Literature DB >> 34160047

Midterm results of stand-alone thoracoscopic epicardial ablation with box lesion for atrial fibrillation.

Chunyu Yu1, Haojie Li1,2, Heng Zhang1,2, Zhe Zheng1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The short-term results of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical ablation (VTSA) with box lesion have been highly variable, and the actual efficacy requires clarification through longer follow-ups. We aimed to report which patients might benefit more from VTSA with box lesion by longer follow-up.
METHODS: From September 2010 to November 2016, patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent VTSA with box lesion were screened. All enrolled patients visited the outpatient clinic and underwent 24-h Holter monitoring at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery and annually thereafter.
RESULTS: A total of 91 consecutive patients [age, 58.0 (interquartile interval from 52.0 to 62.0) years; male, 71.4%] with paroxysmal (67%) or persistent/long-standing persistent (33%) AF were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 48 months (interquartile interval from 36 to 60 months), freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) was 76.5%, 66.0% and 66.0% for paroxysmal AF and 58.6%, 47.8% and 34.2% for persistent/long-standing persistent AF at 12, 36 and 60 months, respectively (P = 0.017). The preoperative left atrial diameter >40 mm (hazard ratio: 2.837, 95% confidence interval: 1.408-5.716; P = 0.004) and age >50 years (hazard ratio: 2.927, 95% confidence interval: 1.359-6.305; P = 0.006) were associated with recurrences of atrial tachyarrhythmias. In patients with paroxysmal AF and left atrial diameter ≤40 mm (n = 43), freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias without AADs was 81.4%, 74.3% and 74.3% at 12, 36 and 60 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with paroxysmal AF and left atrial diameter ≤40 mm, 5-year freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias without AADs was 74.3%, which was better than that in patients with left atrial diameter >40 mm. A larger sample size and improved study design are needed to confirm our conclusions.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Box lesion; Surgical ablation; Thoracoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34160047      PMCID: PMC8691709          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivab148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  29 in total

1.  Thoracoscopic radiofrequency ablation for lone atrial fibrillation: box-lesion technique.

Authors:  Marek Pojar; Jan Vojacek; Ludek Haman; Petr Parizek; Nedal Omran; Martin Vobornik; Jan Harrer
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 1.620

2.  Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence.

Authors:  Yoko Miyasaka; Marion E Barnes; Bernard J Gersh; Stephen S Cha; Kent R Bailey; Walter P Abhayaratna; James B Seward; Teresa S M Tsang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Expert consensus guidelines: Examining surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Niv Ad; Ralph J Damiano; Vinay Badhwar; Hugh Calkins; Mark La Meir; Takashi Nitta; Nicolas Doll; Sari D Holmes; Ali A Weinstein; Marc Gillinov
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Preprocedural predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein antrum isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: long-term follow-up results.

Authors:  Shinsuke Miyazaki; Taishi Kuwahara; Atsushi Kobori; Yoshihide Takahashi; Asumi Takei; Akira Sato; Mitsuaki Isobe; Atsushi Takahashi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-01-14

5.  Single-ring posterior left atrial (box) isolation results in a different mode of recurrence compared with wide antral pulmonary vein isolation on long-term follow-up: longer atrial fibrillation-free survival time but similar survival time free of any atrial arrhythmia.

Authors:  Toon Wei Lim; Choon Hiang Koay; Valerie A See; Rebecca McCall; William Chik; Robert Zecchin; Karen Byth; Swee-Chong Seow; Liza Thomas; David L Ross; Stuart P Thomas
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-09-12

Review 6.  Atrial fibrillation: current knowledge and future directions in epidemiology and genomics.

Authors:  Jared W Magnani; Michiel Rienstra; Honghuang Lin; Moritz F Sinner; Steven A Lubitz; David D McManus; Josée Dupuis; Patrick T Ellinor; Emelia J Benjamin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation versus surgical ablation treatment (FAST): a 2-center randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Lucas V A Boersma; Manuel Castella; Wimjan van Boven; Antonio Berruezo; Alaaddin Yilmaz; Mercedes Nadal; Elena Sandoval; Naiara Calvo; Josep Brugada; Johannes Kelder; Maurits Wijffels; Lluís Mont
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Nonpulmonary vein foci: do they exist?

Authors:  Dipen Shah; Michel Haissaguerre; Pierre Jais; Meleze Hocini
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Predictive factors of sustained sinus rhythm and recurrent atrial fibrillation after a radiofrequency modified Maze procedure.

Authors:  Willem P Beukema; Hauw T Sie; Anand R Ramdat Misier; Peter Paul Delnoy; Hein J J Wellens; Arif Elvan
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Totally thoracoscopic left atrial Maze: standardized, effective and safe.

Authors:  Guillaume S C Geuzebroek; Mohamed Bentala; Sander G Molhoek; Johannes C Kelder; Jeroen Schaap; Bart P Van Putte
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-12-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.