Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most prevalent renal malignant cancer, whose survival rate and quality of life of patients are still not satisfactory. Nevertheless, the TNM staging system currently used in clinical cannot make accurate survival predictions and precise treatment decisions for ccRCC patients. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more reliable biomarkers to identify high-risk subgroups of ccRCC patients to guide timely intervention and treatment. Recently, MiRNAs have been shown to be closely related to the procession of a variety of tumors, and they have high stability in various tissues, which makes them suggested to have the potential as a prognostic biomarker of ccRCC. In this study, by analyzing and processing the miRNAs expression profile of ccRCC patients from the TCGA database, we finally constructed an excellent miRNAs signature and verified it through a variety of methods. In order to build a more accurate and reliable clinical predictive model, we integrated the miRNAs signature with other prognostic-related clinical parameters to construct a nomogram. Functional enrichment analysis showed that miRNAs in the signature may regulate the genes involved in the Hippo signaling pathway, Tight junction, and Wnt signaling pathway to cause different prognoses of ccRCC patients, which may provide a reference for subsequent basic research and targeted therapy. To conclude, our study constructed a useful miRNAs signature, which allows the prognosis stratification for ccRCC patients and thereby guides the timely and effective interventions on high-risk patients. At the same time, this study also found the potential biological pathways involved in the procession of ccRCC.
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most prevalent renal malignant cancer, whose survival rate and quality of life of patients are still not satisfactory. Nevertheless, the TNM staging system currently used in clinical cannot make accurate survival predictions and precise treatment decisions for ccRCC patients. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more reliable biomarkers to identify high-risk subgroups of ccRCC patients to guide timely intervention and treatment. Recently, MiRNAs have been shown to be closely related to the procession of a variety of tumors, and they have high stability in various tissues, which makes them suggested to have the potential as a prognostic biomarker of ccRCC. In this study, by analyzing and processing the miRNAs expression profile of ccRCC patients from the TCGA database, we finally constructed an excellent miRNAs signature and verified it through a variety of methods. In order to build a more accurate and reliable clinical predictive model, we integrated the miRNAs signature with other prognostic-related clinical parameters to construct a nomogram. Functional enrichment analysis showed that miRNAs in the signature may regulate the genes involved in the Hippo signaling pathway, Tight junction, and Wnt signaling pathway to cause different prognoses of ccRCC patients, which may provide a reference for subsequent basic research and targeted therapy. To conclude, our study constructed a useful miRNAs signature, which allows the prognosis stratification for ccRCC patients and thereby guides the timely and effective interventions on high-risk patients. At the same time, this study also found the potential biological pathways involved in the procession of ccRCC.
Renal carcinoma is one of the most common malignant tumors of the urinary system. In
2020, there were more than 73000 new cases and 14000 new deaths of renal carcinoma
in the United States.
According to statistics, around one-third of patients with renal carcinoma
present local or distant metastasis. Besides, for local renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
patients who have undergone nephrectomy, approximately one quarter of them have
distant relapses.
RCC is the most common type of renal cancer, accounting for more than 90%,
and the morbidity of RCC is steadily increasing every year.
The pathological type of RCC consists of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
(ccRCC), papillary adenocarcinoma, chromophobe cell carcinoma, Xp11.2 translocation
RCC, and unclassified RCC, etc.
They all originate from renal tubular epithelial cells, but there are highly
heterogeneous in biological characteristics and response to treatment between
different histological subtypes.
The most common histological subtype of RCC is ccRCC (about 70%-80%), which
is highly aggressive and has a poor prognosis.
Identification of the patients with poor prognosis early is of great help for
timely and accurate clinical intervention and treatment. Unfortunately, there is
currently a lack of specific biomarkers for screening such patients. Thus, it is
very imperative to explore the prognosis-related specific biomarkers of ccRCC
patients and develop novel treatments for this fatal disease to improve its
prognosis.MiRNAs are a class of short, single-stranded non-coding RNAs, composed of about 22
nucleotides, which negatively regulate gene expression by mediating mRNAs
degradation or inhibiting their translation.
Recently, a large number of studies have confirmed that miRNAs are involved
in the growth, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and the regulation of tumor
microenvironment in various tumors.
Besides, some miRNAs have been shown to hold the potential value for
diagnosis and prognosis of a variety of tumors.
A study that a 17-miRNA signature could effectively classify the ccRCC
tissues and the adjacent normal tissues, and further research has found that the
decreased expression of miR-204-5p and miR-139-5p was associated with an increased
risk of recurrence in ccRCC patients.
Meng et al found that the up-regulation of miR-125b-2-3p is
closely related to lymphatic invasion, distant metastasis and poor survival of ccRCC patients.
Additionally, as for ccRCC patients, the high expression of miR-210-3p,
miR-210, miR-146a-5p, miR-141 and the low expression of miR-194, miR-124-3p,
miR-30a-5p are also found to be associated with the poor prognosis.
However, studies on miRNAs as biomarkers to predict the prognosis of ccRCC
are still not enough. The diagnostic ability of most miRNAs signatures are not ideal
and have not been applied in clinical practice. Therefore, finding and constructing
a more accurate and effective miRNAs signature with prognostic value of ccRCC is of
great clinical significance.Herein, we first downloaded the miRNAs expression data and corresponding clinical
information of ccRCC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas database (TCGA) database.
After differential expression analysis, univariate Cox regression, Least Absolute
Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis, and multivariate Cox
regression analysis, 5 miRNAs with optimal prognostic value were screened out. Then,
we constructed a 5-miRNA signature and validated the prognostic ability of our model
by multiple methods. To build a more accurate and reliable clinical predictive
model, we integrated the miRNAs signature and other prognosis-related clinical
parameters to construct a nomogram. Finally, in order to explore the potential
biological processes related to prognosis, we performed functional enrichment
analysis on the downstream target genes of the 5 miRNAs. The result indicated that
Hippo signaling pathway, Tight junction, and Wnt signaling pathway may be related to
the differential prognosis of ccRCC patients.
Methods
Data Sources and Screening of Differentially Expressed miRNAs
Firstly, the expression data of miRNAs and the corresponding clinical information
of ccRCC patients in the Kidney Clear Cell Carcinoma (KIRC) subset of TCGA
(http://tcga.cancer.gov) database were downloaded for analysis.
These expression data were obtained from the sequencing results of 545 tumor
tissues and 71 adjacent non-tumor tissues. Then, we excluded the patients
without complete clinical information and the characteristics of the rest ccRCC
patients were shown in Table S1. Finally, the differentially expressed miRNAs
(DE-miRNAs) between tumor tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues were identified
using the “edgeR” package in R software with |log2FC|>1 and
adjusted P < 0.05.
Identify a Potential Prognosis-Related miRNAs Signature
We randomly divided patients into 2 groups according to the ratio of 7:3. The
expression data of 1 group (Training set) was used to construct a signature of
miRNAs with prognostic value, while the expression data of another group
(Testing set) was used to validate the signature we constructed. Firstly, a
univariate Cox regression analysis (Hazard Ratio ≠ 1, P <
0.05) was performed on the expression data of the training set (n = 364) to
identify the prognosis-related miRNAs (Pr-miRNAs). Then, LASSO regression
analysis was conducted to sub-select the Pr-miRNAs with the “glmnet” package in
R software, which can scale down the regression coefficient forcedly.
1000-times cross-validations were performed and the optimal penalty
parameter λ was determined to increase the reliability and objectivity.
Next, a multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed on the
sub-selected Pr-miRNAs to get the optimal prognostic miRNAs. Finally, we
combined the expression levels of optimal prognostic miRNAs and their regression
coefficients to establish a formula of risk score:The Exp is the expression level of miRNAs if patient
i, while the coef means its regression
coefficient.
Evaluation and Validation of the miRNAs Model
We stratified all patients in the training set into high- and low-risk groups
according to the median risk score. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis was
used to compare the survival differences between the above 2 groups and the
time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to
evaluate the prognostic accuracy of miRNAs signature.
Besides, we also compared the survival differences between the high- and
low-risk groups in different clinical subgroups (including ages, genders,
histologic grades, and pathologic stages) to measure the prognostic performance
of our miRNAs signature.To validate the miRNAs signature’s prognostic power and applicability, we
performed the above formula on the patients in the testing set (n = 152) and the
entire set (n = 516) similarly. The KM survival analysis and ROC curve were also
used to evaluate our miRNAs signature.
Identification of Independent Prognostic Factors and Nomogram
Construction
To determine whether the miRNAs signature is an independent prognostic factor of
ccRCC. We set the survival of the patients as the dependent variable, while the
risk score ages of patients, gender, histologic grades, and pathologic stages as
independent variables to perform univariate Cox regression analysis. As for
variables with statistical differences (P < 0.05), we
further conducted multivariate Cox regression analysis on these variables to
determine if they are independent prognostic factors of ccRCC. In order to build
an accurate and reliable clinical predictive model, we constructed a nomogram by
integrating all independent prognostic factors to predict the survival of ccRCC
patients at 1-, 3-, and 5-year by using the “rms” package of the R software.
The nomogram can integrate various prognostic factors to predict the
outcome of individual clinical events, it was often used to measure the
prognosis of patients.
Evaluate and Validate the Nomogram
For our nomogram, calibration plots were used to evaluate its performance. In the
calibration curve, X-axis represents the predicted survival rate of our nomogram
while Y-axis represents the actual survival rate respectively and the 45° dotted
line represents the best outcome. Then, KM survival analysis and time-related
ROC analysis were also conducted to measure the predictive power of the
nomogram.
Identification of Downstream Target Genes
The possible target genes of the 5 optimal prognostic miRNAs were predicted by
the miRDB online database (http://www.mirdb.org/), which
can predict and annotate mammalian miRNA target genes. At the same time, we
downloaded mRNAs expression data of ccRCC and adjacent nontumor renal specimens
from the TCGA database and screened out the differentially expressed mRNAs
between ccRCC and adjacent non-tumor specimens. Integrating the predicted target
genes with the differentially expressed mRNAs, we finally obtained the possible
downstream target genes of 5 optimal prognostic miRNAs.
Functional Enrichment Analysis
To find out the potential mechanisms involved in the different prognosis of the
ccRCC, we used the “clusterProfiler” package in R software to perform the gene
ontology (GO) annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG)
pathway enrichment analysis on those possible downstream target genes of 5
optimal prognostic miRNAs.
P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Statistical Analysis
R software (version 3.6.3) was used to perform the statistical analyses in this
study. All statistical tests were 2 sides and P < 0.05 were
statistically significant.
Results
DE-miRNAs in ccRCC
Figure 1 showed the
flowchart of our study. Firstly, a total of 2089 miRNAs were obtained from the
raw sequencing data of ccRCC patients in the TCGA dataset. Principal component
analysis (PCA) showed that there was a significant difference in the expression
profile of miRNAs between tumor and adjacent non-tumor tissues (Figure 2A). Subsequently,
we identified a total of 221 DE-miRNAs between the 2 tissues, including 115
up-regulated DE-miRNAs and 96 down-regulated DE-miRNAs (Figure 2B). Figure 2C showed the heatmap of the top
20 DE-miRNAs in tumor and adjacent nontumor tissues.
Figure 1.
The flowchart of this study. DE-miRNAs indicates differentially expressed
miRNAs; Pr-miRNAs, prognosis-related miRNAs; DE-mRNAs, differentially
expressed mRNAs; TCGA, the cancer genome atlas.
Figure 2.
Screening of the DE-miRNAs. A, PCA plot of the expression profile of
miRNAs between tumor and normal tissue. B, Volcano plot of DE-miRNAs
between tumor and normal tissue. C, Heatmap of the DEmiRNAs. DE-miRNAs
indicates differentially expressed miRNAs; PCA, principal component
analysis.
The flowchart of this study. DE-miRNAs indicates differentially expressed
miRNAs; Pr-miRNAs, prognosis-related miRNAs; DE-mRNAs, differentially
expressed mRNAs; TCGA, the cancer genome atlas.Screening of the DE-miRNAs. A, PCA plot of the expression profile of
miRNAs between tumor and normal tissue. B, Volcano plot of DE-miRNAs
between tumor and normal tissue. C, Heatmap of the DEmiRNAs. DE-miRNAs
indicates differentially expressed miRNAs; PCA, principal component
analysis.
Identify a Prognosis-Related miRNAs Signature
According to our screening criteria, a total of 102 Pr-miRNAs were screened in
the training set, of which 75 with HR >1 and 27 with HR <1. By
intersecting the 75 prognostic miRNAs (HR>1) with the 115 up-regulated miRNAs
and the 27 prognostic miRNAs (HR<1) with the 96 down-regulated miRNAs, we
obtained 28 miRNAs (Figure
3A). To screen out the miRNAs with better prognostic value, we
performed LASSO regression with 1000-times cross-validations on these miRNAs and
obtained 15 candidate miRNAs (Figure 3B-C). Then, these candidate miRNAs were further performed on
multivariate Cox regression analysis. Finally, 5 miRNAs with the optimal
prognostic value were identified (Figure 3D). Figure 3E shows the expression levels of
the optimal prognosis-related miRNAs in tumor and adjacent non-tumor tissues.
The prognostic power of each optimal prognosis-related miRNAs was shown in Figure 4. As Figure 4 showed, higher
expressions of the hsa-miR-130b-3p, hsa-miR-301b-3p, hsa-miR-3614-3p and
hsa-miR-365a-3p were associated with worse prognosis. While the higher
expression of the hsa-miR-502-3p was associated with a better prognosis.
Furthermore, we established a risk score formula by combining the expression
levels of these 5 optimal prognosis-related miRNAs and their corresponding
regression coefficients (Risk score = Exp(miR-130b-3p)*0.44297908 +
Exp(miR-301b-3p)*0.27378521 +
Exp(miR-3614-3p)*0.34747177 + Exp(miR-365a-3p)*0.275049 −
Exp(miR-502-3p)*0.25833766), and calculated the risk score of all
525 patients according to the formula.
Figure 3.
Identification of 5 optimal Pr-miRNAs and their expression levels in
ccRCC. A, Venn diagram of 28 Pr-miRNAs. B, 15 candidate miRNAs obtained
by LASSO regression with 1000-times cross-validation using minimum λ
value. C, LASSO coefficients profiles of 28 Pr-miRNAs. D, 5 optimal
Pr-miRNAs got by multivariate Cox regression analysis. E, Expression
pattern of the 5 optimal Pr-miRNAs between tumor and normal tissues.
Pr-miRNAs indicates prognosis-related miRNAs; ccRCC: clear cell renal
cell carcinoma; LASSO, least absolute shrinkage and selection
operator.
Figure 4.
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of miR-130b-3p, miR-301b-3p, miR-3614-3p,
miR-365a-3p, and miR-502-3p.
Identification of 5 optimal Pr-miRNAs and their expression levels in
ccRCC. A, Venn diagram of 28 Pr-miRNAs. B, 15 candidate miRNAs obtained
by LASSO regression with 1000-times cross-validation using minimum λ
value. C, LASSO coefficients profiles of 28 Pr-miRNAs. D, 5 optimal
Pr-miRNAs got by multivariate Cox regression analysis. E, Expression
pattern of the 5 optimal Pr-miRNAs between tumor and normal tissues.
Pr-miRNAs indicates prognosis-related miRNAs; ccRCC: clear cell renal
cell carcinoma; LASSO, least absolute shrinkage and selection
operator.Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of miR-130b-3p, miR-301b-3p, miR-3614-3p,
miR-365a-3p, and miR-502-3p.
Evaluation and Validation of the 5-miRNAs Signature
We stratified patients into 2 groups (high- and low- risk) based on the median
risk score (0.9354) in training set (Figure 5A). The survival status of all
patients was shown in Figure
5B while the heatmap of the expression levels of the 5 optimal
prognosis-related miRNAs was shown in Figure 5C. The KM survival curve showed
that high-risk patients hold worse overall survival (OS) than low-risk patients
(Figure 5D). The
ROC curve indicated that the 5-miRNAs signature had a reliable prognostic
accuracy with the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.757 at 1 year, 0.720 at 3
years, and 0.734 at 5 years (Figure 5E). Besides, we measured the prognostic performance of the
signature between different clinical subgroups and the results also showed that
the OS of high-risk patients was significantly worse than that of low-risk
patients (Figure
6).
Figure 5.
Prognostic analysis of 5-miRNA signature in the training set. The dotted
line represented the median risk score and stratified the ccRCC patients
into low- and high-risk group. A, The curve of risk score. B, Survival
status of the ccRCC patients. C, Heatmap of the expression levels of the
5 optimal Pr-miRNAs in low- and high-risk group. D, K-M survival
analysis of the 5-miRNA signature. E, Time-dependent ROC analysis of the
5-miRNA signature. CcRCC indicates clear cell renal cell carcinoma;
Pr-miRNAs, prognosis-related miRNAs; K-M, Kaplan-Meier; ROC, receiver
operating characteristic.
Figure 6.
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the 5-miRNA signature in different
subgroups including (A) younger than 65 years old, older than 65 years
old; (B) male, female; (C) grade1/2, grade3/4; (D) stage III, stage
III-IV. K-M indicates Kaplan-Meier.
Prognostic analysis of 5-miRNA signature in the training set. The dotted
line represented the median risk score and stratified the ccRCC patients
into low- and high-risk group. A, The curve of risk score. B, Survival
status of the ccRCC patients. C, Heatmap of the expression levels of the
5 optimal Pr-miRNAs in low- and high-risk group. D, K-M survival
analysis of the 5-miRNA signature. E, Time-dependent ROC analysis of the
5-miRNA signature. CcRCC indicates clear cell renal cell carcinoma;
Pr-miRNAs, prognosis-related miRNAs; K-M, Kaplan-Meier; ROC, receiver
operating characteristic.Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the 5-miRNA signature in different
subgroups including (A) younger than 65 years old, older than 65 years
old; (B) male, female; (C) grade1/2, grade3/4; (D) stage III, stage
III-IV. K-M indicates Kaplan-Meier.In order to validate the constructed 5-miRNAs signature, we further applied the
risk score formula to the testing set and the entire set. Consistent with the
training set, both sets presented that high-risk patients hold worse OS than
low-risk patients (Figure 7A
and B). The ROC curve showed that the AUC of the testing set was
0.733 at 1 year, 0.672 at 3 years, 0.639 at 5 years; and the AUC of the entire
set was 0.749 at 1 year, 0.704 at 3 years, 0.704 at 5 years. (Figure 7C and D). In
summary, the signature constructed by us had good prognostic power for ccRCC
patients.
Figure 7.
Validation of the 5-miRNA signature. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of
the 5-miRNA signature in internal testing set (A) and the entire set
(C). Time-dependent ROC analysis of the 5-miRNA signature in internal
testing set (B) and the entire set (D). K-M indicates Kaplan-Meier; ROC,
receiver operating characteristic.
Validation of the 5-miRNA signature. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of
the 5-miRNA signature in internal testing set (A) and the entire set
(C). Time-dependent ROC analysis of the 5-miRNA signature in internal
testing set (B) and the entire set (D). K-M indicates Kaplan-Meier; ROC,
receiver operating characteristic.
Construction, Calibration and Validation of the Nomogram
The results of the univariate analysis showed that the age of patients, the
histologic grades, the pathologic stages and the risk score based on the 5-miRNA
signature were all negatively correlated with the prognosis of ccRCC patients.
The prognosis of older patients with the higher histological grade, the later
pathological stage and the higher risk score seem to be worse. In contrast, the
gender of the patients was not associated with the prognosis (Figure 8A). The 5-miRNA
signature and other clinical parameters (ages of patients, histologic grades,
and pathologic stages) were identified as the independent prognostic factors for
ccRCC through multivariate analysis (Figure 8B). Then, a nomogram consists of
these independent prognostic factors was established to predict the survival at
1-, 3- and 5-year of ccRCC patients (Figure 8C). Besides, the KM survival
analysis and the ROC curve indicated that the nomogram has a better prognostic
performance than the 5-miRNAs signature (Figure 8E and F) and consistent results
were got in testing set and the entire set (Figure 9A-D).
Figure 8.
Identifying the independent prognostic factors and construction of
miRNA-based nomogram. A, Forrest plot of Univariate Cox regression
analysis in ccRCC. B, Forrest plot of multivariate Cox regression
analysis in ccRCC. C, Nomogram integrated 5 miRNA-based risk score, age,
grade, and stage. D, The calibration plot of the nomogram for agreement
test between 1-, 3- and 5-year OS prediction and the actual outcome. E,
OS of the high-risk group was significantly worse than that of the
low-risk group. F, Time-dependent ROC curves of the nomogram. CcRCC
indicates clear cell renal cell carcinoma; OS, overall survival; ROC,
receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 9.
Validation of the miRNA-based nomogram. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of
the nomogram in the testing set (A) and the entire set (C).
Time-dependent ROC analysis of the nomogram in the testing set (B) and
the entire set (D). K-M indicates Kaplan-Meier; ROC, receiver operating
characteristic.
Identifying the independent prognostic factors and construction of
miRNA-based nomogram. A, Forrest plot of Univariate Cox regression
analysis in ccRCC. B, Forrest plot of multivariate Cox regression
analysis in ccRCC. C, Nomogram integrated 5 miRNA-based risk score, age,
grade, and stage. D, The calibration plot of the nomogram for agreement
test between 1-, 3- and 5-year OS prediction and the actual outcome. E,
OS of the high-risk group was significantly worse than that of the
low-risk group. F, Time-dependent ROC curves of the nomogram. CcRCC
indicates clear cell renal cell carcinoma; OS, overall survival; ROC,
receiver operating characteristic.Validation of the miRNA-based nomogram. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of
the nomogram in the testing set (A) and the entire set (C).
Time-dependent ROC analysis of the nomogram in the testing set (B) and
the entire set (D). K-M indicates Kaplan-Meier; ROC, receiver operating
characteristic.
Biological Pathways Related to the Prognosis
To explore the biological functions and potential mechanisms related to
prognosis, we predicted the target genes of 5 miRNAs in the miRDB online
database. 1549 target genes were predicted for the 4 up-regulated miRNAs, while
289 target genes were predicted for the 1 down-regulated miRNAs. By analyzing
the mRNAs expression data of ccRCC in the TCGA database, A total of 6683
up-regulated mRNAs and 2640 down-regulated mRNAs were screened out between ccRCC
and adjacent non-tumor tissues. The target genes of up-regulated miRNAs were
intersected with the down-regulated mRNAs, and the target genes of
down-regulated miRNAs were intersected with the up-regulated mRNAs. Finally, 190
possible downstream target genes were obtained (Figure 10A-D).
Figure 10.
Functional enrichment analysis. A, Volcano plot of DE-mRNAs between tumor
and normal tissue. B, Heatmap of the DE-mRNAs. C, Intersecting the
target genes of up-regulated miRNAs with the downregulated mRNAs. D,
Intersecting the target genes of down-regulated miRNAs with the
up-regulated mRNAs. E, GO enrichment analysis of the possible downstream
target genes. F, KEGG enrichment analysis of the possible downstream
target genes. GO indicates gene ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of
Genes and Genomes; DE-mRNAs, differentially expressed mRNAs.
Functional enrichment analysis. A, Volcano plot of DE-mRNAs between tumor
and normal tissue. B, Heatmap of the DE-mRNAs. C, Intersecting the
target genes of up-regulated miRNAs with the downregulated mRNAs. D,
Intersecting the target genes of down-regulated miRNAs with the
up-regulated mRNAs. E, GO enrichment analysis of the possible downstream
target genes. F, KEGG enrichment analysis of the possible downstream
target genes. GO indicates gene ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of
Genes and Genomes; DE-mRNAs, differentially expressed mRNAs.The GO and KEGG enrichment analysis were performed to identify the potential
biological functions of these target genes. The results of GO showed that these
target genes were mainly enriched in biological processes such as urogenital
system development, renal system development, sodium ion transport, axis
elongation, positive regulation of sodium ion transmembrane transporter
activity, etc (Figure
10E). KEGG pathway enrichment analysis results showed that these
target genes were mainly enriched in Hippo signaling pathway, Propanoate
metabolism, Tight junction and Wnt signaling pathway (Figure 10B).
Discussion
Nowadays, although the treatment of ccRCC has been standardized, the mortality of
patients has not been significantly improved.
In order to reduce the mortality of ccRCC patients and improve their
prognosis, it is sensible to develop effective biomarkers or construct accurate
models with prognostic value for ccRCC patients. Studies have found that a variety
of miRNAs were involved in the occurrence and progression of ccRCC, and some of them
have also been proved to be closely related to the prognosis of ccRCC. Combining
their stability in multiple organizations, they were supported to be effectively
prognostic biomarkers for ccRCC. Thus, the objective of this study is to construct a
miRNAs-based model with a strong prognostic ability to help identify the high-risk
ccRCC patients with poor prognosis, and then guide timely and effective intervention
and treatment, which finally improve the prognosis and quality of life of these
patients.We obtained DE-miRNAs between tumor tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues by
analyzing the sequencing data in the TCGA database. After a series of regression
analyses, we constructed a 5-miRNA signature, including miR-130b-3p, miR-3614-3p,
miR-365a-3p, miR-301b-3p, and miR-502-3p, which is validated as an independent
prognostic factor of ccRCC. Patients were stratified into 2 groups according to the
risk score formula, and KM survival analysis and ROC curve have confirmed the
performance of our signature. We further validated the miRNAs signature in testing
set, entire set and different clinical types of patients. To establish a more
reliable and individualized clinical prediction method, we incorporated the 5-miRNA
signature with other independent prognostic factors to construct a nomogram. The
predicted outcome of the nomogram showed a good agreement with the actual outcome in
the calibration plots, and KM survival analysis and ROC curve analysis also showed
that the constructed nomogram had higher prognostic efficiency. Finally, by
integrating the predicted target genes of 5 miRNAs in miRDB online database and
differentially expressed genes of ccRCC patients in the TCGA database, we obtained
the potential downstream target genes of these 5 miRNAs, and further performed the
functional enrichment analysis on these genes to explore the potential biological
pathways involved in the different prognosis of the ccRCC.It is worth noting that the 5 optimal prognostic miRNAs screened in our study have
also been reported to be related to the ontogeny, progression and prognosis of
tumors in other literature. Peng et al found that the high
expression of miR-130 family was closely related to the poor survival of cancer
patients, especially patients with gastric cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma.
A study also found that the signaling cascade involved in miR-130b-3p can
mediate an interaction between cancer cells and M2 macrophages in the tumor
microenvironment to accelerate the progression of gastric cancer.
Besides, the up-regulated miR-130b-3p in hepatocellular carcinoma can promote
the progression and angiogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma, which is significantly
associated with the poor prognosis of patient.
Interestingly, miR-130b-3p also holds the ability to inhibit the progression
of tumors. Shui et al proved that miR-130b-3p can directly target
Notch ligand Delta-like 1 to inhibit the invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells.
Another study found that exosomal miR-130b-3p targeted
serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 through the p53 signal pathway could inhibit
medulloblastoma tumorigenesis.
As for miR-3614-3p, a study has reported that the overexpression of it can
down-regulate the expression of TRIM25 to inhibit the growth of breast cancer cells.
MiR-365a-3p was proved to inhibit the expansion and metastasis of colorectal
cancer cells partly via inhibiting the expression of ADAM10 and JAK/STAT signal.
In addition, miR-365a-3p could also prevent the progression of pancreatic
cancer through inhibiting NF-κB pathway.
MiR-365a-3p is also regarded as an oncogene, which play an important role in
the proliferation, migration and invasion of lung cancer, gastric cancer and
laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma lung cancer cells.
As an oncogene, miR-301b-3p is involved in the progression of hepatocellular
carcinoma, gastric cancer and prostate cancer through a variety of different mechanisms.
As for miR-502-3p, it can target SET to inhibit the proliferation, migration
and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma.To explore the biological functions and potential mechanisms related to prognosis, we
performed the functional enrichment analysis on the possible downstream target genes
of the 5 optimal prognostic miRNAs. The results of GO showed that these target genes
were mainly associated with the urogenital system development, renal system
development and sodium ion transport. KEGG analysis results showed that these target
genes were mainly enriched in the Hippo signal pathway, tight junction and Wnt
signal pathway. Hippo signal pathway is actually a kind of tumor-suppressive
pathway, which is involved in cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis
and regeneration, and its imbalance is closely related to the occurrence and
progression of a variety of tumors.
YAP, a downstream target of the Hippo signal pathway, whose overexpression
was associated with the poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Besides, the Hippo pathway and its upstream and downstream effectors were
also involved in regulating the development and tumorigenesis of the liver and pancreas.
Wnt signal pathway, like Hippo pathway, was first found in drosophila, which
is highly conserved in evolution and is closely related to cancer.
Wnt pathway was also involved in the occurrence and progression of a variety
of tumors such as colorectal cancer, melanoma, bladder cancer, prostate cancer and
leukemia, which was highly related to cancer cell metastasis and immune response in
the tumor microenvironment.
Tight junctions were involved in maintaining cell polarity, and tight
junction proteins were related to the regulation of cell proliferation,
transformation and metastasis by recruiting signal proteins.
Bhat et al summarized the interaction mechanism and related
molecular signals between tight junction protein claudin 1-20 and a variety of
cancers, and emphasized the important role of tight junction proteins in tumors.
Our results suggested that the 5 miRNAs might affect the prognosis of ccRCC
patients mainly by regulating the expression of genes enriched in the above 3 signal
pathways. This provides a reference for improving the prognosis of high-risk
patients by targeted regulation of the above 3 signaling pathways.In conclusion, our study constructed a 5-miRNAs signature with prognostic value for
ccRCC patients, which is an independent prognostic factor for patients with ccRCC.
Furthermore, we integrated our miRNAs signature and other prognosis-related clinical
parameters to construct a nomogram, which can predict the prognosis of ccRCC
patients more accurate and reliable. Besides, we also found that the potential
mechanism of different prognosis of ccRCC patients caused by potential downstream
target genes of the 5 miRNAs may be related to Hippo, tight junction and Wnt signal
pathways. However, there are still some limitations. This study is based on
bioinformatics data analysis, and the results are needed to further validate in
multicenter and prospective studies in the future. It is pretty necessary to explore
the potential mechanisms related to our signature in the ontogeny, development and
prognosis of ccRCC, which may provide a new field of vision for risk stratification,
early intervention and targeted therapy in patients with ccRCC.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-1-tct-10.1177_15330338211027923 for A Novel
miRNA-Based Model Can Predict the Prognosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
by Jiyue Wu, Feilong Zhang, Jiandong Zhang, Zejia Sun, Changzhen Hao, Huawei Cao
and Wei Wang in Technology in Cancer Research & TreatmentClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-2-tct-10.1177_15330338211027923 for A Novel
miRNA-Based Model Can Predict the Prognosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
by Jiyue Wu, Feilong Zhang, Jiandong Zhang, Zejia Sun, Changzhen Hao, Huawei Cao
and Wei Wang in Technology in Cancer Research & TreatmentClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-3-tct-10.1177_15330338211027923 for A Novel
miRNA-Based Model Can Predict the Prognosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
by Jiyue Wu, Feilong Zhang, Jiandong Zhang, Zejia Sun, Changzhen Hao, Huawei Cao
and Wei Wang in Technology in Cancer Research & TreatmentClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-4-tct-10.1177_15330338211027923 for A Novel
miRNA-Based Model Can Predict the Prognosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
by Jiyue Wu, Feilong Zhang, Jiandong Zhang, Zejia Sun, Changzhen Hao, Huawei Cao
and Wei Wang in Technology in Cancer Research & TreatmentClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-5-tct-10.1177_15330338211027923 for A Novel
miRNA-Based Model Can Predict the Prognosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
by Jiyue Wu, Feilong Zhang, Jiandong Zhang, Zejia Sun, Changzhen Hao, Huawei Cao
and Wei Wang in Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
Authors: Michelle Z Xu; Tzy-Jyun Yao; Nikki P Y Lee; Irene O L Ng; Yuk-Tat Chan; Lars Zender; Scott W Lowe; Ronnie T P Poon; John M Luk Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Yumeng Wang; Xiaoyan Xu; Dejan Maglic; Michael T Dill; Kamalika Mojumdar; Patrick Kwok-Shing Ng; Kang Jin Jeong; Yiu Huen Tsang; Daniela Moreno; Venkata Hemanjani Bhavana; Xinxin Peng; Zhongqi Ge; Hu Chen; Jun Li; Zhongyuan Chen; Huiwen Zhang; Leng Han; Di Du; Chad J Creighton; Gordon B Mills; Fernando Camargo; Han Liang Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 9.423