The oxidative cleavage of C═C double bonds with molecular oxygen to produce carbonyl compounds is an important transformation in chemical and pharmaceutical synthesis. In nature, enzymes containing the first-row transition metals, particularly heme and non-heme iron-dependent enzymes, readily activate O2 and oxidatively cleave C═C bonds with exquisite precision under ambient conditions. The reaction remains challenging for synthetic chemists, however. There are only a small number of known synthetic metal catalysts that allow for the oxidative cleavage of alkenes at an atmospheric pressure of O2, with very few known to catalyze the cleavage of nonactivated alkenes. In this work, we describe a light-driven, Mn-catalyzed protocol for the selective oxidation of alkenes to carbonyls under 1 atm of O2. For the first time, aromatic as well as various nonactivated aliphatic alkenes could be oxidized to afford ketones and aldehydes under clean, mild conditions with a first row, biorelevant metal catalyst. Moreover, the protocol shows a very good functional group tolerance. Mechanistic investigation suggests that Mn-oxo species, including an asymmetric, mixed-valent bis(μ-oxo)-Mn(III,IV) complex, are involved in the oxidation, and the solvent methanol participates in O2 activation that leads to the formation of the oxo species.
The oxidative cleavage of C═C double bonds with molecular oxygen to produce carbonyl compounds is an important transformation in chemical and pharmaceutical synthesis. In nature, enzymes containing the first-row transition metals, particularly heme and non-hemeiron-dependent enzymes, readily activate O2 and oxidatively cleave C═C bonds with exquisite precision under ambient conditions. The reaction remains challenging for syntheticchemists, however. There are only a small number of known syntheticmetalcatalysts that allow for the oxidative cleavage of alkenes at an atmospheric pressure of O2, with very few known to catalyze the cleavage of nonactivated alkenes. In this work, we describe a light-driven, Mn-catalyzed protocol for the selective oxidation of alkenes to carbonyls under 1 atm of O2. For the first time, aromatic as well as various nonactivated aliphaticalkenescould be oxidized to afford ketones and aldehydes under clean, mild conditions with a first row, biorelevant metalcatalyst. Moreover, the protocol shows a very good functional group tolerance. Mechanistic investigation suggests that Mn-oxo species, including an asymmetric, mixed-valent bis(μ-oxo)-Mn(III,IV)complex, are involved in the oxidation, and the solvent methanol participates in O2 activation that leads to the formation of the oxo species.
Alkenes are one of
the most important chemicals on which the chemical
industry is built. Apart from those that are derived from oil and
natural gas in immense quantities, alkenes are widespread in drugs,
natural products, polymers, and countless organicchemicals.[1] The C=C double bonds thus provide a ubiquitous
functionality for accessing bespoke chemicals. In this context, oxidative
cleavage of C=C double bonds to the corresponding carbonyls
is of particular interest, as ketones and aldehydes are one of the
few most often used functionalities in organic synthesis.[1a] Indeed, oxidative cleavage of alkenes has been
practiced for over a century in research laboratories and on various
industrial scales.[2] The standard method
for the direct oxidative cleavage of alkenes is ozonolysis (Scheme a),[3] which is widely performed by the pharmaceutical and fine
chemical industries.[4] However, the use
of ozone as oxidant is associated with intrinsic safety issues, the
need for specialty equipment, and generation of over stoichiometric
amounts of waste.[5] Alternative oxidants,
such as m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid, PhIO/HBF4, KMnO4, CrO2Cl2, RuO4, and OsO4, are well-known to selectively transform
alkenes into carbonyls,[2b,6] but they are expensive
and/or toxic, while creating waste (Scheme b).
Scheme 1
Methods for the Oxidative Cleavage
of Alkenes and Schematic Showing
of a Visible-Light-Driven Dioxygen-Activation Strategy for the Reaction
of O2 with a Metal Catalyst
In response to the mounting environmental and safety issues, the
past four decades have witnessed the study of numerous transition
metalcatalysts for oxidative cleavage of alkenes (Schemec,d).[2c,6,7] More recently, organo- and photocatalytic
methods have been put forward.[7a,8] Although various mild
oxidants have been examined, the use of O2 remains of utmost
interest, as it is the most easily available, least expensive, and
cleanest oxidant. Pleasingly, a number of the reported methods now
allow O2 to be used as the oxidant under various conditions.[7a,9] Notwithstanding the progress made, almost all the methods reported
so far can only deal with activated alkenes, such as styrene and derivatives. In particular, until now, there appear to be no known catalysts that
can be used to cleave the more spread, nonactivated aliphaticalkenes
by using atmosphericO2, while showing
a substrate scope of potential for organic synthesis. To
the best of our knowledge, there are only three reports in the literature
that describe the oxidative cleavage of a few nonactivated aliphaticalkenes with O2, two of which necessitated 3–5 equiv
of reductant (Mn and Co catalysts) while the third relied on a Pdcatalyst with harsh conditions (2% Pd, 8 atm O2, 100 °C,
24 h).[10] In addition to the chemical methods,
enzymatic methods have been explored;[6b] however, they are limited by substrate specificity (Scheme e). Following on from our recent
study of aerobiccleavage of styrene derivatives with molecular iron
and coppercatalysts,[9a,11] herein, we report that the merger of a non-heme Mn(II)catalyst with visible light enables
the oxidative cleavage of both aromatic and aliphaticalkenes under
1 atm of O2at room temperature (Scheme ).Being one of the most abundant, inexpensive, and environmentally
friendly metals on earth, manganese has been extensively studied for
biomimeticO2 activation in the past four decades or so.[12] The combination of a base metalcatalyst with
O2 would provide an ideal “oxygenase-like”
synthetic protocol for oxidative cleavage of alkenes. However, “despite
O2 activation at Fe or Mn being a prominent target for
more than 40 years, there are still relatively few complexes that
activate O2 in a rationally designed and controlled manner”
and particularly, the use of benign and inexpensive O2 for
selective oxidation with the biologically relevant Mn remains “a
significant challenge for the syntheticchemist.”[12b] This may be partly due to the different oxidation
potentials required for oxidizing a substrate versus activation of
O2.Photoirradiation has been explored to tune the
redox potential
of metalcatalysts.[13] Bearing in mind the
remarkable property of a photoexcited catalyst being both more oxidizing
and more reducing than its ground state, we envisaged a visible-light-driven
dioxygen activation strategy for the oxidative cleavage of alkenes
with metalcatalysts (Scheme ). First, a molecular metalcatalyst is excited by visible
light to alter its redox potential. The more reducing excited state
could then activate O2 to afford a more-oxidizing high-valent
metal–oxygen species, which could react with an alkene, leading
to its oxidation. In pioneering studies by Goldberg et al., light
has been shown to promote catalyticC–H oxidation with Mn(III)complexes.[12b,14]
Results and Discussion
Reaction
Development
We set out to examine the oxidation
of an aliphaticalkene, N-methoxy-N,5-dimethylhex-5-enamide (1a) (Scheme ). To produce activated oxygen species from
O2 that can cleave the C=C double bond, a range
of open-shell transition-metalcomplexes and metal salts in combination
with polydentate nitrogen ligands were examined (Table S1 in the Supporting Information). Delightfully, when the
reaction was performed with Mn(OTf)2 and 2,2′-bipyridine
type ligands under blue light irradiation (470 nm, 9 W) in MeOH at
20 °C, the desired product 1, resulting from the
C=C double bond cleavage, was obtained (Table S1, entries 1–12). Screening of ligands revealed
4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-dipyridine
(dtbpy) to be most effective, affording 1 in 32% yield
(Table S1, entry 6). However, its combination
with other metal salts, such as Cu(OTf)2, Fe(OTf)2, and CoCl2, was ineffective, affording no target product
(Table S1, entries 13–15). Notably,
methanol as solvent is critical; no conversion of 1a was
observed when 1,2-dichloroethane, tetrahydrofuran, benzene, ethanol,
isopropanol, or acetonitrile was utilized (Table S1, entries 16–21). Further optimization shows that
a mixture of MeOH and 1,1,1-trifluoroethane (TFE) (1:1 volume) is
optimal, boosting the yield of 1 to 62% (Table S1, entry 22). Note that blue light is
essential for the oxidation, without which the chemistry could not
proceed even at 70 °C (Table S1, entries
25 and 26; also see Figure S12).
Scheme 2
Optimized
Conditions for the Oxidative Cleavage of 1a by O2 and the X-ray Structure of [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2]
See the Supporting Information for details of optimization.
Optimized
Conditions for the Oxidative Cleavage of 1a by O2 and the X-ray Structure of [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2]
See the Supporting Information for details of optimization.The structure of the manganesecomplex [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2], resulting from the reaction of Mn(OTf)2 with
the dtbpy ligand, has been determined by X-ray diffraction (Scheme and Scheme S1). The complex shows a somewhat distorted
octahedral geometry with expected Mn–N bond distances (Tables S7 and S8). It is worth noting that the
isolated [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] displayed a similar
activity as that prepared in situ (Table S1, entries 22 and 23), indicating that it is formed in the in situ reaction. Our subsequent investigation was centered
around using [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] (2 mol %) as
catalyst and O2 (1 atm) as oxidant in MeOH/TFE (1:1) with
continuous blue light irradiation at room temperature.
Scope of Reaction
To demonstrate the generality of
this photo-Mn catalytic system, we first examined a series of nonactivated
1,1-disubstituted aliphatic alkenes. As is shown in Scheme , a wide variety of such olefins
were selectively converted to the corresponding ketones. Thus, aliphaticalkenes bearing amide, ester, or amino acid functionalities are all
suitable, affording the desired products in moderate yields (1–10). Dipeptide, urea, or glucose-containing
alkenescould be oxidized selectively as well (11–13), showing potential applications in bioconjugate chemistry.
Olefins with a synthetically important carbonyl functionality could
be tolerated (14–17), and meanwhile,
olefins without other functional groups were also oxidatively cleaved
to furnish ketone products in good yields (18–21 and 23). However, 3-fluoro-2-methyltridec-1-ene,
in which the C=C double is deactivated by an adjacent electron-withdrawing
fluorine group, could not afford any cleavage product (22), highlighting the sensitivity of the catalyst to substrate electronic
effect. In contrast, the electron-withdrawing, but well-separated,
bromide did not stop the formation of ketone 25. The
presence of halogen substituents in the oxidation products, such as
chloride in 24 and bromide in 25, makes
the ketone products more versatile in further applications. Still
worth noting is that the oxidation-susceptible benzylicC–H
bond (viz. 23, 24 and below) remained intact
during the oxidation, showing the protocol to be chemoselective. The
catalysis thus makes 1,1-disubstitued C=C bonds an easily accessible
latent carbonyl functionality.
Scheme 3
Oxidation of 1,1-Disubstituted Alkenes
All the reactions were performed
with alkene (0.5 mmol), [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] (2
mol %), in MeOH/TFE (1:1, 2 mL) with blue light irradiation (9 W,
470 nm) at 20 °C under O2 (1 atm) for 12 h. Isolated
yields are given.
1 mL of
EtOAc was added.
Starting
material was fully recovered.
Oxidation of 1,1-Disubstituted Alkenes
All the reactions were performed
with alkene (0.5 mmol), [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] (2
mol %), in MeOH/TFE (1:1, 2 mL) with blue light irradiation (9 W,
470 nm) at 20 °C under O2 (1 atm) for 12 h. Isolated
yields are given.1 mL of
EtOAc was added.Starting
material was fully recovered.As maybe expected,
this photo-Mn enabled protocol is well suited
for activated alkenes. Thus, as is seen in Scheme , styrene and related derivatives were oxidatively
cleaved to yield carbonyl compounds in a highly selective manner and
good to excellent yields. Moreover, it shows an excellent functional
group compatibility, with halogen, nitro, ester, acid, cyclopropyl,
alkynyl, pyridine, and boronic ester units all tolerated (26–48). Both benzylic and tertiary C–H bonds,
which are prone to oxidation, were also tolerated during the oxidation
(42, 44–46), adding
more support to the high chemoselectivity mentioned above. A gram-scale
oxidative cleavage was also demonstrated. Under the standard conditions
but with 0.01% mol (0.9 mg) of catalyst, α-methylstyrene (1.18
g, 10 mmol) was oxidized to ketone 26 with a turnover
number of 4000 in 12 h (Scheme S2). It
is noted that this new strategy allows for milder reaction conditions
in comparison with the previously reported Fe- and organo-catalytic
methods,[8b,8d,9a,9b] and shows improved compatibility with electron-withdrawing
groups in comparison with the photocatalytic method developed by Wang
et al.[8c]The oxidation was then extended
to monosubstituted, internal disubstituted,
trisubstituted, and tetrasubstituted alkenes as well as dialkenes.
As shown in Table , a diverse range of such alkenescan be oxidized to afford the corresponding
carbonyls or their methanol-protected form, dimethyl acetals. Thus,
the unsaturated fatty acid derivative 49 was cleaved
into an aldehyde, which was in situ converted into
the acetal 50. Cyclooctene 51 gave rise
to two isolable, valuable oxidation products 52 and 53 in 41% overall yield, the former of which is likely to
result from the oxidation of the initially formed aldehyde. Worth
noting is that the formation of the epoxide 53 may indicate
the involvement of a high valent Mn–oxo species during the
oxidation.[15] The C=C double bonds
of trisubstituted alkenes, such as those in 54, 56, and 58, were all oxidized, affording carbonyl
products and derivatives. For instance, the cleavage of 58 led to benzophenone 38 and the overoxidation product
of benzaldehyde, methyl benzoate 57, in good yield (see
the Supporting Information for details).
The viability of the protocol in oxidatively cleaving tetrasubstituted
alkenes is seen in the examples of 59, 61, and 62, the isolated products being the ketones of
higher molecular weight in the case of 59 and 61. Note that the cyclopentene 62 underwent ring-opening,
affording the diketone 16. Interestingly, dialkenes are
also viable for this transformation, with both the C=C double
bonds selectively oxidized to afford the corresponding dicarbonylcompounds in good yields (63–65 and 67).
Table 1
Oxidation of Mono-, Di-, Tri-, and
Tetrasubstituted Alkenes and Dialkenesa
All the
reactions were performed
with alkene (0.5 mmol), [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] (2
mol %), in MeOH/TFE (1:1, 2 mL) with blue light (9 W, 470 nm) at 20
°C under O2 (1 atm) overnight. Isolated yields are
given.
The yield was obtained
by 1H NMR analysis with mesitylene as internal standard.
All the
reactions were performed
with alkene (0.5 mmol), [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] (2
mol %), in MeOH/TFE (1:1, 2 mL) with blue light (9 W, 470 nm) at 20
°C under O2 (1 atm) overnight. Isolated yields are
given.The yield was obtained
by 1HNMR analysis with mesitylene as internal standard.To further demonstrate the
practical applicability of this photo-Mn
protocol in aerobic oxidation of C=C double bonds, we attempted
the oxidative cleavage of a wide range of natural products and their
derivatives. As shown in Table , terpenescould be selectively oxidized into terpenoids,
which are interesting chemical intermediates for fragrance (70 and 72). The nopinone 70, produced
industrially from ozonolysis of 69, has been used to
synthesize Nabilone,[16] a syntheticcannabinoid
used to treat nausea and vomiting during cancer treatment, and the
prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) receptor antagonist
S-5751.[17] However, a detailed safety study
of the industrial ozonolysis has revealed the high risk of explosion
and a runaway reaction in this multistep process (−57, −27,
0, and finally 25 °C).[17] (+)-Nootkatone 73, a sesquiterpene ketone from the heartwood of yellow cedar,
was cleaved to afford the corresponding methyl ketone in good yield.
Interestingly, although there are two C=C double bonds in the
structure of (+)-Nootkatone, only the electron-rich exo double bond was selectively oxidized. The α-cyperone derivative 75 and the 20-methylpregna-4,20-diene-3,6-dione 77, which are active pharmaceutical ingredients, underwent oxidative
cleavage to give the desired product 76 and 78 in a highly chemoselective manner. Vitamin K1could also be oxidized
efficiently, affording the valuable hexahydrofarnesyl acetone 80, a member of sesquiterpenoids and used in jasminecompositions.[18] These reactions and those above are often accompanied
by some side products (for examples, see the Supporting Information).
Table 2
Oxidation of Natural
Products or Their
Derivativesa
All the reactions
were performed
with alkene (0.5 mmol), [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] (2
mol %), in MeOH/TFE (1:1, 2 mL) with blue light (9 W, 470 nm) at 20
°C under O2 (1 atm) overnight. Isolated yields are
given.
All the reactions
were performed
with alkene (0.5 mmol), [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] (2
mol %), in MeOH/TFE (1:1, 2 mL) with blue light (9 W, 470 nm) at 20
°C under O2 (1 atm) overnight. Isolated yields are
given.
Mechanistic Possibilities
While the detailed mechanism
of the oxidation remains largely unclear, we have performed a range
of experiments, aiming to shed light on possible reaction pathways.
As reactions between olefins and singlet oxygen (1O2), which can be generated from O2, light, and a
photosensitizer, are well-known to give oxidative cleavage products,[19] we thought that it is important to first determine
whether 1O2 plays a role in the photo-Mn enabled
oxidative cleavage. The 1O2 trap 9,10-diphenylanthracene
(DPA) is known to react rapidly with 1O2 to
give an endoperoxide product (k ≈ 1.3 ×
106 M–1 s–1).[20] When α-methylstyrene was subjected to
the standard oxidation conditions but in the presence of DPA as a 1O2 trap, no endoperoxide was detected, and importantly,
the expected cleavage product acetophenone 26 was formed
in 70% yield (Scheme S3). In addition,
when four well-known photosensitizers, eosin Y disodium salt, [Ru(bpy)3·6H2O], [Ir(dFppy)3], and Rose
Bengal, which are all known to be capable of producing 1O2 under blue light irradiation,[21] were used individually as replacement catalyst for the oxidative
cleavage of 1a, none were found to catalyze the reaction
(Table S3). These observations indicate
that the photo-Mn promoted oxidative cleavage of alkenes does not
involve catalytic formation of 1O2.Bearing
in mind that the oxidative catalysis in question likely involves high-valent
Mn–oxygen species, we then followed the photopromoted Mn activation
of O2 by UV–vis spectroscopy. As shown in Figure A, when the [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2]complex was exposed to O2 under
the irradiation of blue light for 1 h, a new absorption band at ∼537
nm appeared, indicative of the formation of a new Mn–oxygen
species.[22] In line with this conjecture,
a color change from pale-yellow to greenish-brown was observed. Notably,
both blue light and O2 are essential for the formation
of this species; in the absence of either one, the complex remained
unchanged. To help assign the photoinduced absorption, a well-studied
oxidant, PhIO, was reacted with [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] in the dark under N2 (room temperature, MeOH solvent).
Compared with the oxidation using O2, the reaction with
the stronger oxidant PhIO was immediate, resulting in the same greenish-brown
solution. As can be seen, an identical absorption band at 537 nm was
observed (Figure A,
red line), suggesting that the two conditions lead to the same Mn–oxygen
species.
Figure 1
(A) UV–vis spectra of [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] with or without oxidants and of bis-μ-O2-Mn2 complex (0.25 mM, in MeOH). (B) X-ray structure of the bis-μ-O2-Mn2 complex (for details, see Figure S7 and section
9.2 in the Supporting Information). (C)
HRMS spectrum of the bis-μ-O2-Mn2 complex
formed in the in situ reaction of [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] with O2. (D) Kinetic behavior
of the oxidation of α-methylstyrene catalyzed by [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] and bis-μ-O2-Mn2. (E) Perpendicular mode, CW-EPR spectra of the bis-μ-O2-Mn2 dimer (black trace) dissolved in cold (208
K) MeOH, followed by irradiation with blue light under air for 40
min (red trace), 5 min (blue), and 10 min (magenta) at the specified
temperatures. The left-hand panel shows the zoomed-in geff = 10 and geff = 4–6
regions of the spectra in the right-hand panel. Conditions: MW power
10 dB, MA 5G, time constant 82 ms, conversion time 10 ms, sweep time
120 s, receiver gain 30 dB, average microwave frequency 9.385 GHz,
temperature 20 K.
(A) UV–vis spectra of [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] with or without oxidants and of bis-μ-O2-Mn2complex (0.25 mM, in MeOH). (B) X-ray structure of the bis-μ-O2-Mn2complex (for details, see Figure S7 and section
9.2 in the Supporting Information). (C)
HRMS spectrum of the bis-μ-O2-Mn2complex
formed in the in situ reaction of [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] with O2. (D) Kinetic behavior
of the oxidation of α-methylstyrenecatalyzed by [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] and bis-μ-O2-Mn2. (E) Perpendicular mode, CW-EPR spectra of the bis-μ-O2-Mn2 dimer (black trace) dissolved in cold (208
K) MeOH, followed by irradiation with blue light under air for 40
min (red trace), 5 min (blue), and 10 min (magenta) at the specified
temperatures. The left-hand panel shows the zoomed-in geff = 10 and geff = 4–6
regions of the spectra in the right-hand panel. Conditions: MW power
10 dB, MA 5G, time constant 82 ms, conversion time 10 ms, sweep time
120 s, receiver gain 30 dB, average microwave frequency 9.385 GHz,
temperature 20 K.Delightfully, we were
able to isolate the Mn–oxygen species
and determine its structure by X-ray diffraction. As is shown in Figure B, it is a mixed-valent
oxo-bridged binuclear Mn(III,IV)complex, [Mn(dtbpy)2(μ-O)2Mn(dtbpy)(MeOH)2](OTf)3 (bis-μ-O2-Mn2). Unlike common bis-μ-oxo Mn(III,IV)
dimers, the complex features two asymmetricmetalcenters in significantly
different environments, with one ligated by two dtbpy ligands while
the other by only one. The former is likely to be Mn(IV) and the latter
Mn(III), judging from the Mn–O and Mn–N bond distances.[23] Most revealing is that the isolated complex
shows a clear UV–vis absorption band at 537 nm (Figure A, black line), suggesting
that the same oxo-bridged species is formed when [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] is irradiated under O2 or reacted with
PhIO under N2, albeit with differing concentrations. HRMS
analysis also indicates that these two different reactions give rise
to the same Mn(III,IV) dimer (Figure S8). Figure C shows
the experimental and calculated mass spectrum of the molecular ion
resulting from the loss of a HOTf and a –OTf fragment
from the parent dimer.Furthermore, the methanol solutions of
bis-μ-O2-Mn2 before and after blue light
irradiation were monitored
by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. As shown in Figure S13, the methanol solution of bis-μ-O2-Mn2 gives a complex multiline spectrum, which
is consistent with the S = 1/2 ground state of the
antiferromagnetically coupled Mn(III/IV) dimer.[24] Notably, at room temperature, the Mn(III/IV) dimer partially
decomposes to Mn(II), which could be further oxidized to the dimer
by air under irradiation, and we see clear signatures of Mn(III) in
parallel mode EPR spectra (Figure S14).
Significantly, irradiating the MeOH-dissolved Mn(III/IV) dimer with
blue light increases the intensity of a signal in the geff = 4 region, with a noticeable enhancement of hyperfine
structure (ca. 90 G), along with the development of a pronounced shoulder
at ca. 1000 G, while the multiline structure in the g = 2 region is lost (Figure E). This could be consistent with generation of high-valent
species from the Mn(III/IV) dimer. We see clear evidence of Mn(III),
and although inconclusive, a Mn(IV) monomer (S =
3/2) with large zero-field splitting would be expected to give signals
in the geff = 4–6 region: similar
signals have previously been assigned to Mn(IV).[25]The time course of the oxidation of a model substrate
α-methylstyrene 26a reveals additional insight.
As shown in Figure D, when the model reaction
was performed by using [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] under
the standard conditions, a clear induction period of ca. 40 min was
observed (green line). However, when the oxidation was performed with
bis-μ-O2-Mn2 as catalyst, the induction
period disappeared, and a zero-order kinetic profile on the substrate
was observed at least up to 60% conversion. Notably, when the Mn–oxygen
species generated from PhIO was employed as the catalyst, the induction
period largely disappeared as well (Figure S9). These observations point to that under the catalyticconditions
the precatalyst [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] is first
converted by O2 into the bis-μ-O2-Mn2complex in an induction period. We suspect that the oxo dimer
is, however, catalytically inactive;[26] under
continuous irradiation, it may undergo rate-determining photolysis
to a monomericMn-oxo species that starts the catalytic turnover,[27] leading to the zero-order kinetics. Indeed,
when the bis-μ-O2-Mn2complex was used
as catalyst for the aerobic oxidation of 26a, light was
still required; in its omission, the oxidation stalled (Scheme S4). This monomericoxo species could
be the high-valent species detected by the EPR.Because MeOH
is critical for this aerobic oxidation reaction, we
suspected that it might be involved in the O2 activation
that leads to the formation of the bis-μ-O2-Mn2complex. To gain insight into the possible role of MeOH,
the kinetic isotope effect was examined in the oxidative cleavage
of 26a. As is shown in Figure S10, CH3OH and CH3OD gave the same introduction
period and same rate of 26a oxidation. On the other hand,
CD3OD afforded an induction period shorter by ca. 10 min
but a similar rate of oxidizing 26a. This somewhat surprising
inverse kinetic isotope effect indicates that, apart from coordination
to the metalcenter (Figure B), MeOH participates in the photoassisted oxidation of [Mn(dtbpy)2(OTf)2] by O2 to give the dioxo–Mn(III,IV)
dimer, presumably by acting as an electron donor; however, the cleavage
of C–H and O–H bond of MeOH is not the rate-determining
step of its formation.Based on the above results and literature
precedents, a putative
mechanism for the oxidative cleavage is tentatively suggested (Scheme ). As illustrated
for a 1,1-disubstituted alkene, the Mn(II)catalyst is first excited
by blue light to afford a more active Mn(II) intermediate A, which reacts with O2 to form a Mn(III)–superoxo
species B.[12b,28] Hydrogen abstraction
by B from methanol, presumably coordinated to Mn(III),
gives rise to an intermediate C, which then transfers
to the Mn(IV)–oxo D with release of formaldehyde
(was detected by GC-MS, see Figure S17)
and water.[28c] While catalytically active,
the monomeric D may easily transfer to the more stable,
observable bis-μ-O2-Mn2complex. Under
the blue light irradiation, the oxo dimer dissociates, presumably
reversibly, to D and a Mn(III) species. Having a radical
character, D adds to the alkene to produce a new radical
species E, which would be active toward O2, forming a six-membered metal–peroxo species F. The unstable species F would rapidly decompose to
form the ketone product and formaldehyde while regenerating D. In the whole catalytic reaction, bis-μ-O2-Mn2 is an off-cycle species. Its formation via C and D involves the participation of methanol
as an electron and hydrogen donor, and the inverse kinetic isotope
effect when using CD3OD may have several origins.[29] Continuous irradiation is necessary, as the
active species D could undergo dimerization with off-cycle
Mn(III) species to re-form the oxo dimer. A similar mechanistic pathway
is seen in the work of Bruice on oxidative cleavage of C=C
double bonds by a Mn(IV)=O porphyrincomplex.[15c]
Scheme 4
A Putative Mechanism for the Photo-Mn Promoted Oxidative
Cleavage
of Alkenes
Additional support for the
mechanism is found in the 16O2–18O2 tracer experiments.
As shown in Scheme S6, when the alkene 62 was oxidized with pure 16O2 or 18O2, only 16O- or 18O-labeled
cleavage product was observed; however, when a mixture of 16O2–18O2 was used, all statistically
possible products were formed. The formation of the statistical mixture
is consistent with what is expected from the mechanism; that is, the
two oxygen atoms in the product 16 originate from two
different O2 molecules, while ruling out a pathway where
the cleavage product results from an dioxetane intermediate.[9a]
Conclusions
In summary, a non-hemeMn(II)-catalyzed aerobiccleavage of activated
as well as nonactivated C=C double bonds has been established
for the first time. Both aliphatic and aromaticalkenescould be oxidized
with this “oxygenase-like” protocol, affording synthetically
versatile carbonyl compounds from widespread olefins. The oxidation
proceeds under an atmosphericO2 pressure at room temperature,
providing an atom-economic, environment- and user-friendly approach
for oxidative cleavage of alkenes. Mechanistic investigations indicate
that an asymmetric, mixed-valent bis(μ-oxo)dimanganese(III,IV)complex is formed as a key but off-cycle intermediate in the catalysis.
Notably, blue light irradiation of the precatalyst and participation
of MeOH are all key elements in the activation of O2 and
formation of the oxo dimer, and light is necessary to generate the
active Mn(IV)=O species and sustain catalytic turnover.
Authors: Heather M Neu; Jieun Jung; Regina A Baglia; Maxime A Siegler; Kei Ohkubo; Shunichi Fukuzumi; David P Goldberg Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Zhiliang Huang; Muralidharan Shanmugam; Zhao Liu; Adam Brookfield; Elliot L Bennett; Renpeng Guan; David E Vega Herrera; Jose A Lopez-Sanchez; Anna G Slater; Eric J L McInnes; Xiaotian Qi; Jianliang Xiao Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 16.383