Literature DB >> 34165577

Unifying Phylogenetic Birth-Death Models in Epidemiology and Macroevolution.

Ailene MacPherson1,2,3, Stilianos Louca4,5, Angela McLaughlin6,7, Jeffrey B Joy6,7,8, Matthew W Pennell1.   

Abstract

Birth-death stochastic processes are the foundations of many phylogenetic models and are widely used to make inferences about epidemiological and macroevolutionary dynamics. There are a large number of birth-death model variants that have been developed; these impose different assumptions about the temporal dynamics of the parameters and about the sampling process. As each of these variants was individually derived, it has been difficult to understand the relationships between them as well as their precise biological and mathematical assumptions. Without a common mathematical foundation, deriving new models is nontrivial. Here, we unify these models into a single framework, prove that many previously developed epidemiological and macroevolutionary models are all special cases of a more general model, and illustrate the connections between these variants. This unification includes both models where the process is the same for all lineages and those in which it varies across types. We also outline a straightforward procedure for deriving likelihood functions for arbitrarily complex birth-death(-sampling) models that will hopefully allow researchers to explore a wider array of scenarios than was previously possible. By rederiving existing single-type birth-death sampling models, we clarify and synthesize the range of explicit and implicit assumptions made by these models. [Birth-death processes; epidemiology; macroevolution; phylogenetics; statistical inference.].
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34165577      PMCID: PMC8972974          DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syab049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  64 in total

Review 1.  Rates of evolutionary change in viruses: patterns and determinants.

Authors:  Siobain Duffy; Laura A Shackelton; Edward C Holmes
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Phylogenetic inference of reciprocal effects between geographic range evolution and diversification.

Authors:  Emma E Goldberg; Lesley T Lancaster; Richard H Ree
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Getting to the root of epidemic spread with phylodynamic analysis of genomic data.

Authors:  Louis du Plessis; Tanja Stadler
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 17.079

4.  Hidden state models improve state-dependent diversification approaches, including biogeographical models.

Authors:  Daniel S Caetano; Brian C O'Meara; Jeremy M Beaulieu
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-10-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Efficient comparative phylogenetics on large trees.

Authors:  Stilianos Louca; Michael Doebeli
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Birth-death skyline plot reveals temporal changes of epidemic spread in HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV).

Authors:  Tanja Stadler; Denise Kühnert; Sebastian Bonhoeffer; Alexei J Drummond
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The spread of hepatitis C virus genotype 1a in North America: a retrospective phylogenetic study.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Joy; Rosemary M McCloskey; Thuy Nguyen; Richard H Liang; Yury Khudyakov; Andrea Olmstead; Mel Krajden; John W Ward; P Richard Harrigan; Julio S G Montaner; Art F Y Poon
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 25.071

8.  Prolonging the past counteracts the pull of the present: protracted speciation can explain observed slowdowns in diversification.

Authors:  Rampal S Etienne; James Rosindell
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 15.683

9.  Coupling adaptive molecular evolution to phylodynamics using fitness-dependent birth-death models.

Authors:  David A Rasmussen; Tanja Stadler
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Recursive algorithms for phylogenetic tree counting.

Authors:  Alexandra Gavryushkina; David Welch; Alexei J Drummond
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 1.405

View more
  5 in total

1.  Markov genealogy processes.

Authors:  Aaron A King; Qianying Lin; Edward L Ionides
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Statistical Challenges in Tracking the Evolution of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Lorenzo Cappello; Jaehee Kim; Sifan Liu; Julia A Palacios
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.015

3.  Deep learning from phylogenies to uncover the epidemiological dynamics of outbreaks.

Authors:  J Voznica; A Zhukova; V Boskova; E Saulnier; F Lemoine; M Moslonka-Lefebvre; O Gascuel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  A computationally tractable birth-death model that combines phylogenetic and epidemiological data.

Authors:  Alexander Eugene Zarebski; Louis du Plessis; Kris Varun Parag; Oliver George Pybus
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Robust Phylodynamic Analysis of Genetic Sequencing Data from Structured Populations.

Authors:  Jérémie Scire; Joëlle Barido-Sottani; Denise Kühnert; Timothy G Vaughan; Tanja Stadler
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.818

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.