are all issues that need to be addressed. The most common type of liver cancer is HCC, which occurs most often in people with chronic liver diseases, for example, cirrhosis caused by hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection. One third of cirrhotic patients is estimated to develop liver cancer during their lifetime, with a 1–8% annual incidence reported in long‐term follow‐up studies (e.g., 2% in HBV‐infected cirrhotic patients and 3–8% in HCV‐infected cirrhotic patients). Cancer is a genetic disease and an epigenetic disease, and people take the epigenetic aspect being used as a target for cancer treatment is gaining more attention., Epigenetic regulation is defined as the expression of genetic changes through the modification of chromatin structure without changing the basic nucleotide sequence., For example, in recent research, overall cell metabolism can be regulated through acetylation is reported. , ,  The epigenetic regulation in cancer is discussed in several papers. Intestinal‐specific homeobox (ISX) is proved to mediate a feed‐forward loop integrating tryptophan catabolism, inflammation, and also immune suppression in HCC., ISX is a proto‐oncogene and known to promote the proliferation, tumorigenesis, and immune tolerance of HCC via proinflammatory cytokine‐mediated upregulation of cyclin D1 and E2F1. In many cancer such as liver cancer, lung cancer, and prostate cancer, bromodomain‐containing protein 4 (BRD4) is a transcriptional and epigenetic regulator t playing a critical role during carcinogenesis and embryogenesis., , , In lung cancer, p300/CBP‐related factor (PCAF) acetylates the ISX–BRD4 complex, unpacks chromatin, and activates the expression of EMT regulators through acetylation of histone H3, eventually promoting EMT and metastasis. Bromodomain‐containing protein 4 (BRD4) acts as a chromatin reader and mediates the binding of acetylated histones. It helps to form a multiprotein complex to connect the super‐enhancer and promoter. p300/CBP‐associated factor (PCAF) is a member of the GCN5‐related protein acetyltransferase N‐acetyltransferase family with histone acetyltransferase activity, which exhibits ambiguous or controversial functions in tumorigenesis, However, whether the PCAF–ISX–BRD4 mechanism is restricted to non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or it is also active in other tumor entities during malignant transformation remains unclear. To explore whether or not ISX, BRD4, and PCAF are also co‐expressed in HCC and modulate the outcome of tumor severity, in this study, we collected the hepatitis specimens from 377 patients with HCC to explore how PCAF, BRD4, and ISX, respectively, and collaboratively impact on liver cancer tumors and the correlation with the prognosis of patients with HCC are discussed. Here we mainly use quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) technology and some cell biology experiments such as western blot to show the co‐expression and the correlation between the expression of the three genes in HCC and their impact on the prognosis of liver cancer.

RESULT

Significant differences in cancer stages, grade, and tumor sizes were observed between patients with high and low levels of ISX or BRD4 expression

Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. The number of participants enrolled in this study was 377 (288 males and 89 females). The mean age of patients with HCC was 61.2 years.
TABLE 1

Basic Characteristic of 377 HCC patients according to mRNA expression of ISX, BRD4, and PCAF

Total ISX BRD4 PCAF
LowHighLowHighLowHigh
N=377286 (%)91 (%)305 (%)72 (%)275 (%)102 (%)
Age (Mean ± SD)
61.2 ± 11.360.9 ± 11.762.4 ± 9.761.1 ± 11.361.9 ± 11.360.8 ± 11.962.6 ± 8.9
Sex
Male288215 (75.5)73 (78.9)231 (76.2)57 (77.0)204(74.7)84 (80.8)
Female8970 (24.5)19 (21.1)72 (23.8)17 (23.0)69 (25.3)20 (19.2)
Basic Characteristic of 377 HCC patients according to mRNA expression of ISX, BRD4, and PCAF Patients with HCC were classified into “low” and “high” groups according to survival receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The threshold values of ISX, BRD4, and PCAF separately were 2.0, 3.0, and 2.2 times the mRNA expression in HCC than that of the neighboring healthy tissues. The high and low ISX group contained 286 and 91 patients, respectively, and the low BRD4 group contained 305 patients. Meanwhile, the high and low PCAF groups contained 102 and 275 patients, respectively. To explore the clinical impact of PCAF, ISX, and BRD4 signals in HCC, 377 paired HCC samples (tumors along with neighboring healthy liver tissues) were obtained and analyzed. In Table 2, significant differences in cancer stages, grades, and tumor sizes were observed between patients with high and low levels of ISX or BRD4 expression.
TABLE 2

Clinical and pathological characteristics of 377 HCC patients according to mRNA expression of ISX and BRD4

Total ISX BRD4
LowHigh p LowHigh p
N=377286 (%)91 (%)305 (%)72 (%)
Stage
I207165 (57.6)42 (47.3)0.0484* 175 (58)32 (41.9)<0.001*
II10781 (28.3)26 (28)91 (29.7)16 (23)
III6340 (14.1)23 (24.7)39 (12.3)24 (35.1)
Grade
I4941 (14.5)8 (7.8)0.0268* 39 (13)10 (12.5)0.9073
II247194 (67)53 (60)201 (65.3)46 (65.3)
III7950 (18)29(31.1)63 (21)16 (22.2)
IV21 (0.3)1 (1.1)2 (0.7)0 (0)
Size (cm)
<25143 (15)8 (8.8)0.0228* 45 (14.7)6 (8)0.0001*
2–5205162 (56)43 (47.3)178 (57.6)26 (38.4)
>512181 (29)40 (43.9)82 (27.6)40 (53.4)

p < 0.05.

Clinical and pathological characteristics of 377 HCC patients according to mRNA expression of ISX and BRD4 p < 0.05. Biochemistry data of 377 patients with HCC according to mRNA expression were presented in Table 3 and Table 4. ISX and BRD4 were significant in liver capsule and lymphovascular invasion, respectively.
TABLE 3

Biochemistry data of 377 HCC cancer patients according to mRNA expression of ISX and BRD4

TotalISXBRD4
LowHigh p LowHigh p
TypeN = 377
NBNC6046 (16.1)14 (15.2)0.67549 (16.3)11 (14.9)0.132
HBV146106 (37.2)40 (43.5)109 (35.9)37 (50.0)
HCV157123 (43.2)34 (37)134 (44.2)23 (31.1)
HBV+HCV1410 (3.5)4 (4.3)11 (3.6)3 (4.0)
AFPN = 368
Low212162 (58.9)50 (53.8)0.3854173 (59)39 (52)0.2707
High156113 (41.1)43 (46.2)120 (41)36 (48)
BilirubinN = 226
≦1.2184136 (80.9)48 (82.8)0.7604150 (82)34 (79)0.6603
>1.24232 (19.1)10 (17.2)33 (18)9 (21)
ALBN = 230
≦4.5199148 (85.6)51 (89.5)0.4517161 (85.6)38 (90.5)0.4065
>4.53125 (14.4)6 (10.5)27 (14.4)4 (9.5)
GOTN = 227
<4010070 (41.4)30 (51.7)0.367478 (42.4)22 (51.2)0.2069
40–1009071 (42)19 (32.8)78 (42.4)12 (27.9)
>1003728 (16.6)9 (15.5)28 (15.2)9 (20.9)
GPTN = 229
<4010374 (43.3)29 (50)0.598780 (43)23 (53.5)0.4095
40–1008262 (36.3)20 (34.5)70 (37.6)12 (27.9)
>1004435 (20.4)9 (15.5)36 (19.4)8 (18.6)
SugarN = 145
<1003829 (25.4)9 (29)0.537734 (27.9)4 (17.4)0.4402
100–1204332 (28.1)11 (35.5)34 (27.9)9 (39.1)
>1206453 (46.5)11 (35.5)54 (44.2)10 (43.5)
ALPN = 82
<4010 (0)1 (4.2)0.28940 (0)1 (4.8)0.1889
40–1006144 (75.9)17 (70.8)47 (77)14 (66.7)
>1002014 (24.1)6 (25)14 (23)6 (28.5)
Lymphovascular invasionN = 347
No207161 (61.7)46 (53.5)0.2438175 (63.2)32 (45.7)0.0075*
Yes140100 (38.3)40 (46.5)102 (36.8)38 (54.3)
Liver capsule invasionN = 159
No9777 (65.8)20 (47.6)0.0381* 78 (62.4)19 (55.9)0.4896
Yes6240 (34.2)22 (52.4)47 (37.6)15 (44.1)

p < 0.05.

TABLE 4

Biochemistry data of 377 HCC cancer patients according to mRNA expression of PCAF

TotalPCAF
LowHigh p
TypeN = 377
NBNC6046 (16.1)14 (15.8)0.7868
HBV145106 (37.2)39 (42.6)
HCV157122 (42.7)35 (38.6)
HBV+HCV1512 (4.0)3 (3.0)
AFPN = 368
Low212161 (60.1)51 (51.0)0.1171
High156107 (39.9)49 (49.0)
BilirubinN = 226
≦1.2184133 (79.2)51 (87.9)0.1390
>1.24235 (20.8)7 (12.1)
ALBN = 230
≦4.5199144 (84.2)55 (93.2)0.0806
>4.53127 (15.8)31 (6.8)
GOTN = 227
<4010069 (41.0)31 (52.5)0.3110
40–1009070 (41.7)20 (33.9)
>1003729 (17.3)8 (13.6)
GPTN = 229
<4010377 (45.3)26 (44.1)0.5517
40–1008258 (34.1)24 (40.7)
>1004435 (20.6)9 (15.2)
SugarN=
<1003828 (25.9)10 (27.0)0.9207
100–1204333 (30.6)10 (27.0)
>1206447 (43.5)17 (46.0)
ALP
<4010 (0)1 (4.8)0.1972
40–1006145 (73.8)16 (76.2)
>1002016 (26.2)4 (19.0)
Lymphovascular invasion
No207156 (61.4)51 (54.8)0.3481
Yes14098 (38.6)42 (45.2)
Liver capsule invasion
No9773 (60.3)24 (63.2)0.7552
Yes6248 (39.7)14 (36.8)
Biochemistry data of 377 HCC cancer patients according to mRNA expression of ISX and BRD4 p < 0.05. Biochemistry data of 377 HCC cancer patients according to mRNA expression of PCAF

Linear trends of ISX, BRD4, and PCAF show that ISX and BRD4 have a high correlation with the outcome after HCC resection

To figure out the trend of the significant difference between the three genes in patients with HCC, we ran tests of the linear trend of ISX, BRD4, and PCAF. We found that the mRNA expression of ISX and BRD4 had a high positive correlation with the stage, grade, and size of HCC (Figure 1A–F). However, the expression of PCAF had little influence on the mentioned outcome (Table 5).
FIGURE 1

Linear trend analyze of ISX and BRD4. (A‐C), The mRNA expression of ISX has positive correlation with the tumor grade(a), size(B), and stage(C). (D‐F), The mRNA expression of BRD4 has positive correlation with the tumor grade(D), size(E), and stage(F)

TABLE 5

Clinical and pathological characteristics of 377 HCC patients according to mRNA expression of PCAF

TotalPCAF
LowHigh p
N=377275 (%)102 (%)
Stage
I207153 (55.6)54 (52.9)0.4638
II10780 (29.1)27 (26.5)
III6342 (15.3)21 (20.6)
Grade
I4934 (12.5)15 (14.3)0.1101
II247184 (66.8)63 (61.2)
III7957 (20.7)22 (22.5)
IV20 (0)2 (2.0)
Size (cm)
<25133 (11.8)18 (17.6)0.1320
2–5202155 (56.8)47 (46.1)
>512487 (31.4)37 (36.3)
Linear trend analyze of ISX and BRD4. (A‐C), The mRNA expression of ISX has positive correlation with the tumor grade(a), size(B), and stage(C). (D‐F), The mRNA expression of BRD4 has positive correlation with the tumor grade(D), size(E), and stage(F) Clinical and pathological characteristics of 377 HCC patients according to mRNA expression of PCAF

ISX, PCAF, and BRD4 are co‐expressed in HCC cell

Western blots of four pairs of tumors/adjacent liver tissues confirmed an increased expression of ISX, BRD4, and PCAF in HCC (Figure 2). To analyze the interaction mode of the ISX–BRD4 and ISX–PCAF complexes, co‐immunoprecipitation was used to identify the interaction domain between ISX, BRD4, and PCAF in SK‐Hep1 cells. The result showed that ISX, PCAF, and BRD4 are co‐expressed in HCC cells (Figure 3). Moreover, mRNA expression of ISX strongly correlated with those of BRD4 and PCAF in patients with HCC (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.8587 and 0.8028, respectively, p < 0.0001) (Figure 4A,B).
FIGURE 2

Western blot analysis of ISX, BRD4, and PCAF in HCC tissues (T1‐5) and adjacent liver tissues (A1‐5). Actin was used as a loading control

FIGURE 3

PCAF, BRD4 determined by Western blot in anti‐ISX immunoprecipitates of tumor tissues from patients with liver cancer

FIGURE 4

mRNA expression of ISX strongly correlated with those of BRD4(A) and PCAF(B) in patients with HCC (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.8587 and 0.8028, respectively, p < 0.0001)

Western blot analysis of ISX, BRD4, and PCAF in HCC tissues (T1‐5) and adjacent liver tissues (A1‐5). Actin was used as a loading control PCAF, BRD4 determined by Western blot in anti‐ISX immunoprecipitates of tumor tissues from patients with liver cancer mRNA expression of ISX strongly correlated with those of BRD4(A) and PCAF(B) in patients with HCC (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.8587 and 0.8028, respectively, p < 0.0001)

ISX–BRD4, ISX–PCAF, and BRD4–PCAF analyzed in patients with HCC

In Tables 6, 7, 8, and 9, the clinical and pathological characteristics of 377 patients with HCC according to mRNA expression of ISX–BRD4, ISX–PCAF, PCAF–BRD4, and ISX–PCAF–BRD4 were, respectively, shown. Significant differences in tumor sizes can be observed in Tables 6, 7, 8, and 9; evident differences in cancer stages between patients with high and low levels of ISX or BRD4 expression are also observed in Table 7.
TABLE 6

Clinical and pathological characteristics of 377 HCC patients according to mRNA expression of ISX–BRD4

Total ISX‐BRD4

Low ISX

Low BRD4

High ISX,

Low BRD4

High BRD4

Low ISX

High BRD4

High ISX

p
N=377266(%)39(%)16(%)56(%)
Stage
I207154 (57.9)23 (59.0)8 (50.0)22 (39.3)0.0008*
II10777 (28.9)13 (33.3)4 (25.0)13 (23.2)
III6335 (13.2)3 (7.7)4 (25.0)21 (37.5)
Grade
I4937 (14.0)3 (8.3)3 (21.4)6 (8.9)0.1307
II247178 (66.9)21 (52.8)12 (71.4)36 (64.2)
III7950 (18.7)14 (36.1)1 (7.2)14 (26.8)
IV21(0.04)1 (2.8)0 (0)0 (0)
Size (cm)
<25141 (15.6)3 (7.7)1 (6.3)6 (8.8)0.0061*
2–5205153 (57.4)22 (56.4)6 (37.5)24 (40.3)
>512172 (27.0)14 (35.9)9 (56.2)26 (50.9)

p < 0.05.

TABLE 7

Clinical and pathological characteristics of 377 HCC patients according to mRNA expression of ISX–PCAF

TotalISX‐PCAF p

Low ISX

Low PCAF

High ISX, Low PCAF

High PCAF

Low ISX

High PCAF

High ISX

N=377242(%)31(%)42(%)62(%)
Stage
I207135 (55.8)18 (58.1)28 (66.7)26 (42.0)0.0902
II10771 (29.3)8 (25.8)10 (23.8)18 (29.0)
III6336 (14.9)5 (16.1)4 (9.5)18 (29.0)
Grade
I4933 (13.7)1 (3.3)8 (20.0)7 (10.0)0.0517
II247163 (67.4)21 (66.7)27 (65.0)36 (56.7)
III7946 (18.9)9 (30.0)6 (12.5)18 (31.7)
IV20 (0)0 (0)1 (2.5)1 (1.6)
Size (cm)
<25132 (13.0)1 (3.1)11 (26.2)7 (11.3)0.0062*
2–5205139 (56.1)19 (62.5)23 (54.8)25 (40.3)
>512172 (30.9)11 (34.4)8 (19.0)30 (48.4)

p < 0.05.

TABLE 8

Clinical and pathological characteristics of 377 HCC patients according to mRNA expression of PCAF–BRD4

TotalPCAF‐BRD4 p

Low PCAF

Low BRD4

High PCAF, Low BRD4

High BRD4

Low PCAF

High BRD4

High PCAF

N=377238(%)35(%)65(%)39(%)
Stage
I207135 (56.7)18 (51.4)41 (63.1)13 (33.4)0.0002*
II10772 (30.3)7 (20.0)18 (27.7)10 (25.6)
III6331 (13.0)10 (28.6)6 (9.2)16 (41.0)
Grade
I4928 (12.2)6 (15.2)11 (16.4)4 (10.3)0.0991
II243156(67.0)25 (72.7)39 (60.7)23 (59.0)
III7954 (22.6)4 (12.1)9 (19.6)12 (30.7)
IV20(0)0 (0)2 (3.3)0(0)
Size (cm)
<25131 (13.2)1 (2.8)13 (20.0)5 (12.8)0.0012*
2–5205142 (59.1)15 (41.7)34 (52.3)14 (35.9)
>512168 (27.7)19 (55.6)14 (35.9)20 (51.3)

p < 0.05.

TABLE 9

Clinical and pathological characteristics of 377 HCC patients according to mRNA expression of ISX‐BRD4‐PCAF

TotalISX‐BRD4‐PCAF p
Low ISX Low BRD4 Low PCAFHigh ISX, Low BRD4 Low PCAFHigh BRD4 Low ISX Low PCAFHigh PCAF Low ISX Low BRD4
N=377255(%)13(%)17(%)41(%)
Stage
I207127 (56.4)8 (61.5)8 (47.1)27 (65.8)
II10767 (29.8)5 (38.5)4 (23.5)10 (24.4)
III6331 (13.8)0 (0)5 (29.4)4 (9.8)
Grade
I4928 (12.9)0 (0)4 (26.7)8 (20.5)
II243147 (67.4)6 (50.0)10 (66.7)25 (64.1)
III7943(19.7)6 (50.0)1 (6.6)5 (12.8)
IV20 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (2.6)
Size (cm)
<25132 (14.0)0 (0)0 (0)10 (24.4)
2–5205132 (57.6)11 (84.6)6 (35.3)23 (56.1)
>512165 (28.4)2 (15.4)11 (64.7)8 (19.5)

p < 0.05.

Clinical and pathological characteristics of 377 HCC patients according to mRNA expression of ISX–BRD4 Low ISX Low BRD4 High ISX, Low BRD4 High BRD4 Low ISX High BRD4 High ISX p < 0.05. Clinical and pathological characteristics of 377 HCC patients according to mRNA expression of ISX–PCAF Low ISX Low PCAF High PCAF Low ISX High PCAF High ISX p < 0.05. Clinical and pathological characteristics of 377 HCC patients according to mRNA expression of PCAF–BRD4 Low PCAF Low BRD4 High BRD4 Low PCAF High BRD4 High PCAF p < 0.05. Clinical and pathological characteristics of 377 HCC patients according to mRNA expression of ISX‐BRD4‐PCAF p < 0.05.

Kaplan–Meier survival curve analysis of patients with HCC shows that patients with HCC having relatively lower ISX and BRD4 expression survive longer

An analysis of the survival curves indicated that patients with HCC having relatively lower ISX expression had a significantly higher survival time than that of patients with HCC having relatively higher expression after liver resection (p = 0.0027)(Figure 5A). Similarly, patients with HCC having relatively lower BRD4 expression had a significantly longer survival time than patients with HCC having relatively higher expression after liver resection (p < 0.0001)(Figure 5B). Nevertheless, the expression of PCAF seems to have less influence on the survival rate of patients with HCC though the survival curve drops slightly (p = 0.1233).
FIGURE 5

Kaplan–Meier survival curve analysis. (A–C), The Kaplan–Meier survival curve was used to analyze survival correlation between patients (n = 377) with HCC and ISX (A),BRD4(B), and PCAF (C) levels. On the basis of the cut‐off values of fold differences, the study population was dichotomized into the “high” and “low” expression groups. p‐values were calculated by log‐rank (Mantel–Cox) test comparing the two Kaplan–Meier curves. (D and E), The Kaplan–Meier survival curve was used to analyze survival correlation between patients (n = 377) with HCC and ISX–BRD4 (D) and BRD4–PCAF (E) levels. On the basis of the cut‐off values of fold differences, the study population was dichotomized into the “high” and “low” expression groups. p‐values were calculated by log‐rank (Mantel–Cox) test comparing the two Kaplan–Meier curves

Kaplan–Meier survival curve analysis. (A–C), The Kaplan–Meier survival curve was used to analyze survival correlation between patients (n = 377) with HCC and ISX (A),BRD4(B), and PCAF (C) levels. On the basis of the cut‐off values of fold differences, the study population was dichotomized into the “high” and “low” expression groups. p‐values were calculated by log‐rank (Mantel–Cox) test comparing the two Kaplan–Meier curves. (D and E), The Kaplan–Meier survival curve was used to analyze survival correlation between patients (n = 377) with HCC and ISX–BRD4 (D) and BRD4–PCAF (E) levels. On the basis of the cut‐off values of fold differences, the study population was dichotomized into the “high” and “low” expression groups. p‐values were calculated by log‐rank (Mantel–Cox) test comparing the two Kaplan–Meier curves The result indicated that PCAF might not be a significant factor to predict the prognosis of patients with HCC; however, the mechanism between PCAF and ISX or BRD4 in HCC remains unclear (Figure 5C).

Higher BRD4 expression in patients with HCC may worsen the prognosis after liver resection

An analysis of the survival curves of the mRNA expression of ISX–BRD4 and PCAF–BRD4 indicated that patients with HCC having relatively lower BRD4, whether its ISX or PCAF was high or low, had a significantly shorter survival time. The results show that BRD4 was a more important factor than ISX to the survival rate of patients with HCC. In other words, the result indicated that patients with HCC with higher BRD4 expression might have a poorer prognosis than those with lower BRD4 expression (Figure 5D,E).

DISCUSSION

This study indicated that ISX and BRD4 (especially BRD4) were closely associated with the prognosis of patients with HCC. The hypothesis can be verified from the analysis of the clinical and pathological characteristics of 377 patients according to the mRNA expression and the survival curve, which shows that patients with HCC having relatively lower ISX or BRD4 expression had a significantly longer survival time than patients with HCC having relatively higher expression after liver resection. The following analysis of BRD4–ISX and BRD4–PCAF indicated that BRD4 plays the most important role in predicting survival of patients with HCC. The imaging of PCAF for the prognosis of liver cancer patients is more controversial. In lung cancer, PCAF is reported to form a PCAF–ISX–BRD4 axis with other two proteins, mediating MT signaling and regulating tumor initiation and metastasis, and promoting cell migration and invasion in lung cancer cells. However, PCAF is reported in another study to be an anti‐oncogene that plays an important role in the development of HCC by suppressing HCC cell metastasis and EMT by targeting Gli1. Also, there is a study suggesting that PCAF induces cell death by autophagy. Although the mRNA expression of ISX strongly correlates with those of BRD4 and PCAF in patients with HCC, denoting that they were co‐expressed in liver cancer cells, the interaction between ISX, BRD4, and PCAF remains to be at issue. In other words, the EMT signaling mechanism regulated by the PCAF–ISX–BRD4 axis, which can be seen in lung cancer seems not to be observed in HCC, or the mechanism is so complicated that it needs further research to elucidate. It is well known that ISX was already found to have an immunosuppression effect in HCC. In this article, based on the analysis of 377 patients with HCC, BRD4 is proven to be a more important factor than ISX in determining the prognosis of patients after HCC resection. The survival curve clearly separated according to the expression of BRD4 and the linear trend analysis shown that the higher the expression of BRD4, the higher the stage, and larger the tumors. The ISX–BRD4 complex is also a good target for predicting cancer cell metastasis as well as the tumor size. Collectively, we have shown that ISX, BRD4, and PCAF are co‐expressed in liver cells, and the expression of the ISX–BRD4 complex plays a significant role in determining the prognosis of patients with HCC. The lower the expression of the complex, the higher the survival rate. The advantage of this article is that a large amount of patient data to support the results exists, making them more credible. Our findings highlight the potential of identifying gene expression as a therapeutic target for the prevention of metastasis and improve survival rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

In this retrospective analysis, we included 377 patients (288 men and 89 women; mean age, 61.2 ± 11.3 years; range, 9–87 years) with confirmed HCC who underwent curative hepatectomy between July 2013 and August 2020 at two medical centers. None of the patients underwent any preoperative treatment. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. The pathological diagnosis and classification of variables were based on the criteria recommended in the General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer. Clinicopathological characteristics collected for analyses included sex, age, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, glutamic‐pyruvic transaminase, albumin, α‐fetoprotein, Bilit, BCLC, tumor stage, tumor size, and tumor number. Tissue specimens obtained during the operation were immediately stored in liquid nitrogen until further analysis. All patients underwent routine and regular follow‐up care at our outpatient department and were carefully monitored once every 6 months for 5 years.

INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

The inclusion criterions for the retrospective study were as follows: (a) patients with HCC; (b) no presence of an extrahepatic metastasis; and (c) no presence of any other complications. Among the recruited cases, we excluded patients who received or underwent the following treatments or conditions: (a) treatment(s) with microwave ablation or radiofrequency ablation during surgery; (b) early surgical death within one month; and (c) patients lost to follow‐up. Finally, 377 patients were included in our study.

Quantitative RT polymerase chain reaction

The expression of ISX, BRD4, and PCAF mRNA in HCC cells and cells from cancer patients was quantified using an SYBR Green Quantitative RT–PCR kit (Invitrogen) as described previously. Total RNA was extracted from tumor mass using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and then transcribed into cDNA (Invitrogen) for PCR amplification using a 7900HT Thermocycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All procedures and data analyses were performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. All data are expressed as mean ±SD of at least three experiments.

Cell culture

The human liver cancer cell line, SK‐Hep1, was purchased from the ATCC in June 2020. Cell lines from ATCC have been thoroughly tested and authenticated; morphology, karyotyping, and PCR‐based approaches were used to confirm the identity of the original cell lines. Cells were grown in 90% Eagle Minimum Essential Medium (MEM;Gibco) with 2 mmol/L L‐glutamine and Earle's Balanced Salt Solution (BSS; Gibco) adjusted to contain 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 0.1 mmol/L nonessential amino acids (Gibco),1.0 mmol/L sodium pyruvate, and 10% FBS (Gibco). All cell lines have been routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination using a Universal Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the last mycoplasma test was performed in August 2020. Mycoplasma‐free cell lines were used in all experiments.

Statistical analysis

Patients with HCC were classified into two groups—“low” and “high” according to survival receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The cutting points of ISX, BRD4, and PCAF separately were 2.0, 3.0, and 2.1 times of the mRNA expression in liver cancer tumors than that of the neighboring healthy tissues. Statistical analysis of categorical variables was carried out by one‐way ANOVA. The cut‐off value of ISX, PCAF, and BRD4 was based on the results of previous studies. Quantitative variables are presented as the mean ± SD. Significant differences were determined using a two‐sample t‐test. Pearson's correlational analysis was used to examine the relationship between the levels of ISX, BRD4, and PCAF expression. Statistical analysis of categorical variables was performed using the chi‐square test, one‐way ANOVA, and Fisher's exact test. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve was used to analyze survival correlation between patients with HCC and ISX, BRD4, PCAF ISX–BRD4, and BRD4–PCAF levels. p‐values were calculated by log‐rank (Mantel–Cox) test comparing the two Kaplan–Meier curves. p‐values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using JMP software (version 14.0).

Western blotting and immunohistochemical analysis

Western blotting staining and immunohistochemical (fluorescence) staining were performed as described previously. The primary antibodies used in this study were PCAF (1:1,000 dilution; #3378S; Cell Signaling Technology), b‐actin (1:10,000 dilution; #4967L; Cell Signaling Technology), GFP (1:500 dilution; SC‐9996; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), ISX (1:200 dilution; sc‐398934; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), BRD4 (1:1,000 dilution; #13440S; Cell Signaling Technology). FITC‐conjugated antirabbit IgG, rhodamine‐conjugated anti‐mouse IgG, and alkaline phosphatase‐conjugated anti‐rabbit IgG antibody (1:500 dilution; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) were also used. All experiments were repeated at least three times.

Co‐immunoprecipitation (CO‐IP)

Whole‐cell lysates from 5 × 107 cells were prepared in modified RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris‐Cl (pH7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP‐40 (0.1% SDS), and 0.5% Na‐deoxycholate). After centrifugation, the supernatant was incubated with 5 μg of antibodies as indicated, and then, protein A/G Sepharose bead was added, and the incubation was continued at 4°C. The beads were washed five times with 1,000 ml of RIPA buffer and examined by western blot analysis.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

There is none

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All listed authors met the ICMJE criteria. All the authors contributed significantly to the creation of this manuscript, each having fulfilled criteria as established by the ICMJE.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

The study was conducted with approval (KMUH‐IRB‐20130052) from the ethics committee of the Kaohsiung Medical University Chung Ho Memorial Hospital.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Epidrugs: targeting epigenetic marks in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Cristiana Libardi Miranda Furtado; Maria Claudia Dos Santos Luciano; Renan Da Silva Santos; Gilvan Pessoa Furtado; Manoel Odorico Moraes; Claudia Pessoa
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 4.528

2.  BRD4 Regulates Metastatic Potential of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer through AHNAK.

Authors:  Jordan S Shafran; Guillaume P Andrieu; Balázs Györffy; Gerald V Denis
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 3.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Hashem B El-Serag; K Lenhard Rudolph
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  Epidemiology and surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma: New trends.

Authors:  Amit G Singal; Pietro Lampertico; Pierre Nahon
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 25.083

5.  Incidence and predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  George N Ioannou; Meaghan F Splan; Noel S Weiss; George B McDonald; Laura Beretta; Sum P Lee
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 6.  Mechanisms and Dynamics of Protein Acetylation in Mitochondria.

Authors:  Josue Baeza; Michael J Smallegan; John M Denu
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 13.807

7.  PCAF-primed EZH2 acetylation regulates its stability and promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression.

Authors:  Junhu Wan; Jun Zhan; Shuai Li; Ji Ma; Weizhi Xu; Chang Liu; Xiaowei Xue; Yuping Xie; Weigang Fang; Y Eugene Chin; Hongquan Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  BRD4 and Cancer: going beyond transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Benedetta Donati; Eugenia Lorenzini; Alessia Ciarrocchi
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 27.401

9.  PCAF inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis by inhibition of epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting Gli-1.

Authors:  Qing Li; Zhikui Liu; Meng Xu; Yumo Xue; Bowen Yao; Changwei Dou; Yuli Jia; Yufeng Wang; Kangsheng Tu; Xin Zheng; Yingmin Yao
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 10.  Epigenetics of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tan Boon Toh; Jhin Jieh Lim; Edward Kai-Hua Chow
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2019-05-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) and intestine-specific homeobox (ISX) expression on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma' for better clarity.

Authors:  Kai-Ting Chuang; Shen-Nien Wang; Shih-Hsien Hsu; Li-Ting Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.452

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.