| Literature DB >> 34172091 |
Laura Gutierrez-Quiceno1,2, Eric B Dammer1,3, Ashlyn Grace Johnson1,2, James A Webster1,2, Rhythm Shah1,2, Duc Duong1,3, Luming Yin1,3, Nicholas T Seyfried1,3, Victor E Alvarez4,5, Thor D Stein4,6,7,8, Ann C McKee4,5,6,7,8,9, Chadwick M Hales10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is an association between repetitive head injury (RHI) and a pathologic diagnosis of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) characterized by the aggregation of proteins including tau. The underlying molecular events that cause these abnormal protein accumulations remain unclear. Here, we hypothesized that identifying the human brain proteome from serial CTE stages (CTE I-IV) would provide critical new insights into CTE pathogenesis. Brain samples from frontotemporal lobar degeneration due to microtubule associated protein tau (FTLD-MAPT) mutations were also included as a distinct tauopathy phenotype for comparison.Entities:
Keywords: Astrocyte; Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE); Frontotemporal dementia (FTD); Immunoglobulin; Proteomics; Tandem mass tagged (TMT); Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA)
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34172091 PMCID: PMC8235576 DOI: 10.1186/s13024-021-00462-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Neurodegener ISSN: 1750-1326 Impact factor: 14.195
Fig. 1Overlap of significant differentially expressed proteins in CTE, FTLD-MAPT, and AD as compared to controls. Proteins were grouped within disease state and sorted based on p-value< 0.05 (ANOVA). Venn diagrams showing 5 way overlap between A. AD or B. FTD and CTE I-IV. C. Venn diagram showing 3 way overlap between CTE IV, AD, and FTLD-MAPT. D. Gene ontology showing Biological Process, Molecular Function and Cellular component for 167 proteins significantly enriched in all 3 neurodegenerative disorders as compared to controls
Fig. 2WGCNA modules demonstrated significant disease-related changes, including enrichment of immunoglobulins in CTE. We generated 28 WGCNA modules from the control, CTE, and FTLD-MAPT proteomic data. A. Representative modules are shown with the top 8 module hub proteins (based on kME value; Table S4) listed below each box plot. Kruskal-Wallis p-values for nonparametric ANOVA following linear modeling of covariates and diagnostic groups are shown in above the box plots along with the number (n) of proteins in each module (module sizes also shown in Table S6). B. (Top): Protein blot of IGHM and IGLL5, key hub proteins in the M28-skyblue module, in control and CTE I-IV as a validation of the proteomic data. GAPDH shown as a loading control. B. (Bottom): Box plots of protein blot densitometry for IGHM and IGLL5. *designates p-value < 0.05 for CTE II cases using ANOVA (IGHM: CTE II significant compared to control, CTE I and CTEIV; IGLL5: CTE II significant compared to control and CTE IV). CTE III cases were borderline significant for both IGHM and IGLL5 in pairwise comparison versus control
Fig. 3CTE/FTLD-MAPT TMT WGCNA modules map to AD-TMT modules and demonstrate strong overlap at the individual protein expression level. A. WGCNA module membership was compared between the CTE/FTD TMT proteomic data and recently publish AD TMT dataset. Although module color varied, many of the modules were well preserved between the two datasets. log10 (p-values) are shown in the red and blue boxes which highlight the intersection of modules with statistically significant overlap (red) or depletion (blue). B. Correlation at the protein level of log2 expression values demonstrated strong overlap between both AD and CTE IV (left) as well as AD and FTD-MAP (right). Individual proteins are plotted in their respective module colors. Correlation constants and p-values are designated within each plot. C. We calculated synthetic eigengenes within the CTE dataset for proteins from the AD dataset. 5 modules identified in Fig. 3B are shown. The vertical line on each box plot separates the two data sets (CTE eigengenes on the left, AD synthetic eigengenes on the right). Control or disease state is listed on the x-axis. Kruskal-Wallis p-values are shown for each group
Fig. 4CTE/FTLD-MAPT TMT modules are enriched with specific cell subtype proteins. We compared the CTE/FTD TMT proteome to the well-known Sharma cell subtype proteome [24]. Fisher’s exact test with Benjamini Hochberg correction was utilized. Module number and colors are shown across the bottom of the figure and cell subtype on the left. p-values are shown in the red boxes on the heat map. Darker red color indicates a stronger level of significance for a module to be enriched with a particular cell subtype from the brain
Fig. 5Cell subtype abundance demonstrated enriched glial proteins with a prominent increase of astrocyte proteins in FTLD-MAPT over that of other tauopathies. We utilized proteomic protein level data and the Sharma [24] cell type marker classification in combination with the digital sorting algorithm [26] to determine the aggregate abundance of each cell subtype. The CTE/FTD and AD TMT datasets were kept separate, with p-values (Kruskall-Wallis ANOVA) shown for each cell, however relative abundance was normalized via z-score to allow for comparison across datasets. A. Box plots of astrocyte, microglia and neuron abundances across control, CTE I-IV and FTLD-MAPT as well as control, asymptomatic AD and AD are shown. Protein blot and densitometry was performed for B. GFAP and C. HEPACAM, two astrocyte associated proteins. *designates p-value less than 0.05 (GFAP: FTD-MAPT was significant compared to control and CTE IV; HEPACAM: FTD-MAPT was significant compared to control, AD and CTE IV). As noted in A., astrocyte abundance is greatest in FTLD-MAPT and significantly higher than AD and CTE IV