Lynn Symonds1, Isaac Jenkins2, Hannah M Linden3, Brenda Kurland4, Julie R Gralow3, Vijayakrishna V K Gadi5, Georgiana K Ellis1, Qian Wu2, Eve Rodler6, Pavani Chalasani7, Xiaoyu Chai8, Jinny Riedel9, Alison Stopeck10, Ursa Brown-Glaberman11, Jennifer M Specht12. 1. Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 2. Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA. 3. Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA. 4. eResearch Technologies, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA. 5. Medical Oncology, University of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago, IL. 6. Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA. 7. Hematology and Oncology, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ. 8. Microsoft, Redmond, WA. 9. Clinical Cancer Genetics, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC. 10. Hematology and Oncology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY. 11. Hematology and Oncology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM. 12. Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: jspecht@uw.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is standard treatment for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). We hypothesized that adding sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antitumor and antiangiogenic activity, to an anthracycline and taxane regimen would improve pathologic complete response (pCR) rates to a prespecified endpoint of 45% in patients with HER2-negative LABC or IBC. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, phase II trial of neoadjuvant sunitinib with paclitaxel (S+T) followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for patients with HER2-negative LABC or IBC. Patients received sunitinib 25 mg PO daily with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV weekly ×12 followed by doxorubicin 24 mg/m2 IV weekly + cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2 PO daily with G-CSF support. Response was evaluated using pCR in the breast and the CPS + EG score (clinical-pathologic scoring + estrogen receptor [ER] and grade). RESULTS: Seventy patients enrolled, and 66 were evaluable for efficacy. Eighteen patients (27%) had pCR in the breast (10 had ER+ disease and 8 had triple-negative disease). When defining response as pCR and/or CPS + EG score ≤2, 31 (47%) were responders. In pateints with ER positive disease, 23 (64%) were responders. The most common toxicities were cytopenias and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant S+T followed by AC+G-CSF was safe and tolerable in LABC and IBC. The study did not meet the prespecified endpoint for pCR; however, 47% were responders using pCR and/or CPS + EG score ≤2. ER positive patients had the highest response rate (64%). The addition of sunitinib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may provide promising incremental benefit for patients with ER positive LABC.
INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is standard treatment for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). We hypothesized that adding sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antitumor and antiangiogenic activity, to an anthracycline and taxane regimen would improve pathologic complete response (pCR) rates to a prespecified endpoint of 45% in patients with HER2-negative LABC or IBC. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, phase II trial of neoadjuvant sunitinib with paclitaxel (S+T) followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for patients with HER2-negative LABC or IBC. Patients received sunitinib 25 mg PO daily with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV weekly ×12 followed by doxorubicin 24 mg/m2 IV weekly + cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2 PO daily with G-CSF support. Response was evaluated using pCR in the breast and the CPS + EG score (clinical-pathologic scoring + estrogen receptor [ER] and grade). RESULTS: Seventy patients enrolled, and 66 were evaluable for efficacy. Eighteen patients (27%) had pCR in the breast (10 had ER+ disease and 8 had triple-negative disease). When defining response as pCR and/or CPS + EG score ≤2, 31 (47%) were responders. In pateints with ER positive disease, 23 (64%) were responders. The most common toxicities were cytopenias and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant S+T followed by AC+G-CSF was safe and tolerable in LABC and IBC. The study did not meet the prespecified endpoint for pCR; however, 47% were responders using pCR and/or CPS + EG score ≤2. ER positive patients had the highest response rate (64%). The addition of sunitinib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may provide promising incremental benefit for patients with ER positive LABC.
Keywords:
Cyclophosphamide; Doxorubicin; HER2-negative; Inflammatory breast cancer; Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC); Neoadjuvant; Paclitaxel; Sunitinib
Authors: Jose Vila; Mediget Teshome; Susan L Tucker; Wendy A Woodward; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Kelly K Hunt; Elizabeth A Mittendorf Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jonas Bergh; Igor M Bondarenko; Mikhail R Lichinitser; Annelie Liljegren; Richard Greil; Nataliya L Voytko; Anatoly N Makhson; Javier Cortes; Alain Lortholary; Joachim Bischoff; Arlene Chan; Suzette Delaloge; Xin Huang; Kenneth A Kern; Carla Giorgetti Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jacqueline S Jeruss; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Susan L Tucker; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Thomas A Buchholz; Aysegul A Sahin; Janice N Cormier; Aman U Buzdar; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Kelly K Hunt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-12-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: I Plaza-Menacho; A Morandi; D Robertson; S Pancholi; S Drury; M Dowsett; L-A Martin; C M Isacke Journal: Oncogene Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Robert Mechera; Savas D Soysal; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Charlotte K Y Ng; Jasmin Zeindler; Edin Mujagic; Silvio Däster; Philippe Glauser; Henry Hoffmann; Ergin Kilic; Raoul A Droeser; Walter P Weber; Simone Muenst Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Ursa Brown-Glaberman; Marilyn Marron; Pavani Chalasani; Robert Livingston; Maria Iannone; Jennifer Specht; Alison T Stopeck Journal: Dis Markers Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 3.434