| Literature DB >> 34161255 |
Jeffrey J Marlow1, Daniel Hoer2, Sean P Jungbluth3, Linda M Reynard4, Amy Gartman5, Marko S Chavez6, Mohamed Y El-Naggar6,7,8, Noreen Tuross4, Victoria J Orphan9, Peter R Girguis1.
Abstract
At marine methane seeps, vast quantities of methane move through the shallow subseafloor, where it is largely consumed by microbial communities. This process plays an important role in global methane dynamics, but we have yet to identify all of the methane sinks in the deep sea. Here, we conducted a continental-scale survey of seven geologically diverse seafloor seeps and found that carbonate rocks from all sites host methane-oxidizing microbial communities with substantial methanotrophic potential. In laboratory-based mesocosm incubations, chimney-like carbonates from the newly described Point Dume seep off the coast of Southern California exhibited the highest rates of anaerobic methane oxidation measured to date. After a thorough analysis of physicochemical, electrical, and biological factors, we attribute this substantial metabolic activity largely to higher cell density, mineral composition, kinetic parameters including an elevated Vmax, and the presence of specific microbial lineages. Our data also suggest that other features, such as electrical conductance, rock particle size, and microbial community alpha diversity, may influence a sample's methanotrophic potential, but these factors did not demonstrate clear patterns with respect to methane oxidation rates. Based on the apparent pervasiveness within seep carbonates of microbial communities capable of performing anaerobic oxidation of methane, as well as the frequent occurrence of carbonates at seeps, we suggest that rock-hosted methanotrophy may be an important contributor to marine methane consumption.Entities:
Keywords: endolith; metabolic rates; methane oxidation; methane seep
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34161255 PMCID: PMC8237665 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2006857118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.An overview of the seven sites across four distinct geological settings that were sampled in this study. All scale bars are ∼25 cm; additional geographical and ground cover context is provided for each site in .
Rates and apparent rates of AOM derived from short- and long-term incubations at atmospheric pressure and short-term incubations at high pressure (7.58 MPa)
Shaded cells indicate the samples that were subjected to triplicate, side-by-side experiments with both 14CH4 and CH3D methods; the values from 14CH4 experiments are shown, and the ratios produced by these direct comparisons of methods () were used to convert the rest of the experiments (conducted with CH3D) to 14C-equivalent “apparent” rates, which are reported here and throughout this study. All data are given at 1.1 mM methane concentration values. SD, standard deviation. All rates and SDs are reported in nanomoles per cubic centimeter per day.
Previously published AOM rates from methane seeps, mud volcanoes, and continental shelf samples
| References | Study site | AOM rates calibrated to 1.1 mM CH4 experimental conditions (nmol ⋅ cm−3 ⋅ d−1) |
| Michaelis et al. ( | Microbial Reefs, Black Sea | 3,545 |
| Treude et al. ( | Microbial Reefs, Black Sea | 3,001 |
| Treude et al. ( | Seep Sediments, Hydrate Ridge | 1,065 |
| Segarra et al. ( | Freshwater Wetlands Sediments, Coastal Georgia | 885 |
| Freshwater Wetlands Sediments, Florida Everglades | 164 | |
| Freshwater Wetlands Sediments, Maine | 248 | |
| Bowles et al. ( | Seep Sediments, Mississippi Canyon, Gulf of Mexico | 871 |
| Seep Sediments, Guaymas Basin | 653 | |
| Seep Sediments, Monterey Bay | 51 | |
| Joye et al. ( | Gas Hydrate Sediments, Green Canyon, Gulf of Mexico | 608 |
| Omoregie et al. ( | Mud Volcano Sediments, Chefren, Eastern Mediterranean Sea | 494 |
| Niemann et al. ( | Mud Volcano Sediments, Haakon Mosby, Barents Sea | 435 |
| Marlow et al. ( | Seep Sediments, Hydrate Ridge | 193.6 |
| Seep Carbonates, Hydrate Ridge | 80.9 | |
| Nauhaus et al. ( | Seep Sediments, Hydrate Ridge | 169 |
| Beal et al. ( | Seep Sediments, Eel River Basin | 110 |
| Wankel et al. ( | Brine Pool Fluids, Gulf of Mexico | 162 |
| Girguis et al. ( | Seep Sediments, Monterey Canyon | 71.6 |
This analysis includes all known “high AOM” results reporting rates >1,000 nmol ⋅ cm−3 ⋅ d−1 under initial experimental conditions. A more complete depiction of study conditions and the rate conversion process is provided in Dataset S2 and .
Fig. 2.Quantity of methane oxidized during extended laboratory-based incubation experiments. Please note the 10× shift in the y-axis scale marked by the scale break and dotted line at 50,000 nmol/cm3. Below this line, all data below 50,000 nmol/cm3 are shown with axis increments of 10,000 nmol/cm3; above this line, all data above 50,000 nmol/cm3 are shown with axis increments of 100,000 nmol/cm3. Error bars represent propagated errors from both the D/H: 14C scaling factor and, where sufficient material was available for triplicate experiments (Dataset S1), incubation SDs. Values from site-specific autoclaved control incubations were subtracted from each data point.
Fig. 3.Confocal microscopy images of an intact interior portion of sample PD R1. (Top) Rock surface. (Bottom) Fluorescence signal from hybridized Arch 915 and DSS 658 FISH probes. A range of cell–cell and cell–rock arrangements were observed, including A) mixed archaeal–SRB aggregates, B) “shell-type” aggregates in which archaeal members occupy exterior spaces and SRB members comprise the interior, and C) domain-specific communities lining rock pore spaces.
Fig. 4.Relative abundance heat map of the thirty-two 16S rRNA gene exact sequence variants (ESVs) that account for at least 5% of the relative abundance in at least one sample. Each row represents a distinct ESV, while columns correspond to the 22 rock or sediment samples (all are labeled at the bottom of the figure). Taxonomic groupings of the 32 ESVs and their closest hits via Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (or BLAST) are indicated on the left, and ESV labels are to the right, colored by putative metabolic category. Bars above the heat map indicate Faith’s phylogenetic diversity index (a measure of alpha diversity) and the AOM rate (on a log10 scale).